"TERRORIST HATER" is a stupid fuck!

[TerroristHater]

Yes, you are!

 

So you CANNOT protect your rights and NOT protect the rights of PEDOPHILES at the same time.

 

In our ever inclusive and diversified society we must include PEDOPHILES in our neigborhoods? Should we offer them free sex with our children too?

 

No you don't, you believe PEDOPHILES are equal and deserve the same constitutional rights as the rest of society. (well some anyway... you still haven't told us how you came up with which ones, exactly... I think it was because chapels are in prisons?????)

 

perhaps we should just do away with government altogether... in that case I'd just shoot the PEDOPHILES and anyone who would offer them protection.

 

We understand... Your whore of a mother produced a pedophile and a moron who blames his ills on ADHD.

 

It's clear that you are a hapless fucking idiot who will never understand what your are doing.

 

You are too fucking stupid to live in America and I would greatly appriciate it if you would take your ignorant facist ass and get the fuck out of this country.

 

I do not need your stupidity causing me to lose my liberty because you want to give the government a precendent to use when they want to strip us of more liberty.

 

You are a dumb fuck and you deserve a bullet through your big empty head.

 

KINDLY FUCKING DIE AND TAKE FLORDIA, ELMOISH, HUGO, and the rest of these moron fucking ogliarchist assholes with you.

 

You dumb motherfucker.

 

 

[TerroristHater]

Yes, you are!

 

So you CANNOT protect your rights and NOT protect the rights of PEDOPHILES at the same time.

 

In our ever inclusive and diversified society we must include PEDOPHILES in our neigborhoods? Should we offer them free sex with our children too?

 

No you don't, you believe PEDOPHILES are equal and deserve the same constitutional rights as the rest of society. (well some anyway... you still haven't told us how you came up with which ones, exactly... I think it was because chapels are in prisons?????)

 

perhaps we should just do away with government altogether... in that case I'd just shoot the PEDOPHILES and anyone who would offer them protection.

 

We understand... Your whore of a mother produced a pedophile and a moron who blames his ills on ADHD.

 

 

You said: In our ever inclusive and diversified society we must include PEDOPHILES in our neigborhoods? Should we offer them free sex with our children too?

 

What I have REPEATEDLY tried to make your ignorant ass understand is this: If we allow the government to strip one part of society of thier rights, THEY WILL use it as an excuse to strip those same rights from the REST OF SOCIETY... INCLUDING YOUR USELESS IDIOTIC ASS. Furthermore, I NEVER EVER said you had to accept them in your neighborhoods. What I said was "WE CANNOT ALLOW THE GOVERNMENT TO STRIP THAT GROUP OF THIER LIBERTY BECAUSE IT GIVES THE GOVERNMENT A PRECENDENT TO STRIP THE REST OF SOCIETY OF THIERS.

 

You said: No you don't, you believe PEDOPHILES are equal and deserve the same constitutional rights as the rest of society. (well some anyway... you still haven't told us how you came up with which ones, exactly... I think it was because chapels are in prisons?????)

 

The Truth is: I never said pedophiles were equal... that is more of your mindless babbling and foolishness. EVERYBODY.... EVEN PEDOPHILES.... have 1st amendment rights. If you don't like that you can leave the country and move to arab land. What I oppose HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PEDOPHILES. It has EVERYTHING to do with the government take it upon themeselves to futher strip the American public of thier rights as given under the Constitution. IF WE ALLOW THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE AN EXCEPTION FOR THE PEDOPHILES THEN THE GOVERNMENT WILL USE THAT EXCEPTION AS A PRECEDENT TO DO THE SAME THING TO THE REST OF US.

 

You said: We understand... Your whore of a mother produced a pedophile and a moron who blames his ills on ADHD.

 

This is just more proof of your lack of IQ. I am not one of those and my opposition to this law has NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM. It's sad that your lack of IQ points prevents you from seeing that.

 

 

You said: So you CANNOT protect your rights and NOT protect the rights of PEDOPHILES at the same time.

 

Under our current system of government.... THAT IS CORRECT.... IT IS ALL OF US OR NONE OF US.

 

The consititution was SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO MAKE ALL MEN, which means the president, myself, morons like Hugo, the lowliest street bum, ignorant cocksuckers like you, and yes, EVEN THE PEDOPHILES, EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW.

That means that if we make an exception for ONE CLASS we are making an exception FOR ALL CLASSES.

 

 

Now....

 

PLEASE GO KILL YOURSELF.

 

 

[Mohammed_Rots_In_Hell]

What I have REPEATEDLY tried to make your ignorant ass understand is this: If we allow the government to strip one part of society of thier rights, THEY WILL use it as an excuse to strip those same rights from the REST OF SOCIETY... INCLUDING YOUR USELESS IDIOTIC ASS.

Ok, you stupid son of a monkey whore... 1st you said convicted pedophiles do not loose any of their rights... THEN you said they infact do loose some but not their first ammendment rights. And I have REPEATEDLY asked you to verify which rights are kept and WHY. You have obviously just FABRICATED the answer that the 1st ammendment rights are retained while the rest are lost... It is obvious that you are a complete liar, fabricator, and a blow hard retard. You have no clue how you came up with that shit, yet you buy into it like it is fact... I would capitulate this point, if you could explain yourself with some proof of your mad claim.

 

2ndly, I don't really see how a municipality, by barring a person from living close to a church, violates his/her 1st ammendment rights... after all the law does not forbid them from attending service, running a printing press, or compelling them to join a certain religion.

 

These two points make you not only stupid, but completely insane.

 

Furthermore, I NEVER EVER said you had to accept them in your neighborhoods.

without petitioning the governemnt for a regress against your beloved pedophiles, just how am I supposed to "not accept" them in my neighborhood? I see 4 choices.

1) Cowar and fear in my own home, and never let my children outside to play.

2) Try to ask him to leave.

3) Try to intimidate him to leave, if he refuses my no. 2 offer.

4) Kill him, if he rejects my no. 3 plan.

 

What I said was "WE CANNOT ALLOW THE GOVERNMENT TO STRIP THAT GROUP OF THIER LIBERTY BECAUSE IT GIVES THE GOVERNMENT A PRECENDENT TO STRIP THE REST OF SOCIETY OF THIERS.

As you have already pointed out, many of their rights are already stripped away. What gives the 1st ammendment rights so much weight that they cannot be removed from pedophiles?

 

The Truth is: I never said pedophiles were equal... that is more of your mindless babbling and foolishness. EVERYBODY.... EVEN PEDOPHILES.... have 1st amendment rights.

Says who?

 

If you don't like that you can leave the country and move to arab land.

you keep saying this, but why don't you heed your own advise. You can become some sheiks little bitch. Make your momma proud!

 

Under our current system of government.... THAT IS CORRECT.... IT IS ALL OF US OR NONE OF US.

Then if you don't like it, leave and go to a country that likes pedophiles... I understand any muslim country will accept your "lifestyle".

 

If yuo want to educate yourself and not sound so stupid in the future, read the fifth ammendment to the constitution.

 

The consititution was SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO MAKE ALL MEN, which means the president, myself, morons like Hugo, the lowliest street bum, ignorant cocksuckers like you, and yes, EVEN THE PEDOPHILES, EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW.

That means that if we make an exception for ONE CLASS we are making an exception FOR ALL CLASSES.

No it wasn't. The constitution was designed to set up a government, the fact that all men are created equal was understood.

 

 

Now....

 

PLEASE GO KILL YOURSELF.

rope, knife, or hand grenade?

 

 

[/size] [/size][/size]

[tizz]

I think what our dear friend is TH is trying to get across (though poorly and inapropriately) isthat if our rights work for the least of us they work for all of us. (The Larry Flint cliche`) What he has failed to factor into his equation is the fact that we are talking about people that have been convicted of breaking the very laws that protect those rights. I think that constitutes disregard for human rights and should therefore result in the termination of those rights. Come on TH you have to work harder than that. Wrong example for your "our rights must be equal for all of us" example.

 

Equal BEFORE the law YUP! Not after you BREAK the law

[Mohammed_Rots_In_Hell]

I think what our dear friend is TH is trying to get across (though poorly and inapropriately) isthat if our rights work for the least of us they work for all of us. (The Larry Flint cliche`) What he has failed to factor into his equation is the fact that we are talking about people that have been convicted of breaking the very laws that protect those rights. I think that constitutes disregard for human rights and should therefore result in the termination of those rights. Come on TH you have to work harder than that. Wrong example for your "our rights must be equal for all of us" example.

 

Equal BEFORE the law YUP! Not after you BREAK the law

EXACTLY, tizz touches nose

[TerroristHater]

I think what our dear friend is TH is trying to get across (though poorly and inapropriately) isthat if our rights work for the least of us they work for all of us. (The Larry Flint cliche`) What he has failed to factor into his equation is the fact that we are talking about people that have been convicted of breaking the very laws that protect those rights. I think that constitutes disregard for human rights and should therefore result in the termination of those rights. Come on TH you have to work harder than that. Wrong example for your "our rights must be equal for all of us" example.

 

Equal BEFORE the law YUP! Not after you BREAK the law

 

 

The constitution doesn't change. EVER. NOBODY LOSES THIER 1st Amendment rights.

[tizz]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

And what is there about not letting peodophiles live near schools and churches goes against the 1st amendmant?

 

 

Wait WTF were we arguing about LOL

[TerroristHater]

Ok, you stupid son of a monkey whore... 1st you said convicted pedophiles do not loose any of their rights... THEN you said they infact do loose some but not their first ammendment rights. And I have REPEATEDLY asked you to verify which rights are kept and WHY. You have obviously just FABRICATED the answer that the 1st ammendment rights are retained while the rest are lost... It is obvious that you are a complete liar, fabricator, and a blow hard retard. You have no clue how you came up with that shit, yet you buy into it like it is fact... I would capitulate this point, if you could explain yourself with some proof of your mad claim.

 

2ndly, I don't really see how a municipality, by barring a person from living close to a church, violates his/her 1st ammendment rights... after all the law does not forbid them from attending service, running a printing press, or compelling them to join a certain religion.

 

These two points make you not only stupid, but completely insane.

 

without petitioning the governemnt for a regress against your beloved pedophiles, just how am I supposed to "not accept" them in my neighborhood? I see 4 choices.

1) Cowar and fear in my own home, and never let my children outside to play.

2) Try to ask him to leave.

3) Try to intimidate him to leave, if he refuses my no. 2 offer.

4) Kill him, if he rejects my no. 3 plan.

 

As you have already pointed out, many of their rights are already stripped away. What gives the 1st ammendment rights so much weight that they cannot be removed from pedophiles?

 

Says who?

 

you keep saying this, but why don't you heed your own advise. You can become some sheiks little bitch. Make your momma proud!

 

Then if you don't like it, leave and go to a country that likes pedophiles... I understand any muslim country will accept your "lifestyle".

 

If yuo want to educate yourself and not sound so stupid in the future, read the fifth ammendment to the constitution.

 

No it wasn't. The constitution was designed to set up a government, the fact that all men are created equal was understood.

 

 

rope, knife, or hand grenade?

 

 

[/size] [/size][/size]

 

 

OK... YOU DUMB FUCKING MEXICAN COCKSUCKER.... PAY FUCKING ATTENTION TO WHAT I AM ABOUT TO SAY BECAUSE I AM TIRED OF TRYING TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOUR ILLEGALLY IMMIGRATED ASS:

YOU SAID: have REPEATEDLY asked you to verify which rights are kept and WHY. You have obviously just FABRICATED the answer that the 1st ammendment

 

The TRUTH IS: THERE IS NO FABRICATION THERE. I TOLD YOU THOSE THAT ARE MANDATED AND I EVEN STATED THAT SOME VERY BY STATE.

You said:

These two points make you not only stupid, but completely insane.

 

without petitioning the governemnt for a regress against your beloved pedophiles, just how am I supposed to "not accept" them in my neighborhood? I see 4 choices.

The truth is:

 

MY AGRUMENTS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH PEDOPHILES. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR ILLEGALLY IMMIGRATED FUCKING WETBACK SKULL.

My argument is that if stupid ignorant fuckers like your ignorant ass allow the government to STEAL RIGHTS FROM ONE CLASS THEY WILL DO IT TO ALL AMERICANS (WHICH DOESN'T INCLUDE YOUR ILLEGAL ASS)

 

You said:

As you have already pointed out, many of their rights are already stripped away. What gives the 1st ammendment rights so much weight that they cannot be removed from pedophiles?

 

The TRUTH is:

THE CONSTITUTION SPECIFICALLY GRANTS ALL AMERICANS THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGON (THIS IS THE 1st Amendement). THIS RIGHT CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.

THE CONSTITUTION SPECIFICALLY STATES THIS RIGHT IS "INALIENABLE", WHICH MEANS THAT IT CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.... EVEN BY IGNORANT DUMB FUCKS LIKE YOU.

YOU SAID:

you keep saying this, but why don't you heed your own advise. You can become some sheiks little bitch. Make your momma proud!

 

Then if you don't like it, leave and go to a country that likes pedophiles... I understand any muslim country will accept your "lifestyle".

 

If yuo want to educate yourself and not sound so stupid in the future, read the fifth ammendment to the constitution.

 

No it wasn't. The constitution was designed to set up a government, the fact that all men are created equal was understood.

 

THE TRUTH IS:

The Constitution was designed to form a FREE government. It was also designed to make all men EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW (NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW AND ALL MEN PAY THE SAME PRICE FOR CRIMES)

Now.

Since I was born here... and you, and probably your whole family, ILLEGIALLY IMMIGRATED .... YOU AND ALL OF THEM CAN GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY COUNTRY. GO BACK TO MEXICO AND DO NOT COME BACK.

YOU CAN SWIM YOUR USELESS WELFARE ASSES BACK ACROSS THE RIVER.

 

 

 

[tizz]

But didn't you say a while back how your friend should NOT have to suffer for his actions? I am so cunfuzzled

[TerroristHater]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

And what is there about not letting peodophiles live near schools and churches goes against the 1st amendmant?

 

 

Wait WTF were we arguing about LOL

 

 

The part of this is: respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

 

The law in question violates this section.

 

 

 

Now... kindly quit sucking illegal alien dick.

[TerroristHater]

But didn't you say a while back how your friend should NOT have to suffer for his actions? I am so cunfuzzled

 

I do not see two teengers (who love eachother and are now married) having sex as a crime.

 

I'm sorry but I do not. From a psychological stand point this is normal, age-appropriate behavior.

[tizz]

No it does not. It does not prohibit violaters from practicing religion. It just says they cannot LIVE near a church (hold residence, be there all the time. It takes aways threat and temptation at eht same time) They can still ATTEND church

[TerroristHater]

 

 

OK... YOU DUMB FUCKING MEXICAN COCKSUCKER.... PAY FUCKING ATTENTION TO WHAT I AM ABOUT TO SAY BECAUSE I AM TIRED OF TRYING TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOUR ILLEGALLY IMMIGRATED ASS:

 

 

YOU SAID: have REPEATEDLY asked you to verify which rights are kept and WHY. You have obviously just FABRICATED the answer that the 1st ammendment

 

The TRUTH IS: THERE IS NO FABRICATION THERE. I TOLD YOU THOSE THAT ARE MANDATED AND I EVEN STATED THAT SOME VERY BY STATE.

 

 

You said:

These two points make you not only stupid, but completely insane.

 

without petitioning the governemnt for a regress against your beloved pedophiles, just how am I supposed to "not accept" them in my neighborhood? I see 4 choices.

 

The truth is:

 

MY AGRUMENTS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH PEDOPHILES. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR ILLEGALLY IMMIGRATED FUCKING WETBACK SKULL.

 

 

My argument is that if stupid ignorant fuckers like your ignorant ass allow the government to STEAL RIGHTS FROM ONE CLASS THEY WILL DO IT TO ALL AMERICANS (WHICH DOESN'T INCLUDE YOUR ILLEGAL ASS)

 

You said:

As you have already pointed out, many of their rights are already stripped away. What gives the 1st ammendment rights so much weight that they cannot be removed from pedophiles?

 

The TRUTH is:

 

THE CONSTITUTION SPECIFICALLY GRANTS ALL AMERICANS THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGON (THIS IS THE 1st Amendement). THIS RIGHT CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.

 

THE CONSTITUTION SPECIFICALLY STATES THIS RIGHT IS "INALIENABLE", WHICH MEANS THAT IT CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.... EVEN BY IGNORANT DUMB FUCKS LIKE YOU.

 

 

YOU SAID:

 

you keep saying this, but why don't you heed your own advise. You can become some sheiks little bitch. Make your momma proud!

 

Then if you don't like it, leave and go to a country that likes pedophiles... I understand any muslim country will accept your "lifestyle".

 

If yuo want to educate yourself and not sound so stupid in the future, read the fifth ammendment to the constitution.

 

No it wasn't. The constitution was designed to set up a government, the fact that all men are created equal was understood.

 

 

THE TRUTH IS:

 

The Constitution was designed to form a FREE government. It was also designed to make all men EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW (NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW AND ALL MEN PAY THE SAME PRICE FOR CRIMES)

 

 

Now.

 

 

Since I was born here... and you, and probably your whole family, ILLEGIALLY IMMIGRATED .... YOU AND ALL OF THEM CAN GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY COUNTRY. GO BACK TO MEXICO AND DO NOT COME BACK.

 

YOU CAN SWIM YOUR USELESS WELFARE ASSES BACK ACROSS THE RIVER.

 

 

 

 

[tizz]

I do not see two teengers (who love eachother and are now married) having sex as a crime.

 

I'm sorry but I do not. From a psychological stand point this is normal, age-appropriate behavior.

 

Well then you should be debating the law that got him convicted but as it stands he DID break the law. And NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW

[TerroristHater]

No it does not. It does not prohibit violaters from practicing religion. It just says they cannot LIVE near a church (hold residence, be there all the time. It takes aways threat and temptation at eht same time) They can still ATTEND church

 

Actually, it does, if that person happens to be a priest or pastor or what not. YES IT MOST CERTAINLY DOES.

 

Also.... State governments are specifically forbidden from interfearing in private contracts. So if somebody wants to buy my house and they have the money to buy my house I can and WILL sell it to them and there is NOT A FUCKING THING THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO ABOUT IT.

[tizz]

If that person is a preist or a pastor I would hope their respictive churches would eb=nd that pretty quick!!!!!!! That a really dumbass example BTW Grasping at straws now I see

[TerroristHater]

Well then you should be debating the law that got him convicted but as it stands he DID break the law. And NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW

 

Obviously not.

 

However, it was still a waste of taxpayer time and money. The judge in that case did his job. He ruled by the letter of the law and NOT by how he felt.

 

That is EXACTLY my point. MRIH's illegal immigrant ass wants a law that reflects the way HE FEELS and not that reflects the LETTER OF THE CONSTITUTION, and he is unwilling or unable to understand the ramifications of that.

 

Of course, he's an illegal alien with a 2nd rate mexican education. We shouldn't expect much.

[tizz]

OK I feel like you have pulled a perverbial Kerry here and flipped flopped from here to the whitehouse and back

[hugo]

The fact is these laws exist all across the country and not one single court has revoked them on 1st Amendment grounds. TH is incapable of removing his head from his ass.

[tizz]

AH cranial/rectal syndrome. Now I get it! Thanks!

[TerroristHater]

The fact is these laws exist all across the country and not one single court has revoked them on 1st Amendment grounds. TH is incapable of removing his head from his ass.

 

 

Acrually, Hugo, you clueless fuckwit, you are WRONG.

 

The state of Iowa REMOVED THIERS BECASUE IT FAILED TO STAND UP TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLEGES PUT FORTH AGAINST IT.

 

 

The Court finds that

[TerroristHater]

AH cranial/rectal syndrome. Now I get it! Thanks!

 

No, Tizz, you don't get it and you never will. Kindly move out of my country and never come back.

 

Thanks

[Outlaw2747]

Listen you spinless jellyfish. Let me ask you this...WTF IS YOUR PROBLEM!?! You go around spewing stupid shit about people all the damn time. And you wonder why people have assaulted you on this site. Hell, at one time, I didn't mind your existance but now your presence is stagnant. Instead of everyone having a crusade against MRIH, the target should be YOU. You try so hard to be this bad-ass here but you are nothing more than some simple-minded mollusk that has to prove he is dominant over everyone else by calling them a name and referring posters to your target's genitals.

 

You HAVE shown that you have a degree of intelligence from some of your better posts but their quality has gone down a noch. Just simply running out to attack someone and kiss the ass of the higher-ups by showing them how many curse words you can spew and how big you can make your font. Perhaps you are compensating for something? I don't know. But you are anything but intimidating. So why don't YOU go jump into a dirty river and ally yourself with the rest of the scum down there.

[tizz]

No, Tizz, you don't get it and you never will. Kindly move out of my country and never come back.

 

Thanks

 

Get over yourself kid!!! And while you are at it grow a few new layers of skin, you need em!

[hugo]

Acrually, Hugo, you clueless fuckwit, you are WRONG.

 

The state of Iowa REMOVED THIERS BECASUE IT FAILED TO STAND UP TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLEGES PUT FORTH AGAINST IT.

 

 

The Court finds that