Guest Amanda Williams Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com: > On Feb 21, 8:50 Quote
Guest George Grapman Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 HarryNadds wrote: > On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote: >> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com: >> >>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote: >>>> D O N E >>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he >>> denied it and that's the end of that. >> rotfl... >> >> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh? >> >> We KNOW he "fucked around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited >> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so >> why would it be a surprise that he fucked around on the second ??? >> >> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia >> to get the NYT to "bin" the story. >> >> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all >> the fuss ??? >> >> <snicker> >> >> -- >> AW >> >> <small but dangerous> > > WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a > person does in his sex life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened?? > Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name. Likewise we also heard that when it is a public official it is a matter of public interest. Quote
Guest robw Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 So why worry about it? "HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ff167f54-a265-4f5d-a6cd-8c8f85eca3a6@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote: > Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com: > > > On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote: > >> D O N E > > > Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he > > denied it and that's the end of that. > > rotfl... > > Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh? > > We KNOW he "fucked around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited > faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so > why would it be a surprise that he fucked around on the second ??? > > What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia > to get the NYT to "bin" the story. > > But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all > the fuss ??? > > <snicker> > > -- > AW > > <small but dangerous> WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a person does in his sex life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened?? Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name. Quote
Guest OneTwoThree Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252... > Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in > news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com: > >> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote: >>> D O N E >> >> >> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he >> denied it and that's the end of that. > > rotfl... > > Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh? > > We KNOW he "fucked around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited > faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so > why would it be a surprise that he fucked around on the second ??? yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a Viet Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as you stood behind Kerry. > > What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia > to get the NYT to "bin" the story. Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer? thought you folks believed in personal privacy? > > But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all > the fuss ??? right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt even need viagra! > > <snicker> > > -- > AW > > <small but dangerous> Quote
Guest Amanda Williams Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 "OneTwoThree" <youare@notverysmart.ru> allegedly said in news:6pWdnRvOlO8PJCDanZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com: > > "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252... >> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in >> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com: >> >>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote: >>>> D O N E >>> >>> >>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he >>> denied it and that's the end of that. >> >> rotfl... >> >> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh? >> >> We KNOW he "fucked around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who >> waited faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger >> model, so why would it be a surprise that he fucked around on the >> second ??? > > yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a > Viet Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as > you stood behind Kerry. > WTF has THAT to do with whether he is "fucking around" on cindy ? > >> >> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane >> mafia to get the NYT to "bin" the story. > > Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer? > thought you folks believed in personal privacy? > Gee.. you don't think it's relevant that the randy old goat may have been getting the leg over with a lobbyist ??? A lobbyist for the Telecom industry while the matter was before the Senate ??? Of course old Cindy was zonked out on "hillbilly heroin" that she stole from her employer at the time, so she probably doesn't care. REAL "family values" at work eh ??? > >> >> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so >> why all the fuss ??? > > > right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt > even need viagra! > Unlike your other hero Limpballs Quote
Guest OneTwoThree Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A4B94CF485B9fubar@63.218.45.252... > "OneTwoThree" <youare@notverysmart.ru> allegedly said in > news:6pWdnRvOlO8PJCDanZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com: > >> >> "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252... >>> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in >>> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com: >>> >>>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote: >>>>> D O N E >>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he >>>> denied it and that's the end of that. >>> >>> rotfl... >>> >>> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh? >>> >>> We KNOW he "fucked around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who >>> waited faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger >>> model, so why would it be a surprise that he fucked around on the >>> second ??? >> >> yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a >> Viet Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as >> you stood behind Kerry. >> > > WTF has THAT to do with whether he is "fucking around" on cindy ? what do you care whether or not he is getting something on the side? > >> >>> >>> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane >>> mafia to get the NYT to "bin" the story. >> >> Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer? >> thought you folks believed in personal privacy? >> > > Gee.. you don't think it's relevant that the randy old goat may have been > getting the leg over with a lobbyist ??? A lobbyist for the Telecom > industry while the matter was before the Senate ??? Of course old Cindy > was zonked out on "hillbilly heroin" that she stole from her employer at > the time, so she probably doesn't care. as soon as you start outing dems for their sleazeball realtionships with lobbyists, you will have some credibility on this one. fact is you're a hypocrite who has no interest in eliminating the problem. > > REAL "family values" at work eh ??? define "family values" then tell us all how you denounce anyone (including leftists like SF mayor Gavin Newsome) for violating those values that you subscribe to. > > >> >>> >>> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so >>> why all the fuss ??? >> >> >> right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt >> even need viagra! >> > > Unlike your other hero Limpballs Quote
Guest Gogarty Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 In article <d36ea826-7b26-4053-a8d2-e0184c98972d@60g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>, hoofhearted07@yahoo.com says... > > >Do you have proof McBeaner was whacking some lobbyist or is just >something the NY Slime decided to throw against the wall to see if it >would stick? Sounds like something the Clinton's would do.Osamas >next.She has his FBI file. I don't have proof of anything and also don't care. But I do suspect that the NY Times is sitting on a lot of stuff they have not published and denials to the contrary (I did not have sex with that woman) McCain was in fact diddling a lobbyist who had business before his committee. It's the hypocrisy factor, stupid. Quote
Guest Gogarty Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 And isn't that Cindy the hardest looking broad this side of Damon Runyon? Quote
Guest Nicklas@Click.com Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:10:13 -0800 (PST), Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> wrote: >Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he >denied it and that's the end of that. S0--- Are you saying it's NOT okay if a loony billionaire "digs up" some bimbo to make accusations, pays witnesses, pays her lawyers to smear him? If so, why was it okay against Clinton? Quote
Guest Eddie Haskell Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 <Nicklas@Click.com> wrote in message news:e4srr3hs5b8hfeekgbqk9c904o1ie0j9kh@4ax.com... > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:10:13 -0800 (PST), Christopher > Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he >>denied it and that's the end of that. > > > S0--- Are you saying it's NOT okay if a loony > billionaire "digs up" some bimbo to make accusations, > pays witnesses, pays her lawyers to smear him? > > If so, why was it okay against Clinton? Because he was guilty. -Eddie Haskell Quote
Guest Titix Posted February 22, 2008 Posted February 22, 2008 "HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ff167f54-a265-4f5d-a6cd-8c8f85eca3a6@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote: > Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com: > > > On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote: > >> D O N E > > > Oh, no way. They asked him if he was fucking around on his wife, he > > denied it and that's the end of that. > > rotfl... > > Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh? > > We KNOW he "fucked around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited > faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so > why would it be a surprise that he fucked around on the second ??? > > What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia > to get the NYT to "bin" the story. > > But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all > the fuss ??? > > <snicker> > > -- > AW > > <small but dangerous> WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a person does in his sex life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened?? Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name. --------------------------------------------- You must be new in this group. If you scroll up you will find Bill Clinton's name all over here, about Monica, something that happened many yrs.ago. Do you think it only should matter if the person has a (D) in front of his name? The (R's) have way more episodes on this matter than D's. Going as far as tapping toes in men's public restrooms, codes that most people didn't know existed. If the R's didn't preach morality, maybe it won't be so news worthy. Quote
Guest Name Stolen Posted February 22, 2008 Posted February 22, 2008 ned wrote: > D O N E > > > > You are so confused... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.