Guest Magus Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 RD (The Sandman) wrote: > "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in > news:47a5fe4b$0$4049$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net: > >> if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a gun, he >> would not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life >> lvoing productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax cuts >> possible that gun nuts on the other hands so love to have. > > I would bet that his possession of a firearm was illegal. Wanna bet? > I'd even be willing to bet that he was a convicted felon too. Illegal for him to own a firearm. Illegal for him to possess a firearm. Illegal for him to use a firearm anywhere, let alone in Chicago and that mall. Murder is also illegal, that didn't stop him five instances. Quote
Guest RSweeney Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:47a65526$0$4035$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net... > people are agreeing with me; very scary. i take my post back. i meant to > say make all guns illegal everywhere. because guns makes a person nut, > plain and simple regardless of surroindings. Let's make crime illegal. What a perfect world it would be. How old are you? 10? Quote
Guest RSweeney Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 <usenet@mantra.com and/or http://www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in message news:20080203QV6108y6Ys6pwypIx3CiZD6@JpPcW... > Leave weapons in the hands of the organized militia, that is > the military, law enforcement agencies and qualified, professional > security personnel. And drugs in the hands of physicians? Please... are you really a child? Quote
Guest Scout Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message news:9-idnZPN-aPEHjvanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com... > I'm not opposed to guns. > I'm opposed to illegal guns. Sure you are, and just as soon as you manage to make all guns illegal then you will be very happy. > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message > news:tXtpj.12909$U12.12318@trnddc06... >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:kIadnf_wgohZ9DvanZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com... >> > If the gun was illegal it's only more shit to smear in your face. >> > >> > You getting it, asshole? >> >> You are opposed to guns and you will twist anything and everything >> towards >> that end. So don't bother to confuse you with facts, or point out the >> logical flaws of your position. >> >> So how did I do? Did I get it right? >> >> >> > > Quote
Guest Scout Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message news:D_OdnX6LYsIPHjvanZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com... > It gives nuts an ability they should not have. Not what you said. I will simply acknowledge you can't support your own claims. > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message > news:%wtpj.6131$M71.3112@trnddc08... >> >> "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:47a65526$0$4035$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net... >> > people are agreeing with me; very scary. i take my post back. i meant >> > to >> > say make all guns illegal everywhere. because guns makes a person nut, >> > plain and simple regardless of surroindings. >> >> Please explain the process by which a piece of metal and plastic turns a >> normal person into a nut. >> >> >> > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 No, google my posts. I've always said that if people who are legal want to own legal guns, then I have no problem with that. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message news:rXBpj.6166$M71.4977@trnddc08... > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:9-idnZPN-aPEHjvanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com... > > I'm not opposed to guns. > > I'm opposed to illegal guns. > > Sure you are, and just as soon as you manage to make all guns illegal then > you will be very happy. > > > > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message > > news:tXtpj.12909$U12.12318@trnddc06... > >> > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > >> news:kIadnf_wgohZ9DvanZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com... > >> > If the gun was illegal it's only more shit to smear in your face. > >> > > >> > You getting it, asshole? > >> > >> You are opposed to guns and you will twist anything and everything > >> towards > >> that end. So don't bother to confuse you with facts, or point out the > >> logical flaws of your position. > >> > >> So how did I do? Did I get it right? > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 It's exactly what I said. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message news:2YBpj.45993$K%.42162@trnddc04... > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:D_OdnX6LYsIPHjvanZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com... > > It gives nuts an ability they should not have. > > Not what you said. I will simply acknowledge you can't support your own > claims. > > > > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message > > news:%wtpj.6131$M71.3112@trnddc08... > >> > >> "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:47a65526$0$4035$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net... > >> > people are agreeing with me; very scary. i take my post back. i meant > >> > to > >> > say make all guns illegal everywhere. because guns makes a person nut, > >> > plain and simple regardless of surroindings. > >> > >> Please explain the process by which a piece of metal and plastic turns a > >> normal person into a nut. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Quote
Guest Wayne Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 OK...I'll repeat it in "special english". The point is, if the women had been KILLED WITH A KNIFE, the poster would not have written a subject of "Knife Nut Massacres....." But, with a gun involved, anti-gunners use inflammatory language. "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message news:muednditlteyHjvanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com... > They might have been "held" by knifepoint. > > Five women are dead by a gun. > > You really didn't make your point. > > Asshole. > > By the way, no matter what you respond with I just won 8 grand on the > game. > > > > > "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in message > news:WYtpj.18746$Ou1.13402@trnddc07... >> Ok...I'll switch to top posting, since you did. >> >> The point is, if the women had been held at knife point, the poster would >> not have written a subject of "Knife Nut Massacres....." But, with a >> gun >> involved, anti-gunners use inflammatory language. >> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:icqdnTErAbIL9DvanZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com... >> > If the criminal hadn't had access to a gun?????? >> > >> > >> > "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in message >> > news:oJqpj.1345$bs4.1109@trndny01... >> >> >> >> "RSweeney" <dockscience@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:puednf3QhuWgszvanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com... >> >> > >> >> > "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> > news:47a5fe4b$0$4049$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net... >> >> >> if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a gun, >> >> >> he >> >> >> would not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life >> > lvoing >> >> >> productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax cuts > possible >> >> >> that gun nuts on the other hands so love to have. >> >> > >> >> > Guns are illegal in public places in Illinois. >> >> > And you have to have a permit to own either a gun or ammunition. >> >> > >> >> > As usual, the criminal didn't obey the law. >> >> I'm not sure how to take the thread subject "Gun Nut......" The OP > could >> >> have said "Robber Massacres....." or "Bandit massacres...." >> >> >> >> Ohhhhh, I see...."gun nut" is a general prejorative term to lump legal >> >> gun >> >> owners together with criminals, so that the anti-gun agenda can be >> >> fanned. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 How is it "inflammatory" language? Did this cretin use a gun? Do you think sane people kill???? Look, if you can't take responsibility then you're in trouble. And no, I don't want to take your guns away. But you better start being more help in controlling these problems. Make book on it. "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in message news:pJGpj.19862$Ou1.11609@trnddc07... > OK...I'll repeat it in "special english". > > The point is, if the women had been KILLED WITH A KNIFE, the poster would > not have written a subject of "Knife Nut Massacres....." But, with a gun > involved, anti-gunners use inflammatory language. > > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:muednditlteyHjvanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com... > > They might have been "held" by knifepoint. > > > > Five women are dead by a gun. > > > > You really didn't make your point. > > > > Asshole. > > > > By the way, no matter what you respond with I just won 8 grand on the > > game. > > > > > > > > > > "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in message > > news:WYtpj.18746$Ou1.13402@trnddc07... > >> Ok...I'll switch to top posting, since you did. > >> > >> The point is, if the women had been held at knife point, the poster would > >> not have written a subject of "Knife Nut Massacres....." But, with a > >> gun > >> involved, anti-gunners use inflammatory language. > >> > >> > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > >> news:icqdnTErAbIL9DvanZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com... > >> > If the criminal hadn't had access to a gun?????? > >> > > >> > > >> > "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> > news:oJqpj.1345$bs4.1109@trndny01... > >> >> > >> >> "RSweeney" <dockscience@yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:puednf3QhuWgszvanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com... > >> >> > > >> >> > "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> > news:47a5fe4b$0$4049$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net... > >> >> >> if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a gun, > >> >> >> he > >> >> >> would not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life > >> > lvoing > >> >> >> productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax cuts > > possible > >> >> >> that gun nuts on the other hands so love to have. > >> >> > > >> >> > Guns are illegal in public places in Illinois. > >> >> > And you have to have a permit to own either a gun or ammunition. > >> >> > > >> >> > As usual, the criminal didn't obey the law. > >> >> I'm not sure how to take the thread subject "Gun Nut......" The OP > > could > >> >> have said "Robber Massacres....." or "Bandit massacres...." > >> >> > >> >> Ohhhhh, I see...."gun nut" is a general prejorative term to lump legal > >> >> gun > >> >> owners together with criminals, so that the anti-gun agenda can be > >> >> fanned. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:kIadnf_wgohZ9DvanZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com: > If the gun was illegal it's only more shit to smear in your face. Not at all. I am as much against illegal possession of a firearm as you should be. However, all the attempts of your ilk to pass gun control is directed at the honest citizen not assholes like the one in Lane Bryant. -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:9-idnZPN-aPEHjvanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: > I'm not opposed to guns. > I'm opposed to illegal guns. So are we opposed to illegal possession of guns. Do you get it now, asshole? -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:Zfwpj.65706$Mu4.23945 @bignews7.bellsouth.net: > RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in >> news:47a5fe4b$0$4049$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net: >> >>> if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a gun, he >>> would not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life >>> lvoing productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax cuts >>> possible that gun nuts on the other hands so love to have. >> >> I would bet that his possession of a firearm was illegal. Wanna bet? >> > > I'd even be willing to bet that he was a convicted felon too. > > Illegal for him to own a firearm. > Illegal for him to possess a firearm. > Illegal for him to use a firearm anywhere, let alone in Chicago and that > mall. > > Murder is also illegal, that didn't stop him five instances. > > Exactly, but all these anti gunners want to take guns from the folks who didn't do it. -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:Xdudnbw-vsLX9DvanZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@comcast.com: > Giving the perp a gun worked out how>????? Who claimed anything about giving that perp a gun? Are you also illiterate? > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A39A23E2CBDASandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:2KSdnZKGdJoogzvanZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > So you admit there is a problem with illegal guns in this country? >> > >> > Thanks!!!! >> >> We've been saying that all along. However, all the legislation that >> you schmucks wish to pass only affects the legal gunowner. That's a >> problem. Oh, look....a shooting at the mall. Let's take guns away >> from those who didn't do it. Yeah, that's the ticket. >> >> > "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message >> > news:47a602da$0$15203$607ed4bc@cv.net... >> >> harmony(aka Jay Stevens) wrote: >> >> >> >> > if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a >> >> > gun, he >> > would >> >> > not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life >> >> > lvoing productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax >> >> > cuts >> possible >> > that >> >> > gun nuts on the other hands so love to have. >> >> >> >> Handguns ARE illegal in that section of the US. >> >> That's why only the LAWFUL/Unarmed people were shot, and the >> criminal >> >> got away. >> >> >> >> But then again, you are a retard that believes something can be >> >> univented, AND that criminals will obey the law. >> >> >> >> Say! Isn't robbery and murder already against the law, you >> >> half-wit? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in news:47a65526$0$4035$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net: > people are agreeing with me; very scary. i take my post back. i meant > to say make all guns illegal everywhere. because guns makes a person > nut, plain and simple regardless of surroindings. > A gun may make you feel that way, but then no one in here feels that you are wrapped real tight to begin with. -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:D_OdnX6LYsIPHjvanZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com: > It gives nuts an ability they should not have. Then don't own one, Robw. It's that simple. > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message > news:%wtpj.6131$M71.3112@trnddc08... >> >> "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:47a65526$0$4035$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net... >> > people are agreeing with me; very scary. i take my post back. i >> > meant to say make all guns illegal everywhere. because guns makes a >> > person nut, plain and simple regardless of surroindings. >> >> Please explain the process by which a piece of metal and plastic >> turns a normal person into a nut. -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 Im "get it" that morons like you have no regard for limiting illegal guns. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3A6DEEB9FC1Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:9-idnZPN-aPEHjvanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > I'm not opposed to guns. > > I'm opposed to illegal guns. > > So are we opposed to illegal possession of guns. Do you get it now, > asshole? > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 Not true. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3A6E194264CSandman@216.196.97.136... > Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:Zfwpj.65706$Mu4.23945 > @bignews7.bellsouth.net: > > > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in > >> news:47a5fe4b$0$4049$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net: > >> > >>> if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a gun, he > >>> would not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life > >>> lvoing productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax cuts > >>> possible that gun nuts on the other hands so love to have. > >> > >> I would bet that his possession of a firearm was illegal. Wanna bet? > >> > > > > I'd even be willing to bet that he was a convicted felon too. > > > > Illegal for him to own a firearm. > > Illegal for him to possess a firearm. > > Illegal for him to use a firearm anywhere, let alone in Chicago and > that > > mall. > > > > Murder is also illegal, that didn't stop him five instances. > > > > > > Exactly, but all these anti gunners want to take guns from the folks who > didn't do it. > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 That is absolutely not true. Check out the law that was proposed in Philly. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3A6DCC5192BSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:kIadnf_wgohZ9DvanZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > If the gun was illegal it's only more shit to smear in your face. > > Not at all. I am as much against illegal possession of a firearm as you > should be. However, all the attempts of your ilk to pass gun control is > directed at the honest citizen not assholes like the one in Lane Bryant. > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 He had a gun.....right? "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3A6E4951F2CSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:Xdudnbw-vsLX9DvanZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > Giving the perp a gun worked out how>????? > > Who claimed anything about giving that perp a gun? Are you also > illiterate? > > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A39A23E2CBDASandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:2KSdnZKGdJoogzvanZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > So you admit there is a problem with illegal guns in this country? > >> > > >> > Thanks!!!! > >> > >> We've been saying that all along. However, all the legislation that > >> you schmucks wish to pass only affects the legal gunowner. That's a > >> problem. Oh, look....a shooting at the mall. Let's take guns away > >> from those who didn't do it. Yeah, that's the ticket. > >> > >> > "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message > >> > news:47a602da$0$15203$607ed4bc@cv.net... > >> >> harmony(aka Jay Stevens) wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a > >> >> > gun, he > >> > would > >> >> > not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life > >> >> > lvoing productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax > >> >> > cuts > >> possible > >> > that > >> >> > gun nuts on the other hands so love to have. > >> >> > >> >> Handguns ARE illegal in that section of the US. > >> >> That's why only the LAWFUL/Unarmed people were shot, and the > >> criminal > >> >> got away. > >> >> > >> >> But then again, you are a retard that believes something can be > >> >> univented, AND that criminals will obey the law. > >> >> > >> >> Say! Isn't robbery and murder already against the law, you > >> >> half-wit? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 Of course I don't own a gun. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3A6E9B03F20Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:D_OdnX6LYsIPHjvanZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com: > > > It gives nuts an ability they should not have. > > Then don't own one, Robw. It's that simple. > > > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message > > news:%wtpj.6131$M71.3112@trnddc08... > >> > >> "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:47a65526$0$4035$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net... > >> > people are agreeing with me; very scary. i take my post back. i > >> > meant to say make all guns illegal everywhere. because guns makes a > >> > person nut, plain and simple regardless of surroindings. > >> > >> Please explain the process by which a piece of metal and plastic > >> turns a normal person into a nut. > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest KerryHatch Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 RD (The Sandman) wrote: > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:9-idnZPN-aPEHjvanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: >>I'm not opposed to guns. >>I'm opposed to illegal guns. > So are we opposed to illegal possession of guns. Do you get it now, > asshole? "robw" forgets that ONLY criminals can have guns in or near Chicago. (legality means nothing) "robw" forgets that ONLY criminals shoot unarmed people. "robw" forgets that ONLY the free people are denied a method to defend thenselvs in Chicago, as ordered by the LIBERAL government that inacted stump stupid laws that cured nothing. "robw" forgets that he is dancing in the blood of other's demise to promote his stupidity. Quote
Guest KerryHatch Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 RD (The Sandman) wrote: > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:Xdudnbw-vsLX9DvanZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@comcast.com: > > >>Giving the perp a gun worked out how>????? > > > Who claimed anything about giving that perp a gun? Are you also > illiterate? Well, yes he is. So why challenge that point, when he already acknowledged it? Quote
Guest KerryHatch Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 robw, the top posting retard wrote: > Im "get it" that morons like you have no regard for limiting illegal guns. No such thing as an "illegal gun", you fruit bar. There is, however, "Illegal possesion of a weapon" by nut cases like you. I would ask you to learn the diff, butt, you seem to be unable to learn. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 If you want a legal carry law in Chicago, knock yourself out. If you want to legally own a million guns, so be it. I just want illegal guns reduced to nothing. You? "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47a75654$0$25029$607ed4bc@cv.net... > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > > news:9-idnZPN-aPEHjvanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: > > >>I'm not opposed to guns. > >>I'm opposed to illegal guns. > > > So are we opposed to illegal possession of guns. Do you get it now, > > asshole? > > "robw" forgets that ONLY criminals can have guns in or near Chicago. > (legality means nothing) > "robw" forgets that ONLY criminals shoot unarmed people. > "robw" forgets that ONLY the free people are denied a method to defend > thenselvs in Chicago, as ordered by the LIBERAL government that inacted > stump stupid laws that cured nothing. > "robw" forgets that he is dancing in the blood of other's demise to > promote his stupidity. > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 Smiling that this is another gun event that we'll stuff down your throat? Yeah asshole, you keep smiling. "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47a756d4$0$25029$607ed4bc@cv.net... > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > > news:Xdudnbw-vsLX9DvanZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > > > >>Giving the perp a gun worked out how>????? > > > > > > Who claimed anything about giving that perp a gun? Are you also > > illiterate? > > Well, yes he is. > > So why challenge that point, when he already acknowledged it? > Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.