Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:46131618.FDE7D8A2@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:460F35DC.123BBF53@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> troops > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> present. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked up > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lies > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> was > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> run > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > troops > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > die > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > our > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > money > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wasted? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > what's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > left > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Iraq. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking > >> >> >> >> > up. > >> >> >> >> > Peace > >> >> >> >> > will > >> >> >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its > >> >> >> >> > factions. > >> >> >> >> > You > >> >> >> >> > seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it > >> >> >> >> > out > >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> > you > >> >> >> >> > again. > >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > > Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. Peace will come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you again. > >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. > >> > Peace > >> > will > >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You > >> > seem > >> > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you > >> > again. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> gov't.? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cite? > http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> we > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> working > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you? > 7http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > May 16, 2005 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > are > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > scarcely cold, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dismiss > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > White > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > House > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > city > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andijan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > included > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > should, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > McClellan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > insists, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful means, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > through > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > violence". > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > June 20, 2005 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > successfully > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blocked > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > call > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > by > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NATO for > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 massacre > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > hundreds > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > civilians by > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > serves > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > as > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > yet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > another > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > administration's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > claims > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > supporting > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > former > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Soviet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Union. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political prisoners, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bush's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > man > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > people? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Pick > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > one. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did nothing > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > even > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > assured > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > murdering > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > citizens??? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg > >> >> >> >> >> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being > >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured > >> >> >> >> >> >> > not > >> >> >> >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> >> >> >> > worry > >> >> >> >> >> >> > about > >> >> >> >> >> >> > it by the guy on the left. > >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted????? > >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted? > >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> > Didn't you read what I already posted? I even provided a picture > >> >> >> > link. > >> >> >> > Get someone in your trailer park to help you. > >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? > >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> > Did you read what I posted???? > >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > > Did you read what I posted? > > Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? Did you read what I posted? RT Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:461C5348.B87F02CF@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:46185C77.C72B7C9F@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:4613150C.31DC5358@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:460F3585.6A3AECD8@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:4609F1EC.4845DEF6@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> news:4605FD45.787F8AA2@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > killed? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Lancet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > report? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hello? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it went >> >> >> >> >> >> > on >> >> >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam nothing would come of it? >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up. >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? >> >> >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-03-18-poll-cover_N.htm >> >> >> >> > Iraqis see hope drain away >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> than >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that >> >> > happened >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful >> >> than >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> > Do you think the killing of thousands by Chimpoleon is ok? Yes Or No? >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:461C5372.1FE55639@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:46185AD0.5CC54F3A@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:460F356C.5EBEEAB9@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:4609F0F4.2B3E4963@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ago? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > LOL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons >> >> >> >> >> >> > stood >> >> >> >> >> >> > by, >> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW. >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions ended a long time ago - do keep up. >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> > Haven't you anything current to compare with as opposed to >> >> >> >> > something >> >> >> >> > from >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> > last century? HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> than >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that >> >> > happened >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful >> >> than >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> > What about the thousands Chimpoleon killed? Yes or No? >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:461C53B5.40A1CE56@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:46185D4A.1EB57AB6@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:46131A7B.7F5E1231@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> news:sqtQh.2395$WL4.450@trnddc04... >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:zsfQh.3432$jZ3.2316@trnddc06... >> >> >> >>> Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >>>> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >>>> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... >> >> >> >>>>> Do you think... forget that. >> >> >> >>>>> Do you believe that bush,jr >> >> >> >>>>> did right by destroying >> >> >> >>>>> Muslim fundamentalist Iran's >> >> >> >>>>> most potent enemy? >> >> >> >>>> Absolutely. >> >> >> >>>> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes the >> >> >> >>>> entire >> >> >> >>>> area safer. >> >> >> >>> The "Nation of Iraq" ....your wet dream! >> >> >> >> Please explain why a sadistic dictator running Iraq IS YOUR WET >> >> >> >> DREAM? >> >> >> > Explained above >> >> >> I wonder how many families of the hundreds and hundreds of >> >> >> thousands >> >> >> of >> >> >> Iraqis killed by Saddam would like an hour alone with you in a >> >> >> room? >> >> >> You're a disgusting wretched fuck. >> >> > Haven't seen the Lancet report, eh? >> >> Scientists Discredit Bogus Lancet Iraqi Death Study >> >> http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/03/scientists-discredit-bogus-lancet-iraqi.html >> >> You're a lying fool. >> > You're a lying idiot. >> > http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707P.shtml >> > The Independent UK >> > Tuesday 27 March 2007 >> > British government officials have backed the methods used by scientists >> > who >> > concluded that more than 600,000 Iraqis have been killed since the >> > invasion, the >> > BBC reported yesterday. >> > The Government publicly rejected the findings, published in The Lancet >> > in >> > October. But the BBC said documents obtained under freedom of >> > information >> > legislation showed advisers concluded that the much-criticised study >> > had >> > used >> > sound methods. >> > The study, conducted by researchers from Johns Hopkins University in >> > Baltimore and the Al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, estimated that >> > 655,000 >> > more Iraqis had died since March 2003 than one would expect without the >> > war. The >> > study estimated that 601,027 of those deaths were from violence. >> > ... >> "British government officials..." >> Who? > The British government. It's right up there. Names? >> What agency? > Agency for what? Don't "British government officials" have JOBS, don't they work for SOME AGENCY? Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:461C5405.3FB866FB@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:46131A17.B1FA5EBF@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... >> >> >> > Do you think... forget that. >> >> >> > Do you believe that bush,jr >> >> >> > did right by destroying >> >> >> > Muslim fundamentalist Iran's >> >> >> > most potent enemy? >> >> >> Absolutely. >> >> >> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes the entire >> >> >> area >> >> >> safer. >> >> > Let us know when Iraq becomes democratic. >> >> Already happenned. >> >> Dec. 17, 2005: Iraq eases security after national election >> >> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/world/3531941.html >> >> You're a lying fool, try to pay attention. >> > That explains all the bombings and killings and the near assassination >> > of >> > the >> > PM. >> Did you assume that "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and >> killings? > It would help. Hahahahahhaha!!! >> Feel free to cite anywhere on the planet, at any time in human history, >> when >> becoming "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and killings... > Feel free to cite where democracy had so many ongoing bombings and > killings. EVERYWHERE where a criminal insurgency is taking place or has taken place. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:461C543D.A94D727D@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:46131618.FDE7D8A2@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:460F35DC.123BBF53@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> succeed? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> troops >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> present. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > up >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lies >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Their >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> was >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> run >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > troops >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > die >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > our >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > money >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wasted? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > what's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > left >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Iraq. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to >> >> >> >> >> > breaking >> >> >> >> >> > up. >> >> >> >> >> > Peace >> >> >> >> >> > will >> >> >> >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its >> >> >> >> >> > factions. >> >> >> >> >> > You >> >> >> >> >> > seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it >> >> >> >> >> > out >> >> >> >> >> > for >> >> >> >> >> > you >> >> >> >> >> > again. >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. Peace > will > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You > seem > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you again. Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. >> >> > Peace >> >> > will >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. >> >> > You >> >> > seem >> >> > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you >> >> > again. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> gov't.? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cite? >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> we >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> working >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you? >> 7http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > May 16, 2005 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > are >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > scarcely cold, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dismiss >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > White >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > House >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > city >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andijan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > included >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > should, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > McClellan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > insists, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > means, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > through >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > violence". >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > June 20, 2005 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > successfully >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blocked >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > call >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > by >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NATO for >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > massacre >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > hundreds >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > civilians by >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > serves >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > as >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > yet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > another >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > administration's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > claims >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > for >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > supporting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > former >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Soviet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Union. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > prisoners, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bush's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > man >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > people? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Pick >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > one. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > nothing >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > even >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > assured >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > murdering >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > citizens??? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? >> http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > worry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > about >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it by the guy on the left. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted????? >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted? >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> >> > Didn't you read what I already posted? I even provided a >> >> >> >> > picture >> >> >> >> > link. >> >> >> >> > Get someone in your trailer park to help you. >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> > Did you read what I posted? >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > Did you read what I posted? Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? Quote
Guest Baldin Lee Pramer Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 On Apr 11, 7:18 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com> wrote: > Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. Were they Americans? If not, then why should I care? Baldin Lee Pramer Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 "Baldin Lee Pramer" <BaldinPramer@msn.com> wrote in message news:1176297843.496869.118510@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 11, 7:18 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com> wrote: >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > Were they Americans? Nope. > If not, then why should I care? Beats me... Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:461C5348.B87F02CF@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:46185C77.C72B7C9F@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:4613150C.31DC5358@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:460F3585.6A3AECD8@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:4609F1EC.4845DEF6@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> news:4605FD45.787F8AA2@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > killed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Lancet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > report? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hello? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it went > >> >> >> >> >> >> > on > >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam nothing would come of it? > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? > >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up. > >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? > >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? > >> >> >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-03-18-poll-cover_N.htm > >> >> >> >> > Iraqis see hope drain away > >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? > >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> than > >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > >> >> > happened > >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful > >> >> than > >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> > Do you think the killing of thousands by Chimpoleon is ok? Yes Or No? > >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > > Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:461C5372.1FE55639@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:46185AD0.5CC54F3A@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:460F356C.5EBEEAB9@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:4609F0F4.2B3E4963@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big deal. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but I'm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 years > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ago? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > LOL > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons > >> >> >> >> >> >> > stood > >> >> >> >> >> >> > by, > >> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW. > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions ended a long time ago - do keep up. > >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> > Haven't you anything current to compare with as opposed to > >> >> >> >> > something > >> >> >> >> > from > >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> > last century? HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA > >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? > >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> than > >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > >> >> > happened > >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful > >> >> than > >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> > What about the thousands Chimpoleon killed? Yes or No? > >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > > Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:461C53B5.40A1CE56@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:46185D4A.1EB57AB6@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:46131A7B.7F5E1231@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:sqtQh.2395$WL4.450@trnddc04... > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:zsfQh.3432$jZ3.2316@trnddc06... > >> >> >> >>> Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >>>> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... > >> >> >> >>>>> Do you think... forget that. > >> >> >> >>>>> Do you believe that bush,jr > >> >> >> >>>>> did right by destroying > >> >> >> >>>>> Muslim fundamentalist Iran's > >> >> >> >>>>> most potent enemy? > >> >> >> >>>> Absolutely. > >> >> >> >>>> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes the > >> >> >> >>>> entire > >> >> >> >>>> area safer. > >> >> >> >>> The "Nation of Iraq" ....your wet dream! > >> >> >> >> Please explain why a sadistic dictator running Iraq IS YOUR WET > >> >> >> >> DREAM? > >> >> >> > Explained above > >> >> >> I wonder how many families of the hundreds and hundreds of > >> >> >> thousands > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> Iraqis killed by Saddam would like an hour alone with you in a > >> >> >> room? > >> >> >> You're a disgusting wretched fuck. > >> >> > Haven't seen the Lancet report, eh? > >> >> Scientists Discredit Bogus Lancet Iraqi Death Study > >> >> http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/03/scientists-discredit-bogus-lancet-iraqi.html > >> >> You're a lying fool. > >> > You're a lying idiot. > >> > http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707P.shtml > >> > The Independent UK > >> > Tuesday 27 March 2007 > >> > British government officials have backed the methods used by scientists > >> > who > >> > concluded that more than 600,000 Iraqis have been killed since the > >> > invasion, the > >> > BBC reported yesterday. > >> > The Government publicly rejected the findings, published in The Lancet > >> > in > >> > October. But the BBC said documents obtained under freedom of > >> > information > >> > legislation showed advisers concluded that the much-criticised study > >> > had > >> > used > >> > sound methods. > >> > The study, conducted by researchers from Johns Hopkins University in > >> > Baltimore and the Al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, estimated that > >> > 655,000 > >> > more Iraqis had died since March 2003 than one would expect without the > >> > war. The > >> > study estimated that 601,027 of those deaths were from violence. > >> > ... > >> "British government officials..." > >> Who? > > The British government. It's right up there. > > Names? Not necessary. But, had you followed the link, you would have seen it: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707P.shtml ... The conclusion, based on interviews and not a body count, was disputed by some experts, and rejected by the US and British governments. But the chief scientific adviser to the Ministry of Defence, Roy Anderson, described the methods used in the study as "robust" and "close to best practice". Another official said it was "a tried and tested way of measuring mortality in conflict zones". Gee, was that so hard for you to do? Musta been... > >> What agency? > > Agency for what? > > Don't "British government officials" have JOBS, don't they work for SOME > AGENCY? Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:461C5405.3FB866FB@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:46131A17.B1FA5EBF@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... > >> >> >> > Do you think... forget that. > >> >> >> > Do you believe that bush,jr > >> >> >> > did right by destroying > >> >> >> > Muslim fundamentalist Iran's > >> >> >> > most potent enemy? > >> >> >> Absolutely. > >> >> >> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes the entire > >> >> >> area > >> >> >> safer. > >> >> > Let us know when Iraq becomes democratic. > >> >> Already happenned. > >> >> Dec. 17, 2005: Iraq eases security after national election > >> >> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/world/3531941.html > >> >> You're a lying fool, try to pay attention. > >> > That explains all the bombings and killings and the near assassination > >> > of > >> > the > >> > PM. > >> Did you assume that "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and > >> killings? > > It would help. > > Hahahahahhaha!!! Exactly. It's been a joke. > >> Feel free to cite anywhere on the planet, at any time in human history, > >> when > >> becoming "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and killings... > > Feel free to cite where democracy had so many ongoing bombings and > > killings. > > EVERYWHERE where a criminal insurgency is taking place or has taken place. Everywhere? Criminal insurgency? List some examples... Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:461C543D.A94D727D@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:46131618.FDE7D8A2@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:460F35DC.123BBF53@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> succeed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without foreign > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> troops > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> present. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon cooked > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > up > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lies > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> was > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> run > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > troops > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > die > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > our > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > money > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wasted? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > what's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > left > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Iraq. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to > >> >> >> >> >> > breaking > >> >> >> >> >> > up. > >> >> >> >> >> > Peace > >> >> >> >> >> > will > >> >> >> >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its > >> >> >> >> >> > factions. > >> >> >> >> >> > You > >> >> >> >> >> > seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it > >> >> >> >> >> > out > >> >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> >> > you > >> >> >> >> >> > again. > >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. Peace > > will > > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You > > seem > > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you again. > > Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > > >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. > >> >> > Peace > >> >> > will > >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. > >> >> > You > >> >> > seem > >> >> > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you > >> >> > again. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or democratic > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> gov't.? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cite? > >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, only > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> we > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> working > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you? > >> 7http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > May 16, 2005 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > are > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > scarcely cold, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dismiss > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > White > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > House > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > city > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andijan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > included > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > should, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > McClellan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > insists, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > means, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > through > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > violence". > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > June 20, 2005 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > successfully > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blocked > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > call > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > by > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NATO for > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > massacre > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > hundreds > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > civilians by > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > serves > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > as > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > yet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > another > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > administration's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > claims > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > supporting > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > former > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Soviet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Union. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > prisoners, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bush's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > man > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > people? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Pick > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > one. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > nothing > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > even > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > assured > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > murdering > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > citizens??? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > worry > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > about > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it by the guy on the left. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted????? > >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted? > >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> > Didn't you read what I already posted? I even provided a > >> >> >> >> > picture > >> >> >> >> > link. > >> >> >> >> > Get someone in your trailer park to help you. > >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? > >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? > >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> > Did you read what I posted? > >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > > Did you read what I posted? > > Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? Did you read what I posted? Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:4621B8B4.9457822@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:461C5348.B87F02CF@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:46185C77.C72B7C9F@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:4613150C.31DC5358@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:460F3585.6A3AECD8@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> news:4609F1EC.4845DEF6@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> news:4605FD45.787F8AA2@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > deal. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > killed? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Lancet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > report? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hello? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > went >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > on >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam nothing would come of it? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >> >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up. >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >> >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-03-18-poll-cover_N.htm >> >> >> >> >> > Iraqis see hope drain away >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > happened >> >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> than >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> > Do you think the killing of thousands by Chimpoleon is ok? Yes Or >> >> > No? >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful >> >> than >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that >> > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:4621B8BF.DC9EB12D@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:461C5372.1FE55639@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:46185AD0.5CC54F3A@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:460F356C.5EBEEAB9@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> news:4609F0F4.2B3E4963@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > deal. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > years >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ago? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > LOL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > stood >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > by, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions ended a long time ago - do keep up. >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >> >> >> >> >> >> more >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> >> > Haven't you anything current to compare with as opposed to >> >> >> >> >> > something >> >> >> >> >> > from >> >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> >> > last century? HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > happened >> >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >> >> >> peaceful >> >> >> than >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> >> > What about the thousands Chimpoleon killed? Yes or No? >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful >> >> than >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that >> > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:4621B9E6.58B02297@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:461C53B5.40A1CE56@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:46185D4A.1EB57AB6@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:46131A7B.7F5E1231@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:sqtQh.2395$WL4.450@trnddc04... >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> news:zsfQh.3432$jZ3.2316@trnddc06... >> >> >> >> >>> Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >>>> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... >> >> >> >> >>>>> Do you think... forget that. >> >> >> >> >>>>> Do you believe that bush,jr >> >> >> >> >>>>> did right by destroying >> >> >> >> >>>>> Muslim fundamentalist Iran's >> >> >> >> >>>>> most potent enemy? >> >> >> >> >>>> Absolutely. >> >> >> >> >>>> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes >> >> >> >> >>>> the >> >> >> >> >>>> entire >> >> >> >> >>>> area safer. >> >> >> >> >>> The "Nation of Iraq" ....your wet dream! >> >> >> >> >> Please explain why a sadistic dictator running Iraq IS YOUR >> >> >> >> >> WET >> >> >> >> >> DREAM? >> >> >> >> > Explained above >> >> >> >> I wonder how many families of the hundreds and hundreds of >> >> >> >> thousands >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> Iraqis killed by Saddam would like an hour alone with you in a >> >> >> >> room? >> >> >> >> You're a disgusting wretched fuck. >> >> >> > Haven't seen the Lancet report, eh? >> >> >> Scientists Discredit Bogus Lancet Iraqi Death Study >> >> >> http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/03/scientists-discredit-bogus-lancet-iraqi.html >> >> >> You're a lying fool. >> >> > You're a lying idiot. >> >> > http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707P.shtml >> >> > The Independent UK >> >> > Tuesday 27 March 2007 >> >> > British government officials have backed the methods used by >> >> > scientists >> >> > who >> >> > concluded that more than 600,000 Iraqis have been killed since the >> >> > invasion, the >> >> > BBC reported yesterday. >> >> > The Government publicly rejected the findings, published in The >> >> > Lancet >> >> > in >> >> > October. But the BBC said documents obtained under freedom of >> >> > information >> >> > legislation showed advisers concluded that the much-criticised study >> >> > had >> >> > used >> >> > sound methods. >> >> > The study, conducted by researchers from Johns Hopkins University in >> >> > Baltimore and the Al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, estimated >> >> > that >> >> > 655,000 >> >> > more Iraqis had died since March 2003 than one would expect without >> >> > the >> >> > war. The >> >> > study estimated that 601,027 of those deaths were from violence. >> >> > ... >> >> "British government officials..." >> >> Who? >> > The British government. It's right up there. >> Names? > Not necessary. HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!! > But, had you followed the link, you would have seen it: > http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707P.shtml > The conclusion, based on interviews and not a body count, was disputed by > some > experts, > and rejected by the US and British governments. But the chief scientific > adviser to > the > Ministry of Defence, Roy Anderson, described the methods used in the study > as > "robust" > and "close to best practice". Another official said it was "a tried and > tested way > of > measuring mortality in conflict zones". > Gee, was that so hard for you to do? Musta been... ADVISOR. NOT an official. And - "Another official" who is UNNAMED. HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! 100% bullshit. >> >> What agency? >> > Agency for what? >> Don't "British government officials" have JOBS, don't they work for SOME >> AGENCY? HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:4621BA2F.33A99BB5@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:461C5405.3FB866FB@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:46131A17.B1FA5EBF@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... >> >> >> >> > Do you think... forget that. >> >> >> >> > Do you believe that bush,jr >> >> >> >> > did right by destroying >> >> >> >> > Muslim fundamentalist Iran's >> >> >> >> > most potent enemy? >> >> >> >> Absolutely. >> >> >> >> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes the >> >> >> >> entire >> >> >> >> area >> >> >> >> safer. >> >> >> > Let us know when Iraq becomes democratic. >> >> >> Already happenned. >> >> >> Dec. 17, 2005: Iraq eases security after national election >> >> >> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/world/3531941.html >> >> >> You're a lying fool, try to pay attention. >> >> > That explains all the bombings and killings and the near >> >> > assassination >> >> > of >> >> > the >> >> > PM. >> >> Did you assume that "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings >> >> and >> >> killings? >> > It would help. >> Hahahahahhaha!!! > Exactly. It's been a joke. I've let this go on long enough to ensure that any lurker could only conclude that you're demented. You seem to think that ignoring a question and answering with another unrelated question is acceptable discourse. Good luck, fool. >> >> Feel free to cite anywhere on the planet, at any time in human >> >> history, >> >> when >> >> becoming "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and >> >> killings... >> > Feel free to cite where democracy had so many ongoing bombings and >> > killings. >> EVERYWHERE where a criminal insurgency is taking place or has taken >> place. > Everywhere? Criminal insurgency? List some examples... Good luck, fool. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:4621BA3F.38F4E0F9@hotmMOVEail.com... > Patriot Games wrote: >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> news:461C543D.A94D727D@hotmMOVEail.com... >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:46131618.FDE7D8A2@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:460F35DC.123BBF53@hotmMOVEail.com... >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> succeed? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> foreign >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> troops >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> present. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > cooked >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > up >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lies >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> their >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Their >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> was >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> run >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > troops >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > die >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > more >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > our >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > money >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wasted? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NO. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > what's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > left >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Iraq. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to >> >> >> >> >> >> > breaking >> >> >> >> >> >> > up. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Peace >> >> >> >> >> >> > will >> >> >> >> >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to >> >> >> >> >> >> > its >> >> >> >> >> >> > factions. >> >> >> >> >> >> > You >> >> >> >> >> >> > seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled >> >> >> >> >> >> > it >> >> >> >> >> >> > out >> >> >> >> >> >> > for >> >> >> >> >> >> > you >> >> >> >> >> >> > again. >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. >> > Peace >> > will >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You >> > seem >> > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you >> > again. >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. >> >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking >> >> >> > up. >> >> >> > Peace >> >> >> > will >> >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its >> >> >> > factions. >> >> >> > You >> >> >> > seem >> >> >> > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for >> >> >> > you >> >> >> > again. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> democratic >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> gov't.? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cite? >> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> only >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> we >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> working >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you? >> >> 7http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > May 16, 2005 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > protesters >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > are >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > scarcely cold, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dismiss >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > White >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > House >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > city >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andijan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > included >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > should, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > McClellan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > insists, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > means, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > through >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > violence". >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > June 20, 2005 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > successfully >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blocked >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > call >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > by >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NATO for >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > massacre >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > hundreds >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > civilians by >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > serves >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > as >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > yet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > another >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > administration's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > claims >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > for >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > supporting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > former >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Soviet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Union. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > prisoners, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bush's >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > man >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > people? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Pick >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > one. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > nothing >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > even >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > assured >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > murdering >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > citizens??? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? >> >> http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > worry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > about >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it by the guy on the left. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted????? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted? >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> >> >> > Didn't you read what I already posted? I even provided a >> >> >> >> >> > picture >> >> >> >> >> > link. >> >> >> >> >> > Get someone in your trailer park to help you. >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> >> > Did you read what I posted? >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? >> > Did you read what I posted? >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > Did you read what I posted? I let this go on long enough to prove conclusively that you are incapable of normal discourse. Good luck, fool. Quote
Guest Sid9 Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:4621B8B4.9457822@hotmMOVEail.com... >> Patriot Games wrote: >>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >>> news:461C5348.B87F02CF@hotmMOVEail.com... >>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:46185C77.C72B7C9F@hotmMOVEail.com... >>>>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:4613150C.31DC5358@hotmMOVEail.com... >>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:460F3585.6A3AECD8@hotmMOVEail.com... >>>>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:4609F1EC.4845DEF6@hotmMOVEail.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:4605FD45.787F8AA2@hotmMOVEail.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bigot Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Travsky" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Had that before the invasion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you think life in a dictatorship is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many bombings were there? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it was only two series of several >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bombings >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saddam >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WMD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the Kurds. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The other several hunded thousand innocent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> civilians >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine-gunned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> death. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does that answer your question? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During the 90s there were mass executions but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aware >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bombings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you claiming this is an example of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peacefulness? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Compared to what's going on now???? LOL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the insurgency in Iraq now? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you also including the thousands our invasion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> killed? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lancet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reassured >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saddam nothing would come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is >>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful >>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? >>>>>>>>>>>> Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-03-18-poll-cover_N.htm >>>>>>>>>>>> Iraqis see hope drain away >>>>>>>>>>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >>>>>>>>>>> peaceful >>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >>>>>>>>>> Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? >>>>>>>>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >>>>>>>>> peaceful >>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >>>>>>>> You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>> back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >>>>>>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >>>>>>> peaceful >>>>>>> than >>>>>>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >>>>>> Do you think the killing of thousands by Chimpoleon is ok? Yes Or >>>>>> No? >>>>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >>>>> peaceful than >>>>> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >>>> You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff >>>> that happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL >>> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more >>> peaceful than the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. >> You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that >> happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > > Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful > than the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. Pay some attention to American security. bush,jr has created a situation in Iraq where many Iraqis would like us out and another Saddam in. You and bush,jr have no clue about Islamic society and because of it bush,jr is a failure in the Middle East. bush,jr is a hick, a hillbilly, a provincial, a no-nothing. Thats how he got us into this mess Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:4621BA3F.38F4E0F9@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:461C543D.A94D727D@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:46131618.FDE7D8A2@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:460F35DC.123BBF53@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> succeed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doing what? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Running their country without > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> foreign > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> troops > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> present. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They had that before Chimpoleon > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > cooked > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > up > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lies > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > invade. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No they didn't. They didn't run > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> was > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> run > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for them by a dictator. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam wasn't an Iraqi? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Irrelevant. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Highly relevant. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why do you want to stay and have more of our > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > troops > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > die > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > our > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > money > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wasted? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Our leaving would facilitate things greatly - > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > what's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > left > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Iraq. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to > >> >> >> >> >> >> > breaking > >> >> >> >> >> >> > up. > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Peace > >> >> >> >> >> >> > will > >> >> >> >> >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to > >> >> >> >> >> >> > its > >> >> >> >> >> >> > factions. > >> >> >> >> >> >> > You > >> >> >> >> >> >> > seem especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled > >> >> >> >> >> >> > it > >> >> >> >> >> >> > out > >> >> >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> >> >> > you > >> >> >> >> >> >> > again. > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking up. > >> > Peace > >> > will > >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its factions. You > >> > seem > >> > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for you > >> > again. > >> Do you want the Iraqis to succeed? YES or NO. > >> >> >> > What you refer to as Iraq has taken the first step to breaking > >> >> >> > up. > >> >> >> > Peace > >> >> >> > will > >> >> >> > come after Iraq is no more and broken up according to its > >> >> >> > factions. > >> >> >> > You > >> >> >> > seem > >> >> >> > especially dense, even for a bigot, so I've spelled it out for > >> >> >> > you > >> >> >> > again. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you support dictators or > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> democratic > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> gov't.? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Chimpoleon still supports dictators. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cite? > >> >> http://archive.muslimuzbekistan.com/eng/ennews/2004/03/ennews31032004b.html > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You link DOES NOT indicate we SUPPORT them, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> only > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> we > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> working > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> them FOR OUR OWN PURPOSES. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Oh fer - you don't keep up, do you? > >> >> 7http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > May 16, 2005 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > protesters > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > are > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > scarcely cold, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and already the White House is looking for ways > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dismiss > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > White > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > House > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > city > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andijan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > included > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > They > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > should, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > McClellan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > insists, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > seek democratic government "through peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > means, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > through > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > violence". > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/469 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > June 20, 2005 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Recent revelations that the United States > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > successfully > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blocked > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > call > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > by > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NATO for > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > an international investigation of the May 13 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > massacre > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > hundreds > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > civilians by > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the government of the former Soviet Republic of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Uzbekistan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > serves > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > as > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > yet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > another > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reminder of the insincerity of the Bush > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > administration's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > claims > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > supporting > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > freedom and democracy in the Islamic world and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > former > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Soviet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Union. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Never mind the torture and political > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > prisoners, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bush's > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > man > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4617231.stm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78717.htm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78862.htm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saudia Arabia > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We have no control over that country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Idiot. That wasn't the point. Chimpoleon is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > buddy > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No proof. We have no control over that > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> country. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sigh. Rightards. We can quit supporting > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Karimov. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Some allies, eh? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Which ones are oppressing and killing their > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > people? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Pick > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > one. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You mean back in the 80s and republicons did > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > nothing > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > even > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > assured > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > perp it was ok, or a dictator who is currently > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > murdering > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > citizens??? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The one on the right in that picture who is being > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > worry > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > about > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it by the guy on the left. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted????? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted? > >> >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> >> > Didn't you read what I already posted? I even provided a > >> >> >> >> >> > picture > >> >> >> >> >> > link. > >> >> >> >> >> > Get someone in your trailer park to help you. > >> >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? > >> >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> >> > Did you read what I posted???? > >> >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> >> > Did you read what I posted? > >> >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > >> > Did you read what I posted? > >> Which one used chemical weapons on innocent civilians? > > Did you read what I posted? > > I let this go on long enough to prove conclusively that you are incapable of > normal discourse. > > Good luck, fool. Good luck getting you to actually READ what I posted??? "I even provided a picture link" "The one on the right in that picture who is being reassured not to worry about it by the guy on the left." Perhaps you could get someone in your trailer park to help you follow along. RT Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:4621B8B4.9457822@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:461C5348.B87F02CF@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:46185C77.C72B7C9F@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:4613150C.31DC5358@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:460F3585.6A3AECD8@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> news:4609F1EC.4845DEF6@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> >> > BIGOT Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> news:4605FD45.787F8AA2@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > deal. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you also including the thousands our invasion > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > killed? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Lancet > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > report? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hello? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Why don't you ask republicons who stood by while it > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > went > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > on > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reassured > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam nothing would come of it? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? > >> >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions happened years ago - do keep up. > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No? > >> >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? > >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-03-18-poll-cover_N.htm > >> >> >> >> >> > Iraqis see hope drain away > >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? > >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff > >> >> >> > that > >> >> >> > happened > >> >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> than > >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> > Do you think the killing of thousands by Chimpoleon is ok? Yes Or > >> >> > No? > >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful > >> >> than > >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > >> > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > > Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:4621B9E6.58B02297@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:461C53B5.40A1CE56@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:46185D4A.1EB57AB6@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:46131A7B.7F5E1231@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:sqtQh.2395$WL4.450@trnddc04... > >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> news:zsfQh.3432$jZ3.2316@trnddc06... > >> >> >> >> >>> Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >>>> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... > >> >> >> >> >>>>> Do you think... forget that. > >> >> >> >> >>>>> Do you believe that bush,jr > >> >> >> >> >>>>> did right by destroying > >> >> >> >> >>>>> Muslim fundamentalist Iran's > >> >> >> >> >>>>> most potent enemy? > >> >> >> >> >>>> Absolutely. > >> >> >> >> >>>> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes > >> >> >> >> >>>> the > >> >> >> >> >>>> entire > >> >> >> >> >>>> area safer. > >> >> >> >> >>> The "Nation of Iraq" ....your wet dream! > >> >> >> >> >> Please explain why a sadistic dictator running Iraq IS YOUR > >> >> >> >> >> WET > >> >> >> >> >> DREAM? > >> >> >> >> > Explained above > >> >> >> >> I wonder how many families of the hundreds and hundreds of > >> >> >> >> thousands > >> >> >> >> of > >> >> >> >> Iraqis killed by Saddam would like an hour alone with you in a > >> >> >> >> room? > >> >> >> >> You're a disgusting wretched fuck. > >> >> >> > Haven't seen the Lancet report, eh? > >> >> >> Scientists Discredit Bogus Lancet Iraqi Death Study > >> >> >> http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/03/scientists-discredit-bogus-lancet-iraqi.html > >> >> >> You're a lying fool. > >> >> > You're a lying idiot. > >> >> > http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707P.shtml > >> >> > The Independent UK > >> >> > Tuesday 27 March 2007 > >> >> > British government officials have backed the methods used by > >> >> > scientists > >> >> > who > >> >> > concluded that more than 600,000 Iraqis have been killed since the > >> >> > invasion, the > >> >> > BBC reported yesterday. > >> >> > The Government publicly rejected the findings, published in The > >> >> > Lancet > >> >> > in > >> >> > October. But the BBC said documents obtained under freedom of > >> >> > information > >> >> > legislation showed advisers concluded that the much-criticised study > >> >> > had > >> >> > used > >> >> > sound methods. > >> >> > The study, conducted by researchers from Johns Hopkins University in > >> >> > Baltimore and the Al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, estimated > >> >> > that > >> >> > 655,000 > >> >> > more Iraqis had died since March 2003 than one would expect without > >> >> > the > >> >> > war. The > >> >> > study estimated that 601,027 of those deaths were from violence. > >> >> > ... > >> >> "British government officials..." > >> >> Who? > >> > The British government. It's right up there. > >> Names? > > Not necessary. > > HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!! > > > But, had you followed the link, you would have seen it: > > http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707P.shtml > > The conclusion, based on interviews and not a body count, was disputed by > > some > > experts, > > and rejected by the US and British governments. But the chief scientific > > adviser to > > the > > Ministry of Defence, Roy Anderson, described the methods used in the study > > as > > "robust" > > and "close to best practice". Another official said it was "a tried and > > tested way > > of > > measuring mortality in conflict zones". > > Gee, was that so hard for you to do? Musta been... > > ADVISOR. NOT an official. And - "Another official" who is UNNAMED. > > HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! > > 100% bullshit. An advisor - an official in the British government! http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/03_march/26/iraq.shtml Following a Freedom of Information request, BBC World Service Newshour has learnt that a senior British Government official advised ministers to show "caution" about publicly criticising a report published last October in the Lancet, which estimated that 655,000 Iraqis have died as a result of the war in Iraq. ... The Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Ministry of Defence described the methods used by the Lancet survey as "close to best practice" adding that the "study design is robust." ... HAHAHAHAHAHA H AHHAHAHAAHHAAHHAH AH AHH HAHAHHHAHAH! gasp wheeze HAHAHAAHAHHAHHHAA > >> >> What agency? > >> > Agency for what? > >> Don't "British government officials" have JOBS, don't they work for SOME > >> AGENCY? > > HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:4621B8BF.DC9EB12D@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> news:461C5372.1FE55639@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:46185AD0.5CC54F3A@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:460F356C.5EBEEAB9@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> >> news:4609F0F4.2B3E4963@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bigot Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> message > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> news:45EA36D8.4B4A93D2@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Succeed at achieving a peaceful Iraq. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Had that before the invasion. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you think life in a dictatorship is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How many bombings were there? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it was only two series of several > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> each > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saddam > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> used > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> WMD > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the Kurds. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The other several hunded thousand innocent > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> civilians > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> were > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> machine-gunned > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> death. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that answer your question? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nope. You've got the 1980s covered. Big > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > deal. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> During the 90s there were mass executions but > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> aware > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> any > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bombings. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you claiming this is an example of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peacefulness? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to what's going on now???? LOL > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> people > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than the insurgency in Iraq now? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Compared to something that happened 1-0 to 20 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > years > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ago? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > LOL > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Saddam did that in the 80s and 90s - and republicons > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > stood > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > by, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> >> >> > The mass executions ended a long time ago - do keep up. > >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is > >> >> >> >> >> >> more > >> >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> >> > Haven't you anything current to compare with as opposed to > >> >> >> >> >> > something > >> >> >> >> >> > from > >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> > last century? HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA > >> >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> >> > Haven't you got anything CURRENT to compare with? Yes or no? > >> >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff > >> >> >> > that > >> >> >> > happened > >> >> >> > back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > >> >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more > >> >> >> peaceful > >> >> >> than > >> >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> >> > What about the thousands Chimpoleon killed? Yes or No? > >> >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful > >> >> than > >> >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > >> > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > >> > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > >> Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > >> the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. > > You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that > > happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL > > Do you think mass executions of THOUSANDS of people is more peaceful than > the insurgency in Iraq now - Yes or No. You mean you STILL haven't got anything more current than stuff that happened back in the 80s and 90s? LOL Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Patriot Games wrote: > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > news:4621BA2F.33A99BB5@hotmMOVEail.com... > > Patriot Games wrote: > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:46131A17.B1FA5EBF@hotmMOVEail.com... > >> >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > >> >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... > >> >> >> >> > Do you think... forget that. > >> >> >> >> > Do you believe that bush,jr > >> >> >> >> > did right by destroying > >> >> >> >> > Muslim fundamentalist Iran's > >> >> >> >> > most potent enemy? > >> >> >> >> Absolutely. > >> >> >> >> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes the > >> >> >> >> entire > >> >> >> >> area > >> >> >> >> safer. > >> >> >> > Let us know when Iraq becomes democratic. > >> >> >> Already happenned. > >> >> >> Dec. 17, 2005: Iraq eases security after national election > >> >> >> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/world/3531941.html > >> >> >> You're a lying fool, try to pay attention. > >> >> > That explains all the bombings and killings and the near > >> >> > assassination > >> >> > of > >> >> > the > >> >> > PM. > >> >> Did you assume that "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings > >> >> and > >> >> killings? > >> > It would help. > >> Hahahahahhaha!!! > > Exactly. It's been a joke. > > I've let this go on long enough to ensure that any lurker could only > conclude that you're demented. I've let this go on long enough to ensure that any lurker could only conclude you're a clueles rightard. > You seem to think that ignoring a question and answering with another > unrelated question is acceptable discourse. You seem to think that posting strawmen is acceptable discourse. > Good luck, fool. Waking you up to reality? Agreed. > >> >> Feel free to cite anywhere on the planet, at any time in human > >> >> history, > >> >> when > >> >> becoming "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and > >> >> killings... > >> > Feel free to cite where democracy had so many ongoing bombings and > >> > killings. > >> EVERYWHERE where a criminal insurgency is taking place or has taken > >> place. > > Everywhere? Criminal insurgency? List some examples... > > Good luck, fool. Quote
Guest Rich Travsky Posted April 19, 2007 Posted April 19, 2007 Rich Travsky wrote: > > Patriot Games wrote: > > > > "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > > news:461C5405.3FB866FB@hotmMOVEail.com... > > > Patriot Games wrote: > > >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > > >> > Patriot Games wrote: > > >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message > > >> >> news:46131A17.B1FA5EBF@hotmMOVEail.com... > > >> >> > Patriot Games wrote: > > >> >> >> "Sid9" <sid9@verizon.net> wrote in message > > >> >> >> news:OxdQh.4770$P84.1199@trnddc07... > > >> >> >> > Do you think... forget that. > > >> >> >> > Do you believe that bush,jr > > >> >> >> > did right by destroying > > >> >> >> > Muslim fundamentalist Iran's > > >> >> >> > most potent enemy? > > >> >> >> Absolutely. > > >> >> >> Whether we bomb Iran or not a democratic-like Iraq makes the entire > > >> >> >> area > > >> >> >> safer. > > >> >> > Let us know when Iraq becomes democratic. > > >> >> Already happenned. > > >> >> Dec. 17, 2005: Iraq eases security after national election > > >> >> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/world/3531941.html > > >> >> You're a lying fool, try to pay attention. > > >> > That explains all the bombings and killings and the near assassination > > >> > of > > >> > the > > >> > PM. > > >> Did you assume that "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and > > >> killings? > > > It would help. > > > > Hahahahahhaha!!! > > Exactly. It's been a joke. > > > >> Feel free to cite anywhere on the planet, at any time in human history, > > >> when > > >> becoming "democratic" meant an automatic end to bombings and killings... > > > Feel free to cite where democracy had so many ongoing bombings and > > > killings. > > > > EVERYWHERE where a criminal insurgency is taking place or has taken place. > > Everywhere? Criminal insurgency? List some examples... Still waiting... RT Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.