Guest Marti van Lin Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 Op 16-06-10 17:55, Leythos wrote: > In article <hvar1p$76s$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >> >> Op 16-06-10 17:02, Leythos wrote: >>> In article <hvacek$f97$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >>>> Or why not take the plunge and go with GNU/Linux? which is - in contrast >>>> to any Microsoft Windows version - supported for all eternity. >>>> >>> >>> That's not really true - the new versions are released, updates are >>> released, at some point you upgrade because they don't keep supporting >>> version ABC.ABC... >> >> There for distributions provide a distribution upgrade, from the update >> manager. >> >> I kept on working while the distribution upgrade from the former Long >> Term Support version to the current LTS version was in progress. >> >>> The reason people don't run Linux more than they already do is support >>> and compatibility with devices and people not running Linux. >> >> I'm sorry I didn't have any problems with hardware support for the last >> five years. >> >> If you don't have a driver disk for WinXP or 7, your screwed too. Under >> GNU/Linux it's much more likely that your hardware will be supported >> right out of the box. > > How many Epson printers do you have? I don't, yet I know that Epson provides Linux drivers for ages. > How many Cannon printers do you have? I used a Canon BJC-150, which is an extremely "dumb" WinPrinter. I used the BJC800 driver on SuSE Linux 6.1 in 1999 > and it worked flawlessly. > How many All-In-One printer/scanner/fax devices do you have fully > operational with Linux? I don't have such a device, but people whom I've converted to GNU/Linux have never complained so far. > The list goes on. In your imaginary world... > The one thing we know for sure, drivers for Windows generally come out > with the devices and certainly quicker than for Linux. TÄ¥e other thing we know, is that devices (older that approx half a year) are usually supported out of the box by GNU/Linux. No (missing) driver disks required. Anyway, like I wrote before, I'm not interested in Evangelism and advocacy or another pointless pissing contest. With kind regards, -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin |-|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin Quote
Guest Leythos Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 In article <hvbeqr$8j7$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... > The other thing we know, is that devices (older that approx half a year) > are usually supported out of the box by GNU/Linux. No (missing) driver > disks required. > > Anyway, like I wrote before, I'm not interested in Evangelism and > advocacy or another pointless pissing contest. > I wasn't wanting to get into that crap either - I've been working with Fedora for a decade (at least it seems that long) and AIX before that, and Ubuntu and a couple others. Having an I.T. business means I'm exposed to a LOT of systems and hardware, more than a typical home user, and I've found that Linux, in general, has far less support for devices than does Windows. I'm not talking about a nix driver that gives the basics and that's all, I'm talking about full featured drivers like we see in windows. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address) Quote
Guest Frank Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 alias lies again! On 6/16/2010 11:45 AM, Alias wrote: > Leythos wrote: >> In article<4c19085b@news.x-privat.org>, fb@sr2.cmm says... >>> >>> On 6/16/2010 9:14 AM, Alias wrote: >>>> Leythos wrote: >>>>> In article<hvar1p$76s$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Op 16-06-10 17:02, Leythos wrote: >>>>>>> In article<hvacek$f97$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>> Or why not take the plunge and go with GNU/Linux? which is - in >>>>>>>> contrast >>>>>>>> to any Microsoft Windows version - supported for all eternity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's not really true - the new versions are released, updates are >>>>>>> released, at some point you upgrade because they don't keep >>>>>>> supporting >>>>>>> version ABC.ABC... >>>>>> >>>>>> There for distributions provide a distribution upgrade, from the >>>>>> update >>>>>> manager. >>>>>> >>>>>> I kept on working while the distribution upgrade from the former Long >>>>>> Term Support version to the current LTS version was in progress. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The reason people don't run Linux more than they already do is >>>>>>> support >>>>>>> and compatibility with devices and people not running Linux. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sorry I didn't have any problems with hardware support for the >>>>>> last >>>>>> five years. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't have a driver disk for WinXP or 7, your screwed too. >>>>>> Under >>>>>> GNU/Linux it's much more likely that your hardware will be supported >>>>>> right out of the box. >>>>> >>>>> How many Epson printers do you have? >>>> >>>> I have a few and they work great with Linux. >>> >>> LIAR! No you don't. You only have ( according to you) one HP printer. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> How many Cannon printers do you have? >>>> >>>> Canon is famous for not being Linux friendly but that's Canon's fault >>>> and lose. A little hardware research will go a long way. >>> >>> LIAR! >>>> >>>>> >>>>> How many All-In-One printer/scanner/fax devices do you have fully >>>>> operational with Linux? >>>> >>>> I have an HP All-in-One that works just fine. It doesn't have Vista or >>>> Windows 7 drivers though. >>>> >>> More of your lies? >>> Figures! >>> STFU LIAR! >>>>> >>>>> The list goes on. >>>> >>>> So you're saying that Windows 7 will not have a problem with each and >>>> every printer ever made? >>> >>> Still making up things others never said. >>> Figures, What a cock sucking POS LIAR you are. >>> Get lost creep. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The one thing we know for sure, drivers for Windows generally come out >>>>> with the devices and certainly quicker than for Linux. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Research before buying. You don't do that? >>> >>> Fact it asshole, the world runs on Windows, so most all hardware today >>> has drivers for Windows OS's. >>> Live with it loser. >>>> >> >> I have Alias kill filed, but it's obvious to anyone that's actually used >> Linux that he's lying, they have crappy printer support and a lot of the >> supported printers have basic controls and not the feature rich controls >> or options that are included with most Windows printer drivers. > > You obviously haven't installed the latest Ubuntu but that won't stop > you from lying about it. >> >> My video card, on one of my laptops, does not have a direct Windows 7 >> driver, but, something Alias would not know, is that the XP driver works >> perfectly and at all the same resolutions. On a Linux distro I can only >> get 1024x768, and since the laptop is a wide screen, the fonts are >> skewed. > > Not Ubuntu. Probably one of the distros you say are "better". >> >> I can remember Alias bashing vist, claiming direct problems experience, >> and then he slipped up and admitted he had never installed Vista or even >> used it himself... >> > > Got any more lies you can't substantiate? I find it interesting that you > have me kill filed but don't have Frank kill filed. Why? I make definitive, truthful statements whereas you lie. I actually have and use a legit copy of Windows 7, you don't. I guess your > priorities are about as skewered as your version of the truth. You are one with skewed priorities, like WTF are you even doing in this ng. Quote
Guest Frank Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 On 6/16/2010 2:14 PM, Marti van Lin wrote: > Op 16-06-10 17:55, Leythos wrote: > >> In article<hvar1p$76s$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >>> >>> Op 16-06-10 17:02, Leythos wrote: >>>> In article<hvacek$f97$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >>>>> Or why not take the plunge and go with GNU/Linux? which is - in contrast >>>>> to any Microsoft Windows version - supported for all eternity. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's not really true - the new versions are released, updates are >>>> released, at some point you upgrade because they don't keep supporting >>>> version ABC.ABC... >>> >>> There for distributions provide a distribution upgrade, from the update >>> manager. >>> >>> I kept on working while the distribution upgrade from the former Long >>> Term Support version to the current LTS version was in progress. >>> >>>> The reason people don't run Linux more than they already do is support >>>> and compatibility with devices and people not running Linux. >>> >>> I'm sorry I didn't have any problems with hardware support for the last >>> five years. >>> >>> If you don't have a driver disk for WinXP or 7, your screwed too. Under >>> GNU/Linux it's much more likely that your hardware will be supported >>> right out of the box. >> >> How many Epson printers do you have? > > I don't, yet I know that Epson provides Linux drivers for ages. > >> How many Cannon printers do you have? > > I used a Canon BJC-150, which is an extremely "dumb" WinPrinter. I used > the BJC800 driver on SuSE Linux 6.1 in 1999> and it worked flawlessly. > >> How many All-In-One printer/scanner/fax devices do you have fully >> operational with Linux? > > I don't have such a device, but people whom I've converted to GNU/Linux > have never complained so far. > >> The list goes on. > > In your imaginary world... > >> The one thing we know for sure, drivers for Windows generally come out >> with the devices and certainly quicker than for Linux. > > TÄ¥e other thing we know, is that devices (older that approx half a year) > are usually supported out of the box by GNU/Linux. No (missing) driver > disks required. What lying crock of shit you are. Go fuck yourself asshole! > Anyway, like I wrote before, I'm not interested in Evangelism and > advocacy or another pointless pissing contest. Then STFU asshole! > > With kind regards, > Yeah, you dumb fuck! Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 Leythos wrote: > In article<hvbeqr$8j7$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >> The other thing we know, is that devices (older that approx half a year) >> are usually supported out of the box by GNU/Linux. No (missing) driver >> disks required. >> >> Anyway, like I wrote before, I'm not interested in Evangelism and >> advocacy or another pointless pissing contest. >> > > I wasn't wanting to get into that crap either - I've been working with > Fedora for a decade (at least it seems that long) and AIX before that, > and Ubuntu and a couple others. Having an I.T. business means I'm > exposed to a LOT of systems and hardware, more than a typical home user, > and I've found that Linux, in general, has far less support for devices > than does Windows. I'm not talking about a nix driver that gives the > basics and that's all, I'm talking about full featured drivers like we > see in windows. > Ubuntu has the HP Toobox in the Software Center (a place you've obviously never been) and it provides everything the CD for Windows provides. It's interesting how this Win troll will constantly say it's HP's, Canon's, etc. fault when they don't provide drivers for Windows but it's Linux' fault when they don't provide drivers for Linux. -- Alias Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: > > > "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message > news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>> outdated. It >>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>> the >>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alias >>> >>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >> >> No you haven't. >> >> -- >> Alias > > You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. > > This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. What will you say then? -- Alias Quote
Guest Death Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 Alias wrote: > Leythos wrote: >> In article<hvbeqr$8j7$1@news.albasani.net>, ml2mst@gmail.com says... >>> The other thing we know, is that devices (older that approx half a year) >>> are usually supported out of the box by GNU/Linux. No (missing) driver >>> disks required. >>> >>> Anyway, like I wrote before, I'm not interested in Evangelism and >>> advocacy or another pointless pissing contest. >>> >> >> I wasn't wanting to get into that crap either - I've been working with >> Fedora for a decade (at least it seems that long) and AIX before that, >> and Ubuntu and a couple others. Having an I.T. business means I'm >> exposed to a LOT of systems and hardware, more than a typical home user, >> and I've found that Linux, in general, has far less support for devices >> than does Windows. I'm not talking about a nix driver that gives the >> basics and that's all, I'm talking about full featured drivers like we >> see in windows. >> > > Ubuntu has the HP Toobox in the Software Center (a place you've > obviously never been) and it provides everything the CD for Windows > provides. > > It's interesting how this Win troll will constantly say it's HP's, > Canon's, etc. fault when they don't provide drivers for Windows but it's > Linux' fault when they don't provide drivers for Linux. > Nobody makes drivers for Linux. They just sometimes by sheer coincidence work. -- Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur, Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur. Quote
Guest Death Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 Alias wrote: > Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >> >> >> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>> the >>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>> >>> No you haven't. >>> >>> -- >>> Alias >> >> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >> >> > > This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with > Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with > it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. > What will you say then? > I would say you are planning to steal 2 $500 laptops. -- Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur, Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur. Quote
Guest Frank Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 alias admits he has been lying...!!! On 6/16/2010 4:37 PM, Alias wrote: > Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >> >> >> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>> the >>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>> >>> No you haven't. >>> >>> -- >>> Alias >> >> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >> >> > > This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with > Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with > it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. > What will you say then? > WoW! You do realize you have just proven that you have been lying all this time, as we all knew and expected, about you previously owning Windows 7. Big oops!...LOL! What a POS you are. Quote
Guest Sj Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:28:30 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <nobody@homehere.net> wrote: > >"Sj" <Sj@NOTforMAIL.not> wrote in message >news:ifbf16ho5msvnj6vgb64qionouchvcs59o@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:37:22 -0500, "JC" <jjcardella@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>First allow me to apologize as I am no USENET guru. Typically when I >>>decide >>>to make a post in hopes some kind soul(s) will give some input/feedback >>>towards my interests/concerns I am clueless which group to post to. But I >>>will say I generally get a positive reponse where ever I post. >>> >>>For the past five or so years I have used 2000 on my home machines. They >>>actually still use 98 on the clients where I work (which is medical >>>laboratory) with an antiquated Novell network o/s and Oracle DBMS on the >>>server. This is primarily due to the fact that I have very antiquated >>>tools >>>(Visual Cafe for my IDE with SDK 1.1); my app will only run on 98 >>>machines. >>>Anyway, that is neither here nor there. >>> >>>My question is about Windows XP vs 7. I am at a point where I would like >>>to >>>upgrade my home machines to XP. Even though I've been using 2000 for so >>>long >>>(and very satisfied with it) I do have some XP experience/knowledge. >>>Problem >>>is that one of the used machines I just purchased has XP on it because >>>that >>>is what was on it when I got it. Seems like it is not possible to purchase >>>XP nowadays. It is all Windows 7. >>> >>>A few friends here and there have had me come and look at their Windows 7 >>>machines. They think because I have a degree in CompSci/Math that I know >>>everything there is to know about computers. I cannot make them understand >>>I >>>am a GUI programmer, database programmer, amateur DBA, and data analyst. I >>>keep telling them I am not a technician but they will not believe me. The >>>handful of times I've played around with a Windows 7 machine so far I've >>>found it very counterintuitive and confusing. I do not like it at all! Not >>>knowing much about XP anytime I've worked on an XP machine I've typically >>>had little if any problems. >>> >>>So the question I guess: Is XP a thing of the past? Can I no longer get XP >>>(it definitely is not in stores)? If I wanted to migrate the clients to XP >>>at work would that not be possible? >>> >>>Many Thanks, >>>-JC >> >> Here I thought I was the very last 2000 user on the planet! > >No, I'll bet there are still a lot of us using Win2000. >> Can't help you w/ your question but will follow all the replies, as I >> have access to an unused, relatively new 64 bit/Win 7 computer. >> >> My thoughts were to format the HD & install XP. Is that doable >> on a 64 bit machine? And I didn't know Win 7 has an XP mode. >> >> I'm completely satisfied w/ my 2000 system & will stay w/ it till it >> quits on me. [ . . . ] > >I have two Win2000 systems and I believe they are the only computers that >have never given me any trouble of any kind. I've got three WinXP systems >also (four if you count a little Samsung netbook), and I like XP very much, >but its only real advantage over 2000 as far as I'm concerned is that >nowadays it has significantly more support for both hardware and software. I've had access to XP a few times & like it - but I have a lot of old graphics programs, to go w/ my old scanner, & would like to use them as long as I can - I'm even still using ICQ Sj Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 On 06/17/2010 01:37 AM, Alias wrote: > Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >> >> >> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>> the >>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>> >>> No you haven't. >>> >>> -- >>> Alias >> >> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >> >> > > This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with > Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with > it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. > What will you say then? > Course I still have Windows 7 on the gaming machine but it's not connected to the Net nor does it have a newsreader installed or I would post from there. I'm sure desperate Frank will be accusing me of lying because he will think that the above means I don't have Windows 7 now like I have previously posted. He also has accused me of not being able to afford 64 bit but, what do you know, I'm posting from 64 bit right now. -- Alias Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Death wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alias"<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alias"<aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alias >>>>> >>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>> >>>> No you haven't. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alias >>> >>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>> >>> >> >> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with >> it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. >> What will you say then? >> > > I would say you are planning to steal 2 $500 laptops. > And, as usual, you would be wrong. -- Alias Quote
Guest Frank Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 On 6/17/2010 2:24 AM, Alias wrote: > On 06/17/2010 01:37 AM, Alias wrote: >> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alias >>>>> >>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>> >>>> No you haven't. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alias >>> >>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>> >>> >> >> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with >> it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. >> What will you say then? >> > > Course I still have Windows 7 on the gaming machine but it's not > connected to the Net nor does it have a newsreader installed or I would > post from there. You are a known and admitted LIAR, LIAR! I'm sure desperate Frank will be accusing me of lying > because he will think that the above means I don't have Windows 7 now > like I have previously posted. He also has accused me of not being able > to afford 64 bit but, what do you know, I'm posting from 64 bit right now. hehehe...yeah...from a free up-yr-fucking-butt-too POS toy os for lying linturd losers like you and not form Windows 7/64 which you don't have nor can you afford to purchase a legit copy of it. Oops!...LOL! > Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 On 06/17/2010 04:39 PM, Frank wrote: > On 6/17/2010 2:24 AM, Alias wrote: >> On 06/17/2010 01:37 AM, Alias wrote: >>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alias >>>>>> >>>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>>> >>>>> No you haven't. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >>> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with >>> it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. >>> What will you say then? >>> >> >> Course I still have Windows 7 on the gaming machine but it's not >> connected to the Net nor does it have a newsreader installed or I would >> post from there. > > You are a known and admitted LIAR, LIAR! This from the biggest liar here, although Death is desperately trying to match you. > > I'm sure desperate Frank will be accusing me of lying >> because he will think that the above means I don't have Windows 7 now >> like I have previously posted. He also has accused me of not being able >> to afford 64 bit but, what do you know, I'm posting from 64 bit right >> now. > > hehehe...yeah...from a free up-yr-fucking-butt-too POS toy os for lying > linturd losers like you and not form Windows 7/64 which you don't have > nor can you afford to purchase a legit copy of it. > Oops!...LOL! >> > Um, you said I couldn't afford a 64 bit machine . You were wrong. Now you say I can't afford Win 7. You're wrong. In fact, Frank, you're always wrong. I am replying to this and some other posts of yours today to clear up your lies. Cherish the moment because you go back to being ignored after today. -- Alias Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 On 06/16/2010 04:59 PM, Frank wrote: > On 6/16/2010 1:22 AM, Parko wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:43:52 +1000, John Morrison sgraffire: >> >>> I tried Ubuntu on an earlier computer, it was quite a reasonable OS but >>> wouldn't run my favourite Windows programs. >> >> Of course it won't - natively. You could have tried Wine, or Crossover, >> or Playonlinux. >> >> http://www.winehq.org/about/ >> http://www.codeweavers.com/products/ >> http://www.playonlinux.com/en/ > > What a total wast of time. You're a total waste of a human being. -- Alias Quote
Guest Zimbabwe Jones Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 "Death" <death@rottingcorpses.x-x> wrote in message news:4c1960e7@news.x-privat.org... > Alias wrote: > >> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alias >>>>> >>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>> >>>> No you haven't. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alias >>> >>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>> >>> >> >> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with >> it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. >> What will you say then? >> > > I would say you are planning to steal 2 $500 laptops. > Excellent reply and most likely true! LOL! Quote
Guest Zimbabwe Jones Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message news:hvbn7d$qsr$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >> >> >> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>> the >>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>> >>> No you haven't. >>> >>> -- >>> Alias >> >> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >> >> > > This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with Windows > 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with it and > burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. What will > you say then? > > -- > Alias What's wrong? Your Ubuntu just won't cut the mustard? Didn't think so. Most people need Windows to get their work done. If you want to play around and waste time, then by all means continue to use that SHITTY Ubuntu that most don't want or need. Quote
Guest Frank Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 alias gets caught lying...again...as usual! On 6/17/2010 8:45 AM, Alias wrote: > On 06/17/2010 04:39 PM, Frank wrote: >> On 6/17/2010 2:24 AM, Alias wrote: >>> On 06/17/2010 01:37 AM, Alias wrote: >>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to >>>>>>>>> 99.9999999% of >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>>>> >>>>>> No you haven't. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alias >>>>> >>>>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >>>> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes >>>> with >>>> it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. >>>> What will you say then? >>>> >>> >>> Course I still have Windows 7 on the gaming machine but it's not >>> connected to the Net nor does it have a newsreader installed or I would >>> post from there. >> >> You are a known and admitted LIAR, LIAR! > > This from the biggest liar here, although Death is desperately trying to > match you. > >> >> I'm sure desperate Frank will be accusing me of lying >>> because he will think that the above means I don't have Windows 7 now >>> like I have previously posted. He also has accused me of not being able >>> to afford 64 bit but, what do you know, I'm posting from 64 bit right >>> now. >> >> hehehe...yeah...from a free up-yr-fucking-butt-too POS toy os for lying >> linturd losers like you and not form Windows 7/64 which you don't have >> nor can you afford to purchase a legit copy of it. >> Oops!...LOL! >>> >> > > Um, you said I couldn't afford a 64 bit machine . You were wrong. Now > you say I can't afford Win 7. You're wrong. In fact, Frank, you're > always wrong. I am replying to this and some other posts of yours today > to clear up your lies. Cherish the moment because you go back to being > ignored after today. > Go fuck yourself, you cock sucking sheep-fucking pile of useless lying linturd shit. Oh and posting more lies to cover your previous lies just proves you are a known and admitted LIAR, LIAR. Eat shit and die asshole and you're too stupid to kill file me, you 8DUMB FUCK . Quote
Guest Frank Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 alias the asshole... On 6/17/2010 8:48 AM, Alias wrote: > On 06/16/2010 04:59 PM, Frank wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 1:22 AM, Parko wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:43:52 +1000, John Morrison sgraffire: >>> >>>> I tried Ubuntu on an earlier computer, it was quite a reasonable OS but >>>> wouldn't run my favourite Windows programs. >>> >>> Of course it won't - natively. You could have tried Wine, or Crossover, >>> or Playonlinux. >>> >>> http://www.winehq.org/about/ >>> http://www.codeweavers.com/products/ >>> http://www.playonlinux.com/en/ >> >> What a total wast of time. > > You're a total waste of a human being. > Projecting again you POS? Figures! Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Zimbabwe Jones wrote: > > > "Death" <death@rottingcorpses.x-x> wrote in message > news:4c1960e7@news.x-privat.org... >> Alias wrote: >> >>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alias >>>>>> >>>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>>> >>>>> No you haven't. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >>> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes with >>> it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. >>> What will you say then? >>> >> >> I would say you are planning to steal 2 $500 laptops. >> > Excellent reply and most likely true! LOL! > > > One problem: it's not true. -- Alias Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 alias gets caught lying...again...as usual! Frank wrote: > On 6/17/2010 8:45 AM, Alias wrote: >> On 06/17/2010 04:39 PM, Frank wrote: >>> On 6/17/2010 2:24 AM, Alias wrote: >>>> On 06/17/2010 01:37 AM, Alias wrote: >>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>>>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to >>>>>>>>>> 99.9999999% of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No you haven't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alias >>>>>> >>>>>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >>>>> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes >>>>> with >>>>> it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for you. >>>>> What will you say then? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Course I still have Windows 7 on the gaming machine but it's not >>>> connected to the Net nor does it have a newsreader installed or I would >>>> post from there. >>> >>> You are a known and admitted LIAR, LIAR! >> >> This from the biggest liar here, although Death is desperately trying to >> match you. >> >>> >>> I'm sure desperate Frank will be accusing me of lying >>>> because he will think that the above means I don't have Windows 7 now >>>> like I have previously posted. He also has accused me of not being able >>>> to afford 64 bit but, what do you know, I'm posting from 64 bit right >>>> now. >>> >>> hehehe...yeah...from a free up-yr-fucking-butt-too POS toy os for lying >>> linturd losers like you and not form Windows 7/64 which you don't have >>> nor can you afford to purchase a legit copy of it. >>> Oops!...LOL! >>>> >>> >> >> Um, you said I couldn't afford a 64 bit machine . You were wrong. Now >> you say I can't afford Win 7. You're wrong. In fact, Frank, you're >> always wrong. I am replying to this and some other posts of yours today >> to clear up your lies. Cherish the moment because you go back to being >> ignored after today. >> > Go fuck yourself, you cock sucking sheep-fucking pile of useless lying > linturd shit. Charming. > Oh and posting more lies to cover your previous lies just proves you are > a known and admitted LIAR, LIAR. You're the liar and not a very good one at that. > Eat shit and die asshole and you're too stupid to kill file me, you > 8DUMB FUCK . I don't kill file people. I ignore them. I have something you don't have: self control. -- Alias Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Zimbabwe Jones wrote: > > > "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message > news:hvbn7d$qsr$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alias >>>>> >>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>> >>>> No you haven't. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alias >>> >>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>> >>> >> >> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes >> with it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for >> you. What will you say then? >> >> -- >> Alias > > What's wrong? Your Ubuntu just won't cut the mustard? No. > Didn't think so. You and think don't compute. > Most people need Windows to get their work done. If you want to play > around and waste time, then by all means continue to use that SHITTY > Ubuntu that most don't want or need. > > I can get work done with either. Too bad you're too stupid to be able to say the same. -- Alias Quote
Guest Zimbabwe Jones Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message news:hvdjnq$72m$3@news.eternal-september.org... > Zimbabwe Jones wrote: >> >> >> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >> news:hvbn7d$qsr$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to 99.9999999% of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alias >>>>>> >>>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>>> >>>>> No you haven't. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >>> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes >>> with it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for >>> you. What will you say then? >>> >>> -- >>> Alias >> >> What's wrong? Your Ubuntu just won't cut the mustard? > > No. > >> Didn't think so. > > You and think don't compute. > >> Most people need Windows to get their work done. If you want to play >> around and waste time, then by all means continue to use that SHITTY >> Ubuntu that most don't want or need. >> >> > > I can get work done with either. Too bad you're too stupid to be able to > say the same. > > -- > Alias Ubuntu won't run the programs that I need to do my work so that make Ubuntu worthless. Funny, Ubuntu has been free for years and most agree with me. Ubuntu is worth exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING. Quote
Guest Alias Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Zimbabwe Jones wrote: > > > "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message > news:hvdjnq$72m$3@news.eternal-september.org... >> Zimbabwe Jones wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>> news:hvbn7d$qsr$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to >>>>>>>>> 99.9999999% of >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>>>> >>>>>> No you haven't. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alias >>>>> >>>>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >>>> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes >>>> with it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for >>>> you. What will you say then? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alias >>> >>> What's wrong? Your Ubuntu just won't cut the mustard? >> >> No. >> >>> Didn't think so. >> >> You and think don't compute. >> >>> Most people need Windows to get their work done. If you want to play >>> around and waste time, then by all means continue to use that SHITTY >>> Ubuntu that most don't want or need. >>> >>> >> >> I can get work done with either. Too bad you're too stupid to be able >> to say the same. >> >> -- >> Alias > > Ubuntu won't run the programs that I need to do my work so that make > Ubuntu worthless. Perhaps to someone has stupid as you are. > Funny, Ubuntu has been free for years and most agree > with me No, "they" don't. >. Ubuntu is worth exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING. My, wrong again. Why am I not surprised? -- Alias Quote
Guest Zimbabwe Jones Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message news:hvdn67$ln7$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Zimbabwe Jones wrote: >> >> >> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >> news:hvdjnq$72m$3@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Zimbabwe Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>> news:hvbn7d$qsr$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message >>>>>> news:hvb8ao$tcg$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:hva5s3$8op$6@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>>>>> You are right. Ubuntu doesn't have the problem of BECOMING >>>>>>>>>> outdated. It >>>>>>>>>> has always been OUTDATED and therefore irrelevant to >>>>>>>>>> 99.9999999% of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> computer users who try that piece of shit OS. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As we all know, you're too stupid to install Ubuntu and don't know >>>>>>>>> what the fuck you're talking about. Your ever post proves this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There you go lying again. I have installed that INFERIOR Ubuntu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No you haven't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alias >>>>>> >>>>>> You haven't got the money to purchase a legitimate copy of Windows 7. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This Friday I am buying two very expensive 17" laptops, both with >>>>> Windows 7 preinstalled. After I get rid of the crap ware that comes >>>>> with it and burn the back up DVDs, I will post from Windows 7 just for >>>>> you. What will you say then? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> What's wrong? Your Ubuntu just won't cut the mustard? >>> >>> No. >>> >>>> Didn't think so. >>> >>> You and think don't compute. >>> >>>> Most people need Windows to get their work done. If you want to play >>>> around and waste time, then by all means continue to use that SHITTY >>>> Ubuntu that most don't want or need. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I can get work done with either. Too bad you're too stupid to be able >>> to say the same. >>> >>> -- >>> Alias >> >> Ubuntu won't run the programs that I need to do my work so that make >> Ubuntu worthless. > > Perhaps to someone has stupid as you are. You are the stupid one. Certain programs are written for the Windows platform and just won't run in Ubuntu. I thought you would be smart enough to know that. I guess not. > >> Funny, Ubuntu has been free for years and most agree >> with me > > No, "they" don't. Look at the numbers you idiot. Imagine a free product that is still on less than one percent of the desktops out there. Gotta be a reason for that one! You're just too stupid to figure it out. No wonder, you use Ubuntu so you're not very smart. > >>. Ubuntu is worth exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING. > > My, wrong again. Why am I not surprised? Ubuntu is worth nothing for most. Again you are just too stupid to realize it. Better tone down the drug usage. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.