Guest lisen Posted June 29, 2008 Posted June 29, 2008 I use acronis to backup and recover the system and partitions, but sometimes I found that the image has been corrupted in one of the partitions. Now I placed the images on one external hard disk which is IDE but attached in the USB box. Acronis told me that I could not recover these images unless I use the rescue bootable media. What are the pros and cons for placing images of backup on dynamic hard disk? Quote
Guest S. Pidgorny Posted June 29, 2008 Posted June 29, 2008 In your situation the plus is - portability (you can detach the USB-connected disk and put it away), and the minus is that you'll have additional complexity in recovery process. My suggestion is this: test your recovery scenario. Declare your system dead and see what it takes to use those images to recover. Then test the other setup. You'll be much better positioned to make a call on the proper setup then. -- Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE -= F1 is the key =- http://sl.mvps.org http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp "lisen" <null> wrote in message news:%23XlBudZ2IHA.5176@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> >I use acronis to backup and recover the system and partitions, but >sometimes > I found that the image has been corrupted in one of the partitions. > Now I placed the images on one external hard disk which is IDE but > attached in the USB box. Acronis told me that I could not > recover these images unless I use the rescue bootable media. > > What are the pros and cons for placing images of backup on dynamic hard > disk? > > > </span> Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.