Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 No, you only care about your guns. You;re one of those idiots that think one law will snowball. You;re pathetic. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A407836A5206Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:lcWdnY-2CpDGpzLanZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > You don't care about crime. > > Not true. I am the one asking you why you don't simply enforce the laws > you already have and the ones that are already being broken? You are the > one too ignorant to do that. You think that passing one more law will > suddenly make all the criminals go straight. > > > You only care about your guns. > > I care about my guns more than I care about a criminal's. You don't seem > to agree with that. > > > You;re pathetic. > > I'm not the one wallowing in ignorance. > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A4063A4F9997Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:utmdncMNWuGZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > The gun was the means. > >> > >> And he probably got there by automobile. Do you wish to pass > >> legislation that would limit them to one-car-a-month? > >> > >> > >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > >> > message news:Xns9A3FA04367546Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:W- > >> >> WdnQsu8I_fejDanZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> > >> >> > Are you stupid enough to know the creep couldn't have killed > >> >> > five people with a feather? And if he had a knife I'm willing to > >> >> > bet it also wouldn't have been five people. > >> >> > >> >> Are you so stupid as to not understand that without the 'creep', > >> >> the gun wouldn't have killed five people either? The creep was > >> >> the only one who could make a decision to kill or not. The gun > >> >> was and is inanimate. You do understand that word, don't you? > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 I know what your game is. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A4078E6C119DSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:yO- > dnTUPpMyroDLanZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > So you're not about reducing crime. > > > > You're all about "My gun rights, my gun rights!!!!" > > > > So noted. > > Not what he said. You really are a moron, aren't you. You aren't just > playing one on the internet. > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > >> RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> > Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in > >> > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >> > > >> >> robw wrote: > >> >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by > the > >> >>> entire city. > >> >>> > >> >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > >> >> legislature. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state > law > > is > >> > simply an exercize in mental masturbation. > >> > > >> > >> I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 You mean my beliefs? "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A40785782325Sandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:ntOdnQFD1 > _aTpjLanZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > You've skipped more of my posts than I have yours. > > Because you don't answer any questions, you just keep repeating the same > mantra. > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A4063D0A4CF4Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:-KednVSGN7NZqzPanZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > Standing right in your face. > >> > >> No, you're not. > >> > >> > Running around or from nothing. > >> > >> Then why don't you answer questions you don't like? > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Someone like Lou. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A40788FDA6DSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:MdKdneuyL438pjLanZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > I told you what "dealer" means on the street. > > No, you didn't. You simply accused me of not knowing. What do you think > the term means? > > > Of course any laws would not use colloquialisms. > > Then how would you define 'dealer' in your law? > > > Are you f cking stupid? > > Mirror, mirror...... > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A40640E8E3EESandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:UcSdnXm7odR0qzPanZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > Yours are "backed up" by a paranoid fear that everyone wants to > >> > take > >> your > >> > guns away. > >> > >> I noticed you just ran away from another question. Afraid to answer > >> them? How do you define 'dealer'? How does your legislation you are > >> trying for define 'dealer'? > >> > >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > >> > message news:Xns9A3FA1102D21CSandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> news:we-dnT4b-PzJdTDanZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> > >> >> > It's called having the convictions of one's beliefs. > >> >> > > >> >> > You;re doing the same thing. > >> >> > >> >> At least mine are backed up by reality and common words used on > >> >> this planet. How did you define 'dealer'? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > >> message > >> >> > news:Xns9A3F59A1C2A42Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 > >> >> >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in > >> >> >> >> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1 > >> >> >> >>> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous > >> >> >> >>> postings. (Which is why I was asking the question.) Kinda > >> >> >> >>> like disscussions with "The Weasle". > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in > >> >> >> > the honesty department. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in > >> >> >> > stance. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, it > >> >> >> is like debating a stump. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> > >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 robw wrote: > So you're not about reducing crime. > > You're all about "My gun rights, my gun rights!!!!" > > So noted. > > Not what I said. Another strawman on your part. > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net... >> RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in >>> news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: >>> >>>> robw wrote: >>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >>>>> entire city. >>>>> >>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state >>>> legislature. >>>> >>> Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law > is >>> simply an exercize in mental masturbation. >>> >> I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. > > Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 robw wrote: > No, the State would agree to let Philly enact their own laws. > The state has done so--Philly has enacted many ordinances--the state has excepted the area of Arms because in the past Philly has passed laws that violate the State Constitution. > Don't worry, it won't happen. Too many idiots like you in Western pa. > Anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot? > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the > entire >>> city. >>> >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > legislature. > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 It's what you mean. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:7dIrj.83684$rc2.52767@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > So you're not about reducing crime. > > > > You're all about "My gun rights, my gun rights!!!!" > > > > So noted. > > > > > > Not what I said. > > Another strawman on your part. > > > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > >> RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >>> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in > >>> news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >>> > >>>> robw wrote: > >>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the > >>>>> entire city. > >>>>> > >>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > >>>> legislature. > >>>> > >>> Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law > > is > >>> simply an exercize in mental masturbation. > >>> > >> I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. > > > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Calling someone an idiot is a Philly thing. You wouldn't understand. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:UiIrj.83688$rc2.69772@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > No, the State would agree to let Philly enact their own laws. > > > > The state has done so--Philly has enacted many ordinances--the state has > excepted the area of Arms because in the past Philly has passed laws > that violate the State Constitution. > > > Don't worry, it won't happen. Too many idiots like you in Western pa. > > > > Anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot? > > > > > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the > > entire > >>> city. > >>> > >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > > legislature. > > > > Quote
Guest RSweeney Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message news:pJednZu_frVspzLanZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@comcast.com... > Not if we keep working to get Harrisburg to allow us the chance to make > our > own laws. I think the Philadelphia "leadership" has shown it can't handle the powers it has now, much less seek more. Quote
Guest RSweeney Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message news:n4idnREkluKtzjLanZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com... > Calling someone an idiot is a Philly thing. > > You wouldn't understand. People in NYC consider Philadelphians to be rubes as well. It's a arrogance thing. Everyone understands perfectly. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 You do know we have a new mayor and Chief of Police??? Or do you like to shoot your mouth off and look stupid? "RSweeney" <dockscience@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:UJGdnfMA-egQ9jLanZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com... > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:pJednZu_frVspzLanZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@comcast.com... > > Not if we keep working to get Harrisburg to allow us the chance to make > > our > > own laws. > > I think the Philadelphia "leadership" has shown it can't handle the powers > it has now, much less seek more. > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 You live in NYC? "RSweeney" <dockscience@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4LOdnUNiHIpr9jLanZ2dnUVZ_rqlnZ2d@comcast.com... > > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:n4idnREkluKtzjLanZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com... > > Calling someone an idiot is a Philly thing. > > > > You wouldn't understand. > > People in NYC consider Philadelphians to be rubes as well. > It's a arrogance thing. Everyone understands perfectly. > > Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 robw wrote: > It's what you mean. > Now you're projecting. > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:7dIrj.83684$rc2.52767@bignews1.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> So you're not about reducing crime. >>> >>> You're all about "My gun rights, my gun rights!!!!" >>> >>> So noted. >>> >>> >> Not what I said. >> >> Another strawman on your part. >> >>> >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >>> news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net... >>>> RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>>>> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in >>>>> news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: >>>>> >>>>>> robw wrote: >>>>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >>>>>>> entire city. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state >>>>>> legislature. >>>>>> >>>>> Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law >>> is >>>>> simply an exercize in mental masturbation. >>>>> >>>> I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. >>> > > Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 robw wrote: > Calling someone an idiot is a Philly thing. > From the home of Liberty to the home of the Rude? > You wouldn't understand. > I understand rudeness quite well. > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:UiIrj.83688$rc2.69772@bignews1.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> No, the State would agree to let Philly enact their own laws. >>> >> The state has done so--Philly has enacted many ordinances--the state has >> excepted the area of Arms because in the past Philly has passed laws >> that violate the State Constitution. >> >>> Don't worry, it won't happen. Too many idiots like you in Western pa. >>> >> Anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot? >> >>> >>> >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >>> news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net... >>>> robw wrote: >>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >>> entire >>>>> city. >>>>> >>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state >>> legislature. >>> >>> > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 No, I'm not. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:2bLrj.97298$L%6.73379@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > It's what you mean. > > > > Now you're projecting. > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:7dIrj.83684$rc2.52767@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> So you're not about reducing crime. > >>> > >>> You're all about "My gun rights, my gun rights!!!!" > >>> > >>> So noted. > >>> > >>> > >> Not what I said. > >> > >> Another strawman on your part. > >> > >>> > >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > >>> news:PKGrj.25035$1f.12579@bignews9.bellsouth.net... > >>>> RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >>>>> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in > >>>>> news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >>>>> > >>>>>> robw wrote: > >>>>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the > >>>>>>> entire city. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > >>>>>> legislature. > >>>>>> > >>>>> Bingo!! Trying to enact a law in Philly that would override state law > >>> is > >>>>> simply an exercize in mental masturbation. > >>>>> > >>>> I Disagree. It's an exercise in frustration for petty tyrants. > >>> > > > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Home of the "attytude." Yup. And we're all proud of it. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:XfLrj.97300$L%6.89763@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > Calling someone an idiot is a Philly thing. > > > > From the home of Liberty to the home of the Rude? > > > You wouldn't understand. > > > > I understand rudeness quite well. > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:UiIrj.83688$rc2.69772@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> No, the State would agree to let Philly enact their own laws. > >>> > >> The state has done so--Philly has enacted many ordinances--the state has > >> excepted the area of Arms because in the past Philly has passed laws > >> that violate the State Constitution. > >> > >>> Don't worry, it won't happen. Too many idiots like you in Western pa. > >>> > >> Anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot? > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > >>> news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > >>>> robw wrote: > >>>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the > >>> entire > >>>>> city. > >>>>> > >>>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > >>> legislature. > >>> > >>> > > > > Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:aeWdnU7M_4OZ0DLanZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@comcast.com: > Someone like Lou. If you mean only the illegal part, you are very, very wrong. If you mean and FFL like Lou was supposed to have, then by far the majority of their sales are perfectly legal. After all, they are monitored and licensed by the federal government. > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9A40788FDA6DSandman@216.196.97.136... >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> news:MdKdneuyL438pjLanZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> > I told you what "dealer" means on the street. >> >> No, you didn't. You simply accused me of not knowing. What do you >> think the term means? >> >> > Of course any laws would not use colloquialisms. >> >> Then how would you define 'dealer' in your law? >> >> > Are you f cking stupid? >> >> Mirror, mirror...... >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in >> > message news:Xns9A40640E8E3EESandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> >> news:UcSdnXm7odR0qzPanZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> >> >> > Yours are "backed up" by a paranoid fear that everyone wants to >> >> > take >> >> your >> >> > guns away. >> >> >> >> I noticed you just ran away from another question. Afraid to >> >> answer them? How do you define 'dealer'? How does your >> >> legislation you are trying for define 'dealer'? >> >> >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in >> >> > message news:Xns9A3FA1102D21CSandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in >> >> >> news:we-dnT4b-PzJdTDanZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com: >> >> >> >> >> >> > It's called having the convictions of one's beliefs. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > You;re doing the same thing. >> >> >> >> >> >> At least mine are backed up by reality and common words used on >> >> >> this planet. How did you define 'dealer'? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in >> >> message >> >> >> > news:Xns9A3F59A1C2A42Sandman@216.196.97.136... >> >> >> >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 >> >> >> >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing >> >> >> >> >>> (1 gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous >> >> >> >> >>> postings. (Which is why I was asking the question.) >> >> >> >> >>> Kinda like disscussions with "The Weasle". >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest >> >> >> >> > in the honesty department. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in >> >> >> >> > stance. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, >> >> >> >> it is like debating a stump. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> >> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> >> >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> RD (The Sandman) >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest RD (The Sandman) Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:n4idnREkluKtzjLanZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com: > Calling someone an idiot is a Philly thing. > > You wouldn't understand. See if you understand this. I am tired of wasting my time trying to reason with an idiot who is blatheringly ignorant of laws and business and is as open minded as a stump. PLONK!!!! > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:UiIrj.83688$rc2.69772@bignews1.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >> > No, the State would agree to let Philly enact their own laws. >> > >> >> The state has done so--Philly has enacted many ordinances--the state has >> excepted the area of Arms because in the past Philly has passed laws >> that violate the State Constitution. >> >> > Don't worry, it won't happen. Too many idiots like you in Western pa. >> > >> >> Anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot? >> >> > >> > >> > >> > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message >> > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net... >> >> robw wrote: >> >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by the >> > entire >> >>> city. >> >>> >> >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state >> > legislature. >> > >> > > > > -- RD (The Sandman) War is absolute hell.....but to give in to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 One handgun a month. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A419B4FFB0ECSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:aeWdnU7M_4OZ0DLanZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > Someone like Lou. > > If you mean only the illegal part, you are very, very wrong. If you mean > and FFL like Lou was supposed to have, then by far the majority of their > sales are perfectly legal. After all, they are monitored and licensed > by the federal government. > > > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A40788FDA6DSandman@216.196.97.136... > >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> news:MdKdneuyL438pjLanZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> > >> > I told you what "dealer" means on the street. > >> > >> No, you didn't. You simply accused me of not knowing. What do you > >> think the term means? > >> > >> > Of course any laws would not use colloquialisms. > >> > >> Then how would you define 'dealer' in your law? > >> > >> > Are you f cking stupid? > >> > >> Mirror, mirror...... > >> > >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > >> > message news:Xns9A40640E8E3EESandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> news:UcSdnXm7odR0qzPanZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> > >> >> > Yours are "backed up" by a paranoid fear that everyone wants to > >> >> > take > >> >> your > >> >> > guns away. > >> >> > >> >> I noticed you just ran away from another question. Afraid to > >> >> answer them? How do you define 'dealer'? How does your > >> >> legislation you are trying for define 'dealer'? > >> >> > >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> > message news:Xns9A3FA1102D21CSandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> >> news:we-dnT4b-PzJdTDanZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > It's called having the convictions of one's beliefs. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > You;re doing the same thing. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> At least mine are backed up by reality and common words used on > >> >> >> this planet. How did you define 'dealer'? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in > >> >> message > >> >> >> > news:Xns9A3F59A1C2A42Sandman@216.196.97.136... > >> >> >> >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909 > >> >> >> >> @bignews6.bellsouth.net: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08: > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >>> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing > >> >> >> >> >>> (1 gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous > >> >> >> >> >>> postings. (Which is why I was asking the question.) > >> >> >> >> >>> Kinda like disscussions with "The Weasle". > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter. > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest > >> >> >> >> > in the honesty department. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in > >> >> >> >> > stance. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I agree with that, however, he is also so fixed in his ways, > >> >> >> >> it is like debating a stump. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> RD (The Sandman) > >> >> > >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> RD (The Sandman) > >> > >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in > >> to terrorism is much, much worse > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest robw Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 I told you I wasn't backing down. I told you last time you tried this, as well. Don't let the door hit you in the ass. "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Xns9A419BC28AABFSandman@216.196.97.136... > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in > news:n4idnREkluKtzjLanZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com: > > > Calling someone an idiot is a Philly thing. > > > > You wouldn't understand. > > See if you understand this. I am tired of wasting my time trying to > reason with an idiot who is blatheringly ignorant of laws and business > and is as open minded as a stump. PLONK!!!! > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:UiIrj.83688$rc2.69772@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >> > No, the State would agree to let Philly enact their own laws. > >> > > >> > >> The state has done so--Philly has enacted many ordinances--the state > has > >> excepted the area of Arms because in the past Philly has passed laws > >> that violate the State Constitution. > >> > >> > Don't worry, it won't happen. Too many idiots like you in Western > pa. > >> > > >> > >> Anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot? > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > >> > news:6dGrj.69547$vt2.33208@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > >> >> robw wrote: > >> >>> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed in a vote by > the > >> > entire > >> >>> city. > >> >>> > >> >> Any new gun laws in Philly would have to be passed by the state > >> > legislature. > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > RD (The Sandman) > > War is absolute hell.....but to give in > to terrorism is much, much worse Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 robw wrote: > I told you I wasn't backing down. > > I told you last time you tried this, as well. > > Walls stand. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 What? "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:JI6sj.71849$Mu4.25341@bignews7.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > I told you I wasn't backing down. > > > > I told you last time you tried this, as well. > > > > > > Walls stand. Quote
Guest Magus Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 robw wrote: > What? > Walls, those things that hold up ceilings. Talk to them all you want, they just stand there. Walls stand. > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > news:JI6sj.71849$Mu4.25341@bignews7.bellsouth.net... >> robw wrote: >>> I told you I wasn't backing down. >>> >>> I told you last time you tried this, as well. >>> >>> >> Walls stand. > > Quote
Guest robw Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 Doors. Doors open and let you get out and do things. Try one. "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message news:cN9sj.71938$Mu4.42677@bignews7.bellsouth.net... > robw wrote: > > What? > > > > Walls, those things that hold up ceilings. Talk to them all you want, > they just stand there. > > Walls stand. > > > > > > > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message > > news:JI6sj.71849$Mu4.25341@bignews7.bellsouth.net... > >> robw wrote: > >>> I told you I wasn't backing down. > >>> > >>> I told you last time you tried this, as well. > >>> > >>> > >> Walls stand. > > > > Quote
Guest Morton Davis Posted February 15, 2008 Posted February 15, 2008 "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message news:uvidnTcav5f4fS3anZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@comcast.com... > One handgun a month. > ====================== Why? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.