Guest Patriot Games Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 "Sri Bodhi Prana" <bodhi@mail2bombay.com> wrote in message news:a5a7cc51-98f7-48ec-b56b-b6dee42d292f@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 19, 10:17 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote: >> Intelligent Design: Required by Biological Life? >> February 19, 2008 >> K.D. Kalinsky > Here is a more readable version. Where? > What a load of nonsense this paper is. It sounds like something meant > to fool amateurs into thinking it has scientific content. Yes... I was completely fooled by your POINT BY POINT REFUTATION.... bwahahahahahhahahahaha!!! Quote
Guest Sri Bodhi Prana Posted April 22, 2008 Posted April 22, 2008 On Apr 21, 2:28 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote: > "Sri Bodhi Prana" <bo...@mail2bombay.com> wrote in messagenews:a5a7cc51-98f7-48ec-b56b-b6dee42d292f@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > > > On Apr 19, 10:17 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote: > >> Intelligent Design: Required by Biological Life? > >> February 19, 2008 > >> K.D. Kalinsky > > Here is a more readable version. > > Where? My mistake: Intelligent Design: Required by Biological Life? http://www.arn.org/docs/ID--Required%20by%20Biological%20Life.pdf > > What a load of nonsense this paper is. It sounds like something meant > > to fool amateurs into thinking it has scientific content. > > Yes... I was completely fooled by your POINT BY POINT REFUTATION.... That would be a chore akin to grading high school philosophy papers. If you really are interested, then I would be glad to give you a couple of examples. One, just off the top of my head, is that the author does not understand Hagen's functional information formula. "Ex is the degree of function x"? That does not make any sense at all. Look at Hagen's original paper and compare what this author has to say and what Hagen says. Sri Bodhi Prana Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.