Go Vote

[timesjoke]

But Joe, still all you have is both of us wishful thinking, in that same thread I said exactly that too but you would not accept wishful thinking as a reasonable reason to say some people should not vote.

 

 

But then a long time later you say some people should not vote and that is supposed to be somehow different?

 

 

We said the same thing Joe, we both said some people should not vote, only now it is you saying some people should not vote so that makes it okay.

 

 

 

 

You see, I tend to remember most discussions I have, it is a gift of being trained in interrogations and I find it useful in sales on a regular basis. You on the other hand forget what you say and contradict yourself every now and then, lol. I don't mind, I am used to guys like you intentionally adjusting your position just so you can have an excuse to disagree with me and talk trash.

[jokersarewild]

You said some people shouldn't be allowed to vote, Times. As in, they should not have the RIGHT to vote. It's as simple as that. You can scream semantics like the boy who cried wolf, but you said something, and instead of saying "I misspoke, I meant this", you say "No, I really said this, and it's the same exact thing". You are WRONG.

[eddo]

I want Alyssa Milano to be in my house and have dinner ready for me when I get home today.

 

I can say that I wish for that. or I can go kidnap her and force her to be in my house and have dinner ready for me when I get home today.

 

One is hoping she will do it on her own, and the other is me forcing her.

 

semantics play a pretty big role in differentiating the two.

 

 

no, I have no intentions of kidnapping Alyssa Milano, but I bet she makes an awesome fruit pizza. and if not, I'll just spend dinner time staring at her.