Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Standing right in your face. Running around or from nothing. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3FA08B23437Sandman@216.196.97.136... > Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in > news:ZBkrj.82978$rc2.54129@bignews1.bellsouth.net: > > > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 > >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: > >> > >>> RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >>>> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in > >>>> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: > >>>> > >>>>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 > >>>>> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. > >>>>> (Which is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like disscussions > >>>>> with "The Weasle". > >>>> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in the > >>> honesty department. > >>> > >>> As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in stance. > >>> > >> > >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, it is > >> like debating a stump. > >> > > > > He has a mantra that cures all evils--one gun a month. > > > > Show him where he's demonstratively wrong and he falls back to the > > mantra--one gun a month. > > Yep, akin to plugging one's ears and running around in little circles > whimpering Nyaahhhh, Nyaahhhhh to one's self and expecting enlightenment. > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Yours are "backed up" by a paranoid fear that everyone wants to take your guns away. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A3FA1102D21CSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:we-dnT4b-PzJdTDanZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > It's called having the convictions of one's beliefs. > > > > You;re doing the same thing. > > At least mine are backed up by reality and common words used on this > planet. How did you define 'dealer'? > > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A3F59A1C2A42Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 > >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: > >> > >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> >> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in > >> >> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: > >> >> > >> >>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 > >> >>> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. > >> >>> (Which is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like > >> >>> disscussions with "The Weasle". > >> >> > >> >> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in the > >> > honesty department. > >> > > >> > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in stance. > >> > > >> > >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, it is > >> like debating a stump. > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 robw wrote: > If you don't live in Philly I'm doing nothing to you. > You're the man holding my brothers down. > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:u9nrj.22090$1f.4877@bignews9.bellsouth.net... >> Scout wrote: >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >>> news:Dumrj.21876$1f.18319@bignews9.bellsouth.net... >>>> robw wrote: >>>>> No, I go forward with my beliefs.. >>>>> >>>> even when they're based on fairy tales. >>> Doesn't what to look like a quiter for giving them up? >>> >>> >> Knows in his heart that he's righteous in his beliefs and will do his >> damnedest to impose his will on everyone--regardless of any /facts/ to >> the contrary; after all they're all inner city "criminals" and they >> won't behave unless forced to do so. >> > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the entire city. Who am I holding down? And don't call them your "brothers." They'd as soon kill you. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:wktrj.70714$k27.1667@bignews2.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > If you don't live in Philly I'm doing nothing to you. > > > > You're the man holding my brothers down. > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:u9nrj.22090$1f.4877@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > >> Scout wrote: > >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > >>> news:Dumrj.21876$1f.18319@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > >>>> robw wrote: > >>>>> No, I go forward with my beliefs.. > >>>>> > >>>> even when they're based on fairy tales. > >>> Doesn't what to look like a quiter for giving them up? > >>> > >>> > >> Knows in his heart that he's righteous in his beliefs and will do his > >> damnedest to impose his will on everyone--regardless of any /facts/ to > >> the contrary; after all they're all inner city "criminals" and they > >> won't behave unless forced to do so. > >> > > > > Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:JKednUku6Z4WqDPanZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@comcast.com: > It didn't work out that way now, did it? Nope, but that wasn't the gun's fault. It still took the perp to pull the trigger. That same gun could have been owned by a legal gunowner or a cop. It wasn't.....and there lies the difference. > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A3F9FBC32C64Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:SNedndXqP8geejDanZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > Without that evil gun perhaps five women wouldn't be dead. >> >> Without the asshole pulling the trigger no doubt they wouldn't be dead. -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:utmdncMNWuGZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com: > The gun was the means. And he probably got there by automobile. Do you wish to pass legislation that would limit them to one-car-a-month? > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A3FA04367546Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:W- >> WdnQsu8I_fejDanZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > Are you stupid enough to know the creep couldn't have killed five >> > people with a feather? And if he had a knife I'm willing to bet it >> > also wouldn't have been five people. >> >> Are you so stupid as to not understand that without the 'creep', the >> gun wouldn't have killed five people either? The creep was the only >> one who could make a decision to kill or not. The gun was and is >> inanimate. You do understand that word, don't you? -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:-KednVSGN7NZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > Standing right in your face. No, you're not. > Running around or from nothing. Then why don't you answer questions you don't like? -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:UcSdnXm7odR0qzPanZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com: > Yours are "backed up" by a paranoid fear that everyone wants to take your > guns away. I noticed you just ran away from another question. Afraid to answer them? How do you define 'dealer'? How does your legislation you are trying for define 'dealer'? > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A3FA1102D21CSandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:we-dnT4b-PzJdTDanZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > It's called having the convictions of one's beliefs. >> > >> > You;re doing the same thing. >> >> At least mine are backed up by reality and common words used on this >> planet. How did you define 'dealer'? >> >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message >> > news:Xns9A3F59A1C2A42Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 >> >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: >> >> >> >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> >> >> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in >> >> >> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: >> >> >> >> >> >>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 >> >> >>> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. >> >> >>> (Which is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like >> >> >>> disscussions with "The Weasle". >> >> >> >> >> >> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in the >> >> > honesty department. >> >> > >> >> > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in stance. >> >> > >> >> >> >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, it is >> >> like debating a stump. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 robw wrote: > Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the entire > city. > Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state legislature. Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > robw wrote: >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >> entire city. >> > > Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > legislature. > Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law is simply an exercize in mental masturbation. -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 RD (The Sandman) wrote: > Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >> robw wrote: >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >>> entire city. >>> >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state >> legislature. >> > > Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law is > simply an exercize in mental masturbation. > I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 So why not help keep guns out of criminals' hands? "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A40636E2634DSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:JKednUku6Z4WqDPanZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@comcast.com: > > > It didn't work out that way now, did it? > > Nope, but that wasn't the gun's fault. It still took the perp to pull > the trigger. That same gun could have been owned by a legal gunowner or > a cop. It wasn't.....and there lies the difference. > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A3F9FBC32C64Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:SNedndXqP8geejDanZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > Without that evil gun perhaps five women wouldn't be dead. > >> > >> Without the asshole pulling the trigger no doubt they wouldn't be > dead. > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 You don't care about crime. You only care about your guns. You;re pathetic. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A4063A4F9997Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:utmdncMNWuGZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > The gun was the means. > > And he probably got there by automobile. Do you wish to pass legislation > that would limit them to one-car-a-month? > > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A3FA04367546Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:W- > >> WdnQsu8I_fejDanZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > Are you stupid enough to know the creep couldn't have killed five > >> > people with a feather? And if he had a knife I'm willing to bet it > >> > also wouldn't have been five people. > >> > >> Are you so stupid as to not understand that without the 'creep', the > >> gun wouldn't have killed five people either? The creep was the only > >> one who could make a decision to kill or not. The gun was and is > >> inanimate. You do understand that word, don't you? > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 No, the State would agree to let Philly enact their own laws. Don't worry, it won't happen. Too many idiots like you in Western pa. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the entire > > city. > > > > Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state legislature. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Not if we keep working to get Harrisburg to allow us the chance to make our own laws. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A406A80EAD25Sandman@216.196.97.136... > Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > > > robw wrote: > >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the > >> entire city. > >> > > > > Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > > legislature. > > > > Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law is > simply an exercize in mental masturbation. > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 You've skipped more of my posts than I have yours. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A4063D0A4CF4Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:-KednVSGN7NZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > Standing right in your face. > > No, you're not. > > > Running around or from nothing. > > Then why don't you answer questions you don't like? > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 I told you what "dealer" means on the street. Of course any laws would not use colloquialisms. Are you f cking stupid? "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A40640E8E3EESandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:UcSdnXm7odR0qzPanZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > Yours are "backed up" by a paranoid fear that everyone wants to take > your > > guns away. > > I noticed you just ran away from another question. Afraid to answer > them? How do you define 'dealer'? How does your legislation you are > trying for define 'dealer'? > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A3FA1102D21CSandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:we-dnT4b-PzJdTDanZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > It's called having the convictions of one's beliefs. > >> > > >> > You;re doing the same thing. > >> > >> At least mine are backed up by reality and common words used on this > >> planet. How did you define 'dealer'? > >> > >> > >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > message > >> > news:Xns9A3F59A1C2A42Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 > >> >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: > >> >> > >> >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> >> >> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in > >> >> >> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 > >> >> >>> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. > >> >> >>> (Which is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like > >> >> >>> disscussions with "The Weasle". > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in the > >> >> > honesty department. > >> >> > > >> >> > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in stance. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, it is > >> >> like debating a stump. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> > >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 So you're not about reducing crime. You're all about "My gun rights, my gun rights!!!!" So noted. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > > Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in > > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > > > >> robw wrote: > >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the > >>> entire city. > >>> > >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > >> legislature. > >> > > > > Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law is > > simply an exercize in mental masturbation. > > > > I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:ULqdnf_ 3lcqDpzLanZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comcast.com: > So why not help keep guns out of criminals' hands? One gun a month won't do it. Why would you think that someone selling guns illegally will suddenly stop if you pass just one more law? Why don't you just arrest them for the illegal sales they are already doing? Seemed to work with Lou.... > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A40636E2634DSandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:JKednUku6Z4WqDPanZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > It didn't work out that way now, did it? >> >> Nope, but that wasn't the gun's fault. It still took the perp to pull >> the trigger. That same gun could have been owned by a legal gunowner or >> a cop. It wasn't.....and there lies the difference. >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message >> > news:Xns9A3F9FBC32C64Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> >> news:SNedndXqP8geejDanZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> >> >> > Without that evil gun perhaps five women wouldn't be dead. >> >> >> >> Without the asshole pulling the trigger no doubt they wouldn't be >> dead. >> >> >> -- >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:lcWdnY-2CpDGpzLanZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com: > You don't care about crime. Not true. I am the one asking you why you don't simply enforce the laws you already have and the ones that are already being broken? You are the one too ignorant to do that. You think that passing one more law will suddenly make all the criminals go straight. > You only care about your guns. I care about my guns more than I care about a criminal's. You don't seem to agree with that. > You;re pathetic. I'm not the one wallowing in ignorance. > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A4063A4F9997Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:utmdncMNWuGZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > The gun was the means. >> >> And he probably got there by automobile. Do you wish to pass >> legislation that would limit them to one-car-a-month? >> >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in >> > message news:Xns9A3FA04367546Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:W- >> >> WdnQsu8I_fejDanZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> >> >> > Are you stupid enough to know the creep couldn't have killed >> >> > five people with a feather? And if he had a knife I'm willing to >> >> > bet it also wouldn't have been five people. >> >> >> >> Are you so stupid as to not understand that without the 'creep', >> >> the gun wouldn't have killed five people either? The creep was >> >> the only one who could make a decision to kill or not. The gun >> >> was and is inanimate. You do understand that word, don't you? -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:ntOdnQFD1 _aTpjLanZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > You've skipped more of my posts than I have yours. Because you don't answer any questions, you just keep repeating the same mantra. > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A4063D0A4CF4Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:-KednVSGN7NZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > Standing right in your face. >> >> No, you're not. >> >> > Running around or from nothing. >> >> Then why don't you answer questions you don't like? >> >> >> >> -- >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:MdKdneuyL438pjLanZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > I told you what "dealer" means on the street. No, you didn't. You simply accused me of not knowing. What do you think the term means? > Of course any laws would not use colloquialisms. Then how would you define 'dealer' in your law? > Are you f cking stupid? Mirror, mirror...... > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A40640E8E3EESandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:UcSdnXm7odR0qzPanZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > Yours are "backed up" by a paranoid fear that everyone wants to >> > take >> your >> > guns away. >> >> I noticed you just ran away from another question. Afraid to answer >> them? How do you define 'dealer'? How does your legislation you are >> trying for define 'dealer'? >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in >> > message news:Xns9A3FA1102D21CSandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> >> news:we-dnT4b-PzJdTDanZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> >> >> > It's called having the convictions of one's beliefs. >> >> > >> >> > You;re doing the same thing. >> >> >> >> At least mine are backed up by reality and common words used on >> >> this planet. How did you define 'dealer'? >> >> >> >> >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in >> message >> >> > news:Xns9A3F59A1C2A42Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 >> >> >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: >> >> >> >> >> >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> >> >> >> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in >> >> >> >> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 >> >> >> >>> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous >> >> >> >>> postings. (Which is why I was asking the question.) Kinda >> >> >> >>> like disscussions with "The Weasle". >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in >> >> >> > the honesty department. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in >> >> >> > stance. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, it >> >> >> is like debating a stump. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> >> >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net: > RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in >> news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: >> >>> robw wrote: >>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >>>> entire city. >>>> >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state >>> legislature. >>> >> >> Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state >> law is simply an exercize in mental masturbation. >> > > I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. A difference in definition..... -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:yO- dnTUPpMyroDLanZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com: > So you're not about reducing crime. > > You're all about "My gun rights, my gun rights!!!!" > > So noted. Not what he said. You really are a moron, aren't you. You aren't just playing one on the internet. > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net... >> RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> > Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in >> > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: >> > >> >> robw wrote: >> >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >> >>> entire city. >> >>> >> >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state >> >> legislature. >> >> >> > >> > Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law > is >> > simply an exercize in mental masturbation. >> > >> >> I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 One will. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A4077CB78E95Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:ULqdnf_ > 3lcqDpzLanZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > So why not help keep guns out of criminals' hands? > > One gun a month won't do it. Why would you think that someone selling > guns illegally will suddenly stop if you pass just one more law? Why > don't you just arrest them for the illegal sales they are already doing? > Seemed to work with Lou.... > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A40636E2634DSandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:JKednUku6Z4WqDPanZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > It didn't work out that way now, did it? > >> > >> Nope, but that wasn't the gun's fault. It still took the perp to pull > >> the trigger. That same gun could have been owned by a legal gunowner > or > >> a cop. It wasn't.....and there lies the difference. > >> > >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > message > >> > news:Xns9A3F9FBC32C64Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> news:SNedndXqP8geejDanZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> > >> >> > Without that evil gun perhaps five women wouldn't be dead. > >> >> > >> >> Without the asshole pulling the trigger no doubt they wouldn't be > >> dead. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.