TommyGun1928 Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 It is a poll on who is the biggest dipshit. TH won hands down. TH is sending me love letters...How sweet. "Reminding you people that I spent money to be here is NOT ABUSE and IT WILL NEVER BE ABUSE. It pisses you off because you know I am right and there is no way you can spin it to fit your bullshit. You're merely calling it abuse because it's a method of disguising your guilt in abusing your mod status. Get your head out of your ass!" He seems to be cooling down a bit. It doesn't sound nearly as ABUSIVE as "I'll keep you in court so long I'll ruin your career." He still doesn't understand that it is his attitude and threats that alienate everyone. Has he been sending mail to everyone? Because I got one, too. He states that this site is a scam, but if you're willing to waste twelve bucks just to get shit from mods and put into the box no matter what.... you realise it really is. This debate forum is to get our frustrations out, and when I first came here a couple years ago, that's exactly what we did. And not a single asshole tried to shut anyone up. Bullshit. Quote
ToriAllen Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 Has he been sending mail to everyone? Because I got one, too. He states that this site is a scam, but if you're willing to waste twelve bucks just to get shit from mods and put into the box no matter what.... you realise it really is. This debate forum is to get our frustrations out, and when I first came here a couple years ago, that's exactly what we did. And not a single asshole tried to shut anyone up. Bullshit. I have been on here a very long time, and things have changed. When I first came on there were very few members. The topics were dry and redundant, and about 80% of the posters were immature, thread derailing idiots. I saw potential and I stayed. I was very serious, too much so, when I became Mod. Once Phreak became a Mod, he taught me to loosen up and have fun with the position. Being an un-Moderated site, our job gets a little boring. You know what they say about idol hands, well, this is our playground. We could moderate like other sites and kick you off for not being politically correct, but we choose to let you say whatever you want (as long as you don Quote Smart men learn from their own mistakes; Wise men learn from others. I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
phreakwars Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 He can E-mail every fucking member in the member list for all I care. The fact of the matter is, we really don't give a rats ass how many new members we get, and we don't care who leaves. And I will NEVER go out of my way to make anybody feel all fucking warm and cozy here. Most any forum you go to, they are either wanting a shit load of members, or they are wanting to create a community with some asshole moderators who have this fucking vision of how everyone should act, or how everyone should treat each other, and somehow, someway, these fucking MODS always turn into Nazi bastards. THEN, when you call them on their shit, they act like they are fucking GODS and that YOU are disrupting the forum.. To all those MODS, I say FUCK YOU !! Here, we choose MODS alot different then most any other site, we chose people with major attitude problems. We want people who are arrogant, self centered, condescending pricks. You can even call it a reward for being an asshole. Were not in a fucking popularity contest, and I think a couple of the MOD positions that were given out had people going "WTF, HE'S A ASSHOLE !!" As for premium memberships, all those are really for, are to offer people an avatar,signature,and profile pic. It also unlocks the invisible forums, and allows members to use other features of the board not available to regular members, like the Journals, and media gallery. It doesn't prevent someone from being tossed in the idiot box, but it does make it a bit more difficult for a MOD to put them there. Premium members have to be voted in. There is an invisible forum for voting premiums and others into the box that only premiums can see. And ONLY premiums/Mods can vote. It's actually a very democratic process. MRIH has YET to be placed in the box, even though there has been MANY polls to try and place him there. So the system works. TH's problem, is he thinks that just because he bought a premium membership, that he should be protected from going in the idiot box, which is simply not the case. A legally binding poll of Premium members put him there. TH also seems to think that the first amendment should only apply to him, and if someone insults him, then it is SLANDER & LIBEL. Slander, would only apply, if it could be associated with who he is. Since he does not use his actual name on this forum, no slander is being commited. As far as all GF members go, the most anybody knows about TH, is that his name is Ben, and that he lives in Colorado. His last name/identity is not known by anybody except myself and GF. To which we are bound by our privacy policy not to reveal. Had Ben revealed personal information about himself, then he might actually have somewhat of an arguement. But then, not many people are brave enough to reveal their REAL identity on the internet. The reason he was silenced the first time, is because he did a charge back on Paypal claiming he was a victim of fraud, a claim that he lost... but of course, now he says PAYPAL are a bunch of Neo-Con assholes too.. But then, if he wants to talk about SLANDER, he outright accused GF of being a GREEDY JEW... This, in fact, is slander, GF has ALWAYS revealed his true identity, which can be found in the sites privacy policy page. http://Off Topic Forum.com/privacy.php Robert Schwarz, Sr. 1417 Brentwood PL Joliet, IL U.S.A 60435 Being called the names that he was, is an outright defamation of character. So it goes both ways. . . 1 Quote https://www.facebook.com/phreakwars
builder Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 It is a poll on who is the biggest dipshit. TH won hands down. Damn, I misread the intent, and voted for RO to stay. Sorry cobber. Too many beers, obviously. Quote Persevere, it pisses people off.
TommyGun1928 Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 But Phreak, what's the use of a democratic process if those voting are appointed, and they are, in fact, known to be assholes? Just because a few people vote doesn't mean it's a democracy. A democracy has to be representative of the entire population-- and under no circumstances are the voters to be appointed, especially because they are assholes. Quote
ImWithStupid Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 But Phreak, what's the use of a democratic process if those voting are appointed, and they are, in fact, known to be assholes? Just because a few people vote doesn't mean it's a democracy. A democracy has to be representative of the entire population-- and under no circumstances are the voters to be appointed, especially because they are assholes. Our system of government is actually a Democratic Republic. Are you happy now? Nitpicking asshat, anyway. Quote
TommyGun1928 Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Our system of government is actually a Democratic Republic. Are you happy now? Nitpicking asshat, anyway. I'm sorry, but that's just not a democracy. When someone appoints the voters, their the ones being represented. I don't care very much for that little label this so-called brand of "democracy" has, it doesn't make it any more democratic. Fuckin' facists... Quote
Chi Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 What is the question? If it is who is funny and sexy, than that would have to be RO;) Quote
TommyGun1928 Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 What is the question? If it is who is funny and sexy, than that would have to be RO;) I hope to God you're a chick. Otherwise, this site has reached its homoerotic limit. It's a vote concerning whom is to be banned permenantly from the site. Those who voted for TH either hated him or were kissing up to the mods' asses. Those who voted RO didn't know what the vote was for. Quote
Cogito Ergo Sum Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 I hope to God you're a chick. Otherwise, this site has reached its homoerotic limit. It's a vote concerning whom is to be banned permenantly from the site. Those who voted for TH either hated him or were kissing up to the mods' asses. Those who voted RO didn't know what the vote was for. Homophobic? You really are confused...The last thing we Mods want to happen is for people to start kissing our asses. Nothing could be further from the truth. You are getting more stupid. You need some more box time I can see... Quote . I put no stock in religion. By the word "religion" I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much "religion" in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. WE'VE SPENT HOW MUCH IN IRAQ? www.costofwar.com - http://icasualties.org/oif/ - http://iraqbodycount.net/
manicmonday Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 I hope to God you're a chick. Otherwise, this site has reached its homoerotic limit. Warning, derailing about to happen, overt your eyes So in your little world, a man couldn't find another man attractive without being gay? That's narrow minded of you. I'm perfectly fine with looking at another woman and finding her attractive without thinking about her sexually. And I know many men who able to do the same thing. Enjoy the box noobie, can't wait to for CES to throw a gay person in there with you and let you duke it out. Quote The dick has no conscience and the heart has no rational abilities.
phreakwars Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 I'm sorry, but that's just not a democracy. When someone appoints the voters, their the ones being represented. I don't care very much for that little label this so-called brand of "democracy" has, it doesn't make it any more democratic. Fuckin' facists... Why is it Democratic you ask ?? Simple... what if we were to allow ANYBODY to vote ?? Then ANYBODY could very easily create multiple screen names and cast multiple votes.. Even if names of voters are shown, the poll would be invalid. By giving the right of vote to ONLY Premium members, and keeping the polls in an area where only paying premiums can vote, it ensures a very fair vote. That's not to say that someone couldn't register another screen name, buy a premium, and vote again.. which is fine with me... $24 for 2 votes ?? Sure why not... But $0 for several votes... ahh hell no !!! Still don't think it is Democratic ?? Then I'll say this.. it is the Premium members that pay for the additional features of the board and the additional software licences, therefore, they are the supporting members of the board. Legacy members (the ones in blue) are next in line... these are members that have been here for quite a while before we changed to a premium member forum, and are given the ability to also have avatars, signatures and profile pics.. while they are not allowed to access premium features, they are rewarded with the other abilities because of their devotion. Then we have the regular members like YOU Tommy.. We allow regular members such as yourself full access to the forums, and not much more... why ??? Simple... members come and go... why would we waste our bandwidth on someone who does not support the site financially by giving them premium services for free ?? And since those people don't support the site, to us, they are nothing but pond scum and we really don't give a fuck about them either way.. That's not to say that we don't like them... people like Hamza, and dare I say cool_dude and a few other regular posters have paid their hazing dues already, and we pretty much leave them alone. However, if they want to participate in other aspects of the board like the aforementioned features, and the REP system, then they simply need to buy a supporting membership.. We won't prevent them from using this board, and they are not obligated in any way to buy one. But they are still subject to instant idiot boxing by MODS just because we are in the mood to do so.. It's just the way the hierarchy runs around here, and it works very well. . . 1 Quote https://www.facebook.com/phreakwars
Cogito Ergo Sum Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 The Phreak has spoken! That is all. Quote . I put no stock in religion. By the word "religion" I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much "religion" in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. WE'VE SPENT HOW MUCH IN IRAQ? www.costofwar.com - http://icasualties.org/oif/ - http://iraqbodycount.net/
snafu Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Warning, derailing about to happen, overt your eyes So in your little world, a man couldn't find another man attractive without being gay? That's narrow minded of you. I'm perfectly fine with looking at another woman and finding her attractive without thinking about her sexually. And I know many men who able to do the same thing. Enjoy the box noobie, can't wait to for CES to throw a gay person in there with you and let you duke it out. I'm sorry MM but I really can't look at a guy and think he's cute. Maybe it's just me and all the other guys are bullshiting but I don't think so. Men and women think different. Wait let me refrase that. I can look at a guy and say "wow that dude is butt ugly! How in the hell does he get laid!" But other than that, no we don't say "boy what a hunk! I'll bet he gets laid a lot!" Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
Cogito Ergo Sum Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Snafu...I think you are 180 degrees off. All Men have looked at another man and thought that he was very handsome, as a man and in his own right, and completely devoid of sexual attraction. For example, thinking that a particular film start is good looking - (personally, I thought Russell Crowe in Gladiator was a very good looking man and I wished I looked like that). Clearer? Quote . I put no stock in religion. By the word "religion" I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much "religion" in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. WE'VE SPENT HOW MUCH IN IRAQ? www.costofwar.com - http://icasualties.org/oif/ - http://iraqbodycount.net/
Chi Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 I hope to God you're a chick. Otherwise, this site has reached its homoerotic limit. It's a vote concerning whom is to be banned permenantly from the site. Those who voted for TH either hated him or were kissing up to the mods' asses. Those who voted RO didn't know what the vote was for. Yes, I'm a chick. About men acknowledging another man's attractiveness and not being gay. Most men tend to keep stuff like that to themselves as to not feel or be looked upon as queer. Some men don't care and see it as being secure enough in themselves. Women are more apt to admit and talk about another woman's good looks because it is taken differently and even if someone took it as in a sexual way, it is more accepted and even "hot" for women to be lez.... Quote
RoyalOrleans Posted July 14, 2006 Author Posted July 14, 2006 Let me go on record in saying that, CES is a sexy motherfucker. 1 Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
manicmonday Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Let me go on record in saying that, CES is a sexy motherfucker. I think all men who were in the military and keep their shapes are sexy motherfuckers. 1 Quote The dick has no conscience and the heart has no rational abilities.
skategreen Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 Has he been sending mail to everyone? Because I got one, too. He states that this site is a scam, but if you're willing to waste twelve bucks just to get shit from mods and put into the box no matter what.... you realise it really is. This debate forum is to get our frustrations out, and when I first came here a couple years ago, that's exactly what we did. And not a single asshole tried to shut anyone up. Bullshit. so....what happened to your original account and name? Witness protection program.... Banned for life..... dumbfuck who forgot who he was? Quote The thought manifests as the word. The word manifests as the deed. The deed develops into habit. And the habit hardens into character. So watch the thought and its ways with care. And let it spring from love, born out of concern for all beings. - Buddha
skategreen Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 I'm sorry MM but I really can't look at a guy and think he's cute. Maybe it's just me and all the other guys are bullshiting but I don't think so. Men and women think different. Wait let me refrase that. I can look at a guy and say "wow that dude is butt ugly! How in the hell does he get laid!" But other than that, no we don't say "boy what a hunk! I'll bet he gets laid a lot!" ohhh? so...how about a son? a grandson? .... have you no good looking male relatives? I'm betting..you DO admire the looks of other men ... you just don't need a drool bib. Quote The thought manifests as the word. The word manifests as the deed. The deed develops into habit. And the habit hardens into character. So watch the thought and its ways with care. And let it spring from love, born out of concern for all beings. - Buddha
skategreen Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 Snafu...I think you are 180 degrees off. All Men have looked at another man and thought that he was very handsome, as a man and in his own right, and completely devoid of sexual attraction. For example, thinking that a particular film start is good looking - (personally, I thought Russell Crowe in Gladiator was a very good looking man and I wished I looked like that). Clearer? for the life of me...I can't see what anyone would ever see in Russell Crowe. shrug Quote The thought manifests as the word. The word manifests as the deed. The deed develops into habit. And the habit hardens into character. So watch the thought and its ways with care. And let it spring from love, born out of concern for all beings. - Buddha
Cogito Ergo Sum Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 for the life of me...I can't see what anyone would ever see in Russell Crowe. shrug Me too, EXCEPT in that particular movie. He looked GOOD! Almost as good as me! Quote . I put no stock in religion. By the word "religion" I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much "religion" in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. WE'VE SPENT HOW MUCH IN IRAQ? www.costofwar.com - http://icasualties.org/oif/ - http://iraqbodycount.net/
phreakwars Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 so....what happened to your original account and name? Witness protection program.... Banned for life..... dumbfuck who forgot who he was?If he did have an account, it was probably the name " Pissedthehelloff " with a join date of: 03-16-2005 based on matching I.P.'s, in which case, that would make him a legacy member entitled to an avatar and profile pic and signature. . . Quote https://www.facebook.com/phreakwars
TommyGun1928 Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 I'm sorry MM but I really can't look at a guy and think he's cute. Maybe it's just me and all the other guys are bullshiting but I don't think so. Men and women think different. Wait let me refrase that. I can look at a guy and say "wow that dude is butt ugly! How in the hell does he get laid!" But other than that, no we don't say "boy what a hunk! I'll bet he gets laid a lot!" That's exactly what I was getting at. For chicks, it's obviously different. Some people say it's narrow-minded not to be ble to look at another man and say/imply that he's attractive, but narrow-minded or not, you know somebody's going to think you're queer. Quote
Cogito Ergo Sum Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 If he did have an account, it was probably the name " Pissedthehelloff " with a join date of: 03-16-2005 based on matching I.P.'s, in which case, that would make him a legacy member entitled to an avatar and profile pic and signature. . . When pigs fly! Quote . I put no stock in religion. By the word "religion" I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much "religion" in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. WE'VE SPENT HOW MUCH IN IRAQ? www.costofwar.com - http://icasualties.org/oif/ - http://iraqbodycount.net/
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.