Guest ~BD~ Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 Should anyone here have ever read this thread: http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=2809...gistry+cleaners they will be aware that the gurus at Aumha do not support the use of Registry cleaners - period! You can therefore imagine my surprise when I read here ......... http://www.aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=37253 ...... this instruction being given by Mr Bill Castner:- Quote: 1) Click on the following link and download the AntiVir Registry Cleaner to your desktop http://dl.antivir.de/down/windows/registrycleaner.zip 2) Create a folder on your desktop called Antivir and Unzip the file to your desktop 3) Double-click on the file called RegCleaner.exe to run it 4) Since the program is German, you'll have to click on the button called "keys asulesen" to search the registry for any issues. Then place checkmarks next to the registry entries you wish to delete. 5) Finally, click on the button called "loschen" to delete the keys 6) Restart your computer. Someone reading here may know of some reason(s) why, in this specific instance, the use of this particular cleaner has been advocated. I'd be very interested to know such reason(s) - if you'll share! style_emoticons/ Dave Quote
Guest David H. Lipman Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> | Should anyone here have ever read this thread: Because you PITA SOB you have taken it out of context. http://www.avira.com/en/support/support_downloads.html Avira RegistryCleaner Normally the Avira RegistryCleaner removes all entries that were created by AntiVir. In this way, it prepares your system for the installation of a new AntiVir version. It is contraindicated to use / generic / Registry Cleaners! -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp Quote
Guest BurfordTJustice Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 Because you are like a bag of rocks! "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:%230ENu56VJHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... Should anyone here have ever read this thread: I'd be very interested to know such reason(s) - if you'll share! style_emoticons/ Dave Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 "BurfordTJustice" <hot@smokey.v8> wrote in message news:_s2dnRKgEZVMN6fUnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@trueband.net...<span style="color:blue"> > Because you are like a bag of rocks! ></span> To which question is that an answer, BTJ? Dave -- Quote
Guest none Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 ~BD~ wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > "BurfordTJustice" <hot@smokey.v8> wrote in message > news:_s2dnRKgEZVMN6fUnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@trueband.net...<span style="color:green"> >> Because you are like a bag of rocks! >></span> > > To which question is that an answer, BTJ? > > Dave > </span> It is beyond my comprehension how anyone who is the constant recipient of continual scorn, derision and loathing can continue to post here with continuing drivel. Do you have a short circuit in your gray matter or are you just a masochist? Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 "none" <""richard\"@(none)"> wrote in message news:ePfB3%238VJHA.1116@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > > It is beyond my comprehension how anyone who is the constant recipient of > continual scorn, derision and loathing can continue to post here with > continuing drivel. > > Do you have a short circuit in your gray matter or are you just a > masochist? ></span> I'll simply refer you here, Richard: http://www.kipling.org.uk/poems_if.htm -------------------------------------------------------------------------- IF..... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- IF you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you, If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, But make allowance for their doubting too; If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, Or being lied about, don't deal in lies, Or being hated, don't give way to hating, And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise: If you can dream - and not make dreams your master; If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim; If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same; If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools: If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings And never breathe a word about your loss; If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone, And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!' If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, ' Or walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch, if neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but none too much; If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds' worth of distance run, Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it, And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote
Guest VanguardLH Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 ~BD~ wrote: <span style="color:blue"> > Should anyone here have ever read this thread: > > http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=2809...gistry+cleaners > > they will be aware that the gurus at Aumha do not support the use > of Registry cleaners - period! You can therefore imagine my surprise when I read here ......... > > http://www.aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=37253 ...... > > this instruction being given by Mr Bill Castner:- > > </span> Quote: 1) Click on the following link and download the AntiVir Registry Cleaner to your desktop http://dl.antivir.de/down/windows/registrycleaner.zip 2) Create a folder on your desktop called Antivir and Unzip the file to your desktop 3) Double-click on the file called RegCleaner.exe to run it 4) Since the program is German, you'll have to click on the button called "keys asulesen" to search the registry for any issues. Then place checkmarks next to the registry entries you wish to delete. 5) Finally, click on the button called "loschen" to delete the keys 6) Restart your computer.<span style="color:blue"> > > > > Someone reading here may know of some reason(s) why, in this specific > instance, the use of this particular cleaner has been advocated. > I'd be very interested to know such reason(s) - if you'll share! style_emoticons/ </span> NOTE: Since the parent group of mirosoft.public.security was included in the newsgroups lists, the child or subgroups or microsoft.public.security.virus and microsoft.public.security.homeusers were omitted in my reply. Just because a program's name is registrycleaner does not mean it is a general-purpose registry cleanup utility. Read the following regarding Avira's utility: http://www.avira.ru/en/support/av7_upgrade_tools.html What you conveniently or perhaps accidentally omitted from your citations of the post was that it was part of: 4. You show Avira Antivirus installed on 10-15-2008. Use Add or Remove Programs and remove its entry. which is then followed by the part that you choose to cite. That entire step is about uninstalling Avira's antivirus program, and the part that you cited was some extra cleanup of remnant registry entries after that uninstallation. Context is important. You left if out. Perhaps you just jumped into that discussion by using a search and didn't read the rest of it to understand what was the registrycleaner utility being mentioned. Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 "VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH> wrote in message news:ghiau3$tf9$1@news.motzarella.org...<span style="color:blue"> > ~BD~ wrote: ><span style="color:green"> >> Should anyone here have ever read this thread: >> >> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=2809...gistry+cleaners >> >> they will be aware that the gurus at Aumha do not support the use >> of Registry cleaners - period! You can therefore imagine my surprise when >> I read here ......... >> >> http://www.aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=37253 ...... >> >> this instruction being given by Mr Bill Castner:- >> >> </span> > Quote: > 1) Click on the following link and download the AntiVir Registry Cleaner > to your desktop http://dl.antivir.de/down/windows/registrycleaner.zip > 2) Create a folder on your desktop called Antivir and Unzip the file to > your desktop > 3) Double-click on the file called RegCleaner.exe to run it > 4) Since the program is German, you'll have to click on the button > called "keys asulesen" to search the registry for any issues. Then place > checkmarks next to the registry entries you wish to delete. > 5) Finally, click on the button called "loschen" to delete the keys > 6) Restart your computer.<span style="color:green"> >> >> >> >> Someone reading here may know of some reason(s) why, in this specific >> instance, the use of this particular cleaner has been advocated. >> I'd be very interested to know such reason(s) - if you'll share! style_emoticons/</span> > > NOTE: Since the parent group of mirosoft.public.security was included > in the newsgroups lists, the child or subgroups or > microsoft.public.security.virus and microsoft.public.security.homeusers > were omitted in my reply. > > Just because a program's name is registrycleaner does not mean it is a > general-purpose registry cleanup utility. Read the following regarding > Avira's utility: > > http://www.avira.ru/en/support/av7_upgrade_tools.html > > What you conveniently or perhaps accidentally omitted from your > citations of the post was that it was part of: > > 4. You show Avira Antivirus installed on 10-15-2008. Use Add or Remove > Programs and remove its entry. > > which is then followed by the part that you choose to cite. That > entire step is about uninstalling Avira's antivirus program, and the > part that you cited was some extra cleanup of remnant registry entries > after that uninstallation. > > Context is important. You left if out. Perhaps you just jumped into > that discussion by using a search and didn't read the rest of it to > understand what was the registrycleaner utility being mentioned.</span> -- Hello Vanguard - thank you for your reply. I actually ran the Avira programme. Although I have NEVER had Avira on this machine, a number of registry entries were identified - NONE of them relating to Avira! Significant? Probably not - but interesting! I then went on to load http://devbuilds.kaspersky-labs.com/devbuilds/AVPTool/ as recommended by Mr Castner. I ran the scan and it found two instances of Trojan-Spy.Win32.Keylogger.bhg (located in the files just downloaded as above!) This is where I get lost! Dave -- Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 "VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH> wrote in message news:ghiau3$tf9$1@news.motzarella.org... "NOTE: Since the parent group of mirosoft.public.security was included in the newsgroups lists, the child or subgroups or microsoft.public.security.virus and microsoft.public.security.homeusers were omitted in my reply." Please could you/would you explain exactly what you mean, Vanguard? Thanks. Dave Quote
Guest Shenan Stanley Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 <snipped and taken apart by ~BD~> VanguardLH wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > "NOTE: Since the parent group of mirosoft.public.security was > included in the newsgroups lists, the child or subgroups or > microsoft.public.security.virus and > microsoft.public.security.homeusers were omitted in my reply."</span> ~BD~ wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > Please could you/would you explain exactly what you mean, Vanguard?</span> Not sure it can be made more clear - but I will try: It seems VanguardLH's intention was to not crosspost to the following two newsgroups: - microsoft.public.security.virus - microsoft.public.security.homeusers given that it was also posted to: - microsoft.public.security You should notice that "microsoft.public.security" is seen in all those newsgroups. The 'parent' (microsoft.public.security) and the children (microsoft.public.security.virus, microsoft.public.security.homeusers) --> called children because they contain the same 'first part' as the parents. In any case - it looks like VanguardLH actually ended up neglecting to remove the other groups in their reply. ;-) -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 "Shenan Stanley" <newshelper@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ul2jASYWJHA.2928@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > <snipped and taken apart by ~BD~> > > VanguardLH wrote:<span style="color:green"> >> "NOTE: Since the parent group of mirosoft.public.security was >> included in the newsgroups lists, the child or subgroups or >> microsoft.public.security.virus and >> microsoft.public.security.homeusers were omitted in my reply."</span> > > ~BD~ wrote:<span style="color:green"> >> Please could you/would you explain exactly what you mean, Vanguard?</span> > > Not sure it can be made more clear - but I will try: > > It seems VanguardLH's intention was to not crosspost to the following two > newsgroups: > - microsoft.public.security.virus > - microsoft.public.security.homeusers > given that it was also posted to: > - microsoft.public.security > > You should notice that "microsoft.public.security" is seen in all those > newsgroups. The 'parent' (microsoft.public.security) and the children > (microsoft.public.security.virus, microsoft.public.security.homeusers) --> > called children because they contain the same 'first part' as the parents. > > In any case - it looks like VanguardLH actually ended up neglecting to > remove the other groups in their reply. ;-) > > -- > Shenan Stanley > MS-MVP > -- </span> Once again I must thank you for taking the time and trouble to help me, Shenan. So ....... Thanks! style_emoticons/ What you seem to intimate is that if a post is made in the "microsoft.public.security" group it will also show up in the sub groups (children) - but this does NOT happen here on my PC (XPHome SP3 using OE6 at present to read newsgroups). Each group seems to be totally independent of the other ....... here! That is why I am, quite deliberately, crossposting to other sub-groups. Are you seeing multiple responses at your end because of my action? Dave -- Quote
Guest Shenan Stanley Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 <snip> ~BD~ wrote:<span style="color:blue"> > What you seem to intimate is that if a post is made in the > "microsoft.public.security" group it will also show up in the sub > groups (children) - but this does NOT happen here on my PC (XPHome > SP3 using OE6 at present to read newsgroups). Each group seems to > be totally independent of the other ....... here!</span> They are independent of one another, as far as I know. I said they were children of the parent group - not that everything posted in one will be reproduced in the other. That would be 'cloning' in the human way of thinking of parent/child. This is not the way I mean it. Let's describe it this way (Windows XP default clean installation)... C:\ <-- that is the root of the C: disk drive. C:\Windows\ <-- a child/sub-folder of C:\ which is the root of the C: disk drive. C:\Documents and Settings\ <-- a child/sub-folder of C:\ which is the root of the C: disk drive. I can create a file and put it in any one or all of those folders - but I do not have to put it in more than one and it would likely be a waste of space and effort. Putting the file in one directory on the same system is more than sufficient and is much more efficient. That's a bit simplistic - because in reality cross-posting only puts the data out there once and all the groups point to/read/display that posting (single copy able to be referred to/examined from multiple location) -- while what I describe with the drives example would be more akin to multi-posting (multiple copies in multiple locations of the same data.) <span style="color:blue"> > That is why I am, quite deliberately, crossposting to other > sub-groups. Are you seeing multiple responses at your end because > of my action?</span> In a way - yes. I choose to 'reply-to-all' when I reply (the majority of the time.) That means whatever groups the person I am responding to has posted their comments to - I will normally end up replying to them in all those groups as well. -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 "Shenan Stanley" <newshelper@gmail.com> wrote in message news:eO3NCoYWJHA.4888@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > <snip> > > ~BD~ wrote:<span style="color:green"> >> What you seem to intimate is that if a post is made in the >> "microsoft.public.security" group it will also show up in the sub >> groups (children) - but this does NOT happen here on my PC (XPHome >> SP3 using OE6 at present to read newsgroups). Each group seems to >> be totally independent of the other ....... here!</span> > > They are independent of one another, as far as I know. > > I said they were children of the parent group - not that everything posted > in one will be reproduced in the other. That would be 'cloning' in the > human way of thinking of parent/child. This is not the way I mean it. > > Let's describe it this way (Windows XP default clean installation)... > > C: > <-- that is the root of the C: disk drive. > > C:Windows > <-- a child/sub-folder of C: which is the root of the C: disk drive. > > C:Documents and Settings > <-- a child/sub-folder of C: which is the root of the C: disk drive. > > I can create a file and put it in any one or all of those folders - but I > do not have to put it in more than one and it would likely be a waste of > space and effort. Putting the file in one directory on the same system is > more than sufficient and is much more efficient. > > That's a bit simplistic - because in reality cross-posting only puts the > data out there once and all the groups point to/read/display that posting > (single copy able to be referred to/examined from multiple location) -- > while what I describe with the drives example would be more akin to > multi-posting (multiple copies in multiple locations of the same data.) ><span style="color:green"> >> That is why I am, quite deliberately, crossposting to other >> sub-groups. Are you seeing multiple responses at your end because >> of my action?</span> > > In a way - yes. I choose to 'reply-to-all' when I reply (the majority of > the time.) That means whatever groups the person I am responding to has > posted their comments to - I will normally end up replying to them in all > those groups as well. > > -- > Shenan Stanley > MS-MVP > -- > How To Ask Questions The Smart Way > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html ></span> -- Thanks once again, Shenan. It seems that my understanding is just as you describe. style_emoticons/ Dave Quote
Guest VanguardLH Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 Shenan Stanley wrote: <span style="color:blue"> > <snipped and taken apart by ~BD~> > > VanguardLH wrote:<span style="color:green"> >> "NOTE: Since the parent group of mirosoft.public.security was >> included in the newsgroups lists, the child or subgroups or >> microsoft.public.security.virus and >> microsoft.public.security.homeusers were omitted in my reply."</span> > > ~BD~ wrote:<span style="color:green"> >> Please could you/would you explain exactly what you mean, Vanguard?</span> > > Not sure it can be made more clear - but I will try: > > It seems VanguardLH's intention was to not crosspost to the following two > newsgroups: > - microsoft.public.security.virus > - microsoft.public.security.homeusers > given that it was also posted to: > - microsoft.public.security > > You should notice that "microsoft.public.security" is seen in all those > newsgroups. The 'parent' (microsoft.public.security) and the children > (microsoft.public.security.virus, microsoft.public.security.homeusers) --> > called children because they contain the same 'first part' as the parents. > > In any case - it looks like VanguardLH actually ended up neglecting to > remove the other groups in their reply. ;-) > > -- > Shenan Stanley > MS-MVP</span> My intention was to not post to the child groups (i.e., subgroups). I had not yet edited the Newsgroups header to post my reply only to mirosoft.public.security. I walked away to blow my nose (I have a severe cold) and someone who shares the laptop but doesn't understand RDP (remote desktop protocol) didn't realize that I was windowed into my home host and thought they were using the laptop. In the 5 seconds that I was looking away from the laptop, they sat down and closed all open apps. That resulted in them saying yes to sending pending posts. So what I had intended to do didn't happen (i.e., posting only to the parent group). The groups are in a hierarchy. Besides the Big-8 groups, you can have subgroups (child groups). mirosoft.public.security is the parent of any subgroup in which it is the branch for those subgroups, like: microsoft.public.security.virus Some posters shotgun their posts all over the place without regard to hierarchy. If some of the groups are children of a common parent group, just post to the parent group. If you want to crosspost to all the child groups then don't post to the parent group. Hitting both the parent and child groups makes it evident you are just shotgunning around. Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted January 2, 2009 Posted January 2, 2009 Both VanguardLH and I have made further posts in this thread, but they do not show up here in OE6 on my PC (XP Home SP3) My last post post was made from Google Groups 02 January 2009 15:23 GMT When I said ....... "I owe you an apology for failing to respond to your message, VanguardLH. So - I'm sorry! I do appreciate the time and trouble you have taken to advise me. Thank you. I have only just noticed same as it did NOT appear (here on my PC) in Outlook Express 6 - rarely do I go to Google Groups using my googlemail address (from which I am now posting) and I'll be interested to see if this post turns up in OE6. I'll have to investigate further if it doesn't!" I'd be grateful if someone will advise if they can see the posts on their machine. TIA Dave Quote
Guest BillW50 Posted January 2, 2009 Posted January 2, 2009 In news:OHZH8OSbJHA.6036@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, ~BD~ typed on Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:47:43 -0000: [...]<span style="color:blue"> > I'd be grateful if someone will advise if they can see the posts on > their machine.</span> Hi Dave! See it. -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux Quote
Guest Bob Lucas Posted January 2, 2009 Posted January 2, 2009 "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:OHZH8OSbJHA.6036@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > Both VanguardLH and I have made further posts in this thread, but they > do not show up here in OE6 on my PC (XP Home SP3) > > My last post post was made from Google Groups 02 January 2009 15:23 > GMT > > When I said ....... > > "I owe you an apology for failing to respond to your message, > VanguardLH. > > So - I'm sorry! I do appreciate the time and trouble you have taken to > advise me. Thank you. > > I have only just noticed same as it did NOT appear (here on my PC) in > Outlook Express 6 - rarely do I go to Google Groups using my > googlemail address (from which I am now posting) and I'll be > interested to see if this post turns up in OE6. I'll have to > investigate further if it doesn't!" > > > I'd be grateful if someone will advise if they can see the posts on > their machine. > > TIA > > Dave ></span> Yes Using Win XP Pro SP3 and OE6, I can see your post on the microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general newsgroup. Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted January 2, 2009 Posted January 2, 2009 Thanks Bill. style_emoticons/ Dave "BillW50" <BillW50@aol.kom> wrote in message news:e9X6%23USbJHA.3692@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > In news:OHZH8OSbJHA.6036@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, > ~BD~ typed on Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:47:43 -0000: > [...]<span style="color:green"> >> I'd be grateful if someone will advise if they can see the posts on >> their machine.</span> > > Hi Dave! See it. > > -- > Bill > 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 > 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC > 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC > Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux > </span> Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted January 2, 2009 Posted January 2, 2009 "Bob Lucas" <bob@nospam.com> wrote in message news:ONlmYmSbJHA.1676@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:OHZH8OSbJHA.6036@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...<span style="color:green"> >> Both VanguardLH and I have made further posts in this thread, but >> they do not show up here in OE6 on my PC (XP Home SP3) >> >> My last post post was made from Google Groups 02 January 2009 15:23 >> GMT >> >> When I said ....... >> >> "I owe you an apology for failing to respond to your message, >> VanguardLH. >> >> So - I'm sorry! I do appreciate the time and trouble you have taken >> to >> advise me. Thank you. >> >> I have only just noticed same as it did NOT appear (here on my PC) in >> Outlook Express 6 - rarely do I go to Google Groups using my >> googlemail address (from which I am now posting) and I'll be >> interested to see if this post turns up in OE6. I'll have to >> investigate further if it doesn't!" >> >> >> I'd be grateful if someone will advise if they can see the posts on >> their machine. >> >> TIA >> >> Dave >></span> > > > Yes > > Using Win XP Pro SP3 and OE6, I can see your post on the > microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general newsgroup.</span> Thank you for letting me know, Bob. style_emoticons/ Dave Quote
Guest FromTheRafters Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 "BillW50" <BillW50@aol.kom> wrote in message news:e9X6%23USbJHA.3692@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > In news:OHZH8OSbJHA.6036@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, > ~BD~ typed on Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:47:43 -0000: > [...]<span style="color:green"> >> I'd be grateful if someone will advise if they can see the posts on >> their machine.</span> > > Hi Dave! See it.</span> ....and now we all have to see it <hint> style_emoticons/) Quote
Guest ~BD~ Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 "FromTheRafters" <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:OflUBbUbJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > > ...and now we all have to see it <hint> style_emoticons/) ></span> @FTR Peter Foldes is right - see here (and scroll down for 'windows') http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsg...78-2a35d422de4d Dave Quote
Guest FromTheRafters Posted January 4, 2009 Posted January 4, 2009 But that's not the webpage lobezno said he was using. This is: http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsg...us/default.aspx Try to find (by navigation) microsoft.public.scripting.virus for instance. ....much easier in the webpage I posted I think. "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:uANLXdbbJHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...<span style="color:blue"> > > "FromTheRafters" <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message > news:OflUBbUbJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...<span style="color:green"> >> >> ...and now we all have to see it <hint> style_emoticons/) >></span> > > @FTR > > Peter Foldes is right - see here (and scroll down for 'windows') > > http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsg...78-2a35d422de4d > > Dave > </span> Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.