Conservapedia

[MALKROSS]

Arrgh, what unmitigated crap is this. Utter baloney. One of their "commandments" is to use American spellings. There are two things wrong with this. Firstly they are trying to extoll the virtues of christianity, by being Xenophobic and refusing to accept other peoples point of view. Secondly they attack Wikipedia for their "prevalant use of British spellings". Despight the act that a large proportion of edits on Wikipedia are by British speaking, British people!!

Also they state their religious teachings as fact, which in my view is terrible. If they can prove the existance of (G)god then, yeah, sure go for it, state the facts, but till then, though you have a strong opinion you can present it in a way that makes sense. It's awfull.

If they had any other content than endless whining lectures on liberal nonsense debating whether to close the site on sundays to meet the christian sabbath. Perhaps slightly more info on early man than "may have used copper tools"

ASSHOLES.

[eddo]

I think it is sad that they force you to go to their website.

 

Assholes indeed...

[MALKROSS]

Don't see anywhere above about being forced to view their page, but yes, if they did do that they would be even greater assholes. I was more raging against the fact that they are spreading lies and fear to stupid pepople, instead of trying to help them learn and improve.

[eddo]

Don't see anywhere above about being forced to view their page, .

oh, then shut the hell up.

[RoyalOrleans]

Those damn British people, speaking British! The nerve of them! I can't speak British!

 

What the fuck is colour? Col our what?