Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:jurbn2hnj0gig14aidoim6p3cqm22hdo9i@4ax.com... > On 5 Dec 2006 09:45:50 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> > transparently proposed: > >>Aratzio wrote: >>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:34 -0800, "Bill Cleere" >>> <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> got double secret probation because: >>> >>> >"Tim Weaver" <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> wrote in message >>> >news:Xns988FD4138BD260Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@news.giganews.com... >>> >> Aratzio wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:16:44 -0600, Tim Weaver >>> >>> <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> got double secret probation >>> >>> because: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:14:15 -0500, dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> got >>> >>>>> double secret probation because: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Loser. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make it funny or >>> >>>>>>>> something? >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> alt.flame is dead, see Cleere, Bill as evidence. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>Did it die or was it closed? >>> >>> >>> >>> I think it was used as a "manpon" by Michael Jackson. >>> >> >>> >> You reckon Cleere licked it? >>> >> -- >>> >> Tim Weaver >>> > >>> >Trying your hand at a flame, Tim? >>> > >>> >Well, there's a first time for everything, I guess. >>> > >>> >But that certainly wasn't it for you. >>> > >>> >Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed >>> >to something far below mediocrity. >>> > >>> >>> Bill is an expert at standing in the shadows of greatness. >> >>I suppose that's an appreciation of my parodies. > > No, but do continue. I am sure your following bloviation will not fail > to measure up to past experience with you. Again, with "bloviation"? Fuckin' bot... >>Otherwise, >>I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than >>being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is >>to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of >>originality. > > And Bill, standing in the shadow of greatness, pulls out his standard > "you suck" lamery and attempts to pass it off as "original". Yep, > right up there with yer best bill. Well, as you say, when one is dealing with a Standard Lamer.... And what, BTW, did I "attempt to pass off as original"? > <ya does has ta wonder if bill will ever "get it"> What, that it's a waste of time trying to use you mutloids as foils for some decent posting? Oh, I get that, all right. Problem is, right now you robAUTS are about the only game in town. -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 "TFTX" <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in message news:T0p9890718F3@72L.AC8C... > Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: > >> I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than >> being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is >> to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of >> originality. > > Apparently, you'd rather be a fucking coward who hides from everyone and > everything that you (correctly) suspect can kick your pansy ass in even an > extremely mild "flame" war. And who would it be that I'm hiding from? Something that hides behind the nym "TFTX"? (How's that pronounced, by the way? Nearest I can figure is the sound the dog makes when it coughs up behind the barn.) > For instance, look at the way you ran away and > hid from a simple one-word insult yesterday. Do tell... > Hell, you probably even hit > the plonk button as soon as you saw it, lest your fragile psyche be > subjected to anything worse. What's a plonk button? > lol You are a disgrace to alt.flame, and > it's a wonder the regs permit you the privilege of posting anything there. Koput did forbid me to post here, but I defied him! -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest Avoid normal situations. Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 In alt.flame Bill Cleere <bcleereNO@spamgmail.com> wrote: > "TFTX" <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in message news:T0p9890718F3@72L.AC8C... [..] >> lol You are a disgrace to alt.flame, and >> it's a wonder the regs permit you the privilege of posting anything there. > Koput did forbid me to post here, but I defied him! He's not really a reg. He's only been allowed back because this year Lord Satan demands that we sacrifice a virgin on Christmas Day. -- alt.flame Special Forces "He is crazy; if he comes back shoot him on sight." -- Adolf Hitler, on Rudolf Hess Quote
Guest Jason Gortician - Libertarian for Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Tim Weaver <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> wrote in news:Xns988FCF1F7F3F10Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@news.giganews.com: > Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 wrote: > >> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD: >> >>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>> >>>>> Loser. >>>> >>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make it funny or >>>> something? >>> >>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >> >> I'm just impressed you didn't spell it 'looser'. > > Children. Don't make me take off my belt. peDo. Quote
Guest Jason Gortician - Libertarian for Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988FBFC59@72L.AB62: > Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking > treat: > >> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD: >> >>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>> >>>>> Loser. >>>> >>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make >>>> it funny or something? >>> >>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >> >> looser > > Looser than what? Your mom? Certainly not your waistband, lardass. Quote
Guest Jason Gortician - Libertarian for Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> wrote in news:i5k9n2l1tv6jpkkai5cr4pb8q5d1elge27@4ax.com: > On 05 Dec 2006 01:51:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote: > >>Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking >>treat: >> >>> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD: >>> >>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>> >>>>>> Loser. >>>>> >>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make >>>>> it funny or something? >>>> >>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >>> >>> looser >> >>Looser than what? Your mom? > > tard fight!!!! Poster boy. Quote
Guest Aratzio Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:13:17 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> transparently proposed: >Aratzio wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:41:48 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" >> <rhondalea@gmail.com> got double secret probation because: >> >>> Aratzio wrote: >>>> On 05 Dec 2006 23:37:45 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got double >>>> secret probation because: >>>> >>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>> >>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 18:12:50 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> >>>>>> transparently proposed: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 05 Dec 2006 00:32:34 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> got >>>>>>>> double secret probation because: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 22:29:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loser. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it funny or something? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> understand.) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year >>>>>>>>>>>> 2006. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ...said Billy's daddy, as he tucked in his shirt. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> nice followup lame. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the newbies should take note, your a master. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's the best retort you can muster, huh. Either you're a >>>>>>>>> mental midget, or your M.O. is to try to bore your opponent to >>>>>>>>> death. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ah, the "yer stoopud" coupled with the ever popular "yer boring" >>>>>>>> lames. Quite a feat of flame history. I doubt any newbie in >>>>>>>> usenet history has ever failed come up with those two lames at >>>>>>>> the same time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dave already used the "newbie" lame. Please try again, with >>>>>>> something original. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, that would be about 5 lines up from my starting point. >>>>> >>>>> For your second try >>>> >>>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. Wow, such an awesome skeel >>>> set fer teh falmer. >>>> >>>> Now Mr. Obvious, will you be providing another other stupid newbie >>>> tricks? Or will you continue your personal expansion of the >>>> boundaries of the incredibly obvious? >>> >>> The painfully obvious and the incredibly lame are his forte. >> >> And how do we pronounce that last word? > >I did that just for you, y'know. I was hopin' Private Obvious would "way" in. -- Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Quote
Guest Aratzio Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:16:18 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> transparently proposed: >"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message >news:jurbn2hnj0gig14aidoim6p3cqm22hdo9i@4ax.com... >> On 5 Dec 2006 09:45:50 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> >> transparently proposed: >> >>>Aratzio wrote: >>>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:34 -0800, "Bill Cleere" >>>> <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> got double secret probation because: >>>> >>>> >"Tim Weaver" <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> wrote in message >>>> >news:Xns988FD4138BD260Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@news.giganews.com... >>>> >> Aratzio wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:16:44 -0600, Tim Weaver >>>> >>> <tmw99999@leavemealonegmail.invalid> got double secret probation >>>> >>> because: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>>Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:14:15 -0500, dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> got >>>> >>>>> double secret probation because: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>On 04 Dec 2006 20:29:11 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Loser. >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make it funny or >>>> >>>>>>>> something? >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>and here we see yet another attempt at flame of the year 2006. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> alt.flame is dead, see Cleere, Bill as evidence. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Did it die or was it closed? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I think it was used as a "manpon" by Michael Jackson. >>>> >> >>>> >> You reckon Cleere licked it? >>>> >> -- >>>> >> Tim Weaver >>>> > >>>> >Trying your hand at a flame, Tim? >>>> > >>>> >Well, there's a first time for everything, I guess. >>>> > >>>> >But that certainly wasn't it for you. >>>> > >>>> >Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed >>>> >to something far below mediocrity. >>>> > >>>> >>>> Bill is an expert at standing in the shadows of greatness. >>> >>>I suppose that's an appreciation of my parodies. >> >> No, but do continue. I am sure your following bloviation will not fail >> to measure up to past experience with you. > >Again, with "bloviation"? A descriptive term very apt in reference to your writings. Until I see a better term, that will suffice. > >Fuckin' bot... Bill, we know your odds of sex are non existint but to announce you have to use "mechanical" methods, pathetic. > >>>Otherwise, >>>I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than >>>being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is >>>to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of >>>originality. >> >> And Bill, standing in the shadow of greatness, pulls out his standard >> "you suck" lamery and attempts to pass it off as "original". Yep, >> right up there with yer best bill. > >Well, as you say, when one is dealing with a Standard Lamer.... Yes, Bill, I did say, I am dealing quite well and you fingered it out from the easy to read and understand English that I wrote, congratulations. Contrary to all expectations, "you got it". > >And what, BTW, did I "attempt to pass off as original"? Poor Blil, whining about originality all while failing to grasp the irony of his standardized whines and lames. Oh well, I guess I was got ahead of myself with the congratulations. > >> <ya does has ta wonder if bill will ever "get it"> > >What, that it's a waste of time trying to use you mutloids >as foils for some decent posting? Bill blames others for his own bloviation. Everyone surprised by that indicate sincerity by laughing at blil and the death of alt.flame. > Oh, I get that, all right. >Problem is, right now you robAUTS are about the >only game in town. Admission that alt.flame is dead, accepted. Please to blame me personally as it is always my fault on usenet. -- Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Quote
Guest TFTX Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking treat: > TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988FBFC59@72L.AB62: > >> Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this >> fucking treat: >> >>> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD: >>> >>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>> >>>>>> Loser. >>>>> >>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make >>>>> it funny or something? >>>> >>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >>> >>> looser >> >> Looser than what? Your mom? > > Certainly not my waistband. Fixed that for you. Quote
Guest TFTX Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Art Deco pooped out this fucking treat: > TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote: > >>Aratzio pooped out this fucking treat: >> [chop] >>> >>> Woo hoo he learned the snip and run post. >> >>Still not original -- Google sez: 'Results 1 - 10 of about 3,090 for >>"snip and run" (0.32 seconds)' > > And at least half of those are associated with the Queen of Screed. You're saying he's the Queen of Screed? lol Quote
Guest TFTX Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: > "TFTX" <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in message > news:T0p9890718F3@72L.AC8C... >> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >> >>> I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than >>> being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is >>> to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of >>> originality. >> >> Apparently, you'd rather be a fucking coward who hides from everyone >> and everything that you (correctly) suspect can kick your pansy ass >> in even an extremely mild "flame" war. > > And who would it be that I'm hiding from? Something that > hides behind the nym "TFTX"? (How's that pronounced, > by the way? Nearest I can figure is the sound the dog > makes when it coughs up behind the barn.) > >> For instance, look at the way you ran away and >> hid from a simple one-word insult yesterday. > > Do tell... > >> Hell, you probably even hit >> the plonk button as soon as you saw it, lest your fragile psyche be >> subjected to anything worse. > > What's a plonk button? > >> lol You are a disgrace to alt.flame, and >> it's a wonder the regs permit you the privilege of posting anything >> there. > > Koput did forbid me to post here, but I defied him! I knew you'd reply to THAT one. Looks like you're an easily-controlled little peanut fetcher. ::snicker:: Who trained you? Quote
Guest dave hillstrom Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:21:07 +0000 (UTC), "Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008" <jasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote: >dave hillstrom <dave@meow.org> wrote in >news:i5k9n2l1tv6jpkkai5cr4pb8q5d1elge27@4ax.com: > >> On 05 Dec 2006 01:51:02 GMT, TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote: >> >>>Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking >>>treat: >>> >>>> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD: >>>> >>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Loser. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make >>>>>> it funny or something? >>>>> >>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >>>> >>>> looser >>> >>>Looser than what? Your mom? >> >> tard fight!!!! > >Poster boy. as long as you send me money. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj this fucking sig is for mimus. deal. Quote
Guest Timmay! Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote: >Admission that alt.flame is dead, accepted. Please to blame me >personally as it is always my fault on usenet. Contrary to popular belief in AUK, stupidity isn't contagious so we're quite safe from you lot. -- Timmay! Kook of the Month May 1999 Golden Killfile Sept 1999 Looney Maroon Dec 1998 Looney Maroon Feb 1999 Palmjob Paddle Nov 1999 Palmjob Paddle Oct 2000 George Pickett Sept 2000 George Pickett Oct 2000 Busted Urinal Award George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award Tar & Feathers Award Kook Kard Deck, Three of Spades Quote
Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:16:18 -0800, "Bill Cleere" > <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> transparently proposed: > > >"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message > >news:jurbn2hnj0gig14aidoim6p3cqm22hdo9i@4ax.com... > >> On 5 Dec 2006 09:45:50 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> > >> transparently proposed: > >> > >>>Aratzio wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:34 -0800, "Bill Cleere" > >>>> <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> got double secret probation because: [snip] > >>>> >Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed > >>>> >to something far below mediocrity. > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> Bill is an expert at standing in the shadows of greatness. > >>> > >>>I suppose that's an appreciation of my parodies. > >> > >> No, but do continue. I am sure your following bloviation will not fail > >> to measure up to past experience with you. > > > >Again, with "bloviation"? > > A descriptive term very apt in reference to your writings. Until I see > a better term, that will suffice. A nice description of your posting style: "Yep, always the same shit, and that's how I like it." > >Fuckin' bot... > > Bill, we know your odds of sex are non existint but to announce you > have to use "mechanical" methods, pathetic. I'd try one if it came with a guarantee that it kept its mouth shut except when required to peform its primary functions. > > > >>>Otherwise, > >>>I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than > >>>being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is > >>>to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of > >>>originality. > >> > >> And Bill, standing in the shadow of greatness, pulls out his standard > >> "you suck" lamery and attempts to pass it off as "original". Yep, > >> right up there with yer best bill. > > > >Well, as you say, when one is dealing with a Standard Lamer.... > > Yes, Bill, I did say, I am dealing quite well and you fingered it out > from the easy to read and understand English that I wrote, > congratulations. Contrary to all expectations, "you got it". I got that you were a Standard Lamer the first time I read a couple of your posts, thanks. It really wasn't all that hard. One reads Standard Lames in a succession of posts, and the conclusion kind of draws itself. > > > >And what, BTW, did I "attempt to pass off as original"? > > Poor Blil, whining about originality all while failing to grasp the > irony of his standardized whines and lames. Oh well, I guess I was got > ahead of myself with the congratulations. Yep, you missed the point, as always. > >> <ya does has ta wonder if bill will ever "get it"> > > > >What, that it's a waste of time trying to use you mutloids > >as foils for some decent posting? > > Bill blames others for his own bloviation. Everyone surprised by that > indicate sincerity by laughing at blil and the death of alt.flame. You seem to be about the only one who gives a shit one way or the other about the supposed "death of alt.flame". Obsessissimo. > > Oh, I get that, all right. > >Problem is, right now you robAUTS are about the > >only game in town. > > Admission that alt.flame is dead, accepted. Please to blame me > personally as it is always my fault on usenet. If it is dead, or merely temporarily flatlining, rest assured no one's thinking you did anything but post a lot of crap which had absolutely zero effect on the life or death of anything. -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 TFTX wrote: > I knew you'd reply to THAT one. Looks like you're an easily-controlled > little peanut fetcher. ::snicker:: Who trained you? Wow, you tricked me into replying to a Usenet post on Usenet! Are all your family clever? -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest TFTX Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: > TFTX wrote: > >> I knew you'd reply to THAT one. Looks like you're an easily-controlled >> little peanut fetcher. ::snicker:: Who trained you? > > I like being trolled. Fixed that for you. (Fixed the NG sneck, too, you coward.) Quote
Guest Aratzio Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 On 6 Dec 2006 12:15:57 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> got double secret probation because: >Aratzio wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:16:18 -0800, "Bill Cleere" >> <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> transparently proposed: >> >> >"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message >> >news:jurbn2hnj0gig14aidoim6p3cqm22hdo9i@4ax.com... >> >> On 5 Dec 2006 09:45:50 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> >> >> transparently proposed: >> >> >> >>>Aratzio wrote: >> >>>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:34 -0800, "Bill Cleere" >> >>>> <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> got double secret probation because: > >[snip] >> >>>> >Here's a hint. If you follow up Ratzo, you're doomed >> >>>> >to something far below mediocrity. >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> Bill is an expert at standing in the shadows of greatness. >> >>> >> >>>I suppose that's an appreciation of my parodies. >> >> >> >> No, but do continue. I am sure your following bloviation will not fail >> >> to measure up to past experience with you. >> > >> >Again, with "bloviation"? >> >> A descriptive term very apt in reference to your writings. Until I see >> a better term, that will suffice. > >A nice description of your posting style: "Yep, always the >same shit, and that's how I like it." Yes, quite the proponent of originality our billy, would that he could, he would declare that it is boring to call cats "cats" but instead would require that each time a cat were mentioned, one would have to use a new term. It would help in billy world, his writings could no long be so easily described as bloviation. > >> >Fuckin' bot... >> >> Bill, we know your odds of sex are non existint but to announce you >> have to use "mechanical" methods, pathetic. > >I'd try one if it came with a guarantee that it kept its mouth >shut except when required to peform its primary functions. soc.men --> > >> > >> >>>Otherwise, >> >>>I've no idea what it means, but it certainly sounds better than >> >>>being an AUKloid robo-poster whose highest aspiration is >> >>>to never, ever post anything with the slightest whiff of >> >>>originality. >> >> >> >> And Bill, standing in the shadow of greatness, pulls out his standard >> >> "you suck" lamery and attempts to pass it off as "original". Yep, >> >> right up there with yer best bill. >> > >> >Well, as you say, when one is dealing with a Standard Lamer.... >> >> Yes, Bill, I did say, I am dealing quite well and you fingered it out >> from the easy to read and understand English that I wrote, >> congratulations. Contrary to all expectations, "you got it". > >I got that you were a Standard Lamer the first time I read >a couple of your posts, thanks. Suck it up, you walked right into that one, now stop acting like you didn't. > It really wasn't all that hard. >One reads Standard Lames in a succession of posts, and >the conclusion kind of draws itself. Yes, Bill, I told you that, you do not have to keep repeating what I write. Really, it is okay, showing you got what I wrote on your second try and all is wonderful and I am sure you are pleased as punch. But stop. > >> > >> >And what, BTW, did I "attempt to pass off as original"? >> >> Poor Blil, whining about originality all while failing to grasp the >> irony of his standardized whines and lames. Oh well, I guess I was got >> ahead of myself with the congratulations. > >Yep, you missed the point, as always. Wow, Billy, went for the "homer" on that one, eh. So why is the ball in the catchers glove? > >> >> <ya does has ta wonder if bill will ever "get it"> >> > >> >What, that it's a waste of time trying to use you mutloids >> >as foils for some decent posting? >> >> Bill blames others for his own bloviation. Everyone surprised by that >> indicate sincerity by laughing at blil and the death of alt.flame. > >You seem to be about the only one who gives a shit one way >or the other about the supposed "death of alt.flame". > >Obsessissimo. Sad, innit, when they get all defensive because their group is now a spam trap. > >> > Oh, I get that, all right. >> >Problem is, right now you robAUTS are about the >> >only game in town. >> >> Admission that alt.flame is dead, accepted. Please to blame me >> personally as it is always my fault on usenet. > >If it is dead, or merely temporarily flatlining, rest assured no >one's thinking you did anything but post a lot of crap which >had absolutely zero effect on the life or death of anything. > All those year wasted by teh alt.falmers. When in fact they could have had fun. Quote
Guest Jason Gortician - Libertarian for Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p98915EE93@72L.D099: > Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking > treat: > >> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988FBFC59@72L.AB62: >> >>> Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this >>> fucking treat: >>> >>>> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD: >>>> >>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Loser. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make >>>>>> it funny or something? >>>>> >>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >>>> >>>> looser >>> >>> Looser than what? Your mom? >> >> Certainly not my waistband. > > Fixed that for you. How clever of you. Quote
Guest Jason Gortician - Libertarian for Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 "Bill Cleere" <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in news:5dWdnbnP4NVRfOnYnZ2dnUVZ_r-dnZ2d@comcast.com: > "Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008" <jasonzc@yahoo.com> > wrote in message news:Xns988FC3AEBDD8112345666@207.14.116.130... >> "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> wrote in >> news:1165199402.480862.50890@ 80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com: >> >>> Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 wrote: >>>> "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> wrote in >>>> news:1164601528.531257.190050 @l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com: >>>> >>>> > Well, if you have, you probably didn't get get it from >>>> > anything you read lately on Usenet. >>>> > >>>> > Which is why I have the honor -- nay, the duty -- to >>>> > proclaim that 2007 will be the year of the Great Revival >>>> > and unHoly Rapture right here on these here newsgroups, >>>> > and I will be the Prophet Bezalel who brings the >>>> > shit to pass, on account of because I been around >>>> > longer than just about any of yez, and I'll be around >>>> > when the the last of yez is gone, which by the looks >>>> > of it will be maybe next Thursday. >>>> > >>>> > Which means merely that you'll miss the good >>>> > shit and the accompanying information and opinion, >>>> > all guaranteed Prime Grade Double-A, insofar as, >>>> > When I put it down, it stays down. >>>> > >>>> > "Bill Cleere Saves Usenet -- Coming in 2007" >>>> > >>>> > And maybe I'll save Christmas, too. >>>> >>>> I am intrugued by your jihad, and wish to subscribe to your >>>> newsletter. >>> >>> We've been sending it to you for years. >>> >>> When was the last time you went down to Hooters Hollow Road >>> and changed your RFD mailbox? Tell the truth. >> >> Sadly, I am no longer allowed in Hooters. > > As part of your "Get Organized" New Year's Resolution, > why not make a list of the places you are still > allowed in? Shouldn't take long. Basically just work, and if I take a psych exam and a drug test, ULL. Quote
Guest TFTX Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking treat: > TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p98915EE93@72L.D099: > >> Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this fucking >> treat: >> >>> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988FBFC59@72L.AB62: >>> >>>> Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 pooped out this >>>> fucking treat: >>>> >>>>> TFTX <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in news:T0p988F8932E@72L.2BCD: >>>>> >>>>>> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Loser. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you've got to be incoherent, could you like make >>>>>>> it funny or something? >>>>>> >>>>>> Dumbass. (Another simple word he probably doesn't understand.) >>>>> >>>>> looser >>>> >>>> Looser than what? Your mom? >>> >>> Certainly not my waistband. >> >> Fixed that for you. > > How clever of you. You mean I sucked all the wind out of your sails with just two posts? You almost suck as bad as Cleere. Quote
Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 "Avoid normal situations." <byend.removethisbityousillyperson@eskimo.com> wrote in message news:el5nn8$ic6$1@eskinews.eskimo.com... > In alt.flame Bill Cleere <bcleereNO@spamgmail.com> wrote: >> "TFTX" <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in message news:T0p9890718F3@72L.AC8C... > > [..] > >>> lol You are a disgrace to alt.flame, and >>> it's a wonder the regs permit you the privilege of posting anything there. > >> Koput did forbid me to post here, but I defied him! > > He's not really a reg. He's only been allowed back because this year Lord > Satan demands that we sacrifice a virgin on Christmas Day. Yay! This is gonna be the bestest Luciferifmas ever ! -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 "TFTX" <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in message news:T0p98918CB71@72L.B5DE... > Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: > >> TFTX wrote: >> >>> I knew you'd reply to THAT one. Looks like you're an easily-controlled >>> little peanut fetcher. ::snicker:: Who trained you? >> >> I like being trolled. > > Fixed that for you. And answered the question about whether cleverness runs in your family. > (Fixed the NG sneck, too, you coward.) Caught! (I'm terribly afraid of alt.adjective.) -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:i2men29lkkl5e5382168is3encr00akc25@4ax.com... > On 6 Dec 2006 12:15:57 -0800, "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> got > double secret probation because: [snip] > Yes, quite the proponent of originality our billy, would that he > could, he would declare that it is boring to call cats "cats" but > instead would require that each time a cat were mentioned, one would > have to use a new term. > > It would help in billy world, his writings could no long be so easily > described as bloviation. I'm sure you'd manage, insofar as it seems the limit of your vocabulary. >> >>> >Fuckin' bot... >>> >>> Bill, we know your odds of sex are non existint but to announce you >>> have to use "mechanical" methods, pathetic. >> >>I'd try one if it came with a guarantee that it kept its mouth >>shut except when required to peform its primary functions. > > soc.men --> Is that another of your obsessions? You'll have to pardon me because I've never looked at it, that I can remember. >>I got that you were a Standard Lamer the first time I read >>a couple of your posts, thanks. > > Suck it up, you walked right into that one, now stop acting like you > didn't. Sorry, child, it so happens there wasn't anything to walk into. >> It really wasn't all that hard. >>One reads Standard Lames in a succession of posts, and >>the conclusion kind of draws itself. > > Yes, Bill, I told you that, you do not have to keep repeating what I > write. Really, it is okay, showing you got what I wrote on your second > try and all is wonderful and I am sure you are pleased as punch. But > stop. As I said, the conclusion draws itself. There's not really anything more for you to go on about, although that's hardly likely to stop you. >>> >And what, BTW, did I "attempt to pass off as original"? >>> >>> Poor Blil, whining about originality all while failing to grasp the >>> irony of his standardized whines and lames. Oh well, I guess I was got >>> ahead of myself with the congratulations. >> >>Yep, you missed the point, as always. > > Wow, Billy, went for the "homer" on that one, eh. So why is the ball > in the catchers glove? While I normally enjoy a baseball metaphor, you whiffed on that one. >>You seem to be about the only one who gives a shit one way >>or the other about the supposed "death of alt.flame". >> >>Obsessissimo. > > Sad, innit, when they get all defensive because their group is now a > spam trap. You seem to be the only one who has anything to say about it. >>> > Oh, I get that, all right. >>> >Problem is, right now you robAUTS are about the >>> >only game in town. >>> >>> Admission that alt.flame is dead, accepted. Please to blame me >>> personally as it is always my fault on usenet. >> >>If it is dead, or merely temporarily flatlining, rest assured no >>one's thinking you did anything but post a lot of crap which >>had absolutely zero effect on the life or death of anything. >> > All those year wasted by teh alt.falmers. When in fact they could have > had fun. The fun of watching you fools make fools of yourself is about all that's left. -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest Bill Cleere Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 "Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008" <jasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns9891CF0F0C3E412345666@207.14.116.130... > "Bill Cleere" <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in > news:5dWdnbnP4NVRfOnYnZ2dnUVZ_r-dnZ2d@comcast.com: > >> "Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008" <jasonzc@yahoo.com> >> wrote in message news:Xns988FC3AEBDD8112345666@207.14.116.130... >>> "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> wrote in >>> news:1165199402.480862.50890@ 80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com: >>> >>>> Jason Gortician - Libertarian for President 2008 wrote: >>>>> "Bill Cleere" <bcleere@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>> news:1164601528.531257.190050 @l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com: >>>>> >>>>> > Well, if you have, you probably didn't get get it from >>>>> > anything you read lately on Usenet. >>>>> > >>>>> > Which is why I have the honor -- nay, the duty -- to >>>>> > proclaim that 2007 will be the year of the Great Revival >>>>> > and unHoly Rapture right here on these here newsgroups, >>>>> > and I will be the Prophet Bezalel who brings the >>>>> > shit to pass, on account of because I been around >>>>> > longer than just about any of yez, and I'll be around >>>>> > when the the last of yez is gone, which by the looks >>>>> > of it will be maybe next Thursday. >>>>> > >>>>> > Which means merely that you'll miss the good >>>>> > shit and the accompanying information and opinion, >>>>> > all guaranteed Prime Grade Double-A, insofar as, >>>>> > When I put it down, it stays down. >>>>> > >>>>> > "Bill Cleere Saves Usenet -- Coming in 2007" >>>>> > >>>>> > And maybe I'll save Christmas, too. >>>>> >>>>> I am intrugued by your jihad, and wish to subscribe to your >>>>> newsletter. >>>> >>>> We've been sending it to you for years. >>>> >>>> When was the last time you went down to Hooters Hollow Road >>>> and changed your RFD mailbox? Tell the truth. >>> >>> Sadly, I am no longer allowed in Hooters. >> >> As part of your "Get Organized" New Year's Resolution, >> why not make a list of the places you are still >> allowed in? Shouldn't take long. > > Basically just work, and if I take a psych exam and a drug test, ULL. From what I know of Ooh-La-La, you flunk the drug test if you don't show enough drugs in your system, right? -- Bill Cleere "I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal) Quote
Guest Bill Jillians Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 Quietly we read <lsGdnQuSlLJgC-rYnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@comcast.com>, unable to contain our credulity we realized that Bill Cleere <bcleereNO@SPAMgmail.com> said this: >"TFTX" <h0ya3@neUOo9v.vACB> wrote in message news:T0p98918CB71@72L.B5DE... >> Bill Cleere pooped out this fucking treat: >> >>> TFTX wrote: >>> >>>> I knew you'd reply to THAT one. Looks like you're an easily-controlled >>>> little peanut fetcher. ::snicker:: Who trained you? >>> >>> I like being trolled. >> >> Fixed that for you. > >And answered the question about whether cleverness >runs in your family. > >> (Fixed the NG sneck, too, you coward.) > >Caught! (I'm terribly afraid of alt.adjective.) Yeah. Should be. -- Bill Jillians Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.