Is this the stupidest comment you've ever seen?

[ImWithStupid]

No dumbass, he wrote, ''WHEN a person of colour is stupid, lazy, crimanal etc''. I'm talking about the use of the word ''WHEN'', as if he expects a person of colour to be ultimately, ''stupid, lazy ...''.

 

''A person IF colour'', HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

If you misunderstand things so much, maybe it was dangerous of your mother to let you out of the house. You'd just die of confusion

 

No. You obviously read more into the word "when" then you should have. I read it as being easily replaced with the word "whenever" or the phrase "on the occasion that"...

 

You are grasping and making assumptions that you can't back up. You are in essence saying you know what ToriAllen was thinking in her heart and mind when she typed that post.

 

That is nothing but small minded thinking. The same thing you continually preach about everyone else being when referring to Islam or Muslims.

 

This makes you no better.

 

p.s. Nice to see you have resorted to name calling. Shows your limited ability to converse, civilly.

[Hamza123]

p.s. Nice to see you have resorted to name calling. Shows your limited ability to converse, civilly.

 

IWS. The majority of the people who have debated with AIG and I have called us names like "pig-shit" before we have shown any verbal hostilities towards them. They continue to do so. It doesn't justify us doing so, but you know what, you only blame AIG for namecalling and not MRIH. Damn dude... If MRIH can do it, AIG should be able to do it three times more than him. We all know what kind of person MRIH is towards Muslims. Even others.

[ImWithStupid]

IWS. The majority of the people who have debated with AIG and I have called us names like "pig-shit" before we have shown any verbal hostilities towards them. They continue to do so. It doesn't justify us doing so, but you know what, you only blame AIG for namecalling and not MRIH. Damn dude... If MRIH can do it, AIG should be able to do it three times more than him. We all know what kind of person MRIH is towards Muslims. Even others.

 

MRIH, has never resorted to namecalling, when debating me. AIG has.

[Hamza123]

MRIH, has never resorted to namecalling, when debating me. AIG has.

 

MRIH hasn't because you're not Muslim. AIG has because you constantly pick on Muslims. It's funny because I actually believed you when you denied doing so.

 

 

Ill have a wad of PayPal cash sometime soon. I should be buying Premium on here soon. Here's my expected avatar unless I can make a new one.

 

.

 

I never thought Photoshop CS2 would come in handy on a debate forum...

[ImWithStupid]

MRIH hasn't because you're not Muslim. AIG has because you constantly pick on Muslims. It's funny because I actually believed you when you denied doing so.

 

I don't constantly pick on Muslims. I pick on stupid posts.

 

If you noticed I don't get into the whole blanket statements about Muslims and I also have stated in the past that all religions have extremist that succumb to violence in contrast to the teachings of their religion.

 

But to deny that Muslim extremist have been involved in much of the conflicts currently in the world would be just as absurd as Christians to deny the Crusades, the inquisition, or Salem witch-hunts of the past. The key here is the words "the past".

 

Most of Christianity of the word hasn't had a major outbreak of this type of extremism for over 200 years.

 

Perception is reality, and the perception of most of the word, as they see it today, is that Muslim extremist embrace violence.

 

That's just how it is.

[berniec]

It's like at the aerobics classes, they get the blokes up front, because everyone is bending down, and the blokes couldn't think straight if they were looking at all those lady's bums in front of them.

Geez Builder,i don't know what aerobic class you went to,but it dosen't sound like to much fun to me.

Getting back on track,how would you know what the gender of the backside was in front of you with the garb that religion wears.

And also AIG,THERE HAS NEVER BEEN AN AUSTRALIAN POPE EITHER,so whats your bloody point?

[ALLAH IS GREAT]

You are grasping and making assumptions that you can't back up. You are in essence saying you know what ToriAllen was thinking in her heart and mind when she typed that post.

 

How can you even comprehend what the post meant when you don't even know who actually posted it?!

Come on, I'm getting really worried about you.

Tomorrow, it's straight to the brain surgeon for you.

[ALLAH IS GREAT]

Geez ,Getting back on track,how would you know what the gender of the backside was in front of you with the garb that religion wears.

 

Obviously, I'm talking to someone who is used to seeing his women reveal all and never leave anything to the imagination. How on earth do those women call something no bigger than FLOSS, underwear?! Flippin' disgusting!

 

And also AIG,THERE HAS NEVER BEEN AN AUSTRALIAN POPE EITHER,so whats your bloody point?

 

My point lies in my posts. Read carefully, you'll know that I wasn't talking about country of origin.

[ALLAH IS GREAT]

MRIH, has never resorted to namecalling, when debating me. AIG has.

 

Oh I'm sorry pumpkin

[ImWithStupid]

How can you even comprehend what the post meant when you don't even know who actually posted it?!

Come on, I'm getting really worried about you.

Tomorrow, it's straight to the brain surgeon for you.

 

Sorry, I was going off memory. It was MRIH replying to Tori. My bad.

 

But when I read it I didn't think it was meant to assume that people of color are destined to be those things.

[ALLAH IS GREAT]

Sorry, I was going off memory. It was MRIH replying to Tori. My bad.

 

But when I read it I didn't think it was meant to assume that people of color are destined to be those things.

 

I don't know what your definition of ''when'' is but I believe it means that something is gonna definately occur or has occured already.

BTW, who made you the defence of MRIH? He didn't find your anus,did he?

[ImWithStupid]

I don't know what your definition of ''when'' is but I believe it means that something is gonna definately occur or has occured already.

BTW, who made you the defence of MRIH? He didn't find your anus,did he?

 

Thank you for proving my point. "When", as in, "When, in past situations", where people of color...

 

Not, When "in the future people of color have done whatever"...

 

That's both past and future tense and doesn't make any sense. Learn some basic grammer.

 

I'm not defending anyone. I am just saying that I didn't interpret that quote the same as you did.

 

And also as far as defending MRIH, it was you who pointed out that I was thinking Tori wrote it and both are capable of defending themselves.

[ALLAH IS GREAT]

That's both past and future tense and doesn't make any sense. Learn some basic grammer

 

Dipshit, that's what I wrote too. It could mean past and future, ''SOMETHING THAT WILL OCCUR OR HAS ALREADY OCCURED''.

However I doubt MRIH was talking about the past. He was talking about present day, cos how the hell would he have come to such a conclusion? He said I was one of them for God's sake. That removes the notion that he was talking about the past. I guess you're even dumb enough to believe anything, even if I said I could travel back to the past.

 

And also as far as defending MRIH, it was you who pointed out that I was thinking Tori wrote it and both are capable of defending themselves.

 

Yet it's only you who's doing all the talking for them.

''I can be your hero, baby''. Pushed Enrique right of the platform, eh stupid?

[berniec]

Obviously, I'm talking to someone who is used to seeing his women reveal all and never leave anything to the imagination. How on earth do those women call something no bigger than FLOSS, underwear?! Flippin' disgusting!

 

You have got to be bloody joking AIG. Leave to the imagination.

Under that gear! It could be qusimoto,alian,or even Pres.Bush. Ughh.

No thanks,i'll stay with the floss, at least i'll know what i'm getting.

[ImWithStupid]

Dipshit, that's what I wrote too. It could mean past and future, ''SOMETHING THAT WILL OCCUR OR HAS ALREADY OCCURED''.

However I doubt MRIH was talking about the past. He was talking about present day, cos how the hell would he have come to such a conclusion? He said I was one of them for God's sake. That removes the notion that he was talking about the past. I guess you're even dumb enough to believe anything, even if I said I could travel back to the past.

 

 

 

Yet it's only you who's doing all the talking for them.

''I can be your hero, baby''. Pushed Enrique right of the platform, eh stupid?

 

Double dipshit. My point is that when speaking you can't refer to the same incident happening in both the past and present at the same time. I'm talking grammer here, not history. Moron.

[ToriAllen]

Finally! You caught on. Sorry to cut through your emotional rant, but I was only joking about the back of the church thing. And if I recall correctly, I never mentioned anything about you practicing anything. No motive at all. Just didn't think you would make a big deal out of this.

I didn