Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 3, 1:34 pm, "Mike" <mat...@hofstra.edu> wrote: > On Apr 3, 4:28 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > atheists? > > Oh ho. Sins of atheists you say? So you are a religious crank as > well as an antirelativity crank. Why am I unsurprised to learn this? > > > Robert B. Winn Well, here is another atheist who wants to talk about relativity. Just a simple little problem for you, Mike. There is an observer beside a railroad track. There is a train traveling on the railroad track toward the observer. There is an observer on the train at the middle of the train. When the observer on the train reaches the position of the observer on the ground, lightning strikes both ends of the train simultaneously, leaving marks on the front and rear of the train and marks on the railroad track. How far apart are the marks on the railroad track? Einstein thought of this problem. It should be a simple task for someone as knowledgable as you to answer this question. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 3, 1:52 pm, "Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 9:28 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the actual > > > existence of millions of atheists. > > > > If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > > atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > > his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of its > > > existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > > atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > atheists? > > Prove it, fuckwit. OK. Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 3, 2:31 pm, "Ronald 'More-More' Moshki" <sector_f...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 4:28 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the actual > > > existence of millions of atheists. > > > > If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > > atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > > his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of its > > > existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > > atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > atheists? > > Robert B. Winn > > ------------------------------------------------ > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of> atheists? > > Robert B. Winn > > ---------------------- > Christan Knut: "We have a living God." > > Objctive person: "You just said 'He died for our sins'. > You can't have it both ways." > > Former Christian: "You got a good point there." Not too good. Jesus Christ has eternal life. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 3, 2:55 pm, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl> wrote: > On 3 apr, 22:28, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the actual > > > existence of millions of atheists. > > > > If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > > atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > > his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of its > > > existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > > atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > atheists? > > Robert B. Winn > > He should be arrested for child-murder! Well, it seems to me that you are free to enforce any laws you want to enforce. Are you going to make a citizen's arrest? Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 3, 4:33 pm, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message > > news:1175632098.792754.327060@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the > >> actual > >> existence of millions of atheists. > > >> If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > >> atheists and send them to his Hell. > > >> If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > >> his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of > >> its > >> existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > >> atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > atheists? > > Robert B. Winn > > What does this Bible story have to do with the question? Why wouldn't a > loving god > demonstrate his existence and eliminate atheism? According to the Bible that will happen when he returns the second time. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 8, 7:28 am, Christopher A.Lee <c...@optonline.net> wrote: > On 8 Apr 2007 07:01:42 -0700, sncco...@gmail.com wrote: > > >On Apr 3, 7:19 pm, "flightlessvacuum" <flightlessvacuums...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > >> On Apr 4, 8:28 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > >> > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > >> > atheists? > > >> It's a sin to think? > > >In no way shape or form is it a sin to think. God wants us to look at > >everything he has created and examine it. He would have made a > > Prove it, moron. > > [rest of this question-begging stupidity deleted] > > Can't you assholes say anything without preaching? Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement. Why don't you try to say something without using profanity? Just a suggestion. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 6, 4:52 pm, "Jeckyl" <n...@nowhere.com> wrote: > "Gabriel" <gabriel_bapt...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1175893536.357762.22000@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Apr 6, 11:36 am, "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote: > >> <gabriel_bapt...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:1175834114.259533.237680@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > > >> > On Apr 3, 5:27 pm, Jim07D7 <Jim0...@nospam.net> wrote: > >> >> "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> said: > > >> >> There is an "argument from disbelief" as follows, that dispenses with > >> >> certain gods, including notably the God of many believers. This is not > >> >> to be confused with much weaker arguments from disbelief. > > >> > This argument from disbelief is flawed and disproves nothing. Let me > >> > show you: > > >> Here's a thought - Prove your god exists. And please back it up with > >> objective, verifiable evidence. Look up those words in a dictionary if > >> you > >> don't know what they mean. > > > I guess you didn't like that I completely discredited your "theory". > > > Here's a thought: prove anything you know was true 1,000 years ago > > exists. And please back it up with objective, verifiable evidence. Oh, > > that's right -- you're in the same boat. > > No.. there is objective verifiable proof of other things .. and even of > things from around the time of Jesus. > > But no proof of God. No proof of the miraculous events in the Gospels. > > It really comes down to a matter of blind faith. > > > As it stands now there's more than enough evidence around you. > > Really .. where? The people who have blind faith are the ones who believe in the distance contraction. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 4, 3:28 pm, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <kill...@killgod.com> wrote: > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > atheists? > > Robert B. Winn > > would that be the same "loving, caring" christian god that sat on his FAT, > LAZY ASS and laughed his sick, sadistic ass off while the events of > 9/11/2001 was happening? > > The christian god is a sick fuck. Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 3, 8:08 pm, "Jeckyl" <n...@nowhere.com> wrote: > "Eric Brze" <b...@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message > > news:dn461398fgidqldqgut6hn2ja14spr1rcp@4ax.com... > > > On 3 Apr 2007 13:28:18 -0700, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > >>What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > >>atheists? > > > God did not send Jesus to die. God sent Jesus to overcome death which > > he did. There is a fundamental difference here. > > So are you claiming Jesus did NOT die? > > Are you claiming it was not God's will that Jesus died .. Jesus seemed to > think it was? > > If Jesus is God, why would he need to overcome death .. he is immortal ? Because he knew there was no distance contraction. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 3, 4:57 pm, "Martin Phipps" <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 4:28 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the actual > > > existence of millions of atheists. > > > > If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > > atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > > his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of its > > > existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > > atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > atheists? > > Were the Jews atheists? > > Martin Some Jews were atheists, just as some Jews are atheists today. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest rbwinn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 8, 11:46 am, "Mike Painter" <mddotpain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Budikka666 wrote: > > Pastor Dave ran from my challenge - again! He's all mouth when he > > doesn't have to support what he says, but when you put him in the hot > > seat, all he does is yell "Ouch!". > > > I provided the evidence he asked for - the evidence on which he > > claimed he could discuss the science, and he ran from the evidence I > > supplied and the discussion I offered. > > > I asked him to provide the same level of evidence for his religious > > beliefs that he demands of the evolutionists (who have provided quite > > ltierally mountains of evidence for the Theory of Evolution), and he > > even ran from that. > > > Thanks for proving evolution, Pastor Dave. Thanks for evolving from a > > jackass to a chicken right before our eyes. No surprises there. > > > Budikka > > Next week you have to step up a notch and debate evolution with a rock. > The easy days are over. What about the theory of relativity? No one wants to talk about relativity any more. Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest Hollis Brown Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 12, 8:11 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 2:55 pm, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl> > wrote: > > > > > > > On 3 apr, 22:28, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the actual > > > > existence of millions of atheists. > > > > > If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > > > atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > > If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > > > his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of its > > > > existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > > > atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > > atheists? > > > Robert B. Winn > > > He should be arrested for child-murder! > > Well, it seems to me that you are free to enforce any laws you want to > enforce. Are you going to make a citizen's arrest? > Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Sadly, the perp fled to Mexico. There have been many reports of sightings in clouds, oil slicks, and cheese sadwiches, but nothing confirmed. HB AA#2 Quote
Guest Scott Richter Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote: > Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement. > Why don't you try to say something without using profanity? Just a > suggestion. Here's a suggestion: why don't you go fuck yourself? Quote
Guest Scott Richter Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote: > > What does this Bible story have to do with the question? Why wouldn't a > > loving god demonstrate his existence and eliminate atheism? > > According to the Bible that will happen when he returns the second > time. In other words, atheism will never be eliminated. Unfortunately, from what we know of history, the far more dangerous converse of atheism--superstitious belief systems--will never be eliminated either. Quote
Guest Scott Richter Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote: > What about the theory of relativity? No one wants to talk about > relativity any more. Correction: no one wants to talk about relativity WITH YOU any more... Quote
Guest Scott Richter Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote: > > >>What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > >>atheists? > > > > > God did not send Jesus to die. God sent Jesus to overcome death which > > > he did. There is a fundamental difference here. > > > > So are you claiming Jesus did NOT die? > > > > Are you claiming it was not God's will that Jesus died .. Jesus seemed to > > think it was? > > > > If Jesus is God, why would he need to overcome death .. he is immortal ? > > Because he knew there was no distance contraction. Ah, so now you're claiming Jesus was a student of relativity theory? Interesting... I guess you can assign your imaginary friend any sort of nonsensical attributes you please. Quote
Guest Scott Richter Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote: > Not too good. Jesus Christ has eternal life. Yes, fictional characters can have any attributes you choose to give them... Quote
Guest Pastor Dave Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:51:44 -0500, Ric claimed: >On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:40:55 -0500, Ric wrote: > >>On 8 Apr 2007 06:38:57 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> >>wrote: >> >>>Pastor Dave ran from my challenge - again! He's all mouth when he >>>doesn't have to support what he says, but when you put him in the >hot >>>seat, all he does is yell "Ouch!". >>> >>>I provided the evidence he asked for - the evidence on which he >>>claimed he could discuss the science, and he ran from the evidence I >>>supplied and the discussion I offered. >>> >>>I asked him to provide the same level of evidence for his religious >>>beliefs that he demands of the evolutionists (who have provided >quite >>>ltierally mountains of evidence for the Theory of Evolution), and he >>>even ran from that. >> >>Hi Budikka666, >> >>If I may ask, what is the "header" subject to this post, and what >>newsgroup was it posted? I'd like to read it, but I can't find it >>here in this NG. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Ric > > >Hi Budikka666, > >I originally posted this in a newsgroup with I don't think you >receive. Anyway, if you would be so kind as to inform me of the >header subject and the newsgroup you posted this material, I would >like to read it. > >BTW, I came across your post (above) in alt.bible, so if you would, >please post your reply there, if possible. All he ever posted, was examples of macirevolution, renamed as macroevolution, when he was challenged to prove his claim that macroevolution has been proved. -- The torture of a bad conscience, is the Hell of a living soul. - John Calvin Quote
Guest Pastor Dave Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:41:26 -0500, Ric claimed: >On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:13:17 -0700, Pastor Dave ><noway@nowhere.com> wrote: > > >>>Hi Budikka666, >>> >>>If I may ask, what is the "header" subject to this post, and what >>>newsgroup was it posted? I'd like to read it, but I can't find it >>>here in this NG. >> >>Budikka is an idiot. He got his ass kicked by me >>a long time ago and he got all pissed off, ranting >>and raving and issuing challenge after challenge, >>in which he couldn't even handle it and is still so >>upset, that he still chases me around, screaming >>that I'm running from him. BAWAHAHAHA!!! > > >Hi Dave, > >Do you recall the subject header, or was this too long ago? It was a long time ago. That's why I said that this man is showing that he is acting on anger that he can't let go of. Anger that he couldn't prove his case and couldn't refute what I said, because I dealt with science and he with fantasy. -- The torture of a bad conscience, is the Hell of a living soul. - John Calvin Quote
Guest Mike Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 12, 10:06 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 1:34 pm, "Mike" <mat...@hofstra.edu> wrote: > > > Oh ho. Sins of atheists you say? So you are a religious crank as > > well as an antirelativity crank. Why am I unsurprised to learn this? > > > > Robert B. Winn > > Well, here is another atheist who wants to talk about relativity. > Just a simple little problem for you, Mike. There is an observer > beside a railroad track. There is a train traveling on the railroad > track toward the observer. There is an observer on the train at the > middle of the train. When the observer on the train reaches the > position of the observer on the ground, lightning strikes both ends of > the train simultaneously, Simultaneous with respect to which observer? If observer B has relative motion with respect to observer A, then events that one observer sees as simultaneous will not be simultaneous with respect to the other observer. You need to clarify this before the question can be answered. > leaving marks on the front and rear of the > train and marks on the railroad track. How far apart are the marks on > the railroad track? > Einstein thought of this problem. It should be a simple task for > someone as knowledgable as you to answer this question. > Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest Mike Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 On Apr 12, 10:06 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 1:34 pm, "Mike" <mat...@hofstra.edu> wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 4:28 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > > atheists? > > > Oh ho. Sins of atheists you say? So you are a religious crank as > > well as an antirelativity crank. Why am I unsurprised to learn this? > > > > Robert B. Winn > > Well, here is another atheist who wants to talk about relativity. > Just a simple little problem for you, Mike. There is an observer > beside a railroad track. There is a train traveling on the railroad > track toward the observer. There is an observer on the train at the > middle of the train. When the observer on the train reaches the > position of the observer on the ground, lightning strikes both ends of > the train simultaneously, In relativity you can't use the word "simultaneously" without specifying the frame of reference. If observers A and B have relative motion they will not agree about simultaneity of space-time points. Did you mean simultaneously for the observer stationary with respect to the track or simultaneously for the observer moving with the train? > leaving marks on the front and rear of the > train and marks on the railroad track. How far apart are the marks on > the railroad track? > Einstein thought of this problem. It should be a simple task for > someone as knowledgable as you to answer this question. > Robert B. Winn Quote
Guest JessHC Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Apr 3, 1:52 pm, "Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 9:28 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the actual > > > > existence of millions of atheists. > > > > > > If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > > > atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > > > If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > > > his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of its > > > > existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > > > atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > > atheists? > > > > Prove it, fuckwit. > > OK. Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement. Please provide objective, verifiable evidence of that claim. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Apr 3, 2:31 pm, "Ronald 'More-More' Moshki" <sector_f...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > On Apr 3, 4:28 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the actual > > > > existence of millions of atheists. > > > > > > If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > > > atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > > > If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > > > his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of its > > > > existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > > > atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > > atheists? > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of> atheists? > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > ---------------------- > > Christan Knut: "We have a living God." > > > > Objctive person: "You just said 'He died for our sins'. > > You can't have it both ways." > > > > Former Christian: "You got a good point there." > > Not too good. Jesus Christ has eternal life. Please provide objective, verifiable evidence of that claim. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Apr 3, 4:33 pm, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message > > > > news:1175632098.792754.327060@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:59 am, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > >> The simplest and most obvious evidence that there are no gods is the > > >> actual > > >> existence of millions of atheists. > > > > >> If a god existed that was mean and intolerant it would simply kill the > > >> atheists and send them to his Hell. > > > > >> If a loving and caring god existed it would it would directly communicate > > >> his existence, wishes and commands to the atheists to convince them of > > >> its > > >> existence. No loving and caring god would keep himself hidden causing the > > >> atheists to spend eternity in his Hell. > > > > > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > > atheists? > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > What does this Bible story have to do with the question? Why wouldn't a > > loving god demonstrate his existence and eliminate atheism? > > According to the Bible that will happen when he returns the second time. Non responsive. Quote
Guest JessHC Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 rbwinn wrote: > On Apr 8, 7:28 am, Christopher A.Lee <c...@optonline.net> wrote: > > On 8 Apr 2007 07:01:42 -0700, sncco...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > >On Apr 3, 7:19 pm, "flightlessvacuum" <flightlessvacuums...@gmail.com> > > >wrote: > > >> On Apr 4, 8:28 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > >> > What about a God who sent his only Begotten Son to die for the sins of > > >> > atheists? > > > > >> It's a sin to think? > > > > >In no way shape or form is it a sin to think. God wants us to look at > > >everything he has created and examine it. He would have made a > > > > Prove it, moron. > > > > [rest of this question-begging stupidity deleted] > > > > Can't you assholes say anything without preaching? > > Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement. Please provide objective, verifiable evidence of that claim. > Why don't you try to say something without using profanity? Just a suggestion. Why don't you try obeying your deity's command to leave from where you aren't wanted? Why don't you try supporting your assertion? Just a suggestion. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.