ImWithStupid Posted February 11, 2008 Author Posted February 11, 2008 TJ is accusing you of a double standard of you doing what he actually desires which is he obviously feels it's ok to take shots at people but not ok when it comes back to him.. and if this was his forum, he'd ban you to prove it.. = hypocrisy. I hardly think he'd have a shred of the patience you've shown him.. and he's blind to it. I think at this point it's pretty safe to say that I can not answer this, or address this, due to strong personal feelings on past events, here, real or percieved. Like I have said many times, perception is subjective, and a persons perception is their reality. This applies to myself. Quote
wez Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 I think at this point it's pretty safe to say that I can not answer this, or address this, due to strong personal feelings on past events, here, real or percieved. Like I have said many times, perception is subjective, and a persons perception is their reality. This applies to myself. Totally understand... Quote
ImWithStupid Posted February 11, 2008 Author Posted February 11, 2008 Totally understand... Especially since the question has to do with me and in this thread, I am obviously taking the role of moderator, not just participating in a thread topic. Quote
timesjoke Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 TJ is accusing you of a double standard of you doing what he actually desires which is he obviously feels it's ok to take shots at people but not ok when it comes back to him.. and if this was his forum, he'd ban you to prove it.. = hypocrisy. I hardly think he'd have a shred of the patience you've shown him.. and he's blind to it. This is not what I said at all but I expect some to ignore the point I was making. All I was saying is right after posting a new rule making personal attacks against forum rules, the poster of that rule made a blanket attack on all Democrats. I was trying to provide a way to show how there are different kinds of personal attacks, some that are not harmful to discussions and some that are harmful to open discussions. Quote
eddo Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 All I was saying is right after posting a new rule making personal attacks against forum rules, the poster of that rule made a blanket attack on all Democrats. Everybody hates generalizations!!! Quote I'm trusted by more women.
ImWithStupid Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 Everybody hates generalizations!!! I always tell my kids not to use the word hate. Hate breeds hate and is wasted emotion and energy. JK Quote
ImWithStupid Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 All I was saying is right after posting a new rule making personal attacks against forum rules, the poster of that rule made a blanket attack on all Democrats. I was trying to provide a way to show how there are different kinds of personal attacks, some that are not harmful to discussions and some that are harmful to open discussions. So it, truly and honestly, wasn't at all a backhanded attack at me, personally? Quote
timesjoke Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 So it, truly and honestly, wasn't at all a backhanded attack at me, personally? Heck no, in fact I made sure to say a couple times that I felt your comment saying Democrats are socialists was on topic (and very accurate I might add). The forum will not suffer harm by honest on topic comments like this even if it can be seen as a kind of attack. The attacks that are harmful are the ones designed to directly attack the person and are off topic. Quote
ImWithStupid Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 Heck no, in fact I made sure to say a couple times that I felt your comment saying Democrats are socialists was on topic (and very accurate I might add). The forum will not suffer harm by honest on topic comments like this even if it can be seen as a kind of attack. The attacks that are harmful are the ones designed to directly attack the person and are off topic. Ok, I just thought it might have been. Thanks for the explanation/clarification. Quote
wez Posted April 13, 2008 Posted April 13, 2008 Last edited by ImWithStupid : Today at 07:35 PM. Reason: Edited due to new rules posted by site Administration. What's the new rules? Didn't see anything changed.. Quote
ImWithStupid Posted April 13, 2008 Author Posted April 13, 2008 Update: Also see this... Off Topic Forum - The Ultimate Chat and Debate Forum - FAQ: Community Guidelines I added the link to Cloaked's rules, hence the word, "update". Quote
wez Posted April 13, 2008 Posted April 13, 2008 I added the link to Cloaked's rules, hence the word, "update". Hahaha.. I see I saw psychofreak or whatever his name is and thought I missed some action. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.