jokersarewild Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 I recognize political realities. Palin made a career out of appealing to emotions that career is now in peril. What is good for the gander is good for the goose. ...and Ozzy Osborne is responsible for suicides, Jodi Foster is responsible for Reagan being shot, J.D. Salinger is responsible for the death of John Lennon... Ahhh exactly! Ain’t that right hugo? Your distain for Sarah is obviously clouding your sense of reason. I'm pretty sure Hugo was saying that, whether she was responsible for it or not, she'll be seen as (at least) partially responsible. It'll ruin any chance she has at becoming POTUS, as it will definitely be brought up in the future, if she tries to run. The fact that IWS can bring up the author of Catcher in the Rye as an example, proves the point. Whether Salinger was responsible or not, it's common knowledge what supposedly "inspired" the assassination. And if it becomes common knowledge that Palin was "responsible" for the death of Gifford, her political career is over. 1 Quote RoyalOrleans is my real dad!
hugo Posted January 10, 2011 Author Posted January 10, 2011 I recognize political realities. Palin made a career out of appealing to emotions that career is now in peril. What is good for the gander is good for the goose. ...and Ozzy Osborne is responsible for suicides, Jodi Foster is responsible for Reagan being shot, J.D. Salinger is responsible for the death of John Lennon... Ahhh exactly! Ain’t that right hugo? Your distain for Sarah is obviously clouding your sense of reason. I'm pretty sure Hugo was saying that, whether she was responsible for it or not, she'll be seen as (at least) partially responsible. It'll ruin any chance she has at becoming POTUS, as it will definitely be brought up in the future, if she tries to run. The fact that IWS can bring up the author of Catcher in the Rye as an example, proves the point. Whether Salinger was responsible or not, it's common knowledge what supposedly "inspired" the assassination. And if it becomes common knowledge that Palin was "responsible" for the death of Gifford, her political career is over. Finally..someone who can read. 1 Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
hugo Posted January 10, 2011 Author Posted January 10, 2011 Of course, the difference is not many were supporting Zuniga for President. I guess I missed the evidence that this anti-flag, anti-God, anti-Constitution, reader of Karl Marx was a Palin supporter. Palin extended communism as governor of Alaska. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
ImWithStupid Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 I recognize political realities. Palin made a career out of appealing to emotions that career is now in peril. What is good for the gander is good for the goose. ...and Ozzy Osborne is responsible for suicides, Jodi Foster is responsible for Reagan being shot, J.D. Salinger is responsible for the death of John Lennon... Ahhh exactly! Ain’t that right hugo? Your distain for Sarah is obviously clouding your sense of reason. I'm pretty sure Hugo was saying that, whether she was responsible for it or not, she'll be seen as (at least) partially responsible. It'll ruin any chance she has at becoming POTUS, as it will definitely be brought up in the future, if she tries to run. The fact that IWS can bring up the author of Catcher in the Rye as an example, proves the point. Whether Salinger was responsible or not, it's common knowledge what supposedly "inspired" the assassination. And if it becomes common knowledge that Palin was "responsible" for the death of Gifford, her political career is over. Only an idiot would place blame on a detached, trumped up, person or thing that supposedly or actually "inspired" a mentally deranged person to harm themselves or others. As for ending Palin's political career. Won't happen. This will be just like all the past events that the left and the media try to pin on a conservative person or group, before learning the truth in the situation. this too will fade away as just another left wing witch hunt and as the rest of these attempts, going back at least half a century that I can think of off the top of my head, will only be heard again from idiots who ignore the truth, As for if this keeps Palin from running for Pres in 2012, that would be a welcome outcome, of the left wing hate/smear machine. Quote
jokersarewild Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 I recognize political realities. Palin made a career out of appealing to emotions that career is now in peril. What is good for the gander is good for the goose. ...and Ozzy Osborne is responsible for suicides, Jodi Foster is responsible for Reagan being shot, J.D. Salinger is responsible for the death of John Lennon... Ahhh exactly! Ain’t that right hugo? Your distain for Sarah is obviously clouding your sense of reason. I'm pretty sure Hugo was saying that, whether she was responsible for it or not, she'll be seen as (at least) partially responsible. It'll ruin any chance she has at becoming POTUS, as it will definitely be brought up in the future, if she tries to run. The fact that IWS can bring up the author of Catcher in the Rye as an example, proves the point. Whether Salinger was responsible or not, it's common knowledge what supposedly "inspired" the assassination. And if it becomes common knowledge that Palin was "responsible" for the death of Gifford, her political career is over. Only an idiot would place blame on a detached, trumped up, person or thing that supposedly or actually "inspired" a mentally deranged person to harm themselves or others. So...most of America? Quote RoyalOrleans is my real dad!
wez Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 Only an idiot would place blame on a detached, trumped up, person or thing that supposedly or actually "inspired" a mentally deranged person to harm themselves or others. Ya know.. Charles Manson never killed anyone.. merely "inspired" them.. was no where near the murder scene when the mentally deranged "harmed"others. Innocent? Why a gun sight target and inspiration to "reload" ? That's exactly what someone did to one of her "targets". Seems to me she has an ethical obligation to be responsible for the message she's putting out as a public figure.. some people are quite literal ya know.. What's with the physical violence wins elections message? What a fucking idiot.. Quote
phreakwars Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 Jim Jones never killed anyone either. He just inspired with words they wanted to believe. Don't know for sure that you could call his followers mentally deranged and get away with it. They just more or less believed what they wanted to believe. . . Quote https://www.facebook.com/phreakwars
wez Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 Come to think of it.. who was that Osama Bin Laden killed on 9/11 that prompted a 10 year war? I forget.. Quote
snafu Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 I read your response just fine hugo. I’m saying Sarah’s medafor of don’t retreat, reload and trying to connect that to this tragedy is absurd. It is nothing like Charles Manson or Jim Jones and you all know it. Your grasping at straws and even a smart man like you hugo should know that. To continue to try and find anything to dis Sarah shows your bias and blindness to facts. Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
jokersarewild Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 I read your response just fine hugo. I’m saying Sarah’s medafor of don’t retreat, reload and trying to connect that to this tragedy is absurd. It is nothing like Charles Manson or Jim Jones and you all know it. Your grasping at straws and even a smart man like you hugo should know that. To continue to try and find anything to dis Sarah shows your bias and blindness to facts. Whether the connection is rational or not isn't necessarily the point. It's whether the connection is seen as rational. The problem is, the way our brain works, in a year or two, when someone says, "Remember how Palin got a Congresswoman shot?", that's the connection they'll make based on what the media is currently reporting. And if they're like us (who tend to research these things for our debates), then they'll say "Oh, she didn't get anyone killed." But the problem is with the rest of Americans who don't do research. They rely on memory, which can be (and often is) wrong. So, the connection will be made, and any sort of office Ms. Palin tries to get into that requires votes, will be shot down quicker than standing in front of Dick Cheney during hunting season. 1 Quote RoyalOrleans is my real dad!
eddo Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 . from 2004. Seems Sarah wasn't the first to put targets on the opposing political adversaries. go figure... source and because of all this, I am no longer shopping at target. insensitive bastards.... [attach=full]3081[/attach] Quote I'm trusted by more women.
ImWithStupid Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 and because of all this, I am no longer shopping at target. insensitive bastards.... [attach=full]3082[/attach] Well it is completely obvious that the store is only named Target and uses that symbol is to incite violence. Quote
hugo Posted January 12, 2011 Author Posted January 12, 2011 and because of all this, I am no longer shopping at target. insensitive bastards.... [attach=full]3083[/attach] Well it is completely obvious that the store is only named Target and uses that symbol is to incite violence. People can throw bean bags at a target. There is a reason intelligent people do not impose gunsights on their political opponents. Obama is sad today. He was hoping for an easy opponent. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
ImWithStupid Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 People can throw bean bags at a target. There is a reason intelligent people do not impose gunsights on their political opponents. Obama is sad today. He was hoping for an easy opponent. If you can find me a rifle scope where the crosshairs of the reticle extend past the body of the rifle scope, I'll accept that what was on Palin's pic was a "gunsight". However, you can't argue that the image that Target used is a bullseye, obviously to draw some form of violence or force toward whatever it is on, whether it's hit by a beanbag, bullet, arrow or urine, force has been applied to the object. Quote
hugo Posted January 13, 2011 Author Posted January 13, 2011 People can throw bean bags at a target. There is a reason intelligent people do not impose gunsights on their political opponents. Obama is sad today. He was hoping for an easy opponent. If you can find me a rifle scope where the crosshairs of the reticle extend past the body of the rifle scope, I'll accept that what was on Palin's pic was a "gunsight". However, you can't argue that the image that Target used is a bullseye, obviously to draw some form of violence or force toward whatever it is on, whether it's hit by a beanbag, bullet, arrow or urine, force has been applied to the object. What was the tweet the great bimbo deleted? Do you think anyone who is referred to as "the great bimbo" could win a general election? Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
ImWithStupid Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 People can throw bean bags at a target. There is a reason intelligent people do not impose gunsights on their political opponents. Obama is sad today. He was hoping for an easy opponent. If you can find me a rifle scope where the crosshairs of the reticle extend past the body of the rifle scope, I'll accept that what was on Palin's pic was a "gunsight". However, you can't argue that the image that Target used is a bullseye, obviously to draw some form of violence or force toward whatever it is on, whether it's hit by a beanbag, bullet, arrow or urine, force has been applied to the object. What was the tweet the great bimbo deleted? Do you think anyone who is referred to as "the great bimbo" could win a general election? http://Off Topic Forum.com/topic/35789-palin-gets-people-killed/page__view__findpost__p__117540 Quote
hugo Posted January 13, 2011 Author Posted January 13, 2011 People can throw bean bags at a target. There is a reason intelligent people do not impose gunsights on their political opponents. Obama is sad today. He was hoping for an easy opponent. If you can find me a rifle scope where the crosshairs of the reticle extend past the body of the rifle scope, I'll accept that what was on Palin's pic was a "gunsight". However, you can't argue that the image that Target used is a bullseye, obviously to draw some form of violence or force toward whatever it is on, whether it's hit by a beanbag, bullet, arrow or urine, force has been applied to the object. What was the tweet the great bimbo deleted? Do you think anyone who is referred to as "the great bimbo" could win a general election? http://Off Topic Forum.com/topic/35789-palin-gets-people-killed/page__view__findpost__p__117540 The great bimbo just lost the Jewish vote. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110112/ts_afp/uscrimeshootingpoliticspalin_20110112164612 Why would a conservative support the most socialist governor since Huey Long? Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
jokersarewild Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 Why are we still arguing over Palin's targets? We've already come to the conclusion only a moron would actually believe she was in any way responsible. Quote RoyalOrleans is my real dad!
ImWithStupid Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 Why are we still arguing over Palin's targets? We've already come to the conclusion only a moron would actually believe she was in any way responsible. I was making a joke about Target. Hugo doesn't have a sense of humor. As for Hugo's question... Why would a conservative support the most socialist governor since Huey Long? He must have been too lazy to actually read the post I left a link to, that would have gave him an idea what my answer would be. http://Off Topic Forum.com/topic/35789-palin-gets-people-killed/page__view__findpost__p__117540 Quote
jokersarewild Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 Why are we still arguing over Palin's targets? We've already come to the conclusion only a moron would actually believe she was in any way responsible. I was making a joke about Target. Hugo doesn't have a sense of humor. You misunderstood me. I mean, we're all in agreement. Why is this still a debate? Quote RoyalOrleans is my real dad!
snafu Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 That bimbo is not only gonna run but she's gonna win! She could beat Obama hands down. Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
snafu Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 And if she doesn’t run she will be the catalyst for the next republican that will be the next president. Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
eddo Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 Palin may run, but I don't think she has the support to win anymore. Her getting the Repub nomination would almost assuredly hand the election back to Obama. and pissin' off the Jews ain't gonna help a thing... Quote I'm trusted by more women.
jokersarewild Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 That bimbo is not only gonna run but she's gonna win! She could beat Obama hands down. That's quite doubtful. She's too volatile. She can express her opinions all she wants, but she sounds like a dumb bimbo half the time. The other half she sounds like a dumb bimbo as well, strangely enough. Basically, she can rally people under her causes (which she makes up half the time, i.e. Death Panels in the Healthcare Bill), but anybody who actually would vote for Palin thinks "Critical Thinking" is a finishing move in Mortal Kombat. Quote RoyalOrleans is my real dad!
hugo Posted January 13, 2011 Author Posted January 13, 2011 That bimbo is not only gonna run but she's gonna win! She could beat Obama hands down. Did she send ya another check? Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.