"TERRORIST HATER" is a stupid fuck!

[TerroristHater]

This is so WRONG it is not even funny... TH, you have just proven just how stupid you are about the law, the constitution and just plain old common sense!

 

The ammendments are just that they are AMMENDMENTS to the original constitution. The constitution itself has the rules to ammending itself!

 

The first ten ammendments are indeed called the bill of rights, but under the constitution they have no more or less authority than than any other ammendment or article, unless a later ammendment changes the meaning of a previous one.

 

How sweet!

 

 

This is nice, but absolutely false and meaningless... who said it? Where is it? Since the constitution is literaly the "highest law of the land" if these sentences are not found in the constitution, the constitution supercedes them.

 

Maybe they do, maybe they don't we only have the words of the moron "TH" as our proof!

 

Perhaps that's because they were never there to begin with... at any rate, even if these two sentences are found somewhere in the constitution, thiose senetences can be "ammendeded" as well! ...

 

Here for the perusal of the intelligent is Article 5 of the constitution.

 

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal

Suffrage in the Senate.

 

No, they can be changed by Article V... see above you slack-jawed, slobering moron!

 

WTF???? Everything is interpreted under English Common Law....????

 

Nice try, dumb-ass!

 

Hey clown....

 

The first ten amendments are "declaratory and restrictive clauses". This means they supersede all other parts of our Constitution and restrict the powers of our Constitution.

 

The above text is a DIRECT PASTE FROM THE PREAMBLES OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS. It is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. Your wanna-be lawyer is WRONG.

 

I bet he got his law degree from a crackerjack box.

 

-TH

[TerroristHater]

This is so WRONG it is not even funny... TH, you have just proven just how stupid you are about the law, the constitution and just plain old common sense!

 

The ammendments are just that they are AMMENDMENTS to the original constitution. The constitution itself has the rules to ammending itself!

 

The first ten ammendments are indeed called the bill of rights, but under the constitution they have no more or less authority than than any other ammendment or article, unless a later ammendment changes the meaning of a previous one.

 

How sweet!

 

 

This is nice, but absolutely false and meaningless... who said it? Where is it? Since the constitution is literaly the "highest law of the land" if these sentences are not found in the constitution, the constitution supercedes them.

 

Maybe they do, maybe they don't we only have the words of the moron "TH" as our proof!

 

Perhaps that's because they were never there to begin with... at any rate, even if these two sentences are found somewhere in the constitution, thiose senetences can be "ammendeded" as well! ...

 

Here for the perusal of the intelligent is Article 5 of the constitution.

 

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal

Suffrage in the Senate.

 

No, they can be changed by Article V... see above you slack-jawed, slobering moron!

 

WTF???? Everything is interpreted under English Common Law....????

 

Nice try, dumb-ass!

 

1.) There is no need for name calling.

2.) YES, MOST OF OUR LAWS CAME FOM ENGLISH COMMON LAW BECAUSE MOST OF OUR FOREFATHERS WERE ENGLISH COMMONERS WHO CAME HERE TO ESCAPE THE KING AND HIS MONARCHY OF DOOM.

 

Any other silly questions?

 

-TH

[Mohammed_Rots_In_Hell]

Hey clown....

I know you are!

 

The first ten amendments are "declaratory and restrictive clauses". This means they supersede all other parts of our Constitution and restrict the powers of our Constitution.

You're too STUPID to know what declatory and restictive means!

 

Your wanna-be lawyer is WRONG.

No he was absolutely right, except the part about me being wrong (he said pretty much the same thing as I did)

 

I bet he got his law degree from a crackerjack box.

perhaps, but he knows a helluvlot more than you!

 

-TH

a.k.a. IGNORANT-DUMBASS

[phreakwars]

Hey clown....

 

The first ten amendments are "declaratory and restrictive clauses". This means they supersede all other parts of our Constitution and restrict the powers of our Constitution.

 

The above text is a DIRECT PASTE FROM THE PREAMBLES OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS. It is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. Your wanna-be lawyer is WRONG.

 

I bet he got his law degree from a crackerjack box.

 

-TH

Considering he has been both a PROSECUTOR and a DEFFENSE attorney for well over 15 years, I would tend to believe what he is telling me over the info your trying to feed me anytime. His response to you is this :

 

"Wanna be" lawyer? What the fuck are this douche-bag's credentials? Does he live behind 5 strands of barbed wire in a compound someplace in Montana?

 

I've read the postings there and I think the majority of posters there are a bunch of ex-Arby's employees with more time on their hands than intelligence. They can't conjure up enough collective intelligence between them all to wipe their asses. And I apologize in advance to all Arby's employees who may take offense at the preceding remark.

 

 

By the way, you might want to tell these dumbasses to try and use their spellcheckers. The word amendment has only one "m". not two.

.

.

[Mohammed_Rots_In_Hell]

I'm going to show all of this to MY lawyer friend, I want a second oppinion. Be back later with his blurb...

[phreakwars]

GF, WE DEBATE SO HARD, WE EVEN BRING IN LAWYERS !!

 

.

.

[ALLAH IS GREAT]

GF, WE DEBATE SO HARD, WE EVEN BRING IN LAWYERS !!

 

.

.

 

Sorry I haven't been paying attention,who's a lawyer?

[phreakwars]

Sorry I haven't been paying attention,who's a lawyer?

http://Off Topic Forum.com/showpost.php?p=379586&postcount=173

.

.

[ALLAH IS GREAT]

Oh sorry.Welcome Attorney Guy/lady.

[TerroristHater]

I asked a lawyer to view the last 2 comments, and his response to me was this:

 

Hope that helps.

.

.

 

Ok.

 

My bad !

[phreakwars]

And with that, I think we should FINALLY put this damn post to rest.

 

.

.

[phreakwars]

Not !!!!!!!

 

.

.