Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Mr. Arnold wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > > "Paul MontDenturesDropped" wrote: > <span style="color:green"> >> Mr. Arnold wrote: >> >> <snipped> >> >> You should fall for the impersonator act.</span> > > I am so glad you AGREE!</span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Guest Paul Montgomery Posted October 17, 2008 Posted October 17, 2008 Paul Montgomery wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm> > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$ > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a > X$x" "in X$#" "is > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just > like X$#" "X#$" > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$ > PARTY" "X$#" "hated > wherever he goes!" "X#$ > > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and > thus illegal > > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly, > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries > > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the > average reader would not be able to detect. > > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a > troll. > > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise > the seriousness of this offence. > > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective. > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is > also worth registering with > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/ > ></span> Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.