RoyalOrleans Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack Are you a man or are you duck? To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
eddo Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Man, do I take this back! Sorry I ever questioned you banning TJ, Bender. No matter the reason. You should check him out over at the Jungle, it should illegal to be that stupid! Translation: blah blah blah, I don't like TJ personally, or agree with him, so I am gonna take potshots. Are you a man or are you duck? If he weighs the same as a duck, I think I know our problem... I'm trusted by more women.
RoyalOrleans Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 If he weighs the same as a duck, I think I know our problem... He's a warlock! He turned wez into a newt... he got better. (I picture, candidly, wez in a tepid pool and flicking his tongue at dragonflies.). To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
Chi Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Translation: blah blah blah, I don't like TJ personally, or agree with him, so I am gonna take potshots. So what's your point? And most importantly what's it to you? You know, you have really gone out of your way lately to butt in and get in stuff that is none of your business. It's starting to feel like something personal that's been bothering for a long time. If so, spill it. Because otherwise, I wasn't aware you and TJ are buddies from way back or something. You also don't seem to care when anyone besides me or Wez get on TJ's case. So Eddo, what gives?
eddo Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 So what's your point? And most importantly what's it to you? You know, you have really gone out of your way lately to butt in and get in stuff that is none of your business. It's starting to feel like something personal that's been bothering for a long time. If so, spill it. Because otherwise, I wasn't aware you and TJ are buddies from way back or something. You also don't seem to care when anyone besides me or Wez get on TJ's case. So Eddo, what gives? you didn't see me calling out Sheik and Bender as well for their potshots at TJ?? I just find it amusing when you jump on bandwagons due to personal vendetta's, that's all. It's not like this is the first time, and I am sure it won't be the last. I'm trusted by more women.
Guest timesjoke2 Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 you didn't see me calling out Sheik and Bender as well for their potshots at TJ?? I just find it amusing when you jump on bandwagons due to personal vendetta's, that's all. It's not like this is the first time, and I am sure it won't be the last. Ya, Chi is the Queen of the pile on, too bad she can't stand on her own two feet, but hey, at least she is admitting her limitations. A duck? Well I do like the water, if I am not taking my kids swimming I am boating or fishing for 90% of my summer and a good part of the winter. Me and a good friend go sailing twice a year as well, you know I never thought about it but maybe I am a duck at heart........ IWS, you don't have to defend Bender anymore, he has admitted his complete lack of integrity and his refusal to show even the slightest shread of fairness based on his personal need for chasing revenge, I am basically just keeping that fact on the surface instead of allowing it to be burried. Let's see if you will answer a direct question being as your the moderator........ Wez breaking the rules concerning airing the dirty laundry form other sites hundreds of times is fact, nobody is even trying to refute that as a fact. Me not being here for a year while Wez was still doing this exact same thing is also a fact. Why claim now that his getting a free pass on the rules has anything to do with me? Why can't you enforce the rules where Wez is concerned?
jokersarewild Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 TJ, you admitted to deliberately causing all of us major annoyance on the forum by starting . Not only is this tactic childish and stupid, it also is ridiculous. Why the hell would you emulate someone you find to be your intellectual opposite just to prove that HE is annoying? And if it was just to prove a point, why do you keep doing it, since we already know you failed at proving the point? And Bender answered your question. Stop asking it and read the damn thing. RoyalOrleans is my real dad!
Guest timesjoke2 Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Bender running away and banning me proves I won, he had to admit that when faced with the same irritation level as what Wez gives everyone else, Bender could not take it, he lashed out in immature fury and called it quits, but he wants everyone else to accept without complaint what he could not live with. And no, Bender said he liked Wez more than me because Wez only bothers the members, not him personally, this was already a given. The question that has not been answered is why even while I was gone, Wez has been allowed to break the rules concerning bringing his dirty laundry from many other sited here and chase eddo all over the forum. This last one with Wez atack phantom too was after I was banned and only posting here, I have no been in the middle of the Wez attacks on eddo, I have nothing to do with any of that mess. Wez has broken this rule hundreds of times and never been banned for it while I complain about Wez's rule infractions that go without punnishment and I get banned. Hell, remove the rules and I can't complain when they let let Wez break them right?
wez Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 As for the whole wez v. TJ thing. One thing I learned long ago, and I think OS has come to the conclusion is that basically wez and TJ are the same. They both continue to prove that they have the self control of a two year old when it comes to adult interaction. Neither have the ability to agree to disagree, or respect that someone may have another point of view/belief/conviction from them and nothing they say can change that and both feel the need to have the last word. The difference however is that wez is able to grasp the concept that he isn't in control of everything, including how this site is ran, and someone else may just want things the way they want them regardless. As for wez, now that the other forum is open, if you want to keep up your childish, immature debate style, take it there. If you want a serious discussion without calling people names or the whole I'm not you crap, do it here. If not take it there or you'll join TJ shortly. Hey IWS.. I didn't have much time this morn before clinical but wanted to address a couple of things in the post there.. Not sure why you felt the need to come out and judge, label and look down on me and try to prove me = to TJ except for... and my abilities to agree or disagree with people.. then prove it by claiming you think OS thinks the same thing and reinforcing it with a ban stick.. Which would lead one to believe what? You are a debater of somewhat higher quality than myself to convince who? TJ seems to think you and he are kindred spirits.. another member not long ago called you for using "timesjoke tactics".. and I've asked people several times not to associate me with that pile of crap.. So if ya want, I could judge you TJ, except for this.. and I'd use specific examples and direct quotes.. And being your comments about me were, in this post alone, if not by design, an indication that you think you are some international man of maturity compared to myself.. then proving it by "waving a scarey ban stick" in my face? .. That alone is more TJ than I'll ever be.. Something to think about.. And one other thing.. If you care to look back and count how many of TJ's posts contain my name and put yourself in my shoes and ask yourself.. what would I do? Realizing you have no authority other than your mouth to defend yourself, you may understand my perspective.. You remember all the IWS is________.. crap.. And you are not TJ either.. But unlike you, I don't wield a scarey ban stick.. I got something better.. It's called the.. I'm not you theory of I know you are but what am I? Worked for bender.. gonna ban him too?
wez Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 I just find it amusing when you jump on bandwagons due to personal vendetta's, that's all. It's not like this is the first time, and I am sure it won't be the last. Yeah.. eddo NEVER does that.. He not only associates himself with the TJ express for months trying to have me banned.. again.. from yet another site, but he runs around agreeing with him like he's BCAR, and acting just like him.. but then when TJ gets banned he starts associating ME with him and tries to distance himself as far away as possible. What gives eddo?
wez Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Translation: blah blah blah, I don't like TJ personally, or agree with him, so I am gonna take potshots. Ever do that to me, eddo? Does that constitute "religious hypocrisy".. or good hypocrisy?
wez Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 TJ, you admitted to deliberately causing all of us major annoyance on the forum by starting . Not only is this tactic childish and stupid, it also is ridiculous. Why the hell would you emulate someone you find to be your intellectual opposite just to prove that HE is annoying? And if it was just to prove a point, why do you keep doing it, since we already know you failed at proving the point? And Bender answered your question. Stop asking it and read the damn thing. Funny thing is jaw.. that's what I did to him.. hahahahaha.. eddo too.. I've admitted childishness many times.. and am proud of it. Lessons one should never forget.. TJ's "I was just doing what wez was doing" is bullsh t.. it was the opposite. And where he did it to many people, including every staff member here, and anyone who disagreed with hiim, I only did it to him and his gang of validators.. And yesterday, I apologized for my behavior to everyone else who had to watch it while TJ and eddo are still trying to hardass and cry their complete innocence into reality.. If that aint the definition of insanity, I don't know what is.. Wez doesn't bother Bender, but anyone with two fake eyes could see wez constantly baiting and attacking me. Yes, eddo sometimes ignores Wez and every now and then will pound his head against the wal trying to talk to Wez about it but one thing is very clear...... Wez "ALWAYS" atarts it....waaaaa... Why is Wez above the rules? hahahahahaha... They both like to validate it for each other too.. I rest my case.. again.. Odd, they both hate what they give and what they are.. Sup with that, boys?
wez Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 So what's your point? And most importantly what's it to you? You know, you have really gone out of your way lately to butt in and get in stuff that is none of your business. It's starting to feel like something personal that's been bothering for a long time. If so, spill it. Because otherwise, I wasn't aware you and TJ are buddies from way back or something. You also don't seem to care when anyone besides me or Wez get on TJ's case. So Eddo, what gives? Yeah Chi.. I'm pretty tired of eddo forcing himself into every online relationship I've ever had with someone for the last 3 1/2 years trying to bring me nothing but harm and continuously claiming I'm him while he does it.. Lets start a pool to get him some help..
Chi Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 you didn't see me calling out Sheik and Bender as well for their potshots at TJ?? I just find it amusing when you jump on bandwagons due to personal vendetta's, that's all. It's not like this is the first time, and I am sure it won't be the last. No, I didnt see you calling out Sheik and Bender, but then again I didn't read every reply on this thread either. Jumping on bandwagons? I didn't make my comments to jump on any bandwagons, but out of being annoyed at the crap TJ is constantly spewing. The fact that a lot of others feel the same way and also detect the same bull is just further confirmation. But speaking of jumping on bandwagons, aren't you the huge hypocrite. Tell me that is something you don't do.
Chi Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Ya, Chi is the Queen of the pile on, too bad she can't stand on her own two feet, but hey, at least she is admitting her limitations. Oh yes, I'm so scared of you, I need back up.... The only thing that I'm scared of is letting you suck me back in to your long, circular, pointless drivel. Out of curiosity, just what limitations did I admit to?
RoyalOrleans Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Jumping on bandwagons? Again, who is wearing an Obama t-shirt in their avatar? Not to be a , but I would like to introduce you to my friend Kettle. To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
Chi Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Again, who is wearing an Obama t-shirt in their avatar? Not to be a , but I would like to introduce you to my friend Kettle. Jumping on a bandwagon is when you follow a person, principle, trend, what have you just to follow the crowd. How is backing someone I truly believe in jumping on a bandwagon? fyi I will stay true to my convictions no matter how popular or unpopular my views are. 1
wez Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Jumping on a bandwagon is when you follow a person, principle, trend, what have you just to follow the crowd. How is backing someone I truly believe in jumping on a bandwagon? fyi I will stay true to my convictions no matter how popular or unpopular my views are. And besides, the point is.. eddo judged, labeled, and looked down on you for jumping on bandwagons.. not the other way around... of which, he is the king of bandwagon asslicking.. Hypocrisy at it's finest in my book. What you hate is what you are and that is why you hate it. ~ wez
hugo Posted September 28, 2008 Posted September 28, 2008 Jumping on a bandwagon is when you follow a person, principle, trend, what have you just to follow the crowd. How is backing someone I truly believe in jumping on a bandwagon? fyi I will stay true to my convictions no matter how popular or unpopular my views are. Go blow a polar bear, fatso. 1 The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
ImWithStupid Posted September 28, 2008 Posted September 28, 2008 Jumping on a bandwagon is when you follow a person, principle, trend, what have you just to follow the crowd. How is backing someone I truly believe in jumping on a bandwagon? fyi I will stay true to my convictions no matter how popular or unpopular my views are. Forgive her for backing Obama. She's from Chicago. She's been indoctrinated in the corrupt Chicago/Daley Democratic Machine Politics.
ImWithStupid Posted September 28, 2008 Posted September 28, 2008 Hey IWS.. I didn't have much time this morn before clinical but wanted to address a couple of things in the post there.. Not sure why you felt the need to come out and judge, label and look down on me and try to prove me = to TJ except for... and my abilities to agree or disagree with people.. then prove it by claiming you think OS thinks the same thing and reinforcing it with a ban stick.. Which would lead one to believe what? You are a debater of somewhat higher quality than myself to convince who? TJ seems to think you and he are kindred spirits.. another member not long ago called you for using "timesjoke tactics".. and I've asked people several times not to associate me with that pile of crap.. So if ya want, I could judge you TJ, except for this.. and I'd use specific examples and direct quotes.. And being your comments about me were, in this post alone, if not by design, an indication that you think you are some international man of maturity compared to myself.. then proving it by "waving a scarey ban stick" in my face? .. That alone is more TJ than I'll ever be.. Something to think about.. And one other thing.. If you care to look back and count how many of TJ's posts contain my name and put yourself in my shoes and ask yourself.. what would I do? Realizing you have no authority other than your mouth to defend yourself, you may understand my perspective.. You remember all the IWS is________.. crap.. And you are not TJ either.. But unlike you, I don't wield a scarey ban stick.. I got something better.. It's called the.. I'm not you theory of I know you are but what am I? Worked for bender.. gonna ban him too? I bring up the subject of your past behvior being that of a child, and I'm in the wrong, even though you yourself admitted to childish behavior in the past. Sounds a bit hypocritical to me. I'm just sayin'. As for your assertation of me thinking I'm a superior debater, that's your own interpretation. As far as calling you on your behavior and the threat of a ban, now that mainstream members are fed up with your crap and not just those who have an issue with you. Yea, as someone who is supposed to be looking out for the overall welfare of the site, I will take whatever action is necessary. Like I said before, the main difference between TJ and yourself as far as getting away with the same antics, is that you didn't act as if you were above the site as TJ did. Don't kid yourself as TJ did. The site will go on without you if you're perceived to be more of a liabilty than an asset. Nothing personal. Just the facts.
wez Posted September 28, 2008 Posted September 28, 2008 Translation - Blah Blah Blah, I'm innocent, Blah blah, I care more about the site than the Admins and mods, blah blah, I didn't do anything wrong, blah blah, I can't explain why members left when I was here but came back while I was banned, blah blah, I'm going to claim that me being a whiny girl was planned and not part of my personality, blah blah... I got cha... I need to be more like this whilst dealing with people..
wez Posted September 28, 2008 Posted September 28, 2008 I bring up the subject of your past behvior being that of a child, and I'm in the wrong, even though you yourself admitted to childish behavior in the past. Sounds a bit hypocritical to me. I'm just sayin'. As for your assertation of me thinking I'm a superior debater, that's your own interpretation. As far as calling you on your behavior and the threat of a ban, now that mainstream members are fed up with your crap and not just those who have an issue with you. Yea, as someone who is supposed to be looking out for the overall welfare of the site, I will take whatever action is necessary. Like I said before, the main difference between TJ and yourself as far as getting away with the same antics, is that you didn't act as if you were above the site as TJ did. Don't kid yourself as TJ did. The site will go on without you if you're perceived to be more of a liabilty than an asset. Nothing personal. Just the facts. Translation: Blah blah blah, ..I'll use generalizations like "mainstream members fed up" with your crap rather than name names and provide specific examples, blah blah blah, my ban stick gives me the right to judge you TJ except for this, blah blah blah, I myself never act childish whilst "debating" and could never be a liability to the site like you and TJ, blah blah blah, one more partial shake of my scarey ban stick at the end to prove my "facts" correct, blah blah. Better? Or do you mean like this.... But, wez, you and Shiek said I was a lazy idiot who only believed what the west said about Russia's motives, and the US and the west was the bad guy iin the Georgia situation. You must mean debating like this accusation that never ocurred as you took something personal that sheik said and I agreed with that had nothing to do with you from our perspective as you accused us of "trying to bait you into an argument for the last week".. Right? To which we replied.. I never said anything of the sort about you. If what I said offended you, you should ask yourself why.. Please find where I said you were a lazy idiot. And dont around with one of my posts. Maybe I don't actually debate as you said by "calling people names" but rather you call yourself names and then claim me and sheik did it so you can claim we called you names to win a "debate" and then judge me a childish, name calling debater like TJ a few weeks down the line? .. Sounds a bit strange to me, but hell, whatever you say.. I'll try it sometime.. Does it really work? Not sure about you, but I don't consider my childish interactions with eddo or TJ, "debating".. But the previous example was you indeed, "debating".. Looks like something straight out of timesjoke tactics: How to debate like the last vestige of hope. As for wez, now that the other forum is open, if you want to keep up your childish, immature debate style, take it there. If you want a serious discussion without calling people names or the whole I'm not you crap, do it here. If not take it there or you'll join TJ shortly. As for your assertation of me thinking I'm a superior debater, that's your own interpretation. What is the proper interpretation? I hate to say it out of sheer fear of a "scarey ban stick" across my rock hard ass attached to my greek god legs.. but... Please explain
RoyalOrleans Posted September 28, 2008 Posted September 28, 2008 Jumping on a bandwagon is when you follow a person, principle, trend, what have you just to follow the crowd. How is backing someone I truly believe in jumping on a bandwagon? fyi I will stay true to my convictions no matter how popular or unpopular my views are. Why should I make excuses for you? To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
ImWithStupid Posted September 28, 2008 Posted September 28, 2008 Translation - Blah Blah Blah' date=' I'm innocent, Blah blah, I care more about the site than the Admins and mods, blah blah, I didn't do anything wrong, blah blah, I can't explain why members left when I was here but came back while I was banned, blah blah, I'm going to claim that me being a whiny girl was planned and not part of my personality, blah blah...[/quote'] I got cha... I need to be more like this whilst dealing with people.. Yea, because anything in this thread can be considered mature debate not playground antics.
Recommended Posts