Guest robw Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Yeah, your intelligence is really fierce. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3E8B0A39DFFSandman@216.196.97.136... > "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in > news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: > > > I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 > > gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. (Which > > is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like disscussions with "The > > Weasle". > > Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 What do you think my "stance" is? "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > > "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in > > news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: > > > >> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 > >> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. (Which > >> is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like disscussions with "The > >> Weasle". > > > > Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. > > > > > > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in the honesty > department. > > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in stance. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 You don't know how city people talk, do you? I thought you were so urban? "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3E8B5ECA008Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:O6KdnaefrsuKATHanZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > Hint: the Philly proposal would. > > No, it wouldn't. You can't even define the term "dealer" much less > understand how dealers work in the real world. > > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A3E5F6F04A13Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:lcidnVUV7ucayjfanZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > The other side of the counter would only be able to buy one handgun > a > >> > month. > >> > >> ROFLMAO!!! You don't even know what one gun a month legislation > >> addresses. Hint, it doesn't limit dealers to one gun a month. > >> > >> > >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > message > >> > news:Xns9A3C993D58E65Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> news:2rudndTQSP0gbjTanZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> > >> >> > If you're a dealer who has been able to by x amount of guns from > a > >> >> dealer > >> >> > and now that number is one....... > >> >> > >> >> But it isn't. If they were already breaking the law, passing one > gun > >> >> a month won't change that. > >> >> > >> >> FWIW, dealers buy guns from distributors not other dealers. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> > >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 I'll take your word, but quite frankly, it's not real evident. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3E8B779CA4ASandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:GKqdnR3tLuMKATHanZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > In or near the cities? > > Both > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A3E5F96D48B4Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:eridnaaJrbTDxTfanZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > Never lived in a metropolitan city, have you? > >> > >> Only Miami, Chicago, Phoenix and LA. > >> > >> > >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > message > >> > news:Xns9A3C9B4516729Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> news:fc2dnS3OHZIsaDTanZ2dnUVZ_t- dnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> > >> >> > You;re from where and lived where? > >> >> > >> >> Too numerous to list and as you have noted, you really don't care > >> >> what I think anyway so why would you really be interested in where > I > >> >> have lived? The truth is that you aren't. So why ask? > >> >> > >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> > message news:Xns9A3C693C023BASandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> >> news:f5idndmLHJASAjXanZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Name calling is a Philly thing. > >> >> >> > An urban thing. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I thought you knew about urban life??? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Where I'm from and in places I have lived it can get you killed. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> > >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest DerekSmalls Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 RD (The Sandman) wrote: > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:YsOdnXRZSoegBjHanZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > >>You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are >>upstairs while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One >>of the kids picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses >>it resulting in the drapes catching fire. >> >>What would you do first? >> >>Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours? >> >>Thank you. > > > I don't have any kids at home. I would never leave the children of other parents alone, unless I could they were toddlers, and locked safely in my closet. I would demand that THEY supervise each and every movement of those brats in the same room that WE are in... hancuffed to the crib they bought with them. But then again, I would never have dinner with friends that brought their rugrats over in the first place. I hate children... unless ya add lots of garlic-n-chives. Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 robw wrote: > Nice try, but I'm not for banning guns. There's not one thing I've said to > that effect. > > If I really believed that all guns should be banned I'd be part of a group > that wants to do that. As I've explained, I've been offered a chance to join > such groups and turned them down. > > You really need to dial 1-800-Clue. > I run that hotline, you should call it sometime. We're not the ones equating children and matches with criminals and guns. > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:I53rj.93637$K27.56485@bignews6.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are > upstairs >>> while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One of the kids >>> picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses it resulting > in >>> the drapes catching fire. >>> >>> What would you do first? >>> >> Put out the fire, I wouldn't try to ban matches. >> >>> Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours? >>> >> After putting out the fire then educate the child in correct behavior. >> Maybe tell the child to not touch matches, I wouldn't tell everyone in >> the house that they were not to touch matches. >> >>> Thank you. >>> >> Find an example that supports your position. >> >>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9A3E5E3F4B53ESandman@216.196.97.136... >>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>> news:qKidndnK_bxxyTfanZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>> >>>>> Waking up and not having to read another story about a six year old > kid >>>>> getting caught in the crossfire of illegal guns will make me very >>>> happy. >>>>> Yes. >>>> It would make me happy too. So why not address the problem of the >>>> criminal? >>>> >>>> >>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:Xns9A3C99E765AEASandman@216.196.97.136... >>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>>>> news:mbWdnYEJ7JX5ZDTanZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> One handgun a month. >>>>>> Nice trite saying. The words themselves must really make you feel >>>>>> comfortable. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>>>> >>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>> >>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>> > > Quote
Guest DerekSmalls Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 robw wrote: > Prove me wrong. Again? Quote
Guest DerekSmalls Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 robw wrote: > I'll answer any question that you'd like. Why are you a moron? Quote
Guest DerekSmalls Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 robw, the top posting retard wrote: > Guns out of their hands will stop the killings. Define "their". Quote
Guest DerekSmalls Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 robw, the top posting retard wrote: > Penis's????? Wow! Your dual dopler GAYTAR locked on that right swiftly! > > You like to "swordfight"???? > > Are you f ckijng gay? I noticed how you avoided everything but the original questions. Why is that? > > > "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message > news:47acc11e$0$7853$607ed4bc@cv.net... > >>RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> >> >>>"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote like the top posting retard he is: >>> >>> >>>>I read many essays on criminals and their relation to culture, etc. And >>>>while I'm reading people are getting killed in West Philly. >>>> >>>>Guns out of their hands first, correct the situation next. >> >>>I see you agree that your plan on gun regulation won't correct the >>>situation. Why don't you work on something that will? >> >>Why doesn't Robweetard want to correct the situation(the real problem!) >>first? >> Guns can't possibly "cause" or promote problems, after all. >>I have a few firearms and other forms of weapons, and they never caused >>any problems. >> >> Even he said "Their hands". >> >> Who is this "their" that ROBW finally admitted to acknowledging to >>being the real problem? >> >>Guns, penis's, fists, knives, bludgeoning "weapons"( and other tools) >>aren't the issue. Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 robw wrote: > Well the law would have to be in place for that to happen now, wouldn't it? > That wasn't your assertion when you said "I've shown you repeatedly." > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:L83rj.93639$K27.47374@bignews6.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> Yes, it would. >>> I've shown you repeatedly. >>> >> You've asserted it's the solution, you haven't demonstrated it would >> actually work. >> >> >>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9A3E5E708F33Sandman@216.196.97.136... >>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>> news:NbqdndjJyYLOyDfanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>> >>>>> The law would hinder the supply. >>>> No, it wouldn't. It only addresses the legal supply not the illegal >>>> one. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>> >>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>> > > Quote
Guest DerekSmalls Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 robw, thr top posting retard wrote: > What do you think my "stance" is? To be the most stupid person in the US? What did I win? Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Knock yourself out. "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47acdc6a$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net... > robw wrote: > > > Prove me wrong. > > Again? Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Simple answer, I'm not. "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47acdc97$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net... > robw wrote: > > > I'll answer any question that you'd like. > > Why are you a moron? Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 I guess you didn't do well on those "what word doesn't belong" tests. And the problem in Philly is guns. Your answer. "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47acde68$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net... > robw, the top posting retard wrote: > > > Penis's????? > > Wow! Your dual dopler GAYTAR locked on that right swiftly! > > > > > You like to "swordfight"???? > > > > Are you f ckijng gay? > > I noticed how you avoided everything but the original questions. > Why is that? > > > > > > > > "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message > > news:47acc11e$0$7853$607ed4bc@cv.net... > > > >>RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> > >> > >>>"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote like the top posting retard he is: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I read many essays on criminals and their relation to culture, etc. And > >>>>while I'm reading people are getting killed in West Philly. > >>>> > >>>>Guns out of their hands first, correct the situation next. > >> > >>>I see you agree that your plan on gun regulation won't correct the > >>>situation. Why don't you work on something that will? > >> > >>Why doesn't Robweetard want to correct the situation(the real problem!) > >>first? > >> Guns can't possibly "cause" or promote problems, after all. > >>I have a few firearms and other forms of weapons, and they never caused > >>any problems. > >> > >> Even he said "Their hands". > >> > >> Who is this "their" that ROBW finally admitted to acknowledging to > >>being the real problem? > >> > >>Guns, penis's, fists, knives, bludgeoning "weapons"( and other tools) > >>aren't the issue. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Criminals who use guns. There are criminals who don't use guns you know. "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47acdcf1$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net... > robw, the top posting retard wrote: > > > Guns out of their hands will stop the killings. > > Define "their". > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 "crib they bought them in"??? I said they were downstairs playing XBox. You read much? "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47acd43f$0$7886$607ed4bc@cv.net... > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > > news:YsOdnXRZSoegBjHanZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > > > >>You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are > >>upstairs while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One > >>of the kids picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses > >>it resulting in the drapes catching fire. > >> > >>What would you do first? > >> > >>Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours? > >> > >>Thank you. > > > > > > I don't have any kids at home. > > I would never leave the children of other parents alone, unless I could > they were toddlers, and locked safely in my closet. > > I would demand that THEY supervise each and every movement of those > brats in the same room that WE are in... hancuffed to the crib they > bought with them. > But then again, I would never have dinner with friends that brought > their rugrats over in the first place. > > I hate children... unless ya add lots of garlic-n-chives. > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 So you came up small too, huh? "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:p%4rj.82499$rc2.77280@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > Nice try, but I'm not for banning guns. There's not one thing I've said to > > that effect. > > > > If I really believed that all guns should be banned I'd be part of a group > > that wants to do that. As I've explained, I've been offered a chance to join > > such groups and turned them down. > > > > You really need to dial 1-800-Clue. > > > > I run that hotline, you should call it sometime. > > We're not the ones equating children and matches with criminals and guns. > > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:I53rj.93637$K27.56485@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are > > upstairs > >>> while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One of the kids > >>> picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses it resulting > > in > >>> the drapes catching fire. > >>> > >>> What would you do first? > >>> > >> Put out the fire, I wouldn't try to ban matches. > >> > >>> Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours? > >>> > >> After putting out the fire then educate the child in correct behavior. > >> Maybe tell the child to not touch matches, I wouldn't tell everyone in > >> the house that they were not to touch matches. > >> > >>> Thank you. > >>> > >> Find an example that supports your position. > >> > >>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > >>> news:Xns9A3E5E3F4B53ESandman@216.196.97.136... > >>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >>>> news:qKidndnK_bxxyTfanZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >>>> > >>>>> Waking up and not having to read another story about a six year old > > kid > >>>>> getting caught in the crossfire of illegal guns will make me very > >>>> happy. > >>>>> Yes. > >>>> It would make me happy too. So why not address the problem of the > >>>> criminal? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > >>>>> news:Xns9A3C99E765AEASandman@216.196.97.136... > >>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >>>>>> news:mbWdnYEJ7JX5ZDTanZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> One handgun a month. > >>>>>> Nice trite saying. The words themselves must really make you feel > >>>>>> comfortable. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> RD (The Sandman) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> RD (The Sandman) > >>>> > >>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >>>> to terrorism is much, much worse > >>> > > > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 No, because you've shown me nothing. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:ja5rj.82505$rc2.64740@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > Well the law would have to be in place for that to happen now, wouldn't it? > > > > That wasn't your assertion when you said "I've shown you repeatedly." > > > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:L83rj.93639$K27.47374@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> Yes, it would. > >>> I've shown you repeatedly. > >>> > >> You've asserted it's the solution, you haven't demonstrated it would > >> actually work. > >> > >> > >>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > >>> news:Xns9A3E5E708F33Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >>>> news:NbqdndjJyYLOyDfanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: > >>>> > >>>>> The law would hinder the supply. > >>>> No, it wouldn't. It only addresses the legal supply not the illegal > >>>> one. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> RD (The Sandman) > >>>> > >>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >>>> to terrorism is much, much worse > >>> > > > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 A cookie. Enjoy! "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message news:47acdf22$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net... > robw, thr top posting retard wrote: > > > What do you think my "stance" is? > > To be the most stupid person in the US? > > What did I win? Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 robw wrote: > So you came up small too, huh? > You come up large when equating children and matches with criminals and guns? > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:p%4rj.82499$rc2.77280@bignews1.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> Nice try, but I'm not for banning guns. There's not one thing I've said > to >>> that effect. >>> >>> If I really believed that all guns should be banned I'd be part of a > group >>> that wants to do that. As I've explained, I've been offered a chance to > join >>> such groups and turned them down. >>> >>> You really need to dial 1-800-Clue. >>> >> I run that hotline, you should call it sometime. >> >> We're not the ones equating children and matches with criminals and guns. >> >> >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >>> news:I53rj.93637$K27.56485@bignews6.bellsouth.net... >>>> robw wrote: >>>>> You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are >>> upstairs >>>>> while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One of the > kids >>>>> picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses it resulting >>> in >>>>> the drapes catching fire. >>>>> >>>>> What would you do first? >>>>> >>>> Put out the fire, I wouldn't try to ban matches. >>>> >>>>> Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours? >>>>> >>>> After putting out the fire then educate the child in correct behavior. >>>> Maybe tell the child to not touch matches, I wouldn't tell everyone in >>>> the house that they were not to touch matches. >>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>> Find an example that supports your position. >>>> >>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:Xns9A3E5E3F4B53ESandman@216.196.97.136... >>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>>>> news:qKidndnK_bxxyTfanZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Waking up and not having to read another story about a six year old >>> kid >>>>>>> getting caught in the crossfire of illegal guns will make me very >>>>>> happy. >>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>> It would make me happy too. So why not address the problem of the >>>>>> criminal? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > message >>>>>>> news:Xns9A3C99E765AEASandman@216.196.97.136... >>>>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:mbWdnYEJ7JX5ZDTanZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One handgun a month. >>>>>>>> Nice trite saying. The words themselves must really make you feel >>>>>>>> comfortable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>>>>> -- >>>>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>>>> >>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>> > > Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 robw wrote: > No, because you've shown me nothing. > You're the one who's made assertions without any facts/data/evidence. > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:ja5rj.82505$rc2.64740@bignews1.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> Well the law would have to be in place for that to happen now, wouldn't > it? >> That wasn't your assertion when you said "I've shown you repeatedly." >> >> >> >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >>> news:L83rj.93639$K27.47374@bignews6.bellsouth.net... >>>> robw wrote: >>>>> Yes, it would. >>>>> I've shown you repeatedly. >>>>> >>>> You've asserted it's the solution, you haven't demonstrated it would >>>> actually work. >>>> >>>> >>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:Xns9A3E5E708F33Sandman@216.196.97.136... >>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>>>> news:NbqdndjJyYLOyDfanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The law would hinder the supply. >>>>>> No, it wouldn't. It only addresses the legal supply not the > illegal >>>>>> one. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>>>> >>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>> > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Apparently I made a point none of you can debate. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:sB6rj.21405$1f.4076@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > So you came up small too, huh? > > > > You come up large when equating children and matches with criminals and > guns? > > > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:p%4rj.82499$rc2.77280@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> Nice try, but I'm not for banning guns. There's not one thing I've said > > to > >>> that effect. > >>> > >>> If I really believed that all guns should be banned I'd be part of a > > group > >>> that wants to do that. As I've explained, I've been offered a chance to > > join > >>> such groups and turned them down. > >>> > >>> You really need to dial 1-800-Clue. > >>> > >> I run that hotline, you should call it sometime. > >> > >> We're not the ones equating children and matches with criminals and guns. > >> > >> > >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > >>> news:I53rj.93637$K27.56485@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > >>>> robw wrote: > >>>>> You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are > >>> upstairs > >>>>> while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One of the > > kids > >>>>> picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses it resulting > >>> in > >>>>> the drapes catching fire. > >>>>> > >>>>> What would you do first? > >>>>> > >>>> Put out the fire, I wouldn't try to ban matches. > >>>> > >>>>> Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours? > >>>>> > >>>> After putting out the fire then educate the child in correct behavior. > >>>> Maybe tell the child to not touch matches, I wouldn't tell everyone in > >>>> the house that they were not to touch matches. > >>>> > >>>>> Thank you. > >>>>> > >>>> Find an example that supports your position. > >>>> > >>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > >>>>> news:Xns9A3E5E3F4B53ESandman@216.196.97.136... > >>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >>>>>> news:qKidndnK_bxxyTfanZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Waking up and not having to read another story about a six year old > >>> kid > >>>>>>> getting caught in the crossfire of illegal guns will make me very > >>>>>> happy. > >>>>>>> Yes. > >>>>>> It would make me happy too. So why not address the problem of the > >>>>>> criminal? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > > message > >>>>>>> news:Xns9A3C99E765AEASandman@216.196.97.136... > >>>>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >>>>>>>> news:mbWdnYEJ7JX5ZDTanZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> One handgun a month. > >>>>>>>> Nice trite saying. The words themselves must really make you feel > >>>>>>>> comfortable. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> RD (The Sandman) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >>>>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> RD (The Sandman) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse > >>> > > > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 400 murders caused by guns. That's the only fact that concerns me. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:dE6rj.21407$1f.4471@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > No, because you've shown me nothing. > > > > You're the one who's made assertions without any facts/data/evidence. > > > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:ja5rj.82505$rc2.64740@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> Well the law would have to be in place for that to happen now, wouldn't > > it? > >> That wasn't your assertion when you said "I've shown you repeatedly." > >> > >> > >> > >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > >>> news:L83rj.93639$K27.47374@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > >>>> robw wrote: > >>>>> Yes, it would. > >>>>> I've shown you repeatedly. > >>>>> > >>>> You've asserted it's the solution, you haven't demonstrated it would > >>>> actually work. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > >>>>> news:Xns9A3E5E708F33Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >>>>>> news:NbqdndjJyYLOyDfanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> The law would hinder the supply. > >>>>>> No, it wouldn't. It only addresses the legal supply not the > > illegal > >>>>>> one. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> RD (The Sandman) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse > >>> > > > > Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 robw wrote: > Apparently I made a point none of you can debate. > Comparing children with matches to criminals with guns was an asinine point not worth debating. > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:sB6rj.21405$1f.4076@bignews9.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> So you came up small too, huh? >>> >> You come up large when equating children and matches with criminals and >> guns? >> >> >> >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >>> news:p%4rj.82499$rc2.77280@bignews1.bellsouth.net... >>>> robw wrote: >>>>> Nice try, but I'm not for banning guns. There's not one thing I've > said >>> to >>>>> that effect. >>>>> >>>>> If I really believed that all guns should be banned I'd be part of a >>> group >>>>> that wants to do that. As I've explained, I've been offered a chance > to >>> join >>>>> such groups and turned them down. >>>>> >>>>> You really need to dial 1-800-Clue. >>>>> >>>> I run that hotline, you should call it sometime. >>>> >>>> We're not the ones equating children and matches with criminals and > guns. >>>> >>>>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:I53rj.93637$K27.56485@bignews6.bellsouth.net... >>>>>> robw wrote: >>>>>>> You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are >>>>> upstairs >>>>>>> while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One of the >>> kids >>>>>>> picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses it > resulting >>>>> in >>>>>>> the drapes catching fire. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What would you do first? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Put out the fire, I wouldn't try to ban matches. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours? >>>>>>> >>>>>> After putting out the fire then educate the child in correct > behavior. >>>>>> Maybe tell the child to not touch matches, I wouldn't tell everyone > in >>>>>> the house that they were not to touch matches. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Find an example that supports your position. >>>>>> >>>>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > message >>>>>>> news:Xns9A3E5E3F4B53ESandman@216.196.97.136... >>>>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:qKidndnK_bxxyTfanZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Waking up and not having to read another story about a six year > old >>>>> kid >>>>>>>>> getting caught in the crossfire of illegal guns will make me very >>>>>>>> happy. >>>>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>>>> It would make me happy too. So why not address the problem of the >>>>>>>> criminal? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in >>> message >>>>>>>>> news:Xns9A3C99E765AEASandman@216.196.97.136... >>>>>>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:mbWdnYEJ7JX5ZDTanZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@comcast.com: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> One handgun a month. >>>>>>>>>> Nice trite saying. The words themselves must really make you > feel >>>>>>>>>> comfortable. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>>>>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> RD (The Sandman) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >>>>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse >>> > > Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.