Black Day in Florida! McAmnesty Beats Mitt to Win Florida Primary

[Guest Tom Sr.]

On Jan 31, 6:10

[Guest Patriot Games]

"Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlink.net> wrote in message

news:13q6hbkj4oh887@corp.supernews.com...

> Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlink.net> wrote in message

>> news:13q4lafnv1cg0ee@corp.supernews.com...

>>> AnAmericanCitizen wrote:

>>>> Interesting that McAmnesty didn't win many of the mainstream

>>>> Republicans and very few

>>>> conservative republicans. As of today he's had two other open borders

>>>> advocates come out for him in addition to

>>>> Crist and Martinez...Guiliani and Swartznegger.

>>> I really wish you would stop these wild exaggerations.

>>> None of the candidates is advocating "open borders." Not even Hillary

>>> or Obama is advocating "open borders."

>>> They all recognized the need for border enforcement. Even the Democrats.

>> B u l l s h i t!

>> Sealed off = Secure.

>> Taking pictures and video so we know how many snuck in last night IS NOT

>> SECURE.

>> ZERO illegal entries = Secure.

>>> What McCain has said, correctly, is that deporting the 12 million

>>> illegal aliens who are already in the U.S. is impossible in any

>>> reasonable time, given the need for due process. And that therefore we

>>> need a more practical solution.

>> B u l l s h i t!

>> We could do it in TWO YEARS.

>>> To deport just one immigrant family is going to bring immigration

>>> lawyers and activists for LaRaza and the ACLU into the case, and they

>>> will fight it in the courts every step of the way. How are you going to

>>> deal with millions of similar cases?

>> B u l l s h i t!

>> They have NO RIGHTS TO FIGHT WHILE HERE.

> The U.S. Constitution guarantees every person on U.S. soil the same Bill

> of Rights as you and me. Not just citizens, PERSONS.

> That's why, for example, a tourist from Europe can come to America and be

> interviewed on TV, or write a letter to the editor of a newspaper, or

> practice his faith, while he's here. You can't deny him those rights just

> because he's not a citizen.

 

YOU ARE WRONG. A LEGAL tourist from Europe......would have been the CORRECT

way to begin that sentence.

> The only way you can get what you want, would be to initiate a totally

> illegal and unconstitutional action. Sure, if you want to turn America

> into a Fascist country, you could solve the immigration problem but I

> hardly think it's worth it.

 

There is NOTHING illegal or unconstitutional about HUNTING DOWN illegals.

> Bottom line: If there were a glib, easy, simple solution to the

> immigration problem, it would have been done by now. It hasn't been

> solved because the only practical solutions are complex, difficult, and

> long.

 

WRONG.

[Guest Rib Crib]

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

<tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

> McCain HAS won the majority of mainstream Republicans.

 

NO he HAS NOT!

 

Romney is the SUPERIOPR candidate!

[Guest Shawn Hirn]

In article <ddf7q3tah1p5568eo7k5nhoaep1nt3f5r0@4ax.com>,

Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>

> > McCain HAS won the majority of mainstream Republicans.

>

> NO he HAS NOT!

>

> Romney is the SUPERIOPR candidate!

 

It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

[Guest Zeno]

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:18:34 -0500, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net>

wrote:

>In article <ddf7q3tah1p5568eo7k5nhoaep1nt3f5r0@4ax.com>,

> Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

>

>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

>> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>>

>> > McCain HAS won the majority of mainstream Republicans.

>>

>> NO he HAS NOT!

>>

>> Romney is the SUPERIOPR candidate!

>

>It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

 

A "ball team" should stick together at any cost, heh ?

[Guest Rib Crib]

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:18:34 -0500, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net>

mumbled:

>In article <ddf7q3tah1p5568eo7k5nhoaep1nt3f5r0@4ax.com>,

> Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

>

>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

>> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>>

>> > McCain HAS won the majority of mainstream Republicans.

>>

>> NO he HAS NOT!

>>

>> Romney is the SUPERIOPR candidate!

>

>It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

 

It defines your idiocy to not understand come election time the

bickering will be a distant memory.

[Guest robw]

It's a thing of beauty.

 

 

"Shawn Hirn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:srhi-559AF8.10183402022008@newsgroups.comcast.net...

> In article <ddf7q3tah1p5568eo7k5nhoaep1nt3f5r0@4ax.com>,

> Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

>

> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

> > <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

> >

> > > McCain HAS won the majority of mainstream Republicans.

> >

> > NO he HAS NOT!

> >

> > Romney is the SUPERIOPR candidate!

>

> It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

[Guest Rib Crib]

On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:45:56 -0500, "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net>

mumbled:

>It's a thing of beauty.

 

You, otoh, not so much...

[Guest Shawn Hirn]

In article <ui99q39a6f8f9hh3k4tanvelac1bjlf2rh@4ax.com>,

Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

> On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:18:34 -0500, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net>

> mumbled:

>

> >In article <ddf7q3tah1p5568eo7k5nhoaep1nt3f5r0@4ax.com>,

> > Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

> >

> >> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

> >> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

> >>

> >> > McCain HAS won the majority of mainstream Republicans.

> >>

> >> NO he HAS NOT!

> >>

> >> Romney is the SUPERIOPR candidate!

> >

> >It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

>

> It defines your idiocy to not understand come election time the

> bickering will be a distant memory.

 

Ah, but will it?

[Guest Rib Crib]

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:23:55 -0500, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net>

mumbled:

>In article <ui99q39a6f8f9hh3k4tanvelac1bjlf2rh@4ax.com>,

> Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

>

>> On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:18:34 -0500, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net>

>> mumbled:

>>

>> >In article <ddf7q3tah1p5568eo7k5nhoaep1nt3f5r0@4ax.com>,

>> > Rib Crib <baby@back.mo> wrote:

>> >

>> >> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

>> >> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>> >>

>> >> > McCain HAS won the majority of mainstream Republicans.

>> >>

>> >> NO he HAS NOT!

>> >>

>> >> Romney is the SUPERIOPR candidate!

>> >

>> >It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

>>

>> It defines your idiocy to not understand come election time the

>> bickering will be a distant memory.

>

>Ah, but will it?

 

Gonna vote Billarry or O-Bamalama are ya?

 

Punk!

[Guest Tom Sr.]

On Feb 2, 12:27

[Guest Tom Sr.]

On Feb 2, 12:45

[Guest robw]

While I generally agree with you, I do think there's a chance someone might

put a little heat on. Not Coulter, she's a loose cannon, but can the Repub

party really live with having a candidate Rush doesn't like?

 

 

"Tom Sr." <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:995f0045-2eb6-48b6-b4fe-86d13c297027@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

On Feb 2, 12:27 pm, Rib Crib <b...@back.mo> wrote:

> It defines your idiocy to not understand come election time the

> bickering will be a distant memory.

 

Really??? Honest and true?!

 

Do you believe Rush Limbaugh will come out in strong support of and

vote for McCain when he becomes the Republican nominee?

 

Do you believe Ann Clouter will as well?

 

Do you believe Patriot Games will be gun-ho for McCain come November

2008?

 

Do you think you should see a psychiatrist for your delusional state

of mind? (You need to answer this "yes" for your own well-being.)

 

-Tom Sr.

[Guest Yuma]

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:53:56 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

<tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>On Feb 2, 12:27

[Guest Yuma]

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:56:04 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

<tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>On Feb 2, 12:45

[Guest Yuma]

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:45:20 -0500, "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net>

mumbled:

>can the Repubparty really live with having a candidate Rush doesn't like?

 

You are so fucking STUPID it defies comprehension!

[Guest babeejm]

On Jan 31, 5:52 pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Interesting that McAmnesty didn't win many of the mainstream Republicans and very few

> conservative republicans.

>

> As of today he's had two other open borders advocates come out for him in addition to

> Crist and Martinez...Guiliani and Swartznegger.

>

> McCain was his usual nasty self on last night's debate.....AAC

>

> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:02:20 -0500, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:

> >http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/mccain_romney_florida/2008/01/29/684...

>

> >McCain Beats Romney to Win Florida Primary

>

> >Tuesday, January 29, 2008

>

> >MIAMI -- Sen. John McCain won a breakthrough triumph in the Florida primary

> >Tuesday night, gaining the upper hand in the battle for the Republican

> >presidential nomination ahead of next week's contests across 21 states.

> >Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani appeared ready to quit the race.

>

> >"It shows one thing. I'm the conservative leader who can unite the party,"

> >McCain said in a brief interview with The Associated Press.

>

> >"It's a very significant boost, but I think we've got a tough week ahead and

> >a lot of states to come."

>

> >The victory was worth 57 national convention delegates for McCain, a

> >winner-take-all haul that catapulted him ahead of Romney for the overall

> >delegate lead.

>

> >Giuliani ran third, his best showing of the campaign but not nearly good

> >enough for the one-time front-runner who decided to make his last stand in a

> >state that is home to tens of thousands of transplanted New Yorkers.

>

> >In remarks to supporters in Orlando, he referred to his candidacy repeatedly

> >in the past tense - as though it was over. "We'll stay involved and together

> >we'll make sure that we'll do everything we can to hand our nation off to

> >the next generation better than it was before," he said.

>

> >Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee trailed, but told supporters he would

> >campaign on. Texas Rep. Ron Paul was fifth, and last.

>

> >Romney, who has spent millions of dollars of his personal fortune to run for

> >the White House, also vowed to stay in the race.

>

> >"At a time like this, America needs a president in the White House who has

> >actually had a job in the real economy," he told supporters in St.

> >Petersburg.

>

> >Florida marked the end of one phase of the campaign, the last in a series of

> >single-state contests.

>

> >The campaign goes national next week, with 21 states holding primaries and

> >caucuses on Tuesday and 1,023 party convention delegates at stake.

>

> >Returns from most of the state's precincts showed McCain, the Arizona

> >senator, with 36 percent of the vote and Romney, the former governor of

> >Massachusetts, with 31 percent.

>

> >The victory was another step in one of the most remarkable political

> >comebacks of recent times. McCain entered the race the front-runner, then

> >found his campaign unraveling last summer as his stands in favor of the Iraq

> >War and a controversial immigration bill proved unpopular.

>

> >The war gradually became less of a concern after President Bush's decision

> >to increase troop deployments began to produce results. McCain also sought

> >to readjust his position on immigration.

>

> >By the time of the New Hampshire primary, he was primed for victory, and got

> >it. He won the South Carolina primary last week, taking first place in the

> >state that had snuffed out his presidential hopes in 2000.

>

> >A survey of Florida voters as they left their polling places showed the

> >economy was the top issue for nearly half the Republican electorate. McCain

> >led his rival among those voters, blunting Romney's weeklong effort to

> >persuade Floridians that his background as a businessman made him

> >best-suited for heading off a recession.

>

> >McCain also was benefiting from the support of self-described moderates, as

> >well as older voters and Hispanics. Giuliani ran second among Latino voters,

> >according to preliminary exit poll data.

>

> >Romney was favored by voters opposed to abortion and to easing the path to

> >citizenship for illegal immigrants.

>

> >About 40 percent of self-described conservatives supported him, as well,

> >compared to about 25 percent for McCain.

>

> >The poll was conducted by Edison Media Research and Mitofsky International

> >for The Associated Press and the television networks.

>

> >Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won the Democratic race, an event that drew no

> >campaigning by any of the contenders - and awarded no delegates to the

> >winner.

>

> >The Democratic primary was controversial by its very existence, an act of

> >defiance against national party officials who wanted it held later in the

> >year.

>

> >Even so, Clinton sought to emphasize her performance in the state, holding a

> >rally as the polls were closing.

>

> >She challenged Barack Obama to agree to seat the delegates on the basis of

> >the night's vote, but he demurred, saying he would abide by an agreement all

> >Democratic candidates had made months ago.

>

> >"Those decisions will be made after the nomination, not before," Obama told

> >reporters Tuesday on a plane from Washington to Kansas. "Obviously, I care a

> >lot about the people in Michigan and a lot about the people in Florida. And

> >I want their votes in the general election. We'll be actively campaigning

> >for them."

>

> >Romney began the evening with 59 Republican delegates, to 36 for McCain and

> >40 for Huckabee. Giuliani had one.

>

> >No matter the winner, there is no time to rest. There are 21 GOP contests on

> >the ballot on Feb. 5, with 1,023 delegates at stake.

>

> >McCain and Romney clashed early and often, in personal appearances and paid

> >television advertising, in a bruising week of campaigning in Florida.

>

> >Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, said his career as a private

> >businessman made him perfectly suited to sit in the Oval Office with a

> >recession looming. Sen. McCain argued he knew his economics well enough, and

> >that his career in the military and in Congress made him the man to steer

> >the country in an age of terrorism.

>

> >By the campaign's final hours, the two men hurled insults at one another,

> >each saying the other hoped to travel a liberal road to the presidential

> >nomination in a party of conservatives.

>

> >Romney attacked McCain for his signature legislation to reduce the role of

> >money in politics, for his position on immigration and for his support of an

> >energy bill that he said would have driven up consumer costs.

>

> >"If you ask people, 'look at the three things Senator McCain has done as a

> >senator,' if you want that kind of a liberal Democrat course as president,

> >then you can vote for him," Romney told campaign workers. "But those three

> >pieces of legislation, those aren't conservative, those aren't Republican,

> >those are not the kind of leadership that we need as we go forward."

>

> >McCain had a ready reply. "On every one of the issues he has attacked us on,

> >Mitt Romney was for it before he was against it," he said. "The truth is,

> >Mitt Romney was a liberal governor of Massachusetts who raised taxes,

> >imposed with Ted Kennedy a big government mandate health care plan that is

> >now a quarter of a billion dollars in the red, and managed his state's

> >economy incompetently, leaving Massachusetts with less job growth than 46

> >other states."

>

> >That wasn't all, either.

>

> >McCain aired radio commercials criticizing Romney, and his campaign Web site

> >has an ad superimposing Romney's face on the image of a windsurfing Sen.

> >John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee.

>

> >The Romney campaign also reported numerous negative phone calls, accusing

> >him incorrectly of supporting taxpayer-funded abortions, opposing President

> >Bush's tax cuts and favoring direct talks with Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

>

> >The McCain campaign said it was not responsible for the calls.

 

 

>He expects nastiness and warmongering and saying the Iraq war is going to last for

a 100 years to propel him to the White House..well if it does..we have

no business

criticzing Bush for his war then!!

[Guest Zigler]

On Feb 3, 11:58 am, Yuma <th...@ten.to> wrote:

> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:45:20 -0500, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net>

> mumbled:

>

> >can the Repubparty really live with having a candidate Rush doesn't like?

>

> You are so fucking STUPID it defies comprehension!

 

almost like that statement...

[Guest robw]

Why is that?

 

I'm curious.

 

 

"Yuma" <three@ten.to> wrote in message

news:kqubq3lvg7jd88a46or9bu1hhfnqqg37g8@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:45:20 -0500, "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net>

> mumbled:

>

> >can the Repubparty really live with having a candidate Rush doesn't like?

>

> You are so fucking STUPID it defies comprehension!

[Guest robw]

While I certainly don't give Limpballs credit for a fraction of the

influence he thinks he has, would it really be wise for the Republican party

to have someone who reaches 4 million minds of mush a day slamming the Repub

candidate?

 

 

"Yuma" <three@ten.to> wrote in message

news:b7ubq3h9gd13d072pn64qpj8qpjtn5qpdh@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:53:56 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>

> >On Feb 2, 12:27 pm, Rib Crib <b...@back.mo> wrote:

> >> It defines your idiocy to not understand come election time the

> >> bickering will be a distant memory.

> >

> >Really??? Honest and true?!

> >

> >Do you believe Rush Limbaugh will

>

> I frankly don't give a flying fuck what the bellicose gasbag does, why

> do you?

[Guest Yuma]

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:07:58 -0800 (PST), Zigler

<misterzigler@yahoo.com> mumbled:

>On Feb 3, 11:58 am, Yuma <th...@ten.to> wrote:

>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:45:20 -0500, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net>

>> mumbled:

>>

>> >can the Repubparty really live with having a candidate Rush doesn't like?

>>

>> You are so fucking STUPID it defies comprehension!

>

>almost like that statement...

 

And you single-handedly define idiotarianism.

[Guest robw]

You;re a troll.

 

Go f ck yourself.

 

 

 

"Yuma" <three@ten.to> wrote in message

news:m8ubq3l6p983jsh1ftemc5cduhomo5q9f1@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:56:04 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>

> >On Feb 2, 12:45 pm, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net> wrote:

> >> "Shawn Hirn" <s...@comcast.net> wrote in message

> >> > It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

> >>

> >> > It's a thing of beauty.

> >

> >With months of it to come to watch! What fun.

> >

> > -Tom Sr.

>

> You're a steaming pile of partisan shit, drop damned dead.

[Guest Yuma]

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:47:34 -0500, "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net>

mumbled:

>would it really be wise for the Republican party

>to have someone who reaches 4 million minds of mush a day slamming the Repub

>candidate?

 

Would you prefer we march in lockstep?

[Guest Starkiller]

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:53:56 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

<tomswiftsr@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 2, 12:27

[Guest Yuma]

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:09:09 -0500, "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net>

mumbled:

>You;re a troll.

>

>Go f ck yourself.

>

>

>

 

KISS MY ASS!

>"Yuma" <three@ten.to> wrote in message

>news:m8ubq3l6p983jsh1ftemc5cduhomo5q9f1@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:56:04 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."

>> <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> mumbled:

>>

>> >On Feb 2, 12:45 pm, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net> wrote:

>> >> "Shawn Hirn" <s...@comcast.net> wrote in message

>> >> > It warms my heart to see the Republican party implode.

>> >>

>> >> > It's a thing of beauty.

>> >

>> >With months of it to come to watch! What fun.

>> >

>> > -Tom Sr.

>>

>> You're a steaming pile of partisan shit, drop damned dead.

>