Brits pulling out, Danes pullingout, bush,jr's collapsing world continues to collapse

March 18, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:45FCDDC4.7C4A4E4E@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> news:45F8EF3B.1E01FF7@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

>> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

>> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops present.

>> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to invade.

>> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

>> >> >> >> >> country

>> >> >> >> >> was

>> >> >> >> >> run

>> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

>> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

>> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

>> >> >> > Highly relevant.

>> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

>> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and more of

>> >> > our

>> >> > money

>> >> > wasted?

>> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of Iraq.

>> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

>> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

>> >> >> >> Cite?

>> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html

>> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are working

>> >> with

>> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

>> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

>> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

>> > May 16, 2005

>> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are

>> > scarcely cold,

>> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The

>> > White

>> > House

>> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of Andijan

>> > included

>> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should, McClellan

>> > insists,

>> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

>> > violence".

>> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

>> > June 20, 2005

>> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a call

>> > by

>> > NATO for

>> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds of

>> > civilians by

>> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves as

>> > yet

>> > another

>> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims for

>> > supporting

>> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet Union.

>> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's man

>> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

>> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

>> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

>> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

>> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

>> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

>> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

>> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

>> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

>> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

>> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even assured

>> > the

>> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

>> > citizens???

>> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

> The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to worry

> about

> it by the guy on the left.

Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

March 19, 2007

On Mar 18, 9:16 pm, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Saddam is gone.

>

> So why are we still there?

>

> "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com> wrote in message

>

> news:jOeLh.14426$yj7.4244@trnddc02...

>

> > "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >news:45FCCFAE.8BD2EB1A@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > >> >> >> >>news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> > >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> > >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> > >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> > >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

> Saddam

> > >> >> >> used

> > >> >> >> WMD

> > >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> > >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> > >> >> >> machine-gunned

> > >> >> >> to

> > >> >> >> death.

> > >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> > >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> > >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

> > >> >> bombings.

> > >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> > >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> > >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

> peaceful

> > >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> > > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years ago? LOL

>

> > Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> > the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

March 19, 2007

Saddam is gone.

So why are we still there?

"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:jOeLh.14426$yj7.4244@trnddc02...

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> news:45FCCFAE.8BD2EB1A@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

Saddam

> >> >> >> used

> >> >> >> WMD

> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> >> to

> >> >> >> death.

> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

> >> >> bombings.

> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

peaceful

> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years ago? LOL

>

> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

>

March 19, 2007

Patriot Games wrote:

>

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> news:45F8ED96.E54C58A4@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> news:45F4C0A7.67F84E02@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> news:45EE3672.18E5EEA1@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when Saddam

> >> >> used

> >> >> WMD

> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> to

> >> >> death.

> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

> >> bombings.

> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

>

> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

Are you also including the thousands our invasion killed? Lancet report? Hello?

RT

March 19, 2007

"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:rfOdnTxpaPgBnWPYnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@comcast.com...

> Saddam is gone.

> So why are we still there?

Non-sequitor.

March 19, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:45FEBD3C.B9F62791@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> news:45F8ED96.E54C58A4@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> news:45F4C0A7.67F84E02@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> news:45EE3672.18E5EEA1@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

>> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

>> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

>> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

>> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when Saddam

>> >> >> used

>> >> >> WMD

>> >> >> on the Kurds.

>> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

>> >> >> machine-gunned

>> >> >> to

>> >> >> death.

>> >> >> Does that answer your question?

>> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

>> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

>> >> bombings.

>> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

>> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

>> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

>> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> Are you also including the thousands our invasion killed? Lancet report?

> Hello?

Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

March 21, 2007

On Mar 20, 9:23 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> > "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > > Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops present.

> > >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to invade.

> > >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

> > >> >> >> >> >> country

> > >> >> >> >> >> was

> > >> >> >> >> >> run

> > >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

> > >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

> > >> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

> > >> >> >> > Highly relevant.

> > >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> > >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and more of

> > >> >> > our

> > >> >> > money

> > >> >> > wasted?

> > >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> > >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of Iraq.

> > >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> > Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> > >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

> > >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

> > >> >> >> >> Cite?

> > >> >>http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004...

> > >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are working

> > >> >> with

> > >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

> > >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

> > >> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

> > >> > May 16, 2005

> > >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are

> > >> > scarcely cold,

> > >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The

> > >> > White

> > >> > House

> > >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of Andijan

> > >> > included

> > >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should, McClellan

> > >> > insists,

> > >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

> > >> > violence".

> > >> >http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

> > >> > June 20, 2005

> > >> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a call

> > >> > by

> > >> > NATO for

> > >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds of

> > >> > civilians by

> > >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves as

> > >> > yet

> > >> > another

> > >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims for

> > >> > supporting

> > >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet Union.

> > >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's man

> > >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> > >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

> > >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> > >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> >http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

> > >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> > >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> >http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

> > >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

> > >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> > >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

> > >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

> > >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even assured

> > >> > the

> > >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

> > >> > citizens???

> > >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > >http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

> > > The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to worry

> > > about

> > > it by the guy on the left.

>

> > Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>

> Did you read what I posted?????

>

> RT- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

[

wolvesslasher · March 21, 2007

"Blame Me I Voted Republican" <BlameMeIVotedRepublican@aol.com> wrote in
message news:12uceshqg2g3lc1@corp.supernews.com...
> "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>>> No test is involved. It's the brits recognizing this ain't working.
>>Feel free to quote a Brit military or gov't official saying that.
> You _are_ aware that news sources other than FOX "News" have reported
> that the puppet pretend "president" of Iraq has ordered the fascist
> baby killing Christians out of Iraq, right?

Cite?

He's just another asshole Atheist extremist.Don't expect anything but bigotry from scum like that.

March 21, 2007

Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when Saddam

> >> >> >> used

> >> >> >> WMD

> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> >> to

> >> >> >> death.

> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

> >> >> bombings.

> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years ago? LOL

>

> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons stood by, BTW.

Are you aware of the Lancet report, hmmm?

RT

March 21, 2007

Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops present.

> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to invade.

> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

> >> >> >> >> >> country

> >> >> >> >> >> was

> >> >> >> >> >> run

> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

> >> >> >> > Highly relevant.

> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and more of

> >> >> > our

> >> >> > money

> >> >> > wasted?

> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of Iraq.

> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

> >> >> >> >> Cite?

> >> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html

> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are working

> >> >> with

> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

> >> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

> >> > May 16, 2005

> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are

> >> > scarcely cold,

> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The

> >> > White

> >> > House

> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of Andijan

> >> > included

> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should, McClellan

> >> > insists,

> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

> >> > violence".

> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

> >> > June 20, 2005

> >> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a call

> >> > by

> >> > NATO for

> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds of

> >> > civilians by

> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves as

> >> > yet

> >> > another

> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims for

> >> > supporting

> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet Union.

> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's man

> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with them.

> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even assured

> >> > the

> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

> >> > citizens???

> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

> > The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to worry

> > about

> > it by the guy on the left.

>

> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

Did you read what I posted?????

RT

wolvesslasher · March 21, 2007

Patriot Games wrote:
> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:
> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> > Patriot Games wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?
> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?
> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops present.
> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to invade.
> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their country was
> >> >> >> run
> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.
> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?
> >> >> Irrelevant.
> >> > Highly relevant.
> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?
> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and more of our
> > money
> > wasted?
>
> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of Iraq.

> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?
> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.
> >> >> Cite?
> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html
>
> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are working with
> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html
May 16, 2005
The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are scarcely cold,
and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The White House
spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of Andijan included
"Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should, McClellan insists,
seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through violence".
...

http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469
June 20, 2005
Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a call by NATO for
an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds of civilians by
the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves as yet another
reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration

March 21, 2007

Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> news:45FEBD3C.B9F62791@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> news:45F8ED96.E54C58A4@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> news:45F4C0A7.67F84E02@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> news:45EE3672.18E5EEA1@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when Saddam

> >> >> >> used

> >> >> >> WMD

> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> >> to

> >> >> >> death.

> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

> >> >> bombings.

> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion killed? Lancet report?

> > Hello?

>

> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it went on and reassured

Saddam nothing would come of it?

RT

March 21, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:4600B304.7C8529CC@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

>> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

>> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

>> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

>> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

>> >> >> >> Saddam

>> >> >> >> used

>> >> >> >> WMD

>> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

>> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

>> >> >> >> machine-gunned

>> >> >> >> to

>> >> >> >> death.

>> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

>> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

>> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

>> >> >> bombings.

>> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

>> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

>> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

>> >> peaceful

>> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

>> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years ago? LOL

>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

> Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons stood by, BTW.

Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

March 21, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:4600B63D.DB42FDBB@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> news:45FEBD3C.B9F62791@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> news:45F8ED96.E54C58A4@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> news:45F4C0A7.67F84E02@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> news:45EE3672.18E5EEA1@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

>> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

>> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

>> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

>> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

>> >> >> >> Saddam

>> >> >> >> used

>> >> >> >> WMD

>> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

>> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

>> >> >> >> machine-gunned

>> >> >> >> to

>> >> >> >> death.

>> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

>> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

>> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

>> >> >> bombings.

>> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

>> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

>> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

>> >> peaceful

>> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

>> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion killed? Lancet

>> > report?

>> > Hello?

>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

> Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it went on and reassured

> Saddam nothing would come of it?

Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

March 21, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:4600B324.C6C3570F@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops present.

>> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to

>> >> >> >> >> >> > invade.

>> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

>> >> >> >> >> >> country

>> >> >> >> >> >> was

>> >> >> >> >> >> run

>> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

>> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

>> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

>> >> >> >> > Highly relevant.

>> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

>> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and more

>> >> >> > of

>> >> >> > our

>> >> >> > money

>> >> >> > wasted?

>> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of

>> >> > Iraq.

>> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

>> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

>> >> >> >> >> Cite?

>> >> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html

>> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are

>> >> >> working

>> >> >> with

>> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

>> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

>> >> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

>> >> > May 16, 2005

>> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are

>> >> > scarcely cold,

>> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The

>> >> > White

>> >> > House

>> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of

>> >> > Andijan

>> >> > included

>> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should,

>> >> > McClellan

>> >> > insists,

>> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

>> >> > violence".

>> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

>> >> > June 20, 2005

>> >> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a

>> >> > call

>> >> > by

>> >> > NATO for

>> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds of

>> >> > civilians by

>> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves as

>> >> > yet

>> >> > another

>> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims for

>> >> > supporting

>> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet

>> >> > Union.

>> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's

>> >> >> >> > man

>> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

>> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

>> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

>> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

>> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

>> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

>> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even

>> >> > assured

>> >> > the

>> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

>> >> > citizens???

>> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> > http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

>> > The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to

>> > worry

>> > about

>> > it by the guy on the left.

>> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> Did you read what I posted?????

Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

March 25, 2007

On Mar 24, 9:41 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Patriot Games wrote:

> > "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops present.

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade.

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> country

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> was

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> run

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

> > >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

> > >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

> > >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant.

> > >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> > >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and more

> > >> >> >> > of

> > >> >> >> > our

> > >> >> >> > money

> > >> >> >> > wasted?

> > >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> > >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of

> > >> >> > Iraq.

> > >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> > >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> > Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. Peace will

> come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You

> seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you again.

>

> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

> > >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

> > >> >> >> >> >> Cite?

> > >> >> >>http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004...

> > >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are

> > >> >> >> working

> > >> >> >> with

> > >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

> > >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

> > >> >> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

> > >> >> > May 16, 2005

> > >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are

> > >> >> > scarcely cold,

> > >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The

> > >> >> > White

> > >> >> > House

> > >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of

> > >> >> > Andijan

> > >> >> > included

> > >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should,

> > >> >> > McClellan

> > >> >> > insists,

> > >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

> > >> >> > violence".

> > >> >> >http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

> > >> >> > June 20, 2005

> > >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a

> > >> >> > call

> > >> >> > by

> > >> >> > NATO for

> > >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds of

> > >> >> > civilians by

> > >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves as

> > >> >> > yet

> > >> >> > another

> > >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims for

> > >> >> > supporting

> > >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet

> > >> >> > Union.

> > >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's

> > >> >> >> >> > man

> > >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> > >> >> >> > them.

> > >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

> > >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> > >> >> >> > them.

> > >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> >> >http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

> > >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> > >> >> >> > them.

> > >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> >> >http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

> > >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

> > >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> > >> >> >> > them.

> > >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> > >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> > >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

> > >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

> > >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even

> > >> >> > assured

> > >> >> > the

> > >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

> > >> >> > citizens???

> > >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > >> >http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

> > >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to

> > >> > worry

> > >> > about

> > >> > it by the guy on the left.

> > >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > > Did you read what I posted?????

>

> > Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>

> Did you read what I posted?

>

> RT- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

March 25, 2007

Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

> >> >> >> >> Saddam

> >> >> >> >> used

> >> >> >> >> WMD

> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> >> >> to

> >> >> >> >> death.

> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

> >> >> >> bombings.

> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

> >> >> peaceful

> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> >> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years ago? LOL

> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

> > Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons stood by, BTW.

>

> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

The mass executions ended a long time ago - do keep up.

RT

March 25, 2007

Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

> >> >> >> >> Saddam

> >> >> >> >> used

> >> >> >> >> WMD

> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> >> >> to

> >> >> >> >> death.

> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of any

> >> >> >> bombings.

> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

> >> >> peaceful

> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> >> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion killed? Lancet

> >> > report?

> >> > Hello?

> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

> > Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it went on and reassured

> > Saddam nothing would come of it?

>

> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up.

RT

March 25, 2007

Patriot Games wrote:

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops present.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

> >> >> >> >> >> >> country

> >> >> >> >> >> >> was

> >> >> >> >> >> >> run

> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant.

> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and more

> >> >> >> > of

> >> >> >> > our

> >> >> >> > money

> >> >> >> > wasted?

> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of

> >> >> > Iraq.

> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. Peace will

come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You

seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you again.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

> >> >> >> >> >> Cite?

> >> >> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html

> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are

> >> >> >> working

> >> >> >> with

> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

> >> >> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

> >> >> > May 16, 2005

> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are

> >> >> > scarcely cold,

> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The

> >> >> > White

> >> >> > House

> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of

> >> >> > Andijan

> >> >> > included

> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should,

> >> >> > McClellan

> >> >> > insists,

> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

> >> >> > violence".

> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

> >> >> > June 20, 2005

> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a

> >> >> > call

> >> >> > by

> >> >> > NATO for

> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds of

> >> >> > civilians by

> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves as

> >> >> > yet

> >> >> > another

> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims for

> >> >> > supporting

> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet

> >> >> > Union.

> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's

> >> >> >> >> > man

> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even

> >> >> > assured

> >> >> > the

> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

> >> >> > citizens???

> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> > http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to

> >> > worry

> >> > about

> >> > it by the guy on the left.

> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > Did you read what I posted?????

>

> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

Did you read what I posted?

RT

March 25, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:4605FCAA.474332E0@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in

>> >> >> >> >> >> message

>> >> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

>> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

>> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

>> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

>> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

>> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

>> >> >> >> >> Saddam

>> >> >> >> >> used

>> >> >> >> >> WMD

>> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

>> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

>> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned

>> >> >> >> >> to

>> >> >> >> >> death.

>> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

>> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

>> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of

>> >> >> >> any

>> >> >> >> bombings.

>> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

>> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

>> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

>> >> >> peaceful

>> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

>> >> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years ago? LOL

>> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

>> >> than

>> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

>> > Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons stood by, BTW.

>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

> The mass executions ended a long time ago - do keep up.

Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

March 25, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:4605FD45.787F8AA2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in

>> >> >> >> >> >> message

>> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

>> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

>> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

>> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

>> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

>> >> >> >> >> Saddam

>> >> >> >> >> used

>> >> >> >> >> WMD

>> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

>> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

>> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned

>> >> >> >> >> to

>> >> >> >> >> death.

>> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

>> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

>> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of

>> >> >> >> any

>> >> >> >> bombings.

>> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

>> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

>> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

>> >> >> peaceful

>> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

>> >> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion killed? Lancet

>> >> > report?

>> >> > Hello?

>> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

>> >> than

>> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

>> > Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it went on and

>> > reassured

>> > Saddam nothing would come of it?

>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

> The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up.

Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

March 25, 2007

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

news:4605FD6E.EB0C248@hotmMOVEail.com...

> Patriot Games wrote:

>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

>> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> present.

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade.

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> country

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> was

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> run

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

>> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

>> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

>> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant.

>> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

>> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and

>> >> >> >> > more

>> >> >> >> > of

>> >> >> >> > our

>> >> >> >> > money

>> >> >> >> > wasted?

>> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of

>> >> >> > Iraq.

>> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. Peace

> will

> come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You

> seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you

> again.

Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

>> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

>> >> >> >> >> >> Cite?

>> >> >> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html

>> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are

>> >> >> >> working

>> >> >> >> with

>> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

>> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

>> >> >> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

>> >> >> > May 16, 2005

>> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan

>> >> >> > are

>> >> >> > scarcely cold,

>> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them.

>> >> >> > The

>> >> >> > White

>> >> >> > House

>> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of

>> >> >> > Andijan

>> >> >> > included

>> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should,

>> >> >> > McClellan

>> >> >> > insists,

>> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

>> >> >> > violence".

>> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

>> >> >> > June 20, 2005

>> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a

>> >> >> > call

>> >> >> > by

>> >> >> > NATO for

>> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds

>> >> >> > of

>> >> >> > civilians by

>> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves

>> >> >> > as

>> >> >> > yet

>> >> >> > another

>> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims

>> >> >> > for

>> >> >> > supporting

>> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet

>> >> >> > Union.

>> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's

>> >> >> >> >> > man

>> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

>> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

>> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

>> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

>> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

>> >> >> >> > them.

>> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

>> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

>> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

>> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

>> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even

>> >> >> > assured

>> >> >> > the

>> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

>> >> >> > citizens???

>> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> >> > http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

>> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to

>> >> > worry

>> >> > about

>> >> > it by the guy on the left.

>> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

>> > Did you read what I posted?????

>> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> Did you read what I posted?

Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

March 28, 2007

Patriot Games wrote:

>

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> news:4605FCAA.474332E0@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in

> >> >> >> >> >> >> message

> >> >> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam

> >> >> >> >> >> used

> >> >> >> >> >> WMD

> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> >> >> >> to

> >> >> >> >> >> death.

> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of

> >> >> >> >> any

> >> >> >> >> bombings.

> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

> >> >> >> peaceful

> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> >> >> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years ago? LOL

> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

> >> >> than

> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

> >> > Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons stood by, BTW.

> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

> > The mass executions ended a long time ago - do keep up.

>

> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No.

Haven't you anything current to compare with as opposed to something from the

last century? HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

RT

March 28, 2007

BIGOT Patriot Games wrote:

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> news:4605FD6E.EB0C248@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign troops

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> present.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up lies to

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their country. Their

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> was

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> run

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant.

> >> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant.

> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed?

> >> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our troops die and

> >> >> >> >> > more

> >> >> >> >> > of

> >> >> >> >> > our

> >> >> >> >> > money

> >> >> >> >> > wasted?

> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> >> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in what's left of

> >> >> >> > Iraq.

> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. Peace

> > will

> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You

> > seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you

> > again.

>

> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO.

>

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic gov't.?

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cite?

> >> >> >> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html

> >> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only that we are

> >> >> >> >> working

> >> >> >> >> with

> >> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES.

> >> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you?

> >> >> >> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html

> >> >> >> > May 16, 2005

> >> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan

> >> >> >> > are

> >> >> >> > scarcely cold,

> >> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them.

> >> >> >> > The

> >> >> >> > White

> >> >> >> > House

> >> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of

> >> >> >> > Andijan

> >> >> >> > included

> >> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should,

> >> >> >> > McClellan

> >> >> >> > insists,

> >> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through

> >> >> >> > violence".

> >> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469

> >> >> >> > June 20, 2005

> >> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States successfully blocked a

> >> >> >> > call

> >> >> >> > by

> >> >> >> > NATO for

> >> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre of hundreds

> >> >> >> > of

> >> >> >> > civilians by

> >> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of Uzbekistan serves

> >> >> >> > as

> >> >> >> > yet

> >> >> >> > another

> >> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush administration's claims

> >> >> >> > for

> >> >> >> > supporting

> >> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the former Soviet

> >> >> >> > Union.

> >> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, he's Bush's

> >> >> >> >> >> > man

> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm

> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm

> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm

> >> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia

> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy buddy with

> >> >> >> >> > them.

> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country.

> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov.

> >> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh?

> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their people? Pick one.

> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing and even

> >> >> >> > assured

> >> >> >> > the

> >> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently murdering his

> >> >> >> > citizens???

> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> >> > http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

> >> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to

> >> >> > worry

> >> >> > about

> >> >> > it by the guy on the left.

> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> >> > Did you read what I posted?????

> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

> > Did you read what I posted?

>

> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians?

Didn't you read what I already posted? I even provided a picture link.

Get someone in your trailer park to help you.

RT

March 28, 2007

BIGOT Patriot Games wrote:

>

> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> news:4605FD45.787F8AA2@hotmMOVEail.com...

> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in

> >> >> >> >> >> >> message

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion.

> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is peaceful?

> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there?

> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several bombings each when

> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam

> >> >> >> >> >> used

> >> >> >> >> >> WMD

> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds.

> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent civilians were

> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned

> >> >> >> >> >> to

> >> >> >> >> >> death.

> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question?

> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal.

> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm not aware of

> >> >> >> >> any

> >> >> >> >> bombings.

> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of peacefulness?

> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL

> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more

> >> >> >> peaceful

> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now?

> >> >> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion killed? Lancet

> >> >> > report?

> >> >> > Hello?

> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful

> >> >> than

> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

> >> > Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it went on and

> >> > reassured

> >> > Saddam nothing would come of it?

> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

> > The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up.

>

> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than

> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No?

Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-03-18-poll-cover_N.htm

Iraqis see hope drain away

Jobs gone and schools closed.

Marriages delayed and children mourned.

Markets bombed and clean water in short supply.

Speaking freely now a dangerous act.

And hope lost.

Four years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, Iraqis describe daily

lives that have been torn apart by spiraling violence and a faltering

economy.

...

Even some of those whose sect suffered under Saddam recall that time

fondly.

"I miss those good old days," said Jasim Mahmood Rajab, 60, a Shiite

businessman.

"I had my work and my social life, and now nothing. I'm ready to pay

everything I have to sit at Abo Nowas Street and eat fish at night."

...

Sign In

Brits pulling out, Danes pullingout, bush,jr's collapsing world continues to collapse

Recommended Posts

Guest Patriot Games

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Guest therethats_better@yahoo.com

Guest robw

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Patriot Games

Guest Patriot Games

Guest there_thatsbetter@yahoo.com

wolvesslasher

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Rich Travsky

wolvesslasher

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Patriot Games

Guest Patriot Games

Guest Patriot Games

Guest Therethatsbetter@yahoo.com

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Patriot Games

Guest Patriot Games

Guest Patriot Games

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Rich Travsky

Guest Rich Travsky

Join the conversation

Browse

Activity

Support