hugo Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 So much for 'settled science' Lorne Gunter, National Post Published: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 According to the U. S. National Climatic Data Center, the average temperature of the global land surface in January 2008 was below the 20th-Century mean for the first time since 1982. Also in January, Southern Hemisphere sea ice coverage was at its greatest summer level (January is summer in the Southern Hemisphere) in the past 30 years. Neither the 3,000 temperature buoys that float throughout the world's oceans nor the eight NASA satellites that float above our atmosphere have recorded appreciable warming in the past six to eight years. Even Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the IPCC, reluctantly admitted to Reuters in January that there has been no warming so far in the 21st Century. Complete article http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=f6fa4aca-61b4-4824-adb4-78eb8fa9081a&p=2 Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
snafu Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 So how come they want to put the Polar Bear on the endangered spices list do to receding ice? I mean somethings going on. Polar Bears Being Considered for U.S. Endangered List As well as the Glaciers and permarfrost. Glaciers and Glacial Warming Globally I remember as a kid I walked on Portage Glacier. Now you need binoculars to see it. Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
hugo Posted May 21, 2008 Author Posted May 21, 2008 I remember as a kid I walked on Portage Glacier. Now you need binoculars to see it. Probably caused by too many kids walking on it. Another theory The Portage Glacier, in south-central Alaska, is viewed by thousands of visitors annually who come to the U.S. Forest Service Begich, Boggs Visitor Center located on the road system between Anchorage and Whittier, Alaska. During the past century, the terminus of the glacier has retreated nearly 5 kilometers to its present location (fig. 1). Like other glaciers that terminate in water, such as Columbia Glacier near Valdez or Mendenhall Glacier near Juneau, Portage Glacier has experienced accelerated retreats in recent decades that likely were initially triggered by climate change begun at the end of the Little Ice Age in the mid-1800s and subsequently controlled in recent history primarily by calving of the glacier terminus. Photographic records of the terminus covering 1914 until present day track the patterns of retreat. These data, coupled with USGS climate information collected from the southern end of the ice field, provide insight to the patterns of retreat that might be observed in the future. History During the late 1800s and early 1900s, Portage Glacier terminated on land at the western end of Portage Lake, filling Portage Lake with ice (Photo Plate 1914). Since the early 1900s, the glacier has receded, leaving Portage Lake in the scoured basin. The initial retreat of the glacier coincides with known climate warming associated with the end of the Little Ice Age (circa mid-19th century). As the glacier receded, its land-based terminus retreated into proglacial Portage Lake and changed from its relatively stable land-based environment to an unstable calving environment. The most rapid recession of some 140 to 160 meters per year occurred between 1939 (Photo Plate, 1939) and 1950, when water depth at the terminus was at its maximum—roughly 200 meters. Recession continued through the 1970s and 1980s (Photo Plate, 1972, 1984) until by late 1999, Portage Glacier had receded almost 5 kilometers, to a more stable position at the eastern end of Portage Lake (Photo Plate, 1999). The retreat was driven primarily by calving of unstable ice at the glacier terminus into Portage Lake. Ice loss resulting from increased melting of the glacier surface during the past century-long general warming trend contributed to glacier retreat, but to a lesser extent. Today, the terminus of Portage Glacier remains close to its 1999 location (Photo Plate, 2006). Future Status Future changes of the terminus of Portage Glacier will depend on a variety of factors. However, present scientific theory (Meier and Post, 1987, Trabant and others, 2003) suggests that calving glaciers cycle between advance and retreat patterns; with rapid retreats, followed by stable retracted positions, slow advances, and then stable extended positions that are not directly related to climate change. Thus, based on its history to date, and if such a pattern holds for Portage Glacier, the glacier may now be in its stable retracted position and could eventually begin a slow advance. However, for a glacier to advance, annual net balance—the amount of new snow and ice added to the glacier minus the amount of glacier melt—must be positive. As a rule of thumb for valley glaciers, net balance is positive when annual snow and ice accumulation occurs over more than 60–70 percent of the entire glacier area. Such accumulation occurs on the glacier above the end-of-summer snow-line altitude, recently measured by USGS at 1,000 meters in altitude. Only 50 percent (not the rule-of-thumb 60–70 percent) of Portage Glacier is more than 1,000 meters in altitude, thus, Portage Glacier may slowly thin and recede rather than experience a slow advance. Regardless of predictions, the position of the Portage Glacier terminus has remained relatively unchanged at the eastern end of Portage Lake for the last 7 years and continues to provide visitors with a spectacular view of glacier ice. There are approximately 5 times as many polar bears now as compared to 1950. Polar bears eat people. Don't need too many of them. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
snafu Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 Probably caused by too many kids walking on it. Another theory There are approximately 5 times as many polar bears now as compared to 1950. Polar bears eat people. Don't need too many of them. Yeah.. well says you. Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
ImWithStupid Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 So how come they want to put the Polar Bear on the endangered spices list do to receding ice? I mean somethings going on. It's a back door tactic to prevent any expansion on oil drilling in Alaska. There are currently around 25,000 polar bears. That is about 3 1/2 times as many polar bears as there was in 1972. Doesn't sound like a species that's endangered to me. Quote
wez Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 The future according to Al? Someday no matter what we do... [attach=full]1964[/attach] Quote
eddo Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 So much for 'settled science' Lorne Gunter, National Post Published: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 According to the U. S. National Climatic Data Center, the average temperature of the global land surface in January 2008 was below the 20th-Century mean for the first time since 1982. Also in January, Southern Hemisphere sea ice coverage was at its greatest summer level (January is summer in the Southern Hemisphere) in the past 30 years. Neither the 3,000 temperature buoys that float throughout the world's oceans nor the eight NASA satellites that float above our atmosphere have recorded appreciable warming in the past six to eight years. Even Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the IPCC, reluctantly admitted to Reuters in January that there has been no warming so far in the 21st Century. Complete article So much for 'settled science' [attach=full]1965[/attach] AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! GLOBAL FREEZING!!! EVERYONE GO BUY AN ESSUUVEE!!! SWITCH FROM FLORESCENT BULBS OR WE ARE GOING TO FREEZE TO DEATH!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! Quote I'm trusted by more women.
ImWithStupid Posted May 23, 2008 Posted May 23, 2008 Obviously more of this, "Global Warming Stuff"... SoCal Braces For More Freaky Weather May 23, 2008, 6:51 AM PDT In Baldwin Park, a San Gabriel Valley suburb east of Los Angeles, children donned yellow kitchen gloves as they threw snowballs at each other. Others squealed with delight as they used boogie boards to slide across lawns and sidewalks buried inches deep in hail. SoCal Braces For More Freaky Weather | News | KTLA The CW | Where Los Angeles Lives Quote
snafu Posted May 24, 2008 Posted May 24, 2008 [ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=vBBAOOJJiy0]YouTube - Polar Bears On Thin Ice (CBS News)[/ame] Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
RoyalOrleans Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Global warming is the brainchild of the failed communists of the 60's who became "environmentalists" in the 80's. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
RoyalOrleans Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 It's a back door tactic to prevent any expansion on oil drilling in Alaska. There are currently around 25,000 polar bears. That is about 3 1/2 times as many polar bears as there was in 1972. Doesn't sound like a species that's endangered to me. Have you ever had a polar bear steak? A lot more tender than one would think. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
RoyalOrleans Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 The future according to Al? Someday no matter what we do... [attach=full]1966[/attach] Wrong thread, wez. This ain't the thread about Star Wars video games. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
ImWithStupid Posted June 29, 2008 Posted June 29, 2008 Usual Congress action. Taking something simple and making it difficult or worse... [ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=e-LOtKIIKcg]YouTube - IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ENERGY SAVER LIGHT BULBS![/ame] morons who aren't able to think things through. Quote
hugo Posted June 30, 2008 Author Posted June 30, 2008 Usual Congress action. Taking something simple and making it difficult or worse... YouTube - IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ENERGY SAVER LIGHT BULBS! morons who aren't able to think things through. Ted Poe is one of the few decent congressmen. Liberals in Harris County hate him since his days as a no nonsense judge. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.