Fight! Fight! Fight!

[eddo]

I once killed a man...just to watch him bleed his own blood.

 

I once killed a man I had just given a blood transfusion too...

 

 

 

just to watch him bleed my blood...

[emkay64]

I once killed a man I had just given a blood transfusion too...

 

 

 

just to watch him bleed my blood...

 

Woah!!! You're super bad!

[wez]

I once killed a man without a shred of emotion.. did CPR.. then killed him again.. just because I'm 100% bad..

 

eddo.. 99% .. I win.. yay me!

[wez]

I have enough experience in real fighting, not sport fighting, to at least know that nobody can beat me easily. I was attacked by four men with the intent to beat me to death one time and lived to tell about it, but one of them did not. To me every fight is win or die, I teach people to put all they have into the fight because in a real fight, they will be dead if they can't fight off their attacker.

 

Hey Batman.. if 4 men attacked you with the intent of beating you to death.. why did the other 3 live?

 

and.. who are these people you teach the fine art of kill or be killed in every real fight to?

 

 

Run and hide in the shadows with your bat..

[Ahhlee]

Again your missing the point, the debate for me is pleasurable, not winning. You can be called the winner and I will still be happy. We don't even have to have a judge, just the agreement to have a pure debate would be perfectly awsome to me.

 

 

As far as being impartial, it would have to be someone who has never jumped on your bandwagon and unfortunately that leaves out most of the forum. The only person I can say has never been involved in the gangbangs on me and is also active is Snaff.

 

 

But as I have already said, a pure debate is reward enough for me.

 

 

 

Too bad we can't do it live, my strongest suit is my general knowledge at my fingertips on most subjects, doing a debate cold without knowing the subject ahead of time and no time for research is very fun for me. Did you ever move further south or are you still stuck in winterland?

 

Cold=bad

 

 

Hey we could debate the pros and cons of living in the north, lol. Your in the North so you can take the pro and I being in Florida can take the cons, lol. Switching might be interesting but I am not sure how well I can defend the North being as much as I hate it

 

 

So debate for the heck of it? Nothing like setting a new standard of interaction for trying to mend fences, at least in my opinion that is.

 

Northern living vs. southern living is fine with me. Snaf as a debate ref is also fine with me. Hell, I would trust anyone here to be impartial enough to perform such a task but if you want snaf to do it I am totally on board and will respect his ruling.

 

Snaf...are you willing?

 

I have enough experience in real fighting, not sport fighting, to at least know that nobody can beat me easily. I was attacked by four men with the intent to beat me to death one time and lived to tell about it, but one of them did not. To me every fight is win or die, I teach people to put all they have into the fight because in a real fight, they will be dead if they can't fight off their attacker.

 

Someone else here knows that concept all too well, too.

 

Just sayin'.

[wez]

They want to preach from their soapbox and if you dare to question them they either ignore the questions or pretend the point you made is beneath them to answer.

 

 

 

 

Errrrrrr.. they? You mean you?

 

 

It's sad.. so sad.. it's a sad sad situation.. and it's getting more and more absurd ~ Elton John

 

 

 

Some bullsh!t can be fun

 

 

You wouldn't know fun if it motorboated you on the ass.. you'd claim it was attacking you and trying to beat you to death and kill it..

 

 

run and hide.. tough guy..

[timesjoke]

Northern living vs. southern living is fine with me. Snaf as a debate ref is also fine with me. Hell, I would trust anyone here to be impartial enough to perform such a task but if you want snaf to do it I am totally on board and will respect his ruling.

 

Snaf...are you willing?

 

You can have eddo if you want, it is the journey, not the destination that makes life great. Is this the source of our problems? You always see things as winning or losing?

 

 

Someone else here knows that concept all too well, too.

 

Just sayin'.

 

Never said there was not, I explained my possition on that. I am confident in my abilities and have been tested in a real life/death situation where I came out alive, to me that is all the tempering I need to show I can take care of myself.

 

There is always someone bigger and stronger, but the question is are they willing to die to face me? Someone who is at my level would never start that fight. "I" would never start that fight, but there is a big difference between starting a fight and finishing it.

[Ahhlee]

You can have eddo if you want, it is the journey, not the destination that makes life great. Is this the source of our problems? You always see things as winning or losing?

 

Sure, TJ. The source of OUR problems is me.

 

It has nothing whatsoever to do with you.

 

I'll be happy to take 50% of the blame the day you can buck up and take the other 50%.

 

Other than that, I'm not in the mood for this today.

 

Later.

[timesjoke]

Sure, TJ. The source of OUR problems is me.

 

It has nothing whatsoever to do with you.

 

I'll be happy to take 50% of the blame the day you can buck up and take the other 50%.

 

Other than that, I'm not in the mood for this today.

 

Later.

 

 

 

Out of every single exchange we have had, I have "NEVER" instigated a personal attack Ali. Now I will admit to tossing a few slams back at you once you started it and that would be my part in keeping the flames fanned but if you had never started it, there would be nothing to fan.

 

 

Consider me a mirror, what you show me I give back, but then again, I have never attacked your loved ones while you have attacked mine so even as a response, there are lows you have traveled I will never stoop down to Ali.

 

 

 

My point in this is maybe your need to start flames might be because you see yourself as losing the arguement so you want to "win" in any way you can think of so you turn to personal attacks instead, if you can't "win" in one way, you will win in another. I could be wrong as well, I was just making an observation at your constant concern about who would "win" in a debate with me, I don't care who wins, I just like to debate.

 

 

Journey, not destination.

[snafu]

Sorry guys but I wouldn't feel right getting in the middle of any dispute. I would say we might try a poll but I would think the odds would be stacked against TJ. If you guys did start a debate and everybody throws in their two cents I would call out any bias attacks if that would help.

[eddo]

Out of every single exchange we have had, I have "NEVER" instigated a personal attack Ali. Now I will admit to tossing a few slams back at you once you started it and that would be my part in keeping the flames fanned but if you had never started it, there would be nothing to fan.

 

 

Does putting "never" in quotes mean that you understand how full of crap you are when you say that?

[timesjoke]

Sorry guys but I wouldn't feel right getting in the middle of any dispute. I would say we might try a poll but I would think the odds would be stacked against TJ. If you guys did start a debate and everybody throws in their two cents I would call out any bias attacks if that would help.

 

 

And I would hate to put you into that spot but unfortunately your about the only person here who has not attacked me and Tami out of anger, even emkay has jumped on the bandwagon a couple time (but not as bad as most of the other regulars).

 

That said I would still gladly have any debate under the no personal flames rule, it would be the first time I have debated with Ali that she has not called me and Tami nasty names......even if everyone on the forum voted her as winning I would still feel a great deal of satisfaction from that.

 

And speaking about the flame trend, here shows eddo to "save" Ali from her current dilema:

 

 

Does putting "never" in quotes mean that you understand how full of crap you are when you say that?

 

 

Why is it you two are always running interference for each other? When one is floundering the other tries to come to the rescue. Here you again turn to personal attacks calling me full of crap when you know I have told the truth. Chi should be showing up soon to join in if the usual gameplan has been put into play.

 

 

Even in the MrsK thing you both admitted there was no reason to tear her apart on the subject being discussed but you still felt justified because of how you both were wronged by MrsK in the past. You two are always comming up with excuses to treat people like garbage and I wonder why?

 

Why do you work so hard to find these excuses?

 

If you spent the same energy only looking for the good in people don't you think things would be a lot nicer?

 

 

Do you consider yourself so low that you have to try and elevate yourself by bringing down other people?

[ImWithStupid]

Good God! I'm gone for one day and look at what happens.

 

 

You're right TJ it sure would be nice to see a real debate. It also sucks when people don't stay on topic.

 

You know like when someone goes on an "Off Topic" thread the is obviously designed to be humorous and takes it seriously on who could "beat up" who.

 

 

Who can beat up who? Are you serious? How old are you again?

 

In your defense I did notice that it wasn't until eddo's post #12 on page 2, that anyone used the "TJ humor/sarcasm disclaimer". So it's not completely on you that you were confused on the intent of the thread.

[timesjoke]

Well as usual you jump on the bandwagon Joe, you did it at the Jungle all the time too.

 

The tread was fight, fight, fight, not debate, debate, debate.

 

 

You will also see mentions of blood if I were to be matched to Ali and she saying she would have to be smuggled to Mexico. Sure sounds like an altercation in a physical way to me long before my first post, but of course admitting that would not let you join in on the usual gangbang now would it?

 

 

Everything you guys do is 100% justified because in your minds, I do not deserve fair treatment.

[ImWithStupid]

Well as usual you jump on the bandwagon Joe, you did it at the Jungle all the time too.

 

The tread was fight, fight, fight, not debate, debate, debate.

 

 

You will also see mentions of blood if I were to be matched to Ali and she saying she would have to be smuggled to Mexico. Sure sounds like an altercation in a physical way to me long before my first post, but of course admitting that would not let you join in on the usual gangbang now would it?

 

 

Everything you guys do is 100% justified because in your minds, I do not deserve fair treatment.

 

 

No bandwagon. I didn't even bother to read the crap from anyone involved. It's just funny that the post you are complaining about people getting off topic, was "off topic".

 

The Mexico thing was an obvious joke that she would end up murdering you if you spent time together and would need to flee the country.

 

It was a fukking joke. NOT a threat on your life and wasn't in this thread.

[Ahhlee]

Out of every single exchange we have had, I have "NEVER" instigated a personal attack Ali. Now I will admit to tossing a few slams back at you once you started it and that would be my part in keeping the flames fanned but if you had never started it, there would be nothing to fan.

 

 

Consider me a mirror, what you show me I give back, but then again, I have never attacked your loved ones while you have attacked mine so even as a response, there are lows you have traveled I will never stoop down to Ali.

 

Wrong.

 

Do you keep repeating that so that one day you'll actually believe your crap yourself?

 

Just wonderin'.

 

Sorry guys but I wouldn't feel right getting in the middle of any dispute. I would say we might try a poll but I would think the odds would be stacked against TJ. If you guys did start a debate and everybody throws in their two cents I would call out any bias attacks if that would help.

 

Fair enough, snaf. Don't worry about it.

 

 

And I would hate to put you into that spot but unfortunately your about the only person here who has not attacked me and Tami out of anger, even emkay has jumped on the bandwagon a couple time (but not as bad as most of the other regulars).

 

That said I would still gladly have any debate under the no personal flames rule, it would be the first time I have debated with Ali that she has not called me and Tami nasty names......even if everyone on the forum voted her as winning I would still feel a great deal of satisfaction from that.

 

Wrong again.

 

 

Good God! I'm gone for one day and look at what happens.

 

 

You're right TJ it sure would be nice to see a real debate. It also sucks when people don't stay on topic.

 

You know like when someone goes on an "Off Topic" thread the is obviously designed to be humorous and takes it seriously on who could "beat up" who.

 

 

Who can beat up who? Are you serious? How old are you again?

 

In your defense I did notice that it wasn't until eddo's post #12 on page 2, that anyone used the "TJ humor/sarcasm disclaimer". So it's not completely on you that you were confused on the intent of the thread.

 

 

You noticed that, too? LOL

 

 

Well as usual you jump on the bandwagon Joe, you did it at the Jungle all the time too.

 

The tread was fight, fight, fight, not debate, debate, debate.

 

 

You will also see mentions of blood if I were to be matched to Ali and she saying she would have to be smuggled to Mexico. Sure sounds like an altercation in a physical way to me long before my first post, but of course admitting that would not let you join in on the usual gangbang now would it?

 

 

Everything you guys do is 100% justified because in your minds, I do not deserve fair treatment.

 

Why in the hell do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 

Why is that?

 

Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 

I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

[timesjoke]

No bandwagon. I didn't even bother to read the crap from anyone involved. It's just funny that the post you are complaining about people getting off topic, was "off topic".

 

The Mexico thing was an obvious joke that she would end up murdering you if you spent time together and would need to flee the country.

 

It was a fukking joke. NOT a threat on your life and wasn't in this thread.

 

So as usual you were just jumping on the bandwagon and putting me down without even reading the tread before you posted?

 

 

Now your trying to make other excuses to cover it?

 

 

I never said anything about a threat, in fact if you actually take the time to read my first post I asked her what she meant when she said fight, physical or debate. Your so ready to jump on the Ali bandwagon like the eddo robot you don't even know what was discussed.

 

 

I never mentioned blood, maybe you need to point that assumption finger at someone else.

[emkay64]

What the hell is a bandwagon anyways? Is it a large wagon with music and alcoholic libations? If it is...I'm jumping on.

 

If it's a crappy wagon toting elastic bands I'm out!

[Ahhlee]

What the hell is a bandwagon anyways? Is it a large wagon with music and alcoholic libations? If it is...I'm jumping on.

 

If it's a crappy wagon toting elastic bands I'm out!

 

If it's my band wagon, you know damn well it's going to have music, alcoholic libations and brownies. Lots and lots of brownies.

[emkay64]

Mmmmmmmm brownies.......

[timesjoke]

Wrong.

 

Do you keep repeating that so that one day you'll actually believe your crap yourself?

 

Just wonderin'.

 

Prove me wrong.

 

You even are flamming me in the perception thread, you can't help yourself but to be ugly all the time.

 

 

 

 

Wrong again.

 

Then why all the talk about cok and such in my perception thread? You could just not say anything but instead you find excuses to always make personal attacks.

 

 

 

 

You noticed that, too? LOL

 

IWS has been jumping on your bandwagon for a long time now, there has never been one time you were flammign me IWS did not join in with a girlish glee.

 

 

Why in the hell do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 

Why is that?

 

Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 

I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

 

Even snaff agreed to it, do you think he is stupid too?

 

It is what it is Ali, your a bully at heart, I said before your a lot like an abusive husband who is all love and candy as long as your appeasing him and beating the crap out of you when your not.

 

 

I go back to the MrsK thing again to make this point, you acted this same way to her until she gave into you, now that she gave in, your best pals. You have to be in control. Everyone has seen you both send thoughtful gifts and rip into your enemies with ruthless abandon. It is almost like you have a dual personality, one sweet and kind and the other the most nasty human to ever post on the internet.

 

 

In all of this though I don't hate you, but you clearly hate me so I ask you why you feel you must hate me? You have done 100 times more nasty things to me than I have ever done to you and maybe I should hate you but I just can't find the spark that will let me hold anger over things said on the internet.

 

 

That is not to say I like it, but I can't hold this stuff so close to my heart the way you do.

[Ahhlee]

Prove me wrong.

 

You even are flamming me in the perception thread, you can't help yourself but to be ugly all the time.

 

I've yet to say anything about Tami since you have been back on BS. Funny how you like to claim I attack you and her ALL THE TIME. That is simply not true.

 

Have others made comments about her? Yes. I have not.

 

Go look and see if I'm right. I dare ya.

 

 

Then why all the talk about cok and such in my perception thread? You could just not say anything but instead you find excuses to always make personal attacks.

 

Sorry, you don't get to claim the monopoly on my cok jokes. I would say that to anyone. Hardly a personal attack.

 

Unless you have cok sucking issues, that is?

 

 

IWS has been jumping on your bandwagon for a long time now, there has never been one time you were flammign me IWS did not join in with a girlish glee.

 

That's not true, either.

 

 

 

 

It is what it is Ali, your a bully at heart, I said before your a lot like an abusive husband who is all love and candy as long as your appeasing him and beating the crap out of you when your not.

 

 

Answer my fukking question:

 

Why in the hell do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 

Why is that?

 

Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 

I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

[ImWithStupid]

So as usual you were just jumping on the bandwagon and putting me down without even reading the tread before you posted?

 

 

Now your trying to make other excuses to cover it?

 

 

I never said anything about a threat, in fact if you actually take the time to read my first post I asked her what she meant when she said fight, physical or debate. Your so ready to jump on the Ali bandwagon like the eddo robot you don't even know what was discussed.

 

 

I never mentioned blood, maybe you need to point that assumption finger at someone else.

 

 

Once again. The point was that you were off of topic in a thread that you complained about people going off topic, in a thread meant to be humorous that you were the only one taking it serious and the comment about Mexico by Ali wasn't even in this thread. It was in a completely different thread and was also understood to be "HUMOR".

 

Get over yourself. You aren't worth the effort for me to "gang up on". If I voice an opinion. It's mine.

[timesjoke]

I've yet to say anything about Tami since you have been back on BS. Funny how you like to claim I attack you and her ALL THE TIME. That is simply not true.

 

Have others made comments about her? Yes. I have not.

 

Go look and see if I'm right. I dare ya.

 

Actually you did, we had this discussion about a month ago and I posted it then, I am not going to keep going back just because you can't remember your own words.

 

But let's drop that and say you didn't, you certainly have not recently so I give you that but why do you feel the need to make any attacks? This comment your responding to was not about Tami at all, so why are you trying to deflect attention away from the point that your now flamming me in the perceptions thread?

 

 

Why do you act this way?

 

 

 

Sorry, you don't get to claim the monopoly on my cok jokes. I would say that to anyone. Hardly a personal attack.

 

Unless you have cok sucking issues, that is?

 

Again nice dodge but it was clearly a personal attack so why do you need to compensate so often with thise kinds of attacks?

 

 

 

That's not true, either.

 

Very true, even at the jungle IWS was there in every thread jumping on the bandwagon. He is always taking your side and he just admitted to not even reading the thread before again jumping on the bandwagon against me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer my fukking question:

 

Why in the hell do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 

Why is that?

 

Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 

I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

 

I did answer your question, you just can't face the truth. You will brush aside anything I say so that is why I pointed out snaff agreed with me too so answer my question, do you think snaff is crazy and seeing things that are not there too?

 

You say you respect his opinion to be impartial, he said the same thing I said so now what? Ignore what you don't want to hear?

 

 

 

I know, what did RO say on the subject a little while back?

 

You and I may not see eye to eye on some things, but I will give credit when and where it is due.

 

Others just disagree with you because it seems like the fun thing to do.

[Ahhlee]

Actually you did, we had this discussion about a month ago and I posted it then, I am not going to keep going back just because you can't remember your own words.

 

 

What in the hell are you talking about?????

 

 

But let's drop that and say you didn't, you certainly have not recently so I give you that but why do you feel the need to make any attacks? This comment your responding to was not about Tami at all, so why are you trying to deflect attention away from the point that your now flamming me in the perceptions thread?

 

 

Why do you act this way?

 

Was it a snotty comment....sure, it was. I'll own that.

 

But my first comment wasn't a personal flame. It was a critique on your writing that you didn't like. Big difference....and you are incapable of seeing that.

 

 

Again nice dodge but it was clearly a personal attack so why do you need to compensate so often with thise kinds of attacks?

 

 

TJ...when you have been "personally attacked" by me, you will know it.

 

This other stuff is all forum/joking/snarky bullsh!t.

 

There IS a difference.

 

 

Very true, even at the jungle IWS was there in every thread jumping on the bandwagon. He is always taking your side and he just admitted to not even reading the thread before again jumping on the bandwagon against me.

 

 

Give IWS some credit, man. If he told me I was out of line or wrong, I'd respect his opinion. He's got a good head on his shoulders...he's so much more than just a glorious side boob.

 

His reactions to you are not being swayed in any way, shape or form by me.

 

 

 

I did answer your question, you just can't face the truth. You will brush aside anything I say so that is why I pointed out snaff agreed with me too so answer my question, do you think snaff is crazy and seeing things that are not there too?

 

You say you respect his opinion to be impartial, he said the same thing I said so now what? Ignore what you don't want to hear?

 

 

 

I know, what did RO say on the subject a little while back?

 

You and I may not see eye to eye on some things, but I will give credit when and where it is due.

 

Others just disagree with you because it seems like the fun thing to do.

 

You're not answering at all. You're deflecting, dodging and even trying to throw snaf under the bus to avoid my question, which was:

 

Why in the hell do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 

Why is that?

 

Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 

I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.