Jump to content

Have you had a FUNTASM?


Recommended Posts

Guest Bill Cleere
Posted

"Tim Weaver" <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> wrote in message

news:Xns988FD4138BD260Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@news.giganews.com...

> Aratzio wrote:

>

>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:16:44 -0600, Tim Weaver

>> <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> got double secret probation

>> because:

>>

>>>Aratzio wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:14:15 -0500, dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> got

>>>> double secret probation because:

>>>>

>>>>>On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make it funny or

>>>>>>> something?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>

>>>>>and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>

>>>> alt.flame is dead, see Cleere, Bill as evidence.

>>>

>>>Did it die or was it closed?

>>

>> I think it was used as a "manpon" by Michael Jackson.

>

> You reckon Cleere licked it?

> --

> Tim Weaver

 

Trying your hand at a flame, Tim?

 

Well, there's a first time for everything, I guess.

 

But that certainly wasn't it for you.

 

Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed

to something far below mediocrity.

 

-- Bill Cleere

 

"I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of

wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal)

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:34 -0800, "Bill Cleere"

<bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> got double secret probation because:

>"Tim Weaver" <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> wrote in message

>news:Xns988FD4138BD260Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@news.giganews.com...

>> Aratzio wrote:

>>

>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:16:44 -0600, Tim Weaver

>>> <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> got double secret probation

>>> because:

>>>

>>>>Aratzio wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:14:15 -0500, dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> got

>>>>> double secret probation because:

>>>>>

>>>>>>On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make it funny or

>>>>>>>> something?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>>and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>

>>>>> alt.flame is dead, see Cleere, Bill as evidence.

>>>>

>>>>Did it die or was it closed?

>>>

>>> I think it was used as a "manpon" by Michael Jackson.

>>

>> You reckon Cleere licked it?

>> --

>> Tim Weaver

>

>Trying your hand at a flame, Tim?

>

>Well, there's a first time for everything, I guess.

>

>But that certainly wasn't it for you.

>

>Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed

>to something far below mediocrity.

>

 

Bill is an expert at standing in the shadows of greatness.

Posted

In article <1165263105.350872.124450@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>, Bill

Cleere took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh

Wow"...

> trippy wrote:

> > In article <1164601528.531257.190050@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>, Bill

> > Cleere took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh

> > Wow"...

> >

> > > Well, if you have, you probably didn't get get it from

> > > anything you read lately on Usenet.

> >

> > Sounds more like something Doc Johnson makes.

> >

> > >

> > > Which is why I have the honor -- nay, the duty -- to

> > > proclaim that 2007 will be the year of the Great Revival

> > > and unHoly Rapture right here on these here newsgroups,

> > > and I will be the Prophet Bezalel who brings the

> > > shit to pass, on account of because I been around

> > > longer than just about any of yez, and I'll be around

> > > when the the last of yez is gone, which by the looks

> > > of it will be maybe next Thursday.

> >

> > Loser. Haha.

>

> If you've got to be irrelevant and incoherent, could you

> like make it funny or something?

 

Oooh. So cwanky.

 

What the fuck makes you think you're going to revive alt.flame? You

weren't all that hot to begin with. Maybe you figured enough flamers

finally dropped out so you'd take your shot. Well, that's delusional.

You're welcome. Love, reality.

>

> > > Which means merely that you'll miss the good

> > > shit and the accompanying information and opinion,

> > > all guaranteed Prime Grade Double-A, insofar as,

> > > When I put it down, it stays down.

> > >

> > > "Bill Cleere Saves Usenet -- Coming in 2007"

> > >

> > > And maybe I'll save Christmas, too.

> >

> > Will you buy me a puppy?

>

> No, but you can get one yourself through the

> "Pups for Puds" program. Just bring a new unwrapped

> dog toy to your Animal Control Morgue, and you'll

> walk away with a nice maintenance-free pet.

 

Take him home fast enough, you can have a nice, tasty, Korean dinner.

 

 

 

--

trippy

mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30

sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

 

NP: "Never Again" -- Nickelback

 

"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,

but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife,

and a smile."

 

-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"

Posted

In article <Xns988FC3CABDBF112345666@207.14.116.130>, Jason Gortician -

Libertarian for President 2008 took the hamburger meat, threw it on the

grill, and I said "Oh Wow"...

> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD:

>

> > Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

> >>>

> >>> Loser.

> >>

> >> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

> >> it funny or something?

> >

> > Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>

> I'm just impressed you didn't spell it 'looser'.

>

 

Oh thank God. I was so worried about that.

 

--

trippy

mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30

sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

 

NP: "Never Again" -- Nickelback

 

"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,

but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife,

and a smile."

 

-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"

Guest Bill Cleere
Posted

Aratzio wrote:

> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:34 -0800, "Bill Cleere"

> <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> got double secret probation because:

>

> >"Tim Weaver" <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> wrote in message

> >news:Xns988FD4138BD260Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@news.giganews.com...

> >> Aratzio wrote:

> >>

> >>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:16:44 -0600, Tim Weaver

> >>> <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> got double secret probation

> >>> because:

> >>>

> >>>>Aratzio wrote:

> >>>>

> >>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:14:15 -0500, dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> got

> >>>>> double secret probation because:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>> Loser.

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make it funny or

> >>>>>>>> something?

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> alt.flame is dead, see Cleere, Bill as evidence.

> >>>>

> >>>>Did it die or was it closed?

> >>>

> >>> I think it was used as a "manpon" by Michael Jackson.

> >>

> >> You reckon Cleere licked it?

> >> --

> >> Tim Weaver

> >

> >Trying your hand at a flame, Tim?

> >

> >Well, there's a first time for everything, I guess.

> >

> >But that certainly wasn't it for you.

> >

> >Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed

> >to something far below mediocrity.

> >

>

> Bill is an expert at standing in the shadows of greatness.

 

I suppose that's an appreciation of my parodies. Otherwise,

I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than

being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is

to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of

originality.

 

-- Bill Cleere

 

"I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing

an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal)

Posted

Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

> I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than

> being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is

> to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of

> originality.

 

Apparently, you'd rather be a fucking coward who hides from everyone and

everything that you (correctly) suspect can kick your pansy ass in even an

extremely mild "flame" war. For instance, look at the way you ran away and

hid from a simple one-word insult yesterday. Hell, you probably even hit

the plonk button as soon as you saw it, lest your fragile psyche be

subjected to anything worse. lol You are a disgrace to alt.flame, and

it's a wonder the regs permit you the privilege of posting anything there.

Posted

Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

> secret probation because:

>

>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>

>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>

>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>

>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>

>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>

>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>

>>> nice followup lame.

>>>

>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>

>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a mental

>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>

> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same time.

 

Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with something

original.

Guest Bill Cleere
Posted

trippy wrote:

> In article <1165263105.350872.124450@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>, Bill

> Cleere took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh

> Wow"...

>

> > trippy wrote:

> > > In article <1164601528.531257.190050@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>, Bill

> > > Cleere took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh

> > > Wow"...

> > >

> > > > Well, if you have, you probably didn't get get it from

> > > > anything you read lately on Usenet.

> > >

> > > Sounds more like something Doc Johnson makes.

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Which is why I have the honor -- nay, the duty -- to

> > > > proclaim that 2007 will be the year of the Great Revival

> > > > and unHoly Rapture right here on these here newsgroups,

> > > > and I will be the Prophet Bezalel who brings the

> > > > shit to pass, on account of because I been around

> > > > longer than just about any of yez, and I'll be around

> > > > when the the last of yez is gone, which by the looks

> > > > of it will be maybe next Thursday.

> > >

> > > Loser. Haha.

> >

> > If you've got to be irrelevant and incoherent, could you

> > like make it funny or something?

>

> Oooh. So cwanky.

 

Huh? Who is?

> What the fuck makes you think you're going to revive alt.flame? You

> weren't all that hot to begin with. Maybe you figured enough flamers

> finally dropped out so you'd take your shot. Well, that's delusional.

> You're welcome. Love, reality.

 

You claim to personify "reality" while calling other people

delusional?

 

Whatever, Mr. President.

> >

> > > > Which means merely that you'll miss the good

> > > > shit and the accompanying information and opinion,

> > > > all guaranteed Prime Grade Double-A, insofar as,

> > > > When I put it down, it stays down.

> > > >

> > > > "Bill Cleere Saves Usenet -- Coming in 2007"

> > > >

> > > > And maybe I'll save Christmas, too.

> > >

> > > Will you buy me a puppy?

> >

> > No, but you can get one yourself through the

> > "Pups for Puds" program. Just bring a new unwrapped

> > dog toy to your Animal Control Morgue, and you'll

> > walk away with a nice maintenance-free pet.

>

> Take him home fast enough, you can have a nice, tasty, Korean dinner.

 

Stop drooling.

 

-- Bill Cleere

 

"I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing

an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal)

Guest dave hillstrom
Posted

On 05 Dec 2006 02:00:06 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>

>> On 05 Dec 2006 01:51:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>

>>>Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking

>>>treat:

>>>

>>>> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD:

>>>>

>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>

>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>

>>>> looser

>>>

>>>Looser than what? Your mom?

>>

>> tard fight!!!!

>

>http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/592/01/

>

>HTH

 

does it bother you that i use caps only for emphasis?

 

--

dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

 

this fucking sig is for mimus. deal.

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On 5 Dec 2006 09:45:50 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com>

transparently proposed:

>Aratzio wrote:

>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:34 -0800, "Bill Cleere"

>> <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> got double secret probation because:

>>

>> >"Tim Weaver" <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> wrote in message

>> >news:Xns988FD4138BD260Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@news.giganews.com...

>> >> Aratzio wrote:

>> >>

>> >>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:16:44 -0600, Tim Weaver

>> >>> <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> got double secret probation

>> >>> because:

>> >>>

>> >>>>Aratzio wrote:

>> >>>>

>> >>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:14:15 -0500, dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> got

>> >>>>> double secret probation because:

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>>>On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>> >>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>> >>>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>> Loser.

>> >>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make it funny or

>> >>>>>>>> something?

>> >>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>> >>>>>>

>> >>>>>>and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>> alt.flame is dead, see Cleere, Bill as evidence.

>> >>>>

>> >>>>Did it die or was it closed?

>> >>>

>> >>> I think it was used as a "manpon" by Michael Jackson.

>> >>

>> >> You reckon Cleere licked it?

>> >> --

>> >> Tim Weaver

>> >

>> >Trying your hand at a flame, Tim?

>> >

>> >Well, there's a first time for everything, I guess.

>> >

>> >But that certainly wasn't it for you.

>> >

>> >Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed

>> >to something far below mediocrity.

>> >

>>

>> Bill is an expert at standing in the shadows of greatness.

>

>I suppose that's an appreciation of my parodies.

 

No, but do continue. I am sure your following bloviation will not fail

to measure up to past experience with you.

>Otherwise,

>I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than

>being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is

>to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of

>originality.

 

And Bill, standing in the shadow of greatness, pulls out his standard

"you suck" lamery and attempts to pass it off as "original". Yep,

right up there with yer best bill.

 

<ya does has ta wonder if bill will ever "get it">

 

--

 

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

proposed:

>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>

>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>> secret probation because:

>>

>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>

>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>

>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>

>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>

>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>

>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a mental

>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>

>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same time.

>

>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with something

>original.

 

Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point. Do you

always spend days fingering out the obvious so that you can then

report the obvious?

 

Here is the helpful hint, I agreed with DAEV, noob.

 

<notes cowardly snipping of clue x 4>

 

--

 

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Posted

Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

> proposed:

>

>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>

>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>> secret probation because:

>>>

>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>

>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>

>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>

>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>

>>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a mental

>>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>>

>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

time.

>>

>>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with something

>>original.

>

> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

 

For your second try, you merely confirm my first sentence and completely

ignore the second. That's either one hell of a short attention span, or

a sad indication of your poor reading skills. But either way, I can

easily accomodate your weakness; expect to see nothing but one-liners,

from now on.

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

secret probation because:

>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>

>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

>> proposed:

>>

>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>

>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>

>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>

>>>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a mental

>>>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>>>

>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>time.

>>>

>>>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with something

>>>original.

>>

>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>

>For your second try

 

Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

set fer teh falmer.

 

Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the boundaries

of the incredibly obvious?

Guest Rhonda Lea Kirk
Posted

Aratzio wrote:

> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

> secret probation because:

>

>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>

>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

>>> proposed:

>>>

>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>

>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>

>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>>>>>>>>>> understand.)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to

>>>>>> death.

>>>>>

>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>> time.

>>>>

>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>> something original.

>>>

>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>

>> For your second try

>

> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

> set fer teh falmer.

>

> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the boundaries

> of the incredibly obvious?

 

The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte.

 

--

Rhonda Lea Kirk

 

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is

willing to inflict on others. Ph

Posted

Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

> secret probation because:

>

>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>

>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

>>> proposed:

>>>

>>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>

>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>

>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a mental

>>>>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>>>>

>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>time.

>>>>

>>>>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

something

>>>>original.

>>>

>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>

>>For your second try, you merely confirm my first sentence and

>>completely ignore the second. That's either one hell of a short

>>attention span, or a sad indication of your poor reading skills.

>>But either way, I can easily accomodate your weakness; expect to

>>see nothing but one-liners, from now on.

>

> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post.

 

Still not original -- Google sez: 'Results 1 - 10 of about 3,090 for

"snip and run" (0.32 seconds)'

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On 06 Dec 2006 00:51:08 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

secret probation because:

>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>

>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>> secret probation because:

>>

>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>

>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

>>>> proposed:

>>>>

>>>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a mental

>>>>>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>time.

>>>>>

>>>>>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>something

>>>>>original.

>>>>

>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>

>>>For your second try, you merely confirm my first sentence and

>>>completely ignore the second. That's either one hell of a short

>>>attention span, or a sad indication of your poor reading skills.

>>>But either way, I can easily accomodate your weakness; expect to

>>>see nothing but one-liners, from now on.

>>

>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post.

>

>Still

 

can;t figure out how to post, dayam you must have been a real punching

bag as a kid.

Posted

Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

> On 06 Dec 2006 00:51:08 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

> secret probation because:

>

>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>

>>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>> secret probation because:

>>>

>>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>

>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB>

transparently

>>>>> proposed:

>>>>>

>>>>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year

2006.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

mental

>>>>>>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in

usenet

>>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>time.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>something

>>>>>>original.

>>>>>

>>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>>

>>>>For your second try, you merely confirm my first sentence and

>>>>completely ignore the second. That's either one hell of a short

>>>>attention span, or a sad indication of your poor reading skills.

>>>>But either way, I can easily accomodate your weakness; expect to

>>>>see nothing but one-liners, from now on.

>>>

>>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post.

>>

>>Still not original -- Google sez: 'Results 1 - 10 of about 3,090

>>for "snip and run" (0.32 seconds)'

>

> Still can;t figure out how to post

 

http://kb.earthlink.net/case.asp?article=15649

Guest dave hillstrom
Posted

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:41:48 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

<rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:

>Aratzio wrote:

>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>> secret probation because:

>>

>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>

>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

>>>> proposed:

>>>>

>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>>>>>>>>>>> understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to

>>>>>>> death.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>>> time.

>>>>>

>>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>>> something original.

>>>>

>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>

>>> For your second try

>>

>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

>> set fer teh falmer.

>>

>> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

>> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the boundaries

>> of the incredibly obvious?

>

>The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte.

 

PKB

 

--

dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

 

this fucking sig is for mimus. deal.

Posted

dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:41:48 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>>Aratzio wrote:

>>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>> secret probation because:

>>>

>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>

>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB>

transparently

>>>>> proposed:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>>>>>>>>>>>> understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year

2006.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>>>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to

>>>>>>>> death.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in

usenet

>>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>>>> time.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>>>> something original.

>>>>>

>>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>>

>>>> For your second try

>>>

>>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

>>> set fer teh falmer.

>>>

>>> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

>>> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the

boundaries

>>> of the incredibly obvious?

>>

>>The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte.

>

> PKB

 

Are you teasing my groupie?

Guest Art Deco
Posted

TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>

>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>> secret probation because:

>>

>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>

>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

>>>> proposed:

>>>>

>>>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a mental

>>>>>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>time.

>>>>>

>>>>>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>something

>>>>>original.

>>>>

>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>

>>>For your second try, you merely confirm my first sentence and

>>>completely ignore the second. That's either one hell of a short

>>>attention span, or a sad indication of your poor reading skills.

>>>But either way, I can easily accomodate your weakness; expect to

>>>see nothing but one-liners, from now on.

>>

>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post.

>

>Still not original -- Google sez: 'Results 1 - 10 of about 3,090 for

>"snip and run" (0.32 seconds)'

 

And at least half of those are associated with the Queen of Screed.

You're in fine company.

Guest dave hillstrom
Posted

On 06 Dec 2006 01:45:59 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>

>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:41:48 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:

>>

>>>Aratzio wrote:

>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>

>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB>

>transparently

>>>>>> proposed:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year

>2006.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>>>>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to

>>>>>>>>> death.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in

>usenet

>>>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>>>>> time.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>>>>> something original.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>>>

>>>>> For your second try

>>>>

>>>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

>>>> set fer teh falmer.

>>>>

>>>> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

>>>> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the

>boundaries

>>>> of the incredibly obvious?

>>>

>>>The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte.

>>

>> PKB

>

>Are you teasing my groupie?

 

PKB

 

heh. wonder if we can go for three.

 

--

dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

 

this fucking sig is for mimus. deal.

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On 06 Dec 2006 01:24:40 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

secret probation because:

>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>

>> On 06 Dec 2006 00:51:08 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>> secret probation because:

>>

>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>

>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>

>>>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB>

>transparently

>>>>>> proposed:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year

>2006.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>mental

>>>>>>>>>midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to death.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in

>usenet

>>>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>>time.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>something

>>>>>>>original.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>>>

>>>>>For your second try, you merely confirm my first sentence and

>>>>>completely ignore the second. That's either one hell of a short

>>>>>attention span, or a sad indication of your poor reading skills.

>>>>>But either way, I can easily accomodate your weakness; expect to

>>>>>see nothing but one-liners, from now on.

>>>>

>>>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post.

>>>

>>>Still not original -- Google sez: 'Results 1 - 10 of about 3,090

>>>for "snip and run" (0.32 seconds)'

>>

>> Still can;t figure out how to post

>

><kook link>

 

Sorry, kook links are never opened by sentients.

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:41:48 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

<rhondalea@gmail.com> got double secret probation because:

>Aratzio wrote:

>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>> secret probation because:

>>

>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>

>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> transparently

>>>> proposed:

>>>>

>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>>>>>>>>>>> understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to

>>>>>>> death.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in usenet

>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>>> time.

>>>>>

>>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>>> something original.

>>>>

>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>

>>> For your second try

>>

>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

>> set fer teh falmer.

>>

>> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

>> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the boundaries

>> of the incredibly obvious?

>

>The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte.

 

And how do we pronounce that last word?

Guest Aratzio
Posted

On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:27:26 -0500, dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> got

double secret probation because:

>On 06 Dec 2006 01:45:59 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>

>>dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>

>>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:41:48 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

>>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>

>>>>Aratzio wrote:

>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB>

>>transparently

>>>>>>> proposed:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>>>>>>>> secret probation because:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year

>>2006.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>>>>>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to

>>>>>>>>>> death.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in

>>usenet

>>>>>>>>> history has ever failed come up with those two lames at the same

>>>>>>>>> time.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>>>>>> something original.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> For your second try

>>>>>

>>>>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

>>>>> set fer teh falmer.

>>>>>

>>>>> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

>>>>> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the

>>boundaries

>>>>> of the incredibly obvious?

>>>>

>>>>The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte.

>>>

>>> PKB

>>

>>Are you teasing my groupie?

>

>PKB

>

>heh. wonder if we can go for three.

 

DAEV, Mr. Veiny and...

Guest Rhonda Lea Kirk
Posted

Aratzio wrote:

> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:41:48 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

> <rhondalea@gmail.com> got double secret probation because:

>

>> Aratzio wrote:

>>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double

>>> secret probation because:

>>>

>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>

>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB>

>>>>> transparently proposed:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got

>>>>>>> double secret probation because:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB>

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make

>>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something?

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't

>>>>>>>>>>>> understand.)

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year

>>>>>>>>>>> 2006.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> nice followup lame.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a

>>>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to

>>>>>>>> death.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring"

>>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in

>>>>>>> usenet history has ever failed come up with those two lames at

>>>>>>> the same time.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with

>>>>>> something original.

>>>>>

>>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point.

>>>>

>>>> For your second try

>>>

>>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel

>>> set fer teh falmer.

>>>

>>> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie

>>> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the

>>> boundaries of the incredibly obvious?

>>

>> The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte.

>

> And how do we pronounce that last word?

 

I did that just for you, y'know. :)

 

--

Rhonda Lea Kirk

 

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is

willing to inflict on others. Ph

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...