IgnoranceKills Posted September 25, 2006 Posted September 25, 2006 A 33 year old homeless man robs a liquor store. This man has a severe addiction to menthamphetamines. Another homeless man robs a liquor store just 3 blocks away in the same legal jurisdiction but he does it to feed his 12 year old son. Should the motive for the crime play any sort of roll in the conviction of the criminal. Does motive matter or is a robbery, a robbery plain and simple. When convicting a criminal of any crime, should the motive be taken into consideration? Quote
rizzo Posted September 25, 2006 Posted September 25, 2006 How can you prove motive? How can you prove that the other man robbed to feed his child? Yes, I think that motive should be taken into consideration, but that can be a tricky thing to prove. Quote
phreakwars Posted September 30, 2006 Posted September 30, 2006 Give them both the fucking chair. If his 12 year old is hungry enough, he can simply turn his dad into the social services for neglecting him and depriving him of food.. that should get him a nice warm meal within a couple hours after doing so. . . Quote https://www.facebook.com/phreakwars
ImWithStupid Posted September 30, 2006 Posted September 30, 2006 A 33 year old homeless man robs a liquor store. This man has a severe addiction to menthamphetamines. Another homeless man robs a liquor store just 3 blocks away in the same legal jurisdiction but he does it to feed his 12 year old son. Should the motive for the crime play any sort of roll in the conviction of the criminal. Does motive matter or is a robbery, a robbery plain and simple. When convicting a criminal of any crime, should the motive be taken into consideration? IMO, the motive rarely should be considered as part of a conviction. Either you prove they did the crime or you don't. I do believe, however, that motive may be taken into consideration at the time of sentencing. Quote
ImWithStupid Posted October 3, 2006 Posted October 3, 2006 I am glad to hear this from you. Any of my crew get into trouble they better do it where ever you live, that way I wont have to pay as many bribes. . . . I came to this conclusion about ten years ago. In Texas a jury is able to set the sentace to a crime. The jury convicted a man of murder but only sentenced him to "time served" and a one dollar fine for killing the man who raped and murderd his daughter. That's where my perspective is coming from. Quote
Wurdy Posted October 3, 2006 Posted October 3, 2006 I've thought about this, funny to see it asked here. I've come to the conclusion that it's a good thing motive is considered in the commission of a crime. It at least shows there's something compassionate remaining of humanity. I wonder more about that than I do this question. Quote
smutt butt Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 A 33 year old homeless man robs a liquor store. This man has a severe addiction to menthamphetamines. Another homeless man robs a liquor store just 3 blocks away in the same legal jurisdiction but he does it to feed his 12 year old son. Should the motive for the crime play any sort of roll in the conviction of the criminal. Does motive matter or is a robbery, a robbery plain and simple. When convicting a criminal of any crime, should the motive be taken into consideration? NO. ...... Quote "This place may be bombed and we will be killed. We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us." Osama Bin Laden. nov. 2001
builder Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 Of course it fucking should. Climb out from under that rock, SmuttButt. Oh, that's right....you're a republican. We can't have all of the party you vote for being lumbered for all the shit they've done now, can we? Quote Persevere, it pisses people off.
Lethalfind Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 I agree with Builder, and in the American legal system it does effect what happens to you. I walk up to someone on the street and shoot them for the fun of it...I would probably get lethal injection here in Florida. I shoot someone who is threatening me with a knife, I could get off completely for having shot someone. Quote I am a pathetic piece of shit leeching single mom.
ImWithStupid Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 I agree with Builder, and in the American legal system it does effect what happens to you. I walk up to someone on the street and shoot them for the fun of it...I would probably get lethal injection here in Florida. I shoot someone who is threatening me with a knife, I could get off completely for having shot someone. Those two scenerios don't even relate. In one you commited murder, the other you acted in self defense. Quote
snafu Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 Those two scenerios don't even relate. In one you commited murder, the other you acted in self defense. Scratches head Why on earth would she even equate the two? The scenario would be like I just walked up and shot someone in the face for no reason. Or this guy raped my daughter; I jump into my car, find him and shoot him in the face. Do I get the same time? You have a legal right to defened yourself with leathal force if you feel you, somone else or your property is in danger. Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
Lethalfind Posted October 5, 2006 Posted October 5, 2006 I related the two because this thread is asking should motive effect how your convicted or not, the original mention was about robbing a store, one person was a junky robbing a store for drug money and the other was robbing a store to feed a hungry child, same crime different motive...just like what I posted... Quote I am a pathetic piece of shit leeching single mom.
snafu Posted October 5, 2006 Posted October 5, 2006 I related the two because this thread is asking should motive effect how your convicted or not, the original mention was about robbing a store, one person was a junky robbing a store for drug money and the other was robbing a store to feed a hungry child, same crime different motive...just like what I posted... Yeah but those are two crimes. You said: I shoot someone who is threatening me with a knife, I could get off completely for having shot someone. Thats not a crime. That's self defense. What you think it's a crime becuse he had a knife and you had a gun? Think again. It don't matter. Quote "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller NEVER FORGOTTEN
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.