When you listen to Al Gore!!

[Guest Poetic Justice]

Phil Hays wrote:

> Talk-n-Dog wrote:

>

>> That's the Bush Doctrine, but he's Bi-Polar. Bush is a Liberal on

>> spending and a conservative on taxes, that combibation is like a MUTANT

>> REPUBLICRAT that will crush an economy with a single spending bill,

>> there is no spending he will VETO and no tax he will support.... These

>> Mutants are the most danger to the USA on the planet.

>>

>>

>> He grew up a REPUBLICAN and is fighting to be a Democrat, Bigger more

>> costly government schools and elderly prescriptions for free..... That

>> is the Democrat fighting his way to the surface. NO, Bush is no Reagan.

>

> Reagan presided over the largest federal government spending as a fraction

> of GDP since WW2.

>

> While he talked a good game, Reagan was no St. Reagan either.

>

> Bill Clinton, on the other hand, reduced federal government spending to

> the smallest fraction of GDP since 1974.

>

> What didn't you like again? Peace, prosperity, or smaller government?

 

Back to semantics....

 

 

Clinton cut Military(thanks to Reagan's peace dividend)

 

That one thing cut "government spending" and helped balance the Clinton

budget.

 

Peace? ...was the WTC being bombed and then attacking with cruise

missiles and attacking Saddam in Operation Desert Fox launched at 10

p.m. London time peace too....

[Guest ayatollah obama]

On Apr 21, 10:08

[Guest Window Licking]

Poetic Justice wrote:

> Phil Hays wrote:

>> Talk-n-Dog wrote:

>>

>>> That's the Bush Doctrine, but he's Bi-Polar. Bush is a Liberal on

>>> spending and a conservative on taxes, that combibation is like a MUTANT

>>> REPUBLICRAT that will crush an economy with a single spending bill,

>>> there is no spending he will VETO and no tax he will support.... These

>>> Mutants are the most danger to the USA on the planet.

>>>

>>>

>>> He grew up a REPUBLICAN and is fighting to be a Democrat, Bigger more

>>> costly government schools and elderly prescriptions for free..... That

>>> is the Democrat fighting his way to the surface. NO, Bush is no Reagan.

>>

>> Reagan presided over the largest federal government spending as a

>> fraction

>> of GDP since WW2.

>>

>> While he talked a good game, Reagan was no St. Reagan either.

>>

>> Bill Clinton, on the other hand, reduced federal government spending to

>> the smallest fraction of GDP since 1974.

>>

>> What didn't you like again? Peace, prosperity, or smaller government?

>

> Back to semantics....

>

>

> Clinton cut Military(thanks to Reagan's peace dividend)

>

> That one thing cut "government spending" and helped balance the Clinton

> budget.

>

> Peace? ...was the WTC being bombed and then attacking with cruise

> missiles and attacking Saddam in Operation Desert Fox launched at 10

> p.m. London time peace too....

 

Bush 41 had almost 500,000 troops to fight gulf war 1, and bush 43 can't

muster 200,000 to go into Iraq, where did the 300,000 or 60% of our

troops and their bases go?

 

Only Clinton was between the two wars.

[Guest Al Bedo]

Phil Hays wrote:

> Talk-n-Dog wrote:

>

>> That's the Bush Doctrine, but he's Bi-Polar. Bush is a Liberal on

>> spending and a conservative on taxes, that combibation is like a MUTANT

>> REPUBLICRAT that will crush an economy with a single spending bill,

>> there is no spending he will VETO and no tax he will support.... These

>> Mutants are the most danger to the USA on the planet.

>>

>>

>> He grew up a REPUBLICAN and is fighting to be a Democrat, Bigger more

>> costly government schools and elderly prescriptions for free..... That

>> is the Democrat fighting his way to the surface. NO, Bush is no Reagan.

>

> Reagan presided over the largest federal government spending as a fraction

> of GDP since WW2.

>

> While he talked a good game, Reagan was no St. Reagan either.

>

> Bill Clinton, on the other hand, reduced federal government spending to

> the smallest fraction of GDP since 1974.

 

BC had the benefit of presiding over divided government

which does ( at least did ) curtail spending/tax cuts.

 

Divided guv is probably the key.

> What didn't you like again? Peace, prosperity, or smaller government?

 

The peace and prosperity were illusory.

 

WTC 1, Khobar towers, African Embassies, USS Cole, millenial plot,

and the planning of 9/11.

 

- we were at war, but didn't know it.

 

Similarly, much of the deficit reduction was from capital gains tax

of the .com run up which let us down with .bomb

 

Pets.com anyone?

[Guest SgtMinor]

Bitter Buttock Obomber's terrorist friend William Ayers wrote:

> On Apr 21, 12:07 pm, Tunderbar <tdcom...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Apr 20, 7:35 pm, SgtMinor <Sa...@the.old.folks.home.invalid> wrote:

>>

>>> Harry F. Dope wrote:

>>>> Biofuels under attack as world food prices soar

>>>> Sun Apr 20, 5:36 AM ET

>>>> PARIS (AFP) - Hailed until only months ago as a silver bullet in the fight

>>>> against global warming, biofuels are now accused of snatching food out of

>>>> the mouths of the poor.

>>> Another straw man knocked down. Silver bullet, my ass.

>>> Any article that starts off with such a nonsensical premise cannot be

>>> taken seriously. There may have been some blithering idiots who argued

>>> that biofuels would be the answer, but anyone who has paid attention to

>>> this industry knows that there have been doubts about the concept from

>>> the beginning.

>> But it did not stop the enviro-nutbars from promoting the "green" bio-

>> fuel, did it?

>

> And now, the enviro-nazis created uber-high food prices. Will they

> ever face the guilt over the starving riots that they created?

>

 

Are you saying that people who promoted biofuels wanted food to be taken

from other people's mouths so that they could fill their gas tanks?

 

You don't not shit about biofuels, do you?

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

> 11 trillion dollars of Borrow and Spend RepubliKKKanism.

>

> AmeriKKKa is bankrupt morally, intellectually, and economically.

 

 

"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote

> Over 6 trillion wasted on the "war on poverty"

 

Aren't the poorest AmeriKKKans better off than the richest people in third

world countries? Isn't that the popular retort by KKKonsrevatives wishing

to downplay AmeriKKKan poverty?

 

So if AmeriKKKa's poor are so well off by KKKonservative reasoning, then

the war on poverty must have worked very well indeed.

 

 

"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote

>.According the the kook libs we have more people in poverty now than ever.

 

According to the KKKook KKKonservatives there is no poverty in AmeriKKKa.

 

 

"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote

> More trillions wasted on public education.

 

Ya, children don't need an education. And according to your Libertarian

Brothers, children should be on the streets pimping themselves. Especially

the little girls.

 

 

"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote

> Kids graduating from high school that can't read or do simple math.

 

Too busy dodging bullets.

 

Isn't that a first year course in AmeriKKKan high school? Bullet dodging

101?

 

How to marry a Crack whore 101 and 102 are the most instructive though.

 

AmeriKKKa is a toilet. Thanks for the remindere KKKonservative Nadds.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

> How many Billion in AmeriKKKan dollars did Bush fly secretly to Iraq on

> crates, only to have the money disappear on him? 20 billion? 30 billion.

>

> Ahahahahahaha... Complete incompetence.

 

 

"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote

> You have proof or was that from MOVEON.org??

 

We only have the eye witness accounts of the soldiers who flew it in,

moved it, and watched Iraqi officials drive off with the truckload after

truckload of fresh AmeriKKKan cash.

 

Of course that was before the AmeriKKKan dollar went into the toilet - As

I predicted months earlier.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"ayatollah obama" <osama.obabma.by.anyname@gmail.com> wrote

> Sometimes I am just f'n floored by how you DemonCraps think. Double

> price of fuel and the price of everthing else doubles, that's basic

> free market theory.

 

Well, well, back in the mid 1980's oil was $10 a barrel now it's 117. So

has the price of everything increased by a factor of 11.7 over that time

period?

 

Ahahahahahaahah........ KKKonservative MORONS.

[Guest Phil Hays]

Al Bedo wrote:

> BC had the benefit of presiding over divided government which does ( at

> least did ) curtail spending/tax cuts.

>

> Divided guv is probably the key.

 

Didn't seem to help Reagan much, now did it.

 

>> What didn't you like again? Peace, prosperity, or smaller government?

>

> The peace and prosperity were illusory.

>

> WTC 1, Khobar towers, African Embassies, USS Cole, millenial plot, and

> the planning of 9/11.

>

> - we were at war, but didn't know it.

 

Funny, you didn't mention Oklahoma city. Why not? Do homegrown nutcases

not count as much as foreign ones?

 

Do a few loose nuts make a war? If that is the case, we have always and

will always be "at war". Kiss your freedoms goodbye.

 

> Similarly, much of the deficit reduction was from capital gains tax of

> the .com run up which let us down with .bomb

 

Capital gains taxes as a percentage of income taxes was 11% under Reagan

in 1986 and 1987. Compare with 11% in 1999, and 12% in 2000. Income taxes

are about half of federal government revenue. So why again did Reagan run

up such huge deficits?

 

But hey, why not make wearing a flag on the suit lapel the key issue of

the day, and let the kids pay for it all.

 

With interest.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"ayatollah obama" <osama.obabma.by.anyname@gmail.com> wrote

> You have to cook stuff to make beer.... energy dumbass.

> You have to ship it.... energy dumbass

 

Energy is only one component of the cost in making a product. Other costs

include raw materials, labour, design, production losses, shipping losses,

retailing losses, etc.

 

Certainly energy is a big component of production costs, but it's not a 1

to 1 relationship, and for you to claim it is, shows your complete ignorance

of commerce.

 

But then you are a KKKonservative

 

MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNN

 

So your ignornace is expected.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Phil Hays" <invalid@dont.spam> wrote

> According to republicans, if there is a problem, cut taxes and throw money

> at it.

 

Oh come on now... It worked with Katrina didn't it?

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> That's the Bush Doctrine, but he's Bi-Polar. Bush is a Liberal on spending

> and a conservative on taxes,

 

And he was supported 100% by the RepubliKKKans in congress.

 

All of them must be Bi-Polar as well. And the same in the pervious Bush

administration, and in the Reagan administration as well, when Reagan's

borrow and spend policies started AmeriKKKa on the road to the Slaughter

House.

 

 

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> NO, Bush is no Reagan.

 

You are right. Your president is dumber than a man with Alzhimers.

 

So why did the KKKonservative KKKongress give him everthing he demanded?

 

Are they Dumber than shit too?

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Phil Hays" <invalid@dont.spam> wrote

> What didn't you like again? Peace, prosperity, or smaller government?

 

Well AmeriKKKa got all three with Clinton.

 

"But he got a blow job." the Jealous KKKonservatives whine.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> Clinton cut Military(thanks to Reagan's peace dividend)

 

No, KKKonservatives in KKKongress cut the military.

 

MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Window Licking" <Moron.With.A.Computer@Talk-n-Dog..com> wrote

> Bush 41 had almost 500,000 troops to fight gulf war 1, and bush 43 can't

> muster 200,000 to go into Iraq, where did the 300,000 or 60% of our troops

> and their bases go?

 

Apperntly they went gay.

[Guest Phil Hays]

Window Licking wrote:

> Bush 41 had almost 500,000 troops to fight gulf war 1, and bush 43 can't

> muster 200,000 to go into Iraq, where did the 300,000 or 60% of our

> troops and their bases go?

 

Gulf War 1 was a go kick ass then come home, war.

 

The quagmire in Iraq is a rotate in for a year, rotate out for a year. A

swamp.

 

Kicking ass and taking names, you can send almost the whole force.

 

Quagmires, half the force is at home, getting ready for the next lovely

dip in the glorious swamp.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote

> Worked for Kennedy and Reagan.Bush made the mistake of trying to be a

> "compassionate conservative" and get along with the kooks on the left

> by spending like a drunk sailor in a cathouse.

 

Just like his Father and Ronald Reagan before him.

 

Bush is following the Neo-KKKonservative handbook precisely.

 

The NeoKKKonservative goal is to bankrupt the U.S. government. To "Starve

the beast" they call it.

 

Bush said so himself...

 

"We must manufacture a [economic] crisis in order to assure that there is

no alternative to a smaller government." - Bush - Imprimus Magazine 1995.

[Guest SgtMinor]

HarryNadds wrote:

> On Apr 21, 5:49 am, "V-for-Vendicar"

> <Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:

>> <monkey_cartm...@yahoo.com> wrote

>>

>>> Democrats use taxes to pay for things, Republicans have always gotten

>>> a free ride by accusing the Democrats of.

>>> being the big tax spenders, while they sit back doing nothing very

>>> useful while demanding massive amounts our tax money to be pissed away

>>> in Iraq so they can feel like patriots.

>> How many Billion in AmeriKKKan dollars did Bush fly secretly to Iraq on

>> crates, only to have the money disappear on him? 20 billion? 30 billion.

>>

>> Ahahahahahaha... Complete incompetence.

>

> You have proof or was that from MOVEON.org??

 

 

Here's a quote:

" Money also disappeared in truckloads and by helicopter. The CPA

reportedly distributed funds to contractors in bags off the back of a

truck. In one notorious incident in April 2004, $1.5 billion in cash

that had just been delivered by three Blackhawk helicopters was handed

over to a courier in Erbil, in the Kurdish region, never to be seen

again. Afterwards, no one was able to recall the courier

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"SgtMinor" <Sarge@the.old.folks.home.invalid> wrote

> Corporations have taken over our government and are gorging themselves at

> the expense of the people.

 

Who cares? Dancing with the stars is just starting on channel 4.

 

Besides, All government is evil and all forms of deregulation are good.

That's what Rush tells me.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> If you open the door, there is no telling where it leads. The

> Constitution never intended that government give away money.

 

Actually it provided for taxation, and the providing of the general

welfare of the state.

 

 

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> I go after all welfare

 

You have been posting here for at least half a year and haven't said

anything about corporate welfare. But have whined about individuals

collecting welfare almost continually.

 

I conclude that you are therefore a liar.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> YES..."provide for the general welfare"

> Is just not broad enough, to be construed as the legal right to steal from

> citizens at gun point because you want to.

 

No one is stealing from you at gunpoint - except you Neighbourhood mugger

of course. AmeriKKKa is infested with those KKKonservative KKKretins.

 

The U.S. constitution provides for the collection of taxes.

 

It's a simple matter. Pay your taxes or get out.

 

If you don't want to pay them then leave. If you stay, you are in

violation of the constitutionally provided law, and you will go to jail, as

also provided in the U.S. constitution.

 

Not recognizing this makes you a ....

 

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN

 

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> yes I have a problem with the government "giving" money.

 

Odd that you have never complianed about the hundreds of billions being

given out in Iraq. In one instance - 30 billion in cash flown in on skids

and whisked out of sight by unmarked Iraqi trucks.

 

 

 

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> Taking money at gun point and giving it to the few, doesn't sound like it

> will "promote the general welfare" it sounds like forcing someone else to

> pay for their neighbor to live.

 

No one is stealing from you at gunpoint - except you Neighbourhood mugger

of course. AmeriKKKa is infested with those KKKonservative KKKretins..

 

The U.S. constitution provides for the collection of taxes.

 

It's a simple matter. Pay your taxes or get out.

 

If you don't want to pay them then leave. If you stay, you are in

violation of the constitutionally provided law, and you will go to jail, as

also provided in the U.S. constitution.

 

Not recognizing this makes you a ....

 

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> The commitment is to promote the general welfare of all persons, as

> opposed to protecting the interests of a narrow section or class of the

> population.

 

Corporations are persons. And like the wealthy, they are richer than you

so they are better than you and they are more valuable than you.

 

Compared to a Corporate person you are dirt.

 

And that's the basis of NeoKKKonservatism.

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjc@mindspring.com> wrote

> So tell us, how did liberals alone make billions for defense

> contractors? How did liberals make billions for oil companies? Seems

> like Poetic Baby has some problems with the facts.

 

I first encountered his kind back in the early 1980's. I found a group of

his clones calling for the murder of all government workers (any government

worker), in retribution for the theft of their life (their murder) through

taxation.

 

They were very happy indeed when Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murraih

Government building near Waco, and they called for more such acts in their

patirot "revolution" against the Fascist AmeriKKKan State.

 

I've done some follow up on these guys over the last 20 years, and 3 of

them have served prison time, One for murdering a police officer, another

for threatening to murder a police officer, and one for just for petty

crimes. One was accused of beating his wife - but as a Judge he managed to

pull some strings and had the charges against him dropped by the prosecutor.

 

They were all KKKonservative Losers of course, One boasted that he had

sued his various land lords various times and was about to proceed again

because his current one had failed to fix a light switch sufficiently fast

enough for him.

 

They referred to themselves as "Free thinkers" "Educated Conservatives",

"Freemen" and "Patriot Libertarians."

 

They received quite a lot of support from regular AmeriKKKan

KKKonservatives who would pop in and out of the group. Matt Giwer (well

known net K00K) figured prominentlym and another who's name I don't remember

who's Libertarian Idealism led him to believe that he had the right to

murder Law Enforcement Officers because they were agents of an Illegal

state.

 

25 years later and with AmeriKKKa now destroyed by their KKKonservative

poison, AmeriKKKan KKKonservatives continue to inject their poison.

 

So long AmeriKKKa... It was nice knowing you....

[Guest V-for-Vendicar]

"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote

> Liberals in congress spend the money

 

Through Virtually all of Bush's failed Presidency RepubliKKKans have

controlled the congress.

 

And failing to realize that makes you a.....

 

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN