Phantom Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Dr. Nut Job says: Exterminate the White folks! Not sure what is more disturbing: His message or the fact there were people in the audience nodding and applauding. Quote Blah.
eddo Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 The white man should be done away with. Just look at all the hate and death caused by the white man- The native amewricans robbed of their land, many massacared needlessly. The white man suppressed black folk for centuries, not to mention women. The American Civil war was started by white men. as was the American Revolution. The crusades. The Titanic was designed by a white man. Airplanes were invented by white brothers. Had they not been around, all those people on 9/11 would still be alive. George Bush is a white man. as is his father. The pope is a white man. Hitler was a white man. Kill whitey indeed. Quote I'm trusted by more women.
Chi Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 I'm too lazy and can't turn up my speakers now anyway to sign up and watch the clip. Eddo, you forgot one- Eddo is white, 'nuff said;) Seriously though, we might as well kill off the entire human race as there is scum and evil in every single race. Quote
eddo Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Eddo, you forgot one- Eddo is white, 'nuff said;) I'M WHITE??? Why the hell didn't someone tell me sooner??? AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote I'm trusted by more women.
Phantom Posted November 30, 2006 Author Posted November 30, 2006 The native amewricans robbed of their land, many massacared needlessly. Ancient history. The natives possessed this land for thousands of years but were still rubbing sticks together to make fire. Scalping and human sacrifice ran rampant. The white man came and brought civilation and progress with them. The Indians also fought back just as hard and attacked innocent women and children. Fuck them. The white man suppressed black folk for centuries, not to mention women. History. The American Civil war was started by white men. as was the American Revolution. Ancient history. Also, wars have been started by every race and religion at sometime in the past. The crusades. Ancient, ancient history. Hitler was a white man. Kill THAT whitey. Quote Blah.
phreakwars Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 My grandmother was part aztec part mexican.. my culture has been around way longer then you white fucks. At least 1/2 of it anyway... So I am only for killing extreme whitey... Typical whitey is still pretty much OK. . . Quote https://www.facebook.com/phreakwars
fullauto Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 you will all have a chance to kill us... Patience.... Quote Liberals... Saving the world one semester at a time "I'm not a racist... I'm a realist! And if you don't know the difference, You're an Idiot!" -- Fullauto Present - 1. (Noun) The point that divides disappointment from hope
Phantom Posted December 1, 2006 Author Posted December 1, 2006 My grandmother was part aztec part mexican.. Is that where you get your eyes from? Quote Blah.
hugo Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 The fact is when two cultures collide it usually is bad news for at least one of the cultures. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
Jhony5 Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 I posted a link to this exact same video over a year ago. R E P O S T !!!!! Just kidding Phanny. Even though you bite on my material, I still think you're hot. Anyway that dumb ****** knows hes fighting a losing battle trying to spurn blacks into an organized movement against whitey. The bruthas love their bling waaaaay too much to go exterminating the people that produce the material goods they so love. The system he wishes to fight against provides him with many things, and he knows it. Thats why he tries to distance himself and create the illusion that hes self-sufficient. Like his comments about being a vegan. He bitches about the system, yet that very system provides him with the freedom to stand there and talk about exterminating whites. Sixty years ago that boy would be giving that speech at about 55 miles an hour as hes dragged from behind a pickup truck. He should be thankful our society has adapted too a more civilized attitude toward non-whites. Actually we had to. If we hadn't changed quickly in the '50s and '60s, than I feel a full on race war was inevitable. That ****** is about 50-60 years too late with his tired rhetoric. His bullshit would have meaning if we didn't have so many black doctors, politicians, law enforcement, judges and so on. Ask any successful black man/woman what they think of that little hate speech and I guarantee they'd say "Fuck that NIGGER". Quote i am sofa king we todd did.
Phantom Posted December 1, 2006 Author Posted December 1, 2006 I posted a link to this exact same video over a year ago. R E P O S T !!!!! That's it. I am NEVER posting another thread again. Everything seems to be a repost. I just saw this video for the first time after watching the KKKramer video. This one was shown on the "related video" list. ...Thats why he tries to distance himself and create the illusion that hes self-sufficient. Like his comments about being a vegan. And a "Doctor." He bitches about the system, yet that very system provides him with the freedom to stand there and talk about exterminating whites. Sixty years ago that boy would be giving that speech at about 55 miles an hour as hes dragged from behind a pickup truck. Fifty years ago he would be "hanging upside down from a tree with a fork up his ass." He should be thankful our society has adapted too a more civilized attitude toward non-whites. Actually we had to. If we hadn't changed quickly in the '50s and '60s, than I feel a full on race war was inevitable. What I don't understand, is that the blacks had very little to do with the increase in civil rights towards non-whites just like women had very little to do with the increase in civil rights towards women just like immigrants had very little to do with the increase in civil rights for immigrants. It was the white leaders who sympathized with the civil rights movement and protestors to change the policies to what we have today. The protestors (women, minorities, immigrants, etc.) might have had loud mouths but it was the white male leaders with the power who sparked the change. That is what this guy doesn't understand. Quote Blah.
Jhony5 Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 it was the white male leaders with the power who sparked the change.I attribute a lot of the change coming from the desire to garnish votes and commercialism. Take a politician that doesn't seem to have an impressive platform. The politician can move for reform and once rights begin to be extended to the minority class (women, homos, Mexicans, blacks), he has become the beneficiary of an entirely new voting base that never before existed. Education was something that was restrained from the blacks for so long. Once they gained their freedom from slavery this trend continued. Only too late did the white society realize the detrimental effects caused by having such a large demographic without education. The ripple effects form this are still noticeable today. Stupidity is the leading cause of crime, and there are more blacks in prison than in college. It is the ignorant whites of the past that are at fault for setting this trend. However it gets to a point where holding the past accountable becomes self-destructive. As for commercialism. Take a package of toilet paper or paper towels. These packages were among the first to utilize bilingual, two-sided packaging. Not because they respected the Spanish minority. They know Mexicans have money, and they want it. Quote i am sofa king we todd did.
Phantom Posted December 1, 2006 Author Posted December 1, 2006 I attribute a lot of the change coming from the desire to garnish votes and commercialism. Take a politician that doesn't seem to have an impressive platform. The politician can move for reform and once rights begin to be extended to the minority class (women, homos, Mexicans, blacks), he has become the beneficiary of an entirely new voting base that never before existed. I was thinking about this when typing my previous reply but why would such politicians expect to garnish the votes of people who could not yet vote (serious question- not sarcasm)? Do you think they were expecting future votes? Why would the incumbents jeopardize the votes of their current constituents? This is why I think their political stance in regards to civil rights was based on their compassion and personal morals in that people should not be denied rights based on sex and race. Quote Blah.
Jhony5 Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 I was thinking about this when typing my previous reply but why would such politicians expect to garnish the votes of people who could not yet voteThink of it as an investment in the future. Seriously, I think a lot of white folks back then honestly realized how bad it was for our society to contain such a large 'oppressed' demographic. I'm sure also many whites just saw the overt racism for what it was, ugly. When it comes to politics it boils down to how large of a demographic can you please. If you side too strong with gays, than you alienate the religious base. If you sided with the blacks during the civil rights era, you ran the risk of alienating the white votes. All said and done, I think the blacks of the time did a great job perforating the legislative system and owing allegiance to the white politicians that would push their agenda. Those whites that did help them earn their civil rights, probably did so with a considerable amount of compassion toward the blacks disposition. But there was a great benefit awaiting them if they succeeded. Millions of new votes that would be all theirs. Quote i am sofa king we todd did.
norm Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 So how white do you have to be to get killed? I, for example, am one eighth black, and I challange all you fine ladies to guess which eighth that is. Norm http://www.bostonenglish.pl Quote
fullauto Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 So how white do you have to be to get killed? I, for example, am one eighth black, and I challange all you fine ladies to guess which eighth that is. Norm http://www.bostonenglish.pl The Nazis came up with a wonderful system to determine who lives and who dies... Read up on it... I believe the councel was held at neuremburg! Quote Liberals... Saving the world one semester at a time "I'm not a racist... I'm a realist! And if you don't know the difference, You're an Idiot!" -- Fullauto Present - 1. (Noun) The point that divides disappointment from hope
RoyalOrleans Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 So how white do you have to be to get killed? I, for example, am one eighth black, and I challange all you fine ladies to guess which eighth that is. Norm http://www.bostonenglish.pl You octoroon! We ain't got no place for no house-niggahs up in here. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
RoyalOrleans Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 My grandmother was part aztec part mexican.. my culture has been around way longer then you white fucks. If it weren't for the white Spaniards raping the shit out of Aztec women, you wouldn't be part Mexican. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
Msixty Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 Ancient history. The natives possessed this land for thousands of years but were still rubbing sticks together to make fire. Scalping and human sacrifice ran rampant. actually, they had flint..... and the Aztecs were the only ones with wide-spread sacrifice, and scalping was a European invention, they had natives bring them scalps of the enemy for money. but they were primarily nomadic hunter gatherers who depleted the land they went over, killed off massive numbers of animals, were in constant battle over land, and had not even invented the wheel. some also had stone bladed tools with edges as sharp an one molecule, we still use the same materials (obsidian, a black to green glass-like substance created by lava cooling too quickly to create crystals) in cosmetic surgery scalpels, it's so sharp that the tissue won't scar i love going on about useless facts of history if you haven't noticed Quote Your stupidity is My weapon WARNING! my mood and mental state are strongly influenced by music and T.V./movies..... i may seem the slightest bit insane.. just don't let me watch my favorite show and or listen to my music and it will all be alright.
The Facts Man Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 If you want some come get some. We can take out Africa with one biscuit and a huge Cliff. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.