RegisteredAndEducated Posted February 7, 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 Well, appears we agree on this point TJ... welcome to Liberal party... They actually get in the way of smaller groups of individuals establishing their towns and communities as they fit... Like I said many times, they are their own worst enemy and will lose it by their own hand in time. I don't think I get what you're saying. Social security and other socialist programs are the basis for the "Liberal" party... I wonder if I misunderstood what you said, or you typed it wrong, or you misunderstood what he said... Did you mean, this is why the liberals are wrong? or... Intelligent people think... how ignorance must be bliss.... idiots have it so easy, it's not fair... to have to think... WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE TO BE AMONG THOSE FORTUNATE MASSES..... Hey, "Non-believers" I've just got one thing to say to ya... If you're right, then what difference does it make, it wont matter when we're dead anyway... But if I'm right... Well, hey... Ya better be right...
Old Salt Posted February 7, 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 Well, appears we agree on this point TJ... welcome to Liberal party... They actually get in the way of smaller groups of individuals establishing their towns and communities as they fit... Like I said many times, they are their own worst enemy and will lose it by their own hand in time.Are you sure you don't mean Libertarian Party, Wez?
timesjoke Posted February 7, 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 Are you sure you don't mean Libertarian Party, Wez? I don't think he ever knows what he is saying. It is the liberals that are wanting "more" sociel programs, they even held up the plan for giving out free money (I hate the idea) to add "more" free money the conservatives did not want.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 I don't think I get what you're saying. Social security and other socialist programs are the basis for the "Liberal" party... I wonder if I misunderstood what you said, or you typed it wrong, or you misunderstood what he said... Did you mean, this is why the liberals are wrong? or... Perhaps you were wrong to label me a liberal then, eh? Seems "conservatives" think printing and dropping more welfare checks out of the sky is the answer.. Who's the "liberals"? I don't think the federal government should be in the business of retirement accounts, wealth distribution, asswiping, stock market manipulation, real estate manipulation, slavery, drug control, oversight of the NFL, MLB, the list goes on... etc... I think I know what TJ said and I think I know what I said... Liberal = conservative = jack sh t. Let's see, you hate Clinton, who oversaw the country and paid off Reagan/Bush Sr.s debt and had us in the black... You love Bush, the Conservative liberal who wracked up the biggest debt our countries ever seen and continues to do so, squarely putting the burden on young morons such as yourself and their future children as baby boomers retire and all the once decent wage jobs get moved offshore to communist China and India? Enjoy.... Oh yeah.. the crappy jobs that are left, you get to compete for with illegal immigrants that we "need" to do the jobs Americans "wont" do because unlike the illegals, greedy Americans want health care and don't much like the idea of living in a home with 4 other families and 12 incomes to make the payments and eat...
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 I don't think he ever knows what he is saying. It is the liberals that are wanting "more" sociel programs, they even held up the plan for giving out free money (I hate the idea) to add "more" free money the conservatives did not want. I think you label me a liberal... I think you be wrong.. I think you're the liberal. You seem to think not only everyone in this country, but everyone in the world should be just like you, or else. So Bush is a liberal? What are his economic stimulus packages? Adding more "free" money? Perhaps you don't know what the hell you're talking about... Bush expected to approve stimulus plan - Stocks & economy - MSNBC.com Fed's Fisher adds to warnings on inflation | Reuters
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Call me what you will, maybe you'll believe someone with a bit more clout.. Warren Buffett says U.S. dollar 'worthless' if account deficit persists - MarketWatch He didn't mean "worthless".. but worth less... as in, no longer the standard everyone aspires to be.. woe is us. That's what we get for competing with slaves... Here was some guys response on the Buffet article.. sad. To get an idea of the impact of the weakening dollar on investors, consider this: one of the best investments over the past year was simply to open a non-interest bearing checking account in Canada! If you had or could have open an account on 12/31/2006, leave it alone for a year and then write yourself a check on 12/31/2007 you would have discovered that it would have bought 22% more dollars. Why? The Loonie (the Canadian dollar) rose 22% against the U.S. dollar. Now you understand why Canadians are on shopping sprees in America! Many currencies have risen double-digits this past year. Do a keyword search of "Donoghue" in the next week and you will soon see my column explaining this opportunity in greater detail. Another good quote in the responses.. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation then by deflation, the banks and the corporations will grow up around them, will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. o Thomas Jefferson, The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 I think you label me a liberal... I think you be wrong.. I think you're the liberal. You seem to think not only everyone in this country, but everyone in the world should be just like you, or else. No, I know your a liberal, there is a big difference. Only immature liberals resort to childish name calling and refusal to admit even the most basic reality that does not conform to your forced social programs. So Bush is a liberal? What are his economic stimulus packages? Adding more "free" money? There you go again with your childish personal attacks. Why is it your incapable of an adult conversation without either proving your as stupid as a box of rocks or attacking anyone that does not agree with you? No, I do not like the "stimulus" package, it is just a waste of money the same tax payers will pay back in inflation, but I really don't like the fact the Liberals held up the package trying to force even more billions of added extra "free" money to certain groups like paying extra unemployment money, adding more handouts on top of the already bad handouts was a purely liberal idea. Perhaps you don't know what the hell you're talking about... No, that would be you, if you had any idea what your talking about you would not be relying on personal attacks and posting other men's opinions instead of talking off the top of your head the way I always do. You see, I educate myself on the topics being discussed, I don't have to copy/paste what others write. Look, your just not smart enough to discuss anything with me, as evidence I offer your not even capable of making a simple post without several edits, try hitting the "preview post" tab to the right of the submit reply tab before you hit the submit tab. If you take some time to preview your posts, you won't need to keep editing them.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 No, I know your a liberal, there is a big difference. Only immature liberals resort to childish name calling and refusal to admit even the most basic reality that does not conform to your forced social programs. There you go again with your childish personal attacks. Why is it your incapable of an adult conversation without either proving your as stupid as a box of rocks or attacking anyone that does not agree with you? No, I do not like the "stimulus" package, it is just a waste of money the same tax payers will pay back in inflation, but I really don't like the fact the Liberals held up the package trying to force even more billions of added extra "free" money to certain groups like paying extra unemployment money, adding more handouts on top of the already bad handouts was a purely liberal idea. No, that would be you, if you had any idea what your talking about you would not be relying on personal attacks and posting other men's opinions instead of talking off the top of your head the way I always do. You see, I educate myself on the topics being discussed, I don't have to copy/paste what others write. Look, your just not smart enough to discuss anything with me, as evidence I offer your not even capable of making a simple post without several edits, try hitting the "preview post" tab to the right of the submit reply tab before you hit the submit tab. If you take some time to preview your posts, you won't need to keep editing them. Hahahahahahaha... what personal attacks would those be? I ask you if Bush is a liberal for his welfare check helicopter drop and you think I'm personally attacking you? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.... Insanity is funny... BTW TJ... I'm not you. Hahahahahahahahaha In addition.. you are an immature, personally attacking, english deficient, stupid box of rocks who is incapable of having an intelligent conversation with me... Hahahahahahahahaha Tj is a hypocrite. Did you sell your brain on e bay for $9.95? I thought they quit listing defective body parts? originally posted by a dumbass who cries victim at every turn I don't think he ever knows what he is saying. Was that a personal attack TJ? Course not... you're you.. Hahahahahahahahahaha
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Hahahahahahaha... what personal attacks would those be? I ask you if Bush is a liberal for his welfare check helicopter drop and you think I'm personally attacking you? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.... Insanity is funny... BTW TJ... I'm not you. Hahahahahahahahaha In addition.. you are an immature, personally attacking, english deficient, stupid box of rocks who is incapable of having an intelligent conversation with me... Hahahahahahahahaha Tj is a hypocrite. Did you sell your brain on e bay for $9.95? I thought they quit listing defective body parts? Was that a personal attack TJ? Course not... you're you.. Hahahahahahahahahaha Okay, if you must return to 5 year old crap to dirty up the forums so be it....... I know you are but what am I?
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Okay, if you must return to 5 year old crap to dirty up the forums so be it....... I know you are but what am I? Someone who educates themselves on topics being discussed and speaks off the top of their head without having to cut and paste what other men say who has great tolerance, patience, and understanding for those he disagrees with and blames the Liberal Bush, welfare check printing helicopter drop on "Liberals"?
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Someone who educates themselves on topics being discussed and speaks off the top of their head without having to cut and paste what other men say who has great tolerance, patience, and understanding for those he disagrees with I know I am, too bad your not. and blames the Liberal Bush, welfare check printing helicopter drop on "Liberals"? The world is not black and white, it is shades of grays. Yes, I agree that the action to cut undeserved checks to the people is a very stupid idea, and yes that would make it be liberal leaning, but that does not make him a liberal. That combined with his amnesty bill support last year started making me wonder about Bush to be honest, but many of his other stands are clearly conservative such as refusing to surrender in Iraq. Only a conservative can stand against heavy pressure and still do the right thing. Your problem is you cannot have good possitions of your own so you must turn to personal attacks and game playing. Bush is not a liberal but you try to call him a liberal to elevate liberals, nice try but no cigar (Monica gets the cigar). Liberals are the true social engineers, they believe government can manage the lives of everyone.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 I know I am, too bad your not. The world is not black and white, it is shades of grays. Yes, I agree that the action to cut undeserved checks to the people is a very stupid idea, and yes that would make it be liberal leaning, but that does not make him a liberal. That combined with his amnesty bill support last year started making me wonder about Bush to be honest, but many of his other stands are clearly conservative such as refusing to surrender in Iraq. Only a conservative can stand against heavy pressure and still do the right thing. Your problem is you cannot have good possitions of your own so you must turn to personal attacks and game playing. Bush is not a liberal but you try to call him a liberal to elevate liberals, nice try but no cigar (Monica gets the cigar). Liberals are the true social engineers, they believe government can manage the lives of everyone. Actually, you call me a liberal as you try to manage the lives of everyone. How does that work? Isn't yourself and Bush liberals for wanting to manage the lives of Iraqi's?
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Actually, you call me a liberal as you try to manage the lives of everyone. How does that work? That is you not me, your the one always attacking people who do not do as you want them to do and play 5 year old games. You have never dissagreed with anyone here without turning to personal attacks Wez. You cannot stand for anyone to disagree with you, that is why you start things like the debating skils threads and such to attack and put down everyone who does not conform to what you believe they should conform to. Hell, your still crying about stuff that happened between you and other people at other forums. To you, the only valid opinion is your opinion. I have said many times that some of what you say is good but you wrap your good points in soo much rediclious garbage that you ruin your good points. It is like wrapping a tasty cherry with dog crap, you cannot give the cherry a chance because you must first get past the taste of the dog crap. If you could learn to stop wrapping your ideas in the dog crap, you would be a great addition to any forum, but sadly I don't believe your capable of dropping the crap. I guess all we can do is wait and see.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 That is you not me, your the one always attacking people who do not do as you want them to do and play 5 year old games. You have never dissagreed with anyone here without turning to personal attacks Wez. You cannot stand for anyone to disagree with you, that is why you start things like the debating skils threads and such to attack and put down everyone who does not conform to what you believe they should conform to. Hell, your still crying about stuff that happened between you and other people at other forums. To you, the only valid opinion is your opinion. I have said many times that some of what you say is good but you wrap your good points in soo much rediclious garbage that you ruin your good points. It is like wrapping a tasty cherry with dog crap, you cannot give the cherry a chance because you must first get past the taste of the dog crap. If you could learn to stop wrapping your ideas in the dog crap, you would be a great addition to any forum, but sadly I don't believe your capable of dropping the crap. I guess all we can do is wait and see. Hahahahahaha... Dog crap = what TJ doesn't agree with? Hmmmmmmmmmm You cannot stand for anyone to disagree with you, that is why you start things like the debating skils threads and such to attack and put down everyone who does not conform to what you believe they should conform to. Brotherman started the debating skillz threads, dumbass.
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Hahahahahaha... Dog crap = what TJ doesn't agree with? Hmmmmmmmmmm No, the dog crap is these childish attack posts you make and how you take everything to rediclious levels. Like calling all soldiers mindless murderers. Brotherman started the debating skillz threads, dumbass. More personal attacks I see. You need to go back and look, your the thread starter in all three debating skills threads attacking me, eddo, and brotherman. Everything with you is deflection to avoid taking responsibility for the trouble you make. Instead of facing the issue being brought up about your hostile debating methods, you decided the best way to deflect attention away from your problems was to attack other people. to try and get the discussion away from your problems so you did not have to face them. Your also the only guy keeping the attacks going while everyone else has stopped being concerned with them.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 No, the dog crap is these childish attack posts you make and how you take everything to rediclious levels. Like calling all soldiers mindless murderers. More personal attacks I see. You need to go back and look, your the thread starter in all three debating skills threads attacking me, eddo, and brotherman. Everything with you is deflection to avoid taking responsibility for the trouble you make. Instead of facing the issue being brought up about your hostile debating methods, you decided the best way to deflect attention away from your problems was to attack other people. to try and get the discussion away from your problems so you did not have to face them. Your also the only guy keeping the attacks going while everyone else has stopped being concerned with them. Hahahahahahaha.. I think they are a riot... There was four debate skillz threads... look at the dates and the comments in each and then ask yourself why you and eddo and brotherman got one of your own.. Still stuck on the soldier thing eh? Were Saddams soldiers mindless murderers?
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Hahahahahahaha.. I think they are a riot... There was four debate skillz threads... look at the dates and the comments in each and then ask yourself why you and eddo and brotherman got one of your own.. Out of 4, you created 3, so clearly your the problem. You made the ones against me, eddo, and brotherman to deflect your problems on us so you did not hacve to face them, you have never been able to do more then attack people who you cannot browbeat. Still stuck on the soldier thing eh? That was the first time I noticed your childish tactics, why would I forget it. Sure there are hundreds of examples of how you surround good points with dog crap making it impossible to take you seriously, but why worry about all the mess when the first mess is the best example of your true nature. Were Saddams soldiers mindless murderers? No.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Out of 4, you created 3, so clearly your the problem. Really? Interesting... You made the ones against me, eddo, and brotherman to deflect your problems on us so you did not hacve to face them, you have never been able to do more then attack people who you cannot browbeat. 1 against 3 trying to deflect their problems of browbeating and attacking people who think it's ok for them then cry victim when they get what they give? Hahahahaha.. Look in the mirror already TJ.. That was the first time I noticed your childish tactics, why would I forget it. Sure there are hundreds of examples of how you surround good points with dog crap making it impossible to take you seriously, but why worry about all the mess when the first mess is the best example of your true nature. Actually, that's when you noticed your childish tactics and claimed I was you and wanted to punish me for it. No. What were they, hero's?
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Really? Interesting... Not really interesting, but clearly when your responsible for 75% of the negative threads in this reguard, your proving yourself to be pure instigator. 1 against 3 trying to deflect their problems of browbeating and attacking people who think it's ok for them then cry victim when they get what they give? Hahahahaha.. Look in the mirror already TJ.. You started the threads, not us, so clearly your the one trying to deflect onto us. Your always playing a victim of people teaming up on you but the reason so many agree your an idiot is because you are an idiot, no mater how much you try to make us you. You can't make us you, no matter how hard tyou try you cannot make us into the bully you are. Actually, that's when you noticed your childish tactics and claimed I was you and wanted to punish me for it. Why would anyone want to be you Wez? Nobody want to be you, not even you. That is why you cannot admit to your problems, because you would need to look in the mirror closely, and that is a task nobody wants. I don't want to punnish you Wez, I just want you to either stop with the personal attacks and other 5 year old childish tactics, or just go back to blocking me, leaving me alone. What were they, hero's? No, soldiers.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Not really interesting, but clearly when your responsible for 75% of the negative threads in this reguard, your proving yourself to be pure instigator. Sound logic... in Hades.. You started the threads, not us, so clearly your the one trying to deflect onto us. The first thread, the debate over wez's debate Skillz.. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa wez never made any grand statements about his debate skillz.. So clearly people who hate themselves are what they hate and that is why they hate it. Your always playing a victim of people teaming up on you but the reason so many agree your an idiot is because you are an idiot, no mater how much you try to make us you. I don't care how many people agree with anything, I aint no ones victim, nor am I you... You can't make us you, no matter how hard tyou try you cannot make us into the bully you are. Hahahahahaha... Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I'm a victim of wez's bullying. My bully tactic don't work on him. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Why would anyone want to be you Wez? I've always wondered that myself.. Nobody want to be you, not even you. That is why you cannot admit to your problems, because you would need to look in the mirror closely, and that is a task nobody wants. Why wouldn't anyone want to know who they are? Perhaps because the inside is so ugly it spills to the outside without them even knowing it. I don't want to punnish you Wez, I just want you to either stop with the personal attacks and other 5 year old childish tactics, or just go back to blocking me, leaving me alone. Ignore me... or try new tactics other than personal attacks and hypocrisy.. No, soldiers. Were the SS men mindless murderers?
timesjoke Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Sound logic... in Hades.. You should know, that is where your going. The first thread, the debate over wez's debate Skillz.. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa And instead of facing the observations made about your trend to attack everyone, you decided the best way to deflect attention away from you was to attack three other people, in fact, I never commneted in the Wez thread until you attacked me "first". wez never made any grand statements about his debate skillz.. So clearly people who hate themselves are what they hate and that is why they hate it. And being as you hate yourself so much you cannot even face the reality of what you are, your exactly what you claim everyone else ot be. I don't care how many people agree with anything, I aint no ones victim, nor am I you... You can't be, I am much smarter, better looking, and do not blame the government for anything in my own life. Hahahahahaha... Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I'm a victim of wez's bullying. My bully tactic don't work on him. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa You are a bully Wez, and your only reaction to it being pointed out is to do it some more. I've always wondered that myself.. No a revelation to be honest, I can tell with your every post that even you hate you. Why wouldn't anyone want to know who they are? Perhaps because the inside is so ugly it spills to the outside without them even knowing it. Like with you, a great example, your uglyness is spilling out all over the forum, how about doing something about that. Ignore me... or try new tactics other than personal attacks and hypocrisy.. Your the hypocrite wez, you even murdered your own child, do you think killing an innocent life was something Jesus supported? It is you who needs new tactics Wez, everyone sees you for the narrow minded idiot you truly are. Were the SS men mindless murderers? No. Look Wez, your problem is you believe anyone in a group of any kind is somehow controled by the group, or maybe the uniform is controlling them, that is why I laugh at you so much. Each man is responsible for their own actions. The concept of a soldier is not evil or good on it's own, there are many other factors. Your stuck on labeling all soldiers as evil and refuse to accept reality so your blinded.
ImWithStupid Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Not an attack on you but There you go again with your childish personal attacks. Why is it your incapable of an adult conversation without either proving your as stupid as a box of rocks or attacking anyone that does not agree with you? No, I do not like the "stimulus" package, it is just a waste of money the same tax payers will pay back in inflation, but I really don't like the fact the Liberals held up the package trying to force even more billions of added extra "free" money to certain groups like paying extra unemployment money, adding more handouts on top of the already bad handouts was a purely liberal idea. I didn't see anyones possition attacked in the comment you quoted other then Bush being called a liberal for giving away money. I agree. There is money going to people in the form of "tax refunds" and "rebates" that exceeds what they paid in for taxes. That is neither a refund or a rebate. Lets call a spade a spade. It's either a handout at that point or welfare. That's liberal crap and being pushed by an alleged conservative President. Ergo Bush is acting as a liberal. No, that would be you, if you had any idea what your talking about you would not be relying on personal attacks and posting other men's opinions instead of talking off the top of your head the way I always do. You see, I educate myself on the topics being discussed, I don't have to copy/paste what others write. So are are we not supposed to include quotes from other people to support our point any more? If so the entire thread on No Food For Fat People needs to be erased. That's all is on that thread. Look, your just not smart enough to discuss anything with me, as evidence I offer your not even capable of making a simple post without several edits, try hitting the "preview post" tab to the right of the submit reply tab before you hit the submit tab. If you take some time to preview your posts, you won't need to keep editing them. Glad to see you are above personal attacks. As far as editing you post unless you go back and completely change it to refute someones reply, I would much rather someone go in and edit their own spelling or whatever mistakes themselves then times when I have had to do it (and have done so for several members) to make sure the message is brought across as it was intended and some noob with an empty arsonal (and a few forum veterans) begin the whole spelling and grammar police crap. The childish crap has to stop or this thread will dissappear, just like Abortion Smoothie. Before anyone blames anyone, we all know it often starts with Wez (you know it's true and we had an agreement) but this time it wasn't him. We should not have welfare, we should not have any federal social program of any kind, not even social security. Here is where wez jumped in on the tread before it got out of hand. Well, appears we agree on this point TJ... welcome to Liberal party... They actually get in the way of smaller groups of individuals establishing their towns and communities as they fit... Like I said many times, they are their own worst enemy and will lose it by their own hand in time. He appeared to be agreeing with you about decreasing Federal social programs. Even Brotherman was civil enough to ask about the interpretation. I don't think I get what you're saying. Social security and other socialist programs are the basis for the "Liberal" party... I wonder if I misunderstood what you said, or you typed it wrong, or you misunderstood what he said... Did you mean, this is why the liberals are wrong? or... I may be wrong and Old Salt may be wrong but I assumed he meant the Libertarian party. Then you decided to take the low road this time, and I know you usually don't but you did with this response to Brotherman and talking about wez. I don't think he ever knows what he is saying. It is the liberals that are wanting "more" sociel programs, they even held up the plan for giving out free money (I hate the idea) to add "more" free money the conservatives did not want.. It seems everyone needs to take a step back and regroup to a civil debate. (Pardon my quoting of others if that bothers you but I probably will still quote others on this board and politcal and public figures from time to time. I would also like to appologize for my lack of proofreading. I'm at work and in a hurry)
eddo Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 actually IWS, wez did mean "Liberal party", not Libertarian, and it was most definitely meant as a slam on TJ. You have to understand the mind of wez and how it works: His goal with most of his replies is to point out the hypocrisy of someone else (he has said this himself many times,) and him calling TJ a "liberal" was an attempt at showing the hypocrisy of TJ calling wez a liberal in another thread. Wez was baiting, plain and simple. I'm trusted by more women.
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 You should know, that is where your going. I know, me and Shiek are going to be shackled together sniffing sulpher.. And instead of facing the observations made about your trend to attack everyone, you decided the best way to deflect attention away from you was to attack three other people, in fact, I never commneted in the Wez thread until you attacked me "first". Take another look.. And being as you hate yourself so much you cannot even face the reality of what you are, your exactly what you claim everyone else ot be. Role reversal? You can't be, I am much smarter, better looking, and do not blame the government for anything in my own life. I know, you blame your ex wife.. You are a bully Wez, and your only reaction to it being pointed out is to do it some more. Would the ex call you a bully? No a revelation to be honest, I can tell with your every post that even you hate you. Role reversal? Like with you, a great example, your uglyness is spilling out all over the forum, how about doing something about that. What do you think I'm doing? Your the hypocrite wez, you even murdered your own child, do you think killing an innocent life was something Jesus supported? It is you who needs new tactics Wez, everyone sees you for the narrow minded idiot you truly are. You do have authority to speak for? No. Look Wez, your problem is you believe anyone in a group of any kind is somehow controled by the group, or maybe the uniform is controlling them, that is why I laugh at you so much. Each man is responsible for their own actions. The concept of a soldier is not evil or good on it's own, there are many other factors. Your stuck on labeling all soldiers as evil and refuse to accept reality so your blinded. Lot's of f cked up individuals in Nazi Germany, eh? Each making their own decisions as individuals? How can one run an army of independent thought so efficiently as an organization of mayhem? Mind control?
wez Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 actually IWS, wez did mean "Liberal party", not Libertarian, and it was most definitely meant as a slam on TJ. You have to understand the mind of wez and how it works: His goal with most of his replies is to point out the hypocrisy of someone else (he has said this himself many times,) and him calling TJ a "liberal" was an attempt at showing the hypocrisy of TJ calling wez a liberal in another thread. Wez was baiting, plain and simple. Here's your chance eddo.. one would think you'd give up after so many miserable failures.. The point is, showing TJ he is what he claims I am is a slam and bait to TJ? Don't like TJ's hypocrisy pointed out, eddo? How odd..
Recommended Posts