Guest Gis Bun Posted June 9, 2008 Posted June 9, 2008 Hi, Assuming the security group DARN\MIS exists in a Server 2003 AD domain, why isn't the following working: cacls . /e /r /g darn\mis /c /t Quote
Guest Roger Abell [MVP] Posted June 17, 2008 Posted June 17, 2008 <span style="color:blue"> > cacls . /e /r /g darnmis /c /t</span> is undefined syntax cacls . /e /r darn\mis /c /t revokes any existing grants held by darn\mis Consider use of xcacls or icacls dependiung on OS version as they are newer and more capable. "Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:AAA7D48F-8437-4003-8968-A5F1858A6AF0@microsoft.com...<span style="color:blue"> > Hi, > > Assuming the security group DARNMIS exists in a Server 2003 AD domain, > why > isn't the following working: > > cacls . /e /r /g darnmis /c /t > > </span> Quote
Guest Gis Bun Posted June 17, 2008 Posted June 17, 2008 Wooops. I was thinking that the /E and /R went together - they do if I was adding a user and not a group. :-) Thanks "Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote: <span style="color:blue"> > <span style="color:green"> > > cacls . /e /r /g darnmis /c /t</span> > is undefined syntax > cacls . /e /r darnmis /c /t > revokes any existing grants held by darnmis > Consider use of xcacls or icacls dependiung on OS version > as they are newer and more capable. > > > "Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:AAA7D48F-8437-4003-8968-A5F1858A6AF0@microsoft.com...<span style="color:green"> > > Hi, > > > > Assuming the security group DARNMIS exists in a Server 2003 AD domain, > > why > > isn't the following working: > > > > cacls . /e /r /g darnmis /c /t > > > > </span> > > > </span> Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.