Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hancock was a joke. It was a great premise and Will Smith was wasted talent.

 

Iron Man was great but it doesn't hold shit against the Dark Knight. The Dark Knight is full of depth..almost every character has an obstacle of somesort even the less important one...every character for the exception scarecrow deserved their screen time. Whether it be the people on the boats, the joker, the russian and sal maroni, everyone had a reason and a story to tell.

 

Iron man was good but it was just a popcorn flick that was barely treading moral waters...there was depth but no where near Batman...

 

lol and wallE compared to the darkknight just isnt a fair comparison

¿whysoserious?
  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Aw no it was far too comical at times, it was a very good film but not one of the best films ever as most people are making it out to be. It was just the best BLOCKBUSTER we have had in ages but I think even Wall-E tops it as a movie (though its like comparing butter to jam). I just didn't warm to the Batman charecter at all I had no real emotion for him.

 

You seem to be full of odd posts

Posted
Hancock was a joke. It was a great premise and Will Smith was wasted talent.

 

Iron Man was great but it doesn't hold shit against the Dark Knight. The Dark Knight is full of depth..almost every character has an obstacle of somesort even the less important one...every character for the exception scarecrow deserved their screen time. Whether it be the people on the boats, the joker, the russian and sal maroni, everyone had a reason and a story to tell.

 

Iron man was good but it was just a popcorn flick that was barely treading moral waters...there was depth but no where near Batman...

 

lol and wallE compared to the darkknight just isnt a fair comparison

 

I agree, the whole second half of Hancock was all WTF? for me. It indeed had promise, but the plot was just too weird. As far as ironman, yup pretty solid movie, but like you said it had nothing special that made it stand out. Batman takes top movie of the year easily... maybe not best of all time, but it is up there.

[ R.I.P. LPF ]

Posted
I agree, the whole second half of Hancock was all WTF? for me. It indeed had promise, but the plot was just too weird. As far as ironman, yup pretty solid movie, but like you said it had nothing special that made it stand out. Batman takes top movie of the year easily... maybe not best of all time, but it is up there.

agreed hancock was kinda funny the first half but then it all went... dead and boring

http://www.sucksbbs.net/data/MetaMirrorCache/095443c5f5914cdd05b1d389456c201e.jpg

http://www.sucksbbs.net/data/MetaMirrorCache/8df3638f80a4f010e06ef2c959f426e8.gif

http://www.sucksbbs.net/data/MetaMirrorCache/fe80ab99471398f0ef121d8f90c31038.jpg

Posted

I only think they could have cut The Dark Knight 20 minutes shorter

not saying that it's a bad movie though

 

I'm barely satisfied with any kind of movie

Posted

the ending was abit underdone...prolly coulda saved it up for another movie, but in a way it ties everything up for now

 

hancock was good as a story, though too many holes...hopefully theres a prequel or something, it certainly had good promise

http://www.sucksbbs.net/data/MetaMirrorCache/ddd296f8f90eca79dbafae096b6d28b3.jpg

Posted
go figure...its stenners lol

 

Why hasn't he told us about how some CD full of random noises is better than Linkin Park then? We all know it's just a matter of time if that is the real Stenners!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...