Guest rbwinn Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Mar 10, 5:46�pm, "tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 7:41 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 10, 4:37?pm, "tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 10, 6:06 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 10, 10:12?am, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:> I asked you a simple question on how did you know that he was telling the truth. ?You should answer > > > > > the question instead of offering remedies! > > > > > Well, I am not going to get involved in your idea of accusing God of > > > > lying. ?You need to do that without help from me if you are going to > > > > do it. ?I would advise you not to do it. > > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > Quite the paradox. ?The god thingy doesn't exist and things that don't > > > exist can't lie. ?But the followers of the god thingy believe the lies > > > attributed to it. ?So, based on its non-existence, I don't think the > > > god thingy lies, but the things other people believe it said are lies. > > > > So, RB. ?What terrible thing to you believe will happen to me? ?And > > > can you prove that it will happen? ?Note, if I have to wait until > > > after I'm dead, your proof can't be validated. > > > --- > > > a.a. #2273 > > > I think you will be cut off from the presence of God. Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Mar 10, 5:49?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Mar 10, 5:10?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: > >> rbwinn wrote: > >>> On Mar 10, 2:59?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: > >>>> William Mechlenburg wrote: > >>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message > >>>>>news:1173537055.788478.173840@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com... > >>>>>> On Mar 10, 6:00?am, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Mar 9, 1:45?pm, "jl" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 3:56 pm, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>news:ijapu2hpqemgb5942fpgn11tc5uba0t3fu@4ax.com...> On Mon, 5 Mar > >>>>> 2007 13:59:47 +0800, in alt.atheism > >>>>>>>>>>> "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote in > >>>>>>>>>>> <45ebceae$0$16281$88260...@free.teranews.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>>> ? ?You need to show at least some evidence to be taken > >>>>> seriously. But > >>>>>>>>>>>> then > >>>>>>>>>>>> we all get the impression you're just chanting atheist mantras > >>>>> again, and > >>>>>>>>>>>> that's all you aspire to. > >>>>>>>>>>> For someone who makes all sorts of claims without ever providing > >>>>> a shred > >>>>>>>>>>> of evidence, it's pretty rich for you to ask for evidence. > >>>>>>>>>> ? ? When will you get serious? Our Christian "God is love" (1 John > >>>>> 4:8,16). > >>>>>>>>> No he's not. ?He stains the earth with innocent blood, scatters it > >>>>>>>>> with poverty, starvation, war, famine, disease, and ruin; sacrifices > >>>>>>>>> virgins for his own sadistic blood lust; demands on pain of blood > >>>>>>>>> curses that he be loved and worshiped; shows his ass to Moses; shows > >>>>>>>>> his face, his UFO and his angels to Isaiah; invests his powers in > >>>>>>>>> clergy who rape, steal, murder and pillage; and giggles while David > >>>>> (a > >>>>>>>>> man after God's own heart) commits premeditated murder and steals > >>>>>>>>> another man's wife, estate, and vineyards. > >>>>>>>>> Oh, and did I mention he (after getting the idea from pagan gods who > >>>>>>>>> raped mortals and begat babies on them) dispatched a ghost to > >>>>>>>>> fornicate with Mary against her will and knocked her up even though > >>>>>>>>> she was betrothed to Joseph. > >>>>>>>> Why don't you discuss your ideas with Jesus Christ when he returns to > >>>>>>>> judge the earth? > >>>>>>> Because he's imaginary.- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>> Well, he would be the one to tell your idea. ?Just speak right up and > >>>>>> tell him when he returns to judge the earth. > >>>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>>> Your imaginary god is not going to return to earth. It isn't going to > >>>>> happen! > >>>> It's just wonderful that > >>>> you can imagine God. > >>>> Can you tell us a little more > >>>> about your imaginary God? > >>> Would you like me to send you a copy of the Bible? > >>> Robert B. Winn > >> I have seen and heard many versions. > >> At least some parts of them anyway. > >> But I'm interested in > >> his and your understanding of God. > > >> Is your God male? > > > Why do you ask? > > Robert B. Winn > > To figure out how to properly talk about God. > > -- > ~Stumper- Hide quoted text - > You don't have to figure it out. The example of how to pray was given by Jesus Christ. It starts, Our Father Which art in Heaven. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Mar 10, 5:52�pm, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote: > On 10 Mar 2007 04:52:56 -0800, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> > wrote: > > >rbwinn wrote: > >> Al, good to see you. > >Especially in light of the fact you'd claimed he'd been chased away by > >your nonsensical bible quotes. > > Not chased away, bored to tears. Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Mar 10, 5:56�pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Mar 10, 4:37?pm, "tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 10, 6:06 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > >>> On Mar 10, 10:12?am, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:> I asked you a simple question on how did you know that he was telling the truth. ?You should answer > >>>> the question instead of offering remedies! > >>> Well, I am not going to get involved in your idea of accusing God of > >>> lying. ?You need to do that without help from me if you are going to > >>> do it. ?I would advise you not to do it. > >>> Robert B. Winn > >> Quite the paradox. ?The god thingy doesn't exist and things that don't > >> exist can't lie. ?But the followers of the god thingy believe the lies > >> attributed to it. ?So, based on its non-existence, I don't think the > >> god thingy lies, but the things other people believe it said are lies. > > >> So, RB. ?What terrible thing to you believe will happen to me? ?And > >> can you prove that it will happen? ?Note, if I have to wait until > >> after I'm dead, your proof can't be validated. > >> --- > >> a.a. #2273 > > > I think you will be cut off from the presence of God. Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Mar 10, 6:08�pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: > On 10 Mar 2007 16:37:25 -0800, in alt.atheism > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in > <1173573445.512922.196...@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: > > > > >On Mar 10, 4:16?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >> On 10 Mar 2007 15:02:56 -0800, in alt.atheism > >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in > >> <1173567776.676369.66...@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: > > >> >On Mar 10, 10:22?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: > >> >> rbwinn wrote: > >> >> > On Mar 9, 1:08?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: > >> >> >> rbwinn wrote: > >> >> >>> On Mar 8, 2:39?am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:23:22 -0800, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> > >> >> >>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>> ? - Refer: <erCdnYJ9sbKWS3LYnZ2dnUVZ_trin...@comcast.com> > >> >> >>>>> Michael Gray wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 14:43:40 -0800, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> > >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> ? - Refer: <1173307420.007287.59...@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> > >> >> >>>>>>> Michael Gray wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 09:49:42 -0800, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> > >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> ? - Refer: <1173289782.480046.72...@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2:21?pm, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Robert, why would you believe that you are somehow exempt from a simple > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> instruction in your manual: to beat a speedy retreat from any place like > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> alt dot atheism where your proselytizing is not welcome, and 'shake the > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> dust of that place off your feet' [don't have anything further to do > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> with it]? > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Your hypothesis that things in your manual only apply to the original > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> twelve apostles is just the fallacy of ad hoc hypothesis. If they were > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to apply only to the original twelve apostles then there would be no > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> proselytizing today, would there?- Hide quoted text - > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Who told you I was proselytizing? > >> >> >>>>>>>>> What do YOU think you're doing? > >> >> >>>>>>>> Bzzzt! > >> >> >>>>>>>> Meaningless question. > >> >> >>>>>>>> Bobby is quite incapable of thought. > >> >> >>>>>>> Point taken; I withdraw the question. > >> >> >>>>>> Objection sustained. > >> >> >>>>>> Now, what about this defence of... > >> >> >>>>>> <shuffles papers> > >> >> >>>>>> Erm "Not guilty by way of insanity"? > >> >> >>>>>> What does the defendent have to say? > >> >> >>>>>> You will stand when you address the court Mr. Winn. > >> >> >>>>>> Remove that canvas jacket from him will you, usher? > >> >> >>>>> Take off his straight jacket? I object! > >> >> >>>> The learned counsel's objection is sustained. > >> >> >>>> Mr. Winn is a clear and present danger to rationality. > >> >> >>>> The Jury will now consider it's verdict. > >> >> >>> Well, here is some more atheistic mythology. ?So who do you claim has > >> >> >>> ever had a trial by jury at a sanity hearing? ? > >> >> >> ?> > >> >> >> It's not a real trial, moron, it is just make believe on Usenet. We are > >> >> >> just making fun of you. Can't you tell the difference? Errrm ... never > >> >> >> mind. You aren't known for your ability to tell real from make believe, > >> >> >> are you?- > > >> >> > Well, why would I call it atheistic mythology if it was not make > >> >> > believe? > > >> >> Atheism has no mythology, moron, "Atheism is characterized by an absence > >> >> of belief in the existence of gods." --http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/intro.html > > >> >Atheism does have mythology, otherwise, why would atheists be > >> >pretending that people are being given jury trials at sanity hearings? > >> >Robert B. Winn > > >> This has nothing to do with atheism, as you know.- Hide quoted text - > > >Any time an atheist get caught short, all we see are disclaimers. Quote
Guest stumper Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Mar 10, 5:47�pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >>> On Mar 10, 4:16?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>> On 10 Mar 2007 15:02:56 -0800, in alt.atheism "rbwinn" >>>> <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in >>>> <1173567776.676369.66...@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: >>>>> On Mar 10, 10:22?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>> On Mar 9, 1:08?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2:39?am, Michael Gray >>>>>>>>> <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:23:22 -0800, Sippuuden >>>>>>>>>> <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: ? - Refer: >>>>>>>>>> <erCdnYJ9sbKWS3LYnZ2dnUVZ_trin...@comcast.com> >>>>>>>>>>> Michael Gray wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 14:43:40 -0800, "JessHC" >>>>>>>>>>>> <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote: ? - Refer: >>>>>>>>>>>> <1173307420.007287.59...@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Gray wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 09:49:42 -0800, "JessHC" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote: ? - Refer: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <1173289782.480046.72...@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2:21?pm, Sippuuden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert, why would you believe that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are somehow exempt from a simple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction in your manual: to beat a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speedy retreat from any place like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt dot atheism where your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proselytizing is not welcome, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'shake the dust of that place off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your feet' [don't have anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further to do with it]? Your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypothesis that things in your manual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only apply to the original twelve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apostles is just the fallacy of ad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoc hypothesis. If they were to apply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to the original twelve apostles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then there would be no proselytizing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today, would there?- Hide quoted text >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who told you I was proselytizing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do YOU think you're doing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bzzzt! Meaningless question. Bobby is quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>> incapable of thought. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Point taken; I withdraw the question. >>>>>>>>>>>> Objection sustained. Now, what about this >>>>>>>>>>>> defence of... <shuffles papers> Erm "Not guilty >>>>>>>>>>>> by way of insanity"? What does the defendent >>>>>>>>>>>> have to say? You will stand when you address >>>>>>>>>>>> the court Mr. Winn. Remove that canvas jacket >>>>>>>>>>>> from him will you, usher? >>>>>>>>>>> Take off his straight jacket? I object! >>>>>>>>>> The learned counsel's objection is sustained. Mr. >>>>>>>>>> Winn is a clear and present danger to rationality. >>>>>>>>>> The Jury will now consider it's verdict. >>>>>>>>> Well, here is some more atheistic mythology. ?So who >>>>>>>>> do you claim has ever had a trial by jury at a sanity >>>>>>>>> hearing? ? >>>>>>>> ?> It's not a real trial, moron, it is just make >>>>>>>> believe on Usenet. We are just making fun of you. Can't >>>>>>>> you tell the difference? Errrm ... never mind. You >>>>>>>> aren't known for your ability to tell real from make >>>>>>>> believe, are you?- >>>>>>> Well, why would I call it atheistic mythology if it was >>>>>>> not make believe? >>>>>> Atheism has no mythology, moron, "Atheism is characterized >>>>>> by an absence of belief in the existence of gods." >>>>>> --http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/intro.html >>>>> Atheism does have mythology, otherwise, why would atheists be >>>>> pretending that people are being given jury trials at sanity >>>>> hearings? Robert B. Winn >>>> This has nothing to do with atheism, as you know.- Hide quoted >>>> text - >>> Any time an atheist get caught short, all we see are disclaimers. >>> �I think it does have something to do with atheism. Robert B. >>> Winn >> Are you posting here at alt.atheism intentionally or just replying >> to a post crossposted to a Christian forum? >> >> > Well, actually, originally I was posting from alt.bible in this > conversation, but the thread got so messed up in alt.bible I started > answering on a thread from alt.atheism. Robert B. Winn > > Thank you. I do my best not to be so easily provoked. I'm just visiting alt.atheism to see why so many atheists are abusing people at alt.christian.religion. -- ~Stumper Quote
Guest Free Lunch Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On 10 Mar 2007 20:17:37 -0800, in alt.atheism "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in <1173586657.609454.172380@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>: >On Mar 10, 6:08?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> On 10 Mar 2007 16:37:25 -0800, in alt.atheism >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in >> <1173573445.512922.196...@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: >> >> >> >> >On Mar 10, 4:16?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >> On 10 Mar 2007 15:02:56 -0800, in alt.atheism >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in >> >> <1173567776.676369.66...@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: >> >> >> >On Mar 10, 10:22?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >> >> >> rbwinn wrote: >> >> >> > On Mar 9, 1:08?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> rbwinn wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mar 8, 2:39?am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:23:22 -0800, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> >> >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>> ? - Refer: <erCdnYJ9sbKWS3LYnZ2dnUVZ_trin...@comcast.com> >> >> >> >>>>> Michael Gray wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 14:43:40 -0800, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> ? - Refer: <1173307420.007287.59...@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Michael Gray wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 09:49:42 -0800, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> ? - Refer: <1173289782.480046.72...@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2:21?pm, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Robert, why would you believe that you are somehow exempt from a simple >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> instruction in your manual: to beat a speedy retreat from any place like >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> alt dot atheism where your proselytizing is not welcome, and 'shake the >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> dust of that place off your feet' [don't have anything further to do >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> with it]? >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Your hypothesis that things in your manual only apply to the original >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> twelve apostles is just the fallacy of ad hoc hypothesis. If they were >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to apply only to the original twelve apostles then there would be no >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> proselytizing today, would there?- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Who told you I was proselytizing? >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> What do YOU think you're doing? >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Bzzzt! >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Meaningless question. >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Bobby is quite incapable of thought. >> >> >> >>>>>>> Point taken; I withdraw the question. >> >> >> >>>>>> Objection sustained. >> >> >> >>>>>> Now, what about this defence of... >> >> >> >>>>>> <shuffles papers> >> >> >> >>>>>> Erm "Not guilty by way of insanity"? >> >> >> >>>>>> What does the defendent have to say? >> >> >> >>>>>> You will stand when you address the court Mr. Winn. >> >> >> >>>>>> Remove that canvas jacket from him will you, usher? >> >> >> >>>>> Take off his straight jacket? I object! >> >> >> >>>> The learned counsel's objection is sustained. >> >> >> >>>> Mr. Winn is a clear and present danger to rationality. >> >> >> >>>> The Jury will now consider it's verdict. >> >> >> >>> Well, here is some more atheistic mythology. ?So who do you claim has >> >> >> >>> ever had a trial by jury at a sanity hearing? ? >> >> >> >> ?> >> >> >> >> It's not a real trial, moron, it is just make believe on Usenet. We are >> >> >> >> just making fun of you. Can't you tell the difference? Errrm ... never >> >> >> >> mind. You aren't known for your ability to tell real from make believe, >> >> >> >> are you?- >> >> >> >> > Well, why would I call it atheistic mythology if it was not make >> >> >> > believe? >> >> >> >> Atheism has no mythology, moron, "Atheism is characterized by an absence >> >> >> of belief in the existence of gods." --http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/intro.html >> >> >> >Atheism does have mythology, otherwise, why would atheists be >> >> >pretending that people are being given jury trials at sanity hearings? >> >> >Robert B. Winn >> >> >> This has nothing to do with atheism, as you know.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >Any time an atheist get caught short, all we see are disclaimers. >> >think it does have something to do with atheism. >> >Robert B. Winn >> >> We aren't being caught short. You are lying. You have absolutely no >> evidence to support your false claim and I see no reason to bother >> dealing with this lie, since you have not learned from all of the other >> lies that you have had thrown back in your face. >> >> You personally teach a pathetic god.- Hide quoted text - >> >Well, if you think Jesus Christ is pathetic, tell him what you think >when he returns to judge the earth. What does your opinion have to do >with me? I'm quite familiar with Christianity and its many variants. You don't teach Christianity by any reasonable definition of it. Quote
Guest stumper Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Mar 10, 5:49?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >>> On Mar 10, 5:10?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: >>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>> On Mar 10, 2:59?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: >>>>>> William Mechlenburg wrote: >>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:1173537055.788478.173840@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>> On Mar 10, 6:00?am, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 9, 1:45?pm, "jl" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 3:56 pm, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ijapu2hpqemgb5942fpgn11tc5uba0t3fu@4ax.com...> On Mon, 5 Mar >>>>>>> 2007 13:59:47 +0800, in alt.atheism >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> <45ebceae$0$16281$88260...@free.teranews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? ?You need to show at least some evidence to be taken >>>>>>> seriously. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we all get the impression you're just chanting atheist mantras >>>>>>> again, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's all you aspire to. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For someone who makes all sorts of claims without ever providing >>>>>>> a shred >>>>>>>>>>>>> of evidence, it's pretty rich for you to ask for evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> ? ? When will you get serious? Our Christian "God is love" (1 John >>>>>>> 4:8,16). >>>>>>>>>>> No he's not. ?He stains the earth with innocent blood, scatters it >>>>>>>>>>> with poverty, starvation, war, famine, disease, and ruin; sacrifices >>>>>>>>>>> virgins for his own sadistic blood lust; demands on pain of blood >>>>>>>>>>> curses that he be loved and worshiped; shows his ass to Moses; shows >>>>>>>>>>> his face, his UFO and his angels to Isaiah; invests his powers in >>>>>>>>>>> clergy who rape, steal, murder and pillage; and giggles while David >>>>>>> (a >>>>>>>>>>> man after God's own heart) commits premeditated murder and steals >>>>>>>>>>> another man's wife, estate, and vineyards. >>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and did I mention he (after getting the idea from pagan gods who >>>>>>>>>>> raped mortals and begat babies on them) dispatched a ghost to >>>>>>>>>>> fornicate with Mary against her will and knocked her up even though >>>>>>>>>>> she was betrothed to Joseph. >>>>>>>>>> Why don't you discuss your ideas with Jesus Christ when he returns to >>>>>>>>>> judge the earth? >>>>>>>>> Because he's imaginary.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> Well, he would be the one to tell your idea. ?Just speak right up and >>>>>>>> tell him when he returns to judge the earth. >>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>>>>> Your imaginary god is not going to return to earth. It isn't going to >>>>>>> happen! >>>>>> It's just wonderful that >>>>>> you can imagine God. >>>>>> Can you tell us a little more >>>>>> about your imaginary God? >>>>> Would you like me to send you a copy of the Bible? >>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>> I have seen and heard many versions. >>>> At least some parts of them anyway. >>>> But I'm interested in >>>> his and your understanding of God. >>>> Is your God male? >>> Why do you ask? >>> Robert B. Winn >> To figure out how to properly talk about God. >> >> -- >> ~Stumper- Hide quoted text - >> > You don't have to figure it out. The example of how to pray was given > by Jesus Christ. It starts, Our Father Which art in Heaven. > Robert B. Winn > > Unfortunately, I don't do things just because others do them. Do you believe in miracles? -- ~Stumper Quote
Guest stumper Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Mar 10, 5:56�pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >>> On Mar 10, 4:37?pm, "tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>> On Mar 10, 6:06 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mar 10, 10:12?am, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:> I asked you a simple question on how did you know that he was telling the truth. ?You should answer >>>>>> the question instead of offering remedies! >>>>> Well, I am not going to get involved in your idea of accusing God of >>>>> lying. ?You need to do that without help from me if you are going to >>>>> do it. ?I would advise you not to do it. >>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>> Quite the paradox. ?The god thingy doesn't exist and things that don't >>>> exist can't lie. ?But the followers of the god thingy believe the lies >>>> attributed to it. ?So, based on its non-existence, I don't think the >>>> god thingy lies, but the things other people believe it said are lies. >>>> So, RB. ?What terrible thing to you believe will happen to me? ?And >>>> can you prove that it will happen? ?Note, if I have to wait until >>>> after I'm dead, your proof can't be validated. >>>> --- >>>> a.a. #2273 >>> I think you will be cut off from the presence of God. �So you will >>> just continue on in the things familiar to you. �You would eventually >>> come to know that God exists, but never be allowed where he is. �A >>> person who accuses God of lying will not be allowed into his presence. >>> Robert B. Winn >> How do you know that >> God is not going to soften his mind >> or to just forgive him anyway? >> > Well, you atheists all claim to be special cases. If that is what you > want to believe will happen, go ahead. I do not believe it would work > for me. > Robert B. Winn > I don't think I'm an atheist. Anyhow, if it happened to Paul, it can easily happen to any atheist. No need to curse people to hell so fast. -- ~Stumper Quote
Guest Gospel Bretts Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:27:04 -0500, stumper <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote: >rbwinn wrote: >> On Mar 10, 5:47?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: >>> rbwinn wrote: >>>> On Mar 10, 4:16?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>> On 10 Mar 2007 15:02:56 -0800, in alt.atheism "rbwinn" >>>>> <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in >>>>> <1173567776.676369.66...@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: >>>>>> On Mar 10, 10:22?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mar 9, 1:08?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2:39?am, Michael Gray >>>>>>>>>> <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:23:22 -0800, Sippuuden >>>>>>>>>>> <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: ? - Refer: >>>>>>>>>>> <erCdnYJ9sbKWS3LYnZ2dnUVZ_trin...@comcast.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Gray wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 14:43:40 -0800, "JessHC" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote: ? - Refer: >>>>>>>>>>>>> <1173307420.007287.59...@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Gray wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 09:49:42 -0800, "JessHC" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote: ? - Refer: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <1173289782.480046.72...@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2:21?pm, Sippuuden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert, why would you believe that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are somehow exempt from a simple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction in your manual: to beat a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speedy retreat from any place like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt dot atheism where your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proselytizing is not welcome, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'shake the dust of that place off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your feet' [don't have anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further to do with it]? Your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypothesis that things in your manual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only apply to the original twelve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apostles is just the fallacy of ad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hoc hypothesis. If they were to apply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to the original twelve apostles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then there would be no proselytizing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today, would there?- Hide quoted text >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who told you I was proselytizing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do YOU think you're doing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bzzzt! Meaningless question. Bobby is quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incapable of thought. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Point taken; I withdraw the question. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Objection sustained. Now, what about this >>>>>>>>>>>>> defence of... <shuffles papers> Erm "Not guilty >>>>>>>>>>>>> by way of insanity"? What does the defendent >>>>>>>>>>>>> have to say? You will stand when you address >>>>>>>>>>>>> the court Mr. Winn. Remove that canvas jacket >>>>>>>>>>>>> from him will you, usher? >>>>>>>>>>>> Take off his straight jacket? I object! >>>>>>>>>>> The learned counsel's objection is sustained. Mr. >>>>>>>>>>> Winn is a clear and present danger to rationality. >>>>>>>>>>> The Jury will now consider it's verdict. >>>>>>>>>> Well, here is some more atheistic mythology. ?So who >>>>>>>>>> do you claim has ever had a trial by jury at a sanity >>>>>>>>>> hearing? ? >>>>>>>>> ?> It's not a real trial, moron, it is just make >>>>>>>>> believe on Usenet. We are just making fun of you. Can't >>>>>>>>> you tell the difference? Errrm ... never mind. You >>>>>>>>> aren't known for your ability to tell real from make >>>>>>>>> believe, are you?- >>>>>>>> Well, why would I call it atheistic mythology if it was >>>>>>>> not make believe? >>>>>>> Atheism has no mythology, moron, "Atheism is characterized >>>>>>> by an absence of belief in the existence of gods." >>>>>>> --http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/intro.html >>>>>> Atheism does have mythology, otherwise, why would atheists be >>>>>> pretending that people are being given jury trials at sanity >>>>>> hearings? Robert B. Winn >>>>> This has nothing to do with atheism, as you know.- Hide quoted >>>>> text - >>>> Any time an atheist get caught short, all we see are disclaimers. >>>> ?I think it does have something to do with atheism. Robert B. >>>> Winn >>> Are you posting here at alt.atheism intentionally or just replying >>> to a post crossposted to a Christian forum? >>> >>> >> Well, actually, originally I was posting from alt.bible in this >> conversation, but the thread got so messed up in alt.bible I started >> answering on a thread from alt.atheism. Robert B. Winn >> >> > >Thank you. > >I do my best not to be so easily provoked. >I'm just visiting alt.atheism to see >why so many atheists are abusing people >at alt.christian.religion. I've found that we don't generally post to the christer groups, stumper, except to answer posts that have already been crossposted there. ______________________________________ Gospel Bretts a.a. atheist #2262 Fundy Xian Atheist Quote
Guest Michael Gray Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:27:04 -0500, stumper <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote: - Refer: <JJ6dnSxme4FgGW7YnZ2dnUVZ_q-vnZ2d@ptd.net> : >I do my best not to be so easily provoked. >I'm just visiting alt.atheism to see >why so many atheists are abusing people >at alt.christian.religion. Because most Christians are either shameless outright provable liars, facile vacuous cretins, or certifiably insane. You fall neatly the middle category, with a bit of the other two. -- Quote
Guest Pastor Frank Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 "justiz" <izstanbul@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1173183310.911820.288670@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 6, 1:40 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: >> On Mar 6, 2:40 am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:13:03 -0800, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> >> > wrote: >> >> > >"An ad hoc hypothesis is one created to explain away facts that seem >> > >to >> > >refute one's theory." -- http://skepdic.com/adhoc.html >> >> > One has to actually have a theory in the first place. >> > Bobby has only crazed schizophrenic ramblings. >> >> You were the ones who were trying to promote me to the position of >> apostle. You have no authority to make any such promotion. I am not >> being sent with the same responsibility the apostles were given. I >> have yet to see you use any verse of the Bible in context. All you >> ever do is take random verses and apply them according to your >> interpretation. >> Robert B. Winn > > Isn't that what christians do? Isn't that what makes it fun? > christians use the bible selectively, atheist shove it back in their > face selectively. > The best excuse I heard for using the bible selectively is that parts > are not relevant. gasp. I contend it is holy irrelevant to any > educated person. > "educated person"? Is education your god? Educated persons let Hitler do his thing, killing millions. Intelligent people knew better than to protest and get themselves into trouble like some stupid people with a conscience. Christ is about having a heart and caring for people, regardless of whether you might get yourself killed for doing so. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Quote
Guest Pastor Frank Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 "Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1hujm43.1rv9y9sl4w3jN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com... > Pastor Frank <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote: >> >> Christ tells me not to judge people. All I am allowed is to judge >> actions. So you need to list what actions you want me to judge, and I >> will >> attempt to judge them by the standard of: What Would Jesus Do? > > How about your own actions? What do you think the odds are that they > meet the standard? > "What Would Jesus Do" is a sham, the only standard you have is "What > Would Frank Do". You just don't have the character to call it what it > is, hiding instead behind your religious sanctimony... > That's just your atheist cynicism and paranoia talking. We actually DO believe in Jesus, and seek to submit our wills to His. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Quote
Guest Pastor Frank Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 "JessHC" <jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote in message news:1173221749.213205.258370@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com... > Pastor Frank wrote: >> "Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message >> news:l2ofu25j3689oqkknitg214b0cebi0anqq@4ax.com... >> > >> > But it forces them to do that, even if by willful ignorance, be that >> > through fear, or restricted opportunity, which is my entire point. >> > Atheism does not force people to lie. >> > >> Precisely! For atheism allows people to define the god they reject as >> ridiculously as possible so as to make existence of such a creature >> totally >> impossible. Therefore: There ain't no god(s) is automatically always true >> and there is no need to lie. > > It isn't the atheist's responsibility to define your deities for you. > So you admit to lying then when you say: There ain't no god(s)? For you obviously don't know what that word means to anyone who believe in a God. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Quote
Guest Pastor Frank Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 "Andrew" <thecroft@macunlimited.net> wrote in message news:2007030623193650073-thecroft@macunlimitednet... > On 2007-03-06 22:12:12 +0000, "JessHC" <jesshc@phantomemail.com> said: >> >> Agreed. It's surprising how many xians rationalize why the verse >> doesn't really mean what it says. > > The meaning is actually pretty clear. In its context it requires > Christians to proselytise - to attempt to spread the Gospel. Where that > becomes "shoving ones's religion down the throat of another person" is a > matter of judgement - not interpretation of a verse from scripture. The > text merely says that there will be times when the message is not accepted > and it is time to move on. > It's a free country and you can ignore all advertising, the good with the bad. That goes for political viewpoints as well as religion and many more. "Shoving someone's viewpoint down the throat of others" is nothing but an atheist straw-man they love to trash. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Quote
Guest Pastor Frank Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 "Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1hukpsp.1pxrmuu1t335k3N%scottrichter422@yahoo.com... > rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote: > >> > > Why don't you explain it to Jesus Christ when he returns to judge the >> > > earth? >> > >> > That's so adorable! You think some guy who lived 2000 years ago (if he >> > existed at all) is going to "return to judge the earth"? It's just too >> > cute for words! >> > >> > No, wait... You're an ADULT, right? Hmmm, scratch what I said, it's not >> > cute at all, it's just ridiculous. >> >> Well, Scot, I would not be the one to discuss your idea with. Why >> don't you take an opportunity to discuss it with Jesus Christ after he >> returns to judge the earth? > > Like I said, a grown man saying these things: ridiculous. > Here's a tip, Skippy. For a threat to work, the person at whom the > threat is directed has to believe the threat is real. Otherwise, you > come across like a four year old child trying to scare his parents by > claiming a monster is in the closet. > Does any of this make sense to you? > Thanks for proving my point about atheists being beset by cynicism and paranoia, if not fear. I mean what "threat" is there in discussing matters with Jesus Christ Himself? But then atheism leads to feeling surrounded by liars and being subjected to threats. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Quote
Guest Pastor Frank Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 "Sippuuden" <sipp@macrosoft.net> wrote in message news:y5edna5NbpcM93PYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@comcast.com... > Mettas Mother wrote: >> >> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence! > > No evidence of absence is ever required in any case. The burden of proof > cannot be shifted to the non-believers. > The only reasonable default presumption in any case like this is the null, > 'NO ET,' 'NO GOD' no whatever. > http://www.setileague.org/articles/setihoax.htm > http://www.setileague.org/editor/null.htm > You won't meet up with any argument from us theists. We all agree with you, that the god(s) of atheist definition are guaranteed not to exist. But then there are millions who have their very own existing concrete god(s) they pray to and make offerings to. And others have abstract gods: I.e. our Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16) whom we serve, ...to the death if need be. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Quote
Guest Uncle Clover Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 04:56:08 +0800, "Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote: > When will you get serious? Our Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16). >Sorry that I don't provide evidence of love to your satisfaction, but Christ >did, by laying down His life for you on the cross of Calvary. > But regardless, your claim that love does not exist is ridiculous, or >are you talking of the god of YOUR definition? We already agree that it >doesn't exist, yet you still keep chanting the same inane atheists mantras >you did years ago. Ah, as I thought, then. Your god is an endorphin. At least you're willing to admit it. :-) Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 On Mar 10, 9:28�pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: > On 10 Mar 2007 20:17:37 -0800, in alt.atheism > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in > <1173586657.609454.172...@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>: > > > > > > >On Mar 10, 6:08?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >> On 10 Mar 2007 16:37:25 -0800, in alt.atheism > >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in > >> <1173573445.512922.196...@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: > > >> >On Mar 10, 4:16?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: > >> >> On 10 Mar 2007 15:02:56 -0800, in alt.atheism > >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in > >> >> <1173567776.676369.66...@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>: > > >> >> >On Mar 10, 10:22?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: > >> >> >> rbwinn wrote: > >> >> >> > On Mar 9, 1:08?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> rbwinn wrote: > >> >> >> >>> On Mar 8, 2:39?am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:23:22 -0800, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> > >> >> >> >>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> ? - Refer: <erCdnYJ9sbKWS3LYnZ2dnUVZ_trin...@comcast.com> > >> >> >> >>>>> Michael Gray wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 14:43:40 -0800, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>> ? - Refer: <1173307420.007287.59...@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Michael Gray wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2007 09:49:42 -0800, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> ? - Refer: <1173289782.480046.72...@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2:21?pm, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Robert, why would you believe that you are somehow exempt from a simple > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> instruction in your manual: to beat a speedy retreat from any place like > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> alt dot atheism where your proselytizing is not welcome, and 'shake the > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> dust of that place off your feet' [don't have anything further to do > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> with it]? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Your hypothesis that things in your manual only apply to the original > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> twelve apostles is just the fallacy of ad hoc hypothesis. If they were > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to apply only to the original twelve apostles then there would be no > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> proselytizing today, would there?- Hide quoted text - > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Who told you I was proselytizing? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> What do YOU think you're doing? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Bzzzt! > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Meaningless question. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Bobby is quite incapable of thought. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Point taken; I withdraw the question. > >> >> >> >>>>>> Objection sustained. > >> >> >> >>>>>> Now, what about this defence of... > >> >> >> >>>>>> <shuffles papers> > >> >> >> >>>>>> Erm "Not guilty by way of insanity"? > >> >> >> >>>>>> What does the defendent have to say? > >> >> >> >>>>>> You will stand when you address the court Mr. Winn. > >> >> >> >>>>>> Remove that canvas jacket from him will you, usher? > >> >> >> >>>>> Take off his straight jacket? I object! > >> >> >> >>>> The learned counsel's objection is sustained. > >> >> >> >>>> Mr. Winn is a clear and present danger to rationality. > >> >> >> >>>> The Jury will now consider it's verdict. > >> >> >> >>> Well, here is some more atheistic mythology. ?So who do you claim has > >> >> >> >>> ever had a trial by jury at a sanity hearing? ? > >> >> >> >> ?> > >> >> >> >> It's not a real trial, moron, it is just make believe on Usenet. We are > >> >> >> >> just making fun of you. Can't you tell the difference? Errrm .... never > >> >> >> >> mind. You aren't known for your ability to tell real from make believe, > >> >> >> >> are you?- > > >> >> >> > Well, why would I call it atheistic mythology if it was not make > >> >> >> > believe? > > >> >> >> Atheism has no mythology, moron, "Atheism is characterized by an absence > >> >> >> of belief in the existence of gods." --http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/intro.html > > >> >> >Atheism does have mythology, otherwise, why would atheists be > >> >> >pretending that people are being given jury trials at sanity hearings? > >> >> >Robert B. Winn > > >> >> This has nothing to do with atheism, as you know.- Hide quoted text - > > >> >Any time an atheist get caught short, all we see are disclaimers. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Mar 10, 9:28?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: > > On 10 Mar 2007 20:17:37 -0800, in alt.atheism > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in > > <1173586657.609454.172...@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>: > > >Well, if you think Jesus Christ is pathetic, tell him what you think > > >when he returns to judge the earth. ?What does your opinion have to do > > >with me? > > > > I'm quite familiar with Christianity and its many variants. You don't > > teach Christianity by any reasonable definition of it.- Hide quoted text - > > > Well, I would just as soon let Jesus Christ be the judge of what I > teach. You , of course, are welcome to your own opinion, but your > opinion does not mean anything to me. Nor do facts. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 Pastor Frank wrote: > "justiz" <izstanbul@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1173183310.911820.288670@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > On Mar 6, 1:40 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 6, 2:40 am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote: > >> > On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:13:03 -0800, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >"An ad hoc hypothesis is one created to explain away facts that seem > >> > >to > >> > >refute one's theory." -- http://skepdic.com/adhoc.html > >> > >> > One has to actually have a theory in the first place. > >> > Bobby has only crazed schizophrenic ramblings. > >> > >> You were the ones who were trying to promote me to the position of > >> apostle. You have no authority to make any such promotion. I am not > >> being sent with the same responsibility the apostles were given. I > >> have yet to see you use any verse of the Bible in context. All you > >> ever do is take random verses and apply them according to your > >> interpretation. > >> Robert B. Winn > > > > Isn't that what christians do? Isn't that what makes it fun? > > christians use the bible selectively, atheist shove it back in their > > face selectively. > > The best excuse I heard for using the bible selectively is that parts > > are not relevant. gasp. I contend it is holy irrelevant to any > > educated person. > > > "educated person"? Is education your god? Educated persons let Hitler do > his thing, killing millions. Intelligent people knew better than to protest > and get themselves into trouble like some stupid people with a conscience. > Christ is about having a heart and caring for people, regardless of > whether you might get yourself killed for doing so. Is that why he says stuff like "If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:26)? Quote
Guest JessHC Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 stumper wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Mar 10, 5:56?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: > >> How do you know that > >> God is not going to soften his mind > >> or to just forgive him anyway? > >> > > Well, you atheists all claim to be special cases. If that is what you > > want to believe will happen, go ahead. I do not believe it would work > > for me. > > Robert B. Winn > > > > I don't think I'm an atheist. You're the only one who would know. > Anyhow, if it happened to Paul, > it can easily happen to any atheist. Yes, temporal lobe epilepsy is an insidious illness. > No need to curse people to hell so fast. It's what xians do. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 stumper wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Mar 10, 5:47?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: > >> Are you posting here at alt.atheism intentionally or just replying > >> to a post crossposted to a Christian forum? > >> > > Well, actually, originally I was posting from alt.bible in this > > conversation, but the thread got so messed up in alt.bible I started > > answering on a thread from alt.atheism. Robert B. Winn > > Thank you. > > I do my best not to be so easily provoked. > I'm just visiting alt.atheism to see > why so many atheists are abusing people > at alt.christian.religion. And now you know: the vast majority of the time, it's because there are theists who think it's a good idea to crosspost their delusions into alt.atheism. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Mar 10, 6:08?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote: > > On 10 Mar 2007 16:37:25 -0800, in alt.atheism > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in > > >Any time an atheist get caught short, all we see are disclaimers. ?I > > >think it does have something to do with atheism. > > >Robert B. Winn > > > > We aren't being caught short. You are lying. You have absolutely no > > evidence to support your false claim and I see no reason to bother > > dealing with this lie, since you have not learned from all of the other > > lies that you have had thrown back in your face. > > > > You personally teach a pathetic god.- Hide quoted text - > > > Well, if you think Jesus Christ is pathetic, tell him what you think > when he returns to judge the earth. Yeah, he's what, 2000 years over-due now? > What does your opinion have to do with me? The same thing your opinion has to do with alt.atheism. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Mar 10, 5:56?pm, stumper <stum...@newvessel.com> wrote: > > How do you know that > > God is not going to soften his mind > > or to just forgive him anyway? > > > Well, you atheists all claim to be special cases. Really. Which atheist said that, again? > If that is what you > want to believe will happen, go ahead. I do not believe it would work > for me. Non responsive. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.