timesjoke Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 Such a typical response of a narcissistic statist, inept at providing hard evidence for his cause and denies the other cause a voice out of fear of disobedience. Declare your belief with evidence, experiments, an artlce, a fukken bumper sticker. Well evolutionists do have a lot of bumperstickers, I give them that but there is not one experiment to prove evolution either. All that can be proven is the ability to adapt, not evolve. You can use smoke and mirrors to try and deflect attention away from your own lack of facts but I admit there are no facts on either side, I have nothing to hide or be ashamed of, I know the limitations of the belief in God and admit those limitations. Too bad you can't do the same..... Quote
Ahhlee Posted September 2, 2009 Author Posted September 2, 2009 "Life long mating"......HA! I'm pretty sure we as a species are shooting that concept to sh!t in a hurry. Quote
timesjoke Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 "Life long mating"......HA! I'm pretty sure we as a species are shooting that concept to sh!t in a hurry. Well our "modern" society is, but looking back a few hundred years you did see life long mating with humans. Quote
Chi Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 Merc may be smallish, but i can assure you they enlarged for feeding. Most women go up a few cup sizes when milk comes in. I'm a B normally....I went to a fukking E!!!!! :o after the birth....they enlarge for feeding (BTW it was grotesque, not pretty lol) Genetics preclude how large the breasts will be, but they enlarge to become more than adequate for feeding. Definitely! I'm pretty average, but once that milk came in, they got BayWatch sized!!!! And yes, it is NOT fun! They weighed a ton, were engorged, hurt like hell, etc. (I will spare all the details.) 1 Quote
timesjoke Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 Definitely! I'm pretty average, but once that milk came in, they got BayWatch sized!!!! And yes, it is NOT fun! They weighed a ton, were engorged, hurt like hell, etc. (I will spare all the details.) I remember the ex had to keep expressing milk to relieve pressure when we were away from the baby for any long period. She also used to throw away a lot of her milk she pumped because she made more then our children needed. Can the size of the breast determine the amount of milk she can produce because the ex was a natural DD when we met and she always made more than the baby needed and used the pump to help relieve her pressure feelings. Quote
mercury Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 No... milk production adjusts to how much the baby eats, or how much is expressed. Nature is perfect that way. She made more than the baby ate because she expressed. I only pumped one time. It was during the weaning process and only to the point of relieving the pain of engorgement. Within 24 hours production had almost stopped and within 3 or 4 days I had dried up completely. Quote
Ahhlee Posted September 2, 2009 Author Posted September 2, 2009 Definitely! I'm pretty average, but once that milk came in, they got BayWatch sized!!!! And yes, it is NOT fun! They weighed a ton, were engorged, hurt like hell, etc. (I will spare all the details.) God, I'm a D/DD depending on the bra now. If I breast fed, I'd probably be a Q!!!! Quote
timesjoke Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 God, I'm a D/DD depending on the bra now. If I breast fed, I'd probably be a Q!!!! I am not sure of the steps in size but I seem to remember we had to special order my ex's bras. She was a DD before and I think it was a EEE we ended up ordering. Quote
Ahhlee Posted September 2, 2009 Author Posted September 2, 2009 I am not sure of the steps in size but I seem to remember we had to special order my ex's bras. She was a DD before and I think it was a EEE we ended up ordering. Eh, I wouldn't bother maintaining my dignity with custom bras. I'd just haul mine around in a couple of wheelbarrows and cover them with tarps so as not to scare the neighbors. 1 Quote
timesjoke Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 Eh, I wouldn't bother maintaining my dignity with custom bras. I'd just haul mine around in a couple of wheelbarrows and cover them with tarps so as not to scare the neighbors. lol, well they didn't sag that low, being filled with milk they actually stood out better then you think Quote
mercury Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 oh yeah... it literally feels like you're lugging boulders around. They're rock hard. And sleeping on your stomach is absolutely out of the question. Quote
Ahhlee Posted September 2, 2009 Author Posted September 2, 2009 oh yeah... it literally feels like you're lugging boulders around. They're rock hard. And sleeping on your stomach is absolutely out of the question. WHAT????? That sounds terrible! And I like sleeping on my stomach! I'm so glad no man will tolerate me. I couldn't handle that sh!t. Quote
mercury Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 I'll never forget the pain the next morning when I decided I didn't need to wear a bra to bed one night. Worse than labor because there wasn't a great prize waiting at the end of it! The up side of the stomach sleeping is that by the time your boobs hurt, you're already used to sleeping on your side and back because of your protruding belly. I used to be a total stomach sleeper, but I've only been able to get back to it within the last few years, and it's not very comfortable anymore. Quote
timesjoke Posted September 2, 2009 Posted September 2, 2009 WHAT????? That sounds terrible! And I like sleeping on my stomach! I'm so glad no man will tolerate me. I couldn't handle that sh!t. You know that is the interesting part me and the flower child lady who was our teacher in the birthing classes used to spend a lot of time talking about. The pain a woman goes through in birth is massive, but nature let's her forget it, otherwise they would never let a man touch them again, lol. We had some ladies have a flashback and actually remember the pain of child birth during my first responder training. They showed an actual birth video and the ladies suddenly had the flashback. I felt bad for them but I found it interesting that the mind can work that way as well. Pretty cool Quote
Ahhlee Posted September 2, 2009 Author Posted September 2, 2009 I'll never forget the pain the next morning when I decided I didn't need to wear a bra to bed one night. Worse than labor because there wasn't a great prize waiting at the end of it! The up side of the stomach sleeping is that by the time your boobs hurt, you're already used to sleeping on your side and back because of your protruding belly. I used to be a total stomach sleeper, but I've only been able to get back to it within the last few years, and it's not very comfortable anymore. Good Lord! All that child birthing business is scary and sounds incredibly uncomfortable. From now on, I'm locking my irresponsible vagina up tight! I just ordered a titanium chastity belt from amazon.com. I hope it arrives soon! Quote
RoyalOrleans Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Well our "modern" society is, but looking back a few hundred years you did see life long mating with humans. Wow! I thought you looked forward rather than backwards. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
timesjoke Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Wow! I thought you looked forward rather than backwards. I have a brain capable of doing both depending on the correct need at the time. The only correct way to look at the possibility of evolution is to look forward to try and figure out the why's for each change, not looking backward taking away because it is not that simple, there must be a reason for the addition, it didn't just appear out of nowhere without cause. Taking one of the already offered points of breasts needed to feed a flat face, if there was a "need" for the larger breasts to feed the child, and the child did not get what it needed, it would have died and no future generations. The "need" is a need now, not thousands of years into the future, the baby can't wait for the change. The looking back method is the only way evolution appears possible because you can look past the needs that would have prompted the changes, but looking foward, you see that life is still happening and if it was a "need" to survive, then they would have died waiting for the change..... Quote
RoyalOrleans Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 The only correct way to look at the possibility of evolution is to look forward to try and figure out the why's for each change, not looking backward taking away because it is not that simple, there must be a reason for the addition, it didn't just appear out of nowhere without cause. Right it... changes or mutations did not just happen, they evolved. Such as building a resistance to certain diseases, and maybe even the subsquent treatments, metabolisms adjusting as we travel and live in new places with new food sources... (Lactose... a cow's milk was meant for her calves, but we consume it all the time and in various products.), among other examples. Taking one of the already offered points of breasts needed to feed a flat face, if there was a "need" for the larger breasts to feed the child, and the child did not get what it needed, it would have died and no future generations. The "need" is a need now, not thousands of years into the future, the baby can't wait for the change. Why do you put NEED in quotations? So one day a million years ago, a simian looking creature gave birth to homo sapien erectus? No. No. Through evolution, the gradual mutation of man's features, was enlarged breasts possible. If we evolved from ape, you can't assume that the direct child of our first ancestor looked like your baby. Maybe ten thousand years into the future, babies will be born with breasts and can self feed? Maybe? The looking back method is the only way evolution appears possible because you can look past the needs that would have prompted the changes, but looking foward, you see that life is still happening and if it was a "need" to survive, then they would have died waiting for the change..... Again, NEED appears in quotations. Not sure why. Oh yeah... Neanderthal man stood around waiting for Cro Magnon man to come tell him he is obsolete. 1 Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
timesjoke Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Right it... changes or mutations did not just happen, they evolved. Such as building a resistance to certain diseases, and maybe even the subsquent treatments, metabolisms adjusting as we travel and live in new places with new food sources... (Lactose... a cow's milk was meant for her calves, but we consume it all the time and in various products.), among other examples. But you can't change until there is a need, and if it is a die or adapt issue, you do not have thousands of years to wait for the change. Why do you put NEED in quotations? So one day a million years ago, a simian looking creature gave birth to homo sapien erectus? No. No. Through evolution, the gradual mutation of man's features, was enlarged breasts possible. If we evolved from ape, you can't assume that the direct child of our first ancestor looked like your baby. Maybe ten thousand years into the future, babies will be born with breasts and can self feed? Maybe? Again, NEED appears in quotations. Not sure why. Oh yeah... Neanderthal man stood around waiting for Cro Magnon man to come tell him he is obsolete. Your still stuck looking backwards, I guess your not capable of understanding the evolution concept (as it would have had to happen) then. If they "need" a bigger breast to feed and live, then they will die waiting the thousands of years to get the bigger breast, that is as simple as I can make this concept, if your not able to grasp that very basic idea there really is no way for me to discuss it with you. Quote
Ahhlee Posted September 3, 2009 Author Posted September 3, 2009 Your still stuck looking backwards, I guess your not capable of understanding the evolution concept (as it would have had to happen) then. If they "need" a bigger breast to feed and live, then they will die waiting the thousands of years to get the bigger breast, that is as simple as I can make this concept, if your not able to grasp that very basic idea there really is no way for me to discuss it with you. He understands just fine. You're the one making yourself look completely inept at carrying on this discussion. But please, keep on. It's somewhat entertaining. Quote
eddo Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 I like boobies. 1 Quote I'm trusted by more women.
timesjoke Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 He understands just fine. You're the one making yourself look completely inept at carrying on this discussion. But please, keep on. It's somewhat entertaining. So you don't understand you have to look foward either? Quote
Ahhlee Posted September 3, 2009 Author Posted September 3, 2009 I like boobies. Want mine? So you don't understand you have to look foward either? I prefer to look in all directions. You see more that way. Quote
timesjoke Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 I prefer to look in all directions. You see more that way. Sounds quaint and false to be honest. If all your interested in is taking shots.....ok, when your ready to post with some thought let me know, your nicer to talk to in those times. Quote
eddo Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Want mine? no, they'll make me take out that garbage... Quote I'm trusted by more women.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.