Guest Happy Vegan Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have to die because of our lax gun laws. http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent people will die because of this mentality. M Quote
Guest cyrakis@yahoo.com Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 16, 7:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > people will die because of this mentality. M There was gun control at Virginia Tech. All guns were banned from campus. That gun control policy had the affect of making sure all the nice folks who follow the rules and play nice were totally helpless when they were attacked by a nut who didn't give a damn about any gun ban. Why do you gun grabbers believe that making law-abiding citizens ever easier victims for human predators is a good idea? Quote
Guest ChrisT Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On 16 Apr 2007 19:46:44 -0700, Happy Vegan <nofur4me1@yahoo.com> wrote: >If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >to die because of our lax gun laws. > >http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > >That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >people will die because of this mentality. M Why do you people froth at the mouth and make all these false assumptions. As far as I know he might just well be a vegan that borrowed a gun. doctors kill more people by mistake every year than guns ever thought of except during the civil war. I suppose you would have preferred he used a hundred pounds of ammonium nitrate and diesel and taken out half the campus. This kind of sicko has nothing to do with gun ownership and more to do with our sick society. Quote
Guest Baldin Lee Pramer Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 16, 8:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 It doesn't convince me. Events like this are very rare, and I value our freedom to own guns more than the lives of these people. Baldin Lee Pramer Quote
Guest -HoSt- Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 "Happy Vegan" <nofur4me1@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1176778004.043058.71090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > people will die because of this mentality. M > You know what gun control is? That is when YOU decide whether or not to own/carry a gun. That is all the control you will ever need. Welcome to gun control. Host. Quote
Guest Lockheed Martin Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On 16 Apr 2007 21:56:07 -0700, Baldin Lee Pramer <BaldinPramer@msn.com> wrote: >On Apr 16, 8:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >> to die because of our lax gun laws. >> >> http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > >It doesn't convince me. Events like this are very rare, and I value >our freedom to own guns more than the lives of these people. > >Baldin Lee Pramer of all the countries surveyed America has the most Killings with guns. Greece which banned guns whether locals or tourists from America has the lowest gun murders > Quote
Guest the_blogologist Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 You really believe murderers will obey gun laws? Happy Vegan <nofur4me1@yahoo.com> wrote: > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > people will die because of this mentality. M Quote
Guest Roger Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 <cyrakis@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1176778636.749093.306450@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 16, 7:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >> to die because of our lax gun laws. >> >> http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 >> >> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >> head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >> people will die because of this mentality. M > > There was gun control at Virginia Tech. All guns were banned from > campus. That gun control policy had the affect of making sure all the > nice folks who follow the rules and play nice were totally helpless > when they were attacked by a nut who didn't give a damn about any gun > ban. > > Why do you gun grabbers believe that making law-abiding citizens ever > easier victims for human predators is a good idea? Why don't gun nuts acknowledge the FACTS that a gun in the home is more likely to kill or wound a friendly person than an intruder? That a person is more likely to die from suicide if there's a gun in the home? Guns rarely prevent predators. They make the homes of the owners more dangerous for the people who live there. Quote
Guest glw82664 Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 16, 10:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > people will die because of this mentality. M This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. Quote
Guest Starkiller Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:11:37 -0700, nobody@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote: >You really believe murderers will obey gun laws? > >Happy Vegan <nofur4me1@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >> to die because of our lax gun laws. >> >> http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 >> >> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >> head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >> people will die because of this mentality. M The liberal gun grab freaks don;t give two shits about general safety. They don't care about the public welfare. What they do care about is if you take the guns away from the law abiding citizens then all dependence for protection will go to the government. An unarmed society ios easier to control. The end result hoped for by the liberal socialists is that if and when they obtain enough power and have the public disarmed, then they can do as they damn well please and send their "police" to the doorstep of any "subversives" without fear of any uprising. After all, Stalin is one of their greatest heroes. Regards Starkiller Quote
Guest Roger Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 "glw82664" <glw82664@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1176810962.755303.69800@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 16, 10:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >> to die because of our lax gun laws. >> >> http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 >> >> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >> head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >> people will die because of this mentality. M > > > This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how > any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event > demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would > have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was > quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. One student had two guns and look what happened. Quote
Guest glw82664 Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 17, 8:08 am, "Roger" <roge...@hotmail.com> wrote: > "glw82664" <glw82...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1176810962.755303.69800@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Apr 16, 10:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > >> to die because of our lax gun laws. > > >>http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > >> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > >> head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > >> people will die because of this mentality. M > > > This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how > > any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event > > demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would > > have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was > > quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. > > One student had two guns and look what happened. Good, you're finally starting to get it. You've just admitted that gun laws that prevent students from carrying were totally ignored. Quote
Guest - Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 >> Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating >>> muscle head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. >>> More innocent people will die because of this mentality. M > "glw82664" <glw82664@hotmail.com> wrote: >> This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how >> any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event >> demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would >> have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was >> quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote: > One student had two guns and look what happened. See: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=apLdsmB.kP2U&refer=us (1) Not a student at Virginia Tech. "Authorities are investigating whether the shooter was a 24- year-old Chinese national who arrived in San Francisco on a United Airlines flight August 7 on a student visa issued in Shanghai, the Chicago Sun-Times newspaper reported on its Web site, citing an unidentified official. Jennifer Galt, a spokeswoman for the U.S. consulate in Shanghai, declined to comment." (2) Virginia Tech "already has gun control." Indeed, most places "with gun control" are subject to higher rates of crime. Perhaps academics might sooner get to the point if everyone brought their favorite weapons of mass destruction to the classroom. (3) This is, apparently, a common occurence at Virginia Tech. Last August 21, 2006 the gunman was William Morva, also not a student at Virginia Tech. - regards - jb ----------------------------------------------- Jerry Falwell Ministries http://www.falwell.com/ ----------------------------------------------- Quote
Guest Balanced View Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 glw82664 wrote: > On Apr 17, 8:08 am, "Roger" <roge...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> "glw82664" <glw82...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1176810962.755303.69800@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >>> On Apr 16, 10:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >>>> to die because of our lax gun laws. >>>> >>>> http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 >>>> >>>> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >>>> head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >>>> people will die because of this mentality. M >>>> >>> This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how >>> any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event >>> demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would >>> have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was >>> quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. >>> >> One student had two guns and look what happened. >> > > Good, you're finally starting to get it. You've just admitted that > gun laws that prevent students from carrying were totally ignored. > > And if a bunch of them were carrying there would likely been even more killed, each one shooting at who they thought the original shooter was, or by police mistaking them for the shooter. Any cop will tell you the last thing they want is a civilian pulling their gun in such situations. Quote
Guest hopeful Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4624aa40$0$16728$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > <cyrakis@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1176778636.749093.306450@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... >> There was gun control at Virginia Tech. All guns were banned from >> campus. That gun control policy had the affect of making sure all the >> nice folks who follow the rules and play nice were totally helpless >> when they were attacked by a nut who didn't give a damn about any gun >> ban. >> Why do you gun grabbers believe that making law-abiding citizens ever >> easier victims for human predators is a good idea? > Why don't gun nuts acknowledge the FACTS that a gun in the home is more > likely to kill or wound a friendly person than an intruder? That a person > is more likely to die from suicide if there's a gun in the home? > Guns rarely prevent predators. They make the homes of the owners more > dangerous for the people who live there. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University is the perfect example of the fallacy of the gun control laws both buying and carrying. The victims obeyed the law, the perpetrator did not. So what is a body to do? Think of carrying a gun the same as carrying insurance. Both assist you in dealing with the unlawful actions of others. There was nothing more VPI's administration could do to ensure no one had a gun on the campus. Trying to blame them is another example of avoiding the real problem: government and laws can not protect you. Quote
Guest Server 13 Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 "Happy Vegan" <nofur4me1@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1176778004.043058.71090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. I don't have to have a gun to feel macho, I have to have a gun because of this (and you do too): QUOTE---------------------------------------------------------- Every time a 'RAT mentions the word 'Nazi', he's thinking to himself that he's such a good Stalinist already. Perhaps it's high time to put on the ear defenders, the hip waders, grab some AR-15s and pump action 12 ga. shotguns, lift the manhole covers off the street surfaces of the blue cities, descend into the sewers there, and commence blasting away some big shitty 'RATS. --------------------------- > Dear Canadian Cocksucking piece of shit: > > I hope that someday the USA invades Canada and just turns the whole nation > into a large National Park for Americans. Canucks will have to eat the > Americans' leftovers from the trash bins, just like you have done for the > past 250 years. Canada is just a hemorrhoid on America's ass. Always has been and always will be. ---------------------------- They're the enemy! We can attack them with nukes because with our new missile defense system, they can't fight back! We can wipe out those AIDS infected Niggers in Africa, but not before we ship all the AIDS infected fags and liberals there to be part of it! That should teach them a lesson about abstinence. What a better way to spread our ideology! Everybody's going to love us once they see how well our nukes work. ----------------------------- One by one...they all fall into line. If not...why, then...it's the Wellstone treatment. ------------------------------ Do the phony effete elitist socialist shit Lib Dims really claim to be for 'the poor', 'the economically disadvantaged', and 'the little guy'? >>phony effete elitist socialist shit >>Stevie Dweebie Geekie >>blew this yeller hippy dippy pwarf >>out his fat honky ass: So are you saying that you yourself are not human t'all and therefore a typically ill-Liberal DemonRAT, or are you saying that you simply cannot dispute the valid points presented, or both? Here, suck some more on this, you chickenshitted Bawney Fwank butt-bitch: A loser leading other losers to where all losers belong, to nowhere, to sheer and utter defeat, to the state of complete powerlessness in which the Democrat Party finds itself today -- ------------------------------ > God damn NOW and its pissant host Bill Moyers, the LBJ dick-suck who > thinks he's smarter than everybody but Walter "No Wind Generators Will > Spoil My View" CrankCase. > > Send both of those commie rat bastards to Hell where they bloody well > belong with their soulmates Mao and Stalin. ---------------------------------- These shit eating, American-hating traitors need to drink the "Grape Kool-aid" and do the Republic a favor by dying. ---------------------------------- A "good" illegal alien is a dead one. -------------------------------- Hopefully, for all our sakes, you will be the next one they decide to let starve to death. ------------------------------------ Euthanizing them, and grinding them up for fertilizer doesn't sound so preposterous, does it? They couldn't be pelletized and stored for used as people food, because the dope would still be in the pellets and that would just start the problem all over again. ----------------------------------- > These prisoners are fed better than they ever have been > in their lives. They get these specially prepared 'ALLAH' > approved meals. The Guards wear WHITE GLOVES when > they handle their Holy Comic Book, and they get to Listen > to Christina Aquiliera while they are in Prison. > > They've never had it this good in their lives I say saw off one head a day. overhead reduction Eventually the facility is closed, and the f'loons are happy. ----------------------------------- > ALL LIBERALS SHOULD BE GROUND UP AS PET FOOD! > > Liberals are idiots. ---------------------------------- This a white nat NG. Faggot cry baby liberals can take their whining elsewhere! ------------------------------------- OH Goodie! A whole bunch of traitor-fuck leftists to run over in my SUV. I can't wait! ------------------------------------ When some brain damaged liberal like Dianne Feinstein come sout and says, "I agree, attacking Iran would be an "immoral" decision by the U.S.", then if I'm the anti-christ sand ******, I'm going to say, "you go girl, you go". Liberals have no sense of protectionsim or survival of our culture, period. Liberals have no sense of what an "enemy" is, because in their dimented minds there is no such thing, period. "Enemies" are only a term used in movies like Star Wars and Star Trek. Liberals have no sense of being American, and what sacrafice is required to say that is, period. Bottom line, we were attacked on 9/11 because the radicals think we are weak as a nation. Their perception of America, is what the American Liberal has portrayed us to be in the world. AMERICA, LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE PUSSIES ! George Bush you better get of your Liberal Ass and show the sand ******s who's boss, or we're all doomed. ------------------------------------- In a perfect world Liberals would be packed onto a train to Dachau and gassed immediately. --------------------------------------- > YOU jews will not disarm America...and make it easier for ISRAEL to > complete > > the takeover of us. > > We will put you into box cars again before we let you do that. > > I will nail your door shut myself. ------------------------------------ They're gonna die anyway. Why should we allow them to drain our healthcare, raise insurance rates? Most of the time it's a self inflicted death sentence. CNN doctors also said there is growing evidence that the AIDS infected fags can actually pass this disease of death by sitting on toilet seats. The only humane thing to do is exterminate them....for the sake of our children. ------------------------------------- > All illegal aliens and their spawn should be immediately killed. > All enablers, protectors, and promoters of any illegal > alien activity, including any associated aristocracy and elite > should be tarred, feathered and run out of town (or similarly > punished) immediately. ----------------------------------- His stinking beaner ass will get raped in prison, don't worry. Like I said beaners are not human and must be treated accordingly UNQUOTE---------------------------------------------------------- Quote
Guest cyrakis@yahoo.com Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 17, 4:07 am, "Roger" <roge...@hotmail.com> wrote: > <cyra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > > > There was gun control at Virginia Tech. All guns were banned from > > campus. That gun control policy had the affect of making sure all the > > nice folks who follow the rules and play nice were totally helpless > > when they were attacked by a nut who didn't give a damn about any gun > > ban. > > > Why do you gun grabbers believe that making law-abiding citizens ever > > easier victims for human predators is a good idea? > > Why don't gun nuts acknowledge the FACTS that a gun in the home is more > likely to kill or wound a friendly person than an intruder? That a person is > more likely to die from suicide if there's a gun in the home? I'll indulge your attempt to dodge my question for the moment. While not a "gun nut" I am a gun owner, and I am quite willing to accept the proposition that there is a greater probability that I may shoot a friend or myself, than the probability that I may use a firearm to succesfully defend myself from an intruder. Now, are you willing to accept the fact that the probability of surviving an attack by a deranged psychopath is increased if you are in possession of a weapon that you can use to defend yourself? This is a simple concept. Violent psychopath is attacking you. Are your odds of survival better or worse, if you have access to a firearm? > > Guns rarely prevent predators. They make the homes of the owners more > dangerous for the people who live there.- Hide quoted text - I doubt your analysis of averages and statistical distribution would be very comforting to a student hiding under their desk awaiting their turn to be executed. Personally, I think a handful of pistol would be preferable in that situation to a treatise on average outcomes. Quote
Guest Roger Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 "glw82664" <glw82664@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1176812179.279429.139070@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 17, 8:08 am, "Roger" <roge...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> "glw82664" <glw82...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1176810962.755303.69800@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On Apr 16, 10:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >> >> to die because of our lax gun laws. >> >> >>http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 >> >> >> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >> >> head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >> >> people will die because of this mentality. M >> >> > This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how >> > any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event >> > demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would >> > have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was >> > quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. >> >> One student had two guns and look what happened. > > Good, you're finally starting to get it. You've just admitted that > gun laws that prevent students from carrying were totally ignored. Were the laws preventing him from buying them ignored? Were the laws preventing them from being made ignored? Were the laws preventing them from being imported ignored? Quote
Guest aususa Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 17, 2:26 pm, Lockheed Martin <warprof...@whitehouse.us.gov> wrote: > On 16 Apr 2007 21:56:07 -0700, Baldin Lee Pramer > > <BaldinPra...@msn.com> wrote: > >On Apr 16, 8:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > >> to die because of our lax gun laws. > > >>http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > >It doesn't convince me. Events like this are very rare, and I value > >our freedom to own guns more than the lives of these people. > > >Baldin Lee Pramer > > of all the countries surveyed America has the most Killings with guns. > > Greece which banned guns whether locals or tourists from America has > the lowest gun murders The stats don't lie, easy access to guns like you have in the USA is the cause of an extremely high rate of deaths caused by guns. Gun nuts live in a fantasy world if they believe arming everyone is going to reduce gun deaths. > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Quote
Guest SportsBookJunkie Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 17, 4:21 pm, aususa <josephbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2:26 pm, Lockheed Martin <warprof...@whitehouse.us.gov> > wrote: > > > > > > > On 16 Apr 2007 21:56:07 -0700, Baldin Lee Pramer > > > <BaldinPra...@msn.com> wrote: > > >On Apr 16, 8:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > > >> to die because of our lax gun laws. > > > >>http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > > >It doesn't convince me. Events like this are very rare, and I value > > >our freedom to own guns more than the lives of these people. > > > >Baldin Lee Pramer > > > of all the countries surveyed America has the most Killings with guns. > > > Greece which banned guns whether locals or tourists from America has > > the lowest gun murders > > The stats don't lie, easy access to guns like you have in the USA is > the cause of an extremely high rate of deaths caused by guns. > > Gun nuts live in a fantasy world if they believe arming everyone is > going to reduce gun deaths. > > > > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Why do you believe that passing another gun control law will have some effect on crimes involving guns? Do you have some stats for that one also? Quote
Guest Happy Vegan Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On Apr 16, 10:13 pm, "-HoSt-" <h...@universe.com> wrote: > "Happy Vegan" <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1176778004.043058.71090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > >http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > > people will die because of this mentality. M > > You know what gun control is? > > That is when YOU decide whether or not to own/carry a gun. > That is all the control you will ever need. > > Welcome to gun control. > > Host. You hyper testosterone beefheads aren't intelligent enough to decide to own/carry a gun. This is why we continue to have these massacres at schools and work places. You either want a gun to shoot and kill defenseless animals or people. Now which is it? M Quote
Guest Starkiller Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 On 17 Apr 2007 16:36:00 -0700, Happy Vegan <nofur4me1@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Apr 16, 10:13 pm, "-HoSt-" <h...@universe.com> wrote: >> "Happy Vegan" <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1176778004.043058.71090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... >> >> > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have >> > to die because of our lax gun laws. >> >> >http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 >> >> > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >> > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >> > people will die because of this mentality. M >> >> You know what gun control is? >> >> That is when YOU decide whether or not to own/carry a gun. >> That is all the control you will ever need. >> >> Welcome to gun control. >> >> Host. > >You hyper testosterone beefheads aren't intelligent enough to decide >to own/carry a gun. This is why we continue to have these massacres >at schools and work places. You either want a gun to shoot and kill >defenseless animals or people. Now which is it? M Lots of folks have guns and have never killed a living thing. They carry them for personal protection or are simply avid shooters that go to the range every weekend. Your statement is ignorant. Regards Starkiller Quote
Guest Happy Vegan Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 On Apr 17, 4:56 am, glw82664 <glw82...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 10:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > >http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > > people will die because of this mentality. M > > This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how > any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event > demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would > have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was > quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. How dare you call me a troll you jerk. How about prohibiting sales of guns so that someone who is whacked like you can't just stroll into a gun shop and purchase one. The fact of the matter is its way too easy to purchase guns. You don't need a gun. If you're not a cop or in the military you don't need a gun. This deranged student who had obvious signs of mental problems was able to go to a store and purchase two guns. So here's the logic Einstein IF THEY WERE NO GUN STORES HE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ABLE TO BUY A GUN!!!! M Quote
Guest - Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 >> Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 >>> That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle >>> head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent >>> people will die because of this mentality. M > glw82664 <glw82...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how >> any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event >> demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would >> have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was >> quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. Happy Vegan <nofur4me1@yahoo.com> wrote: > How dare you call me a troll you jerk. How dare you call him a jerk, you fuckfaced troll-butt. > How about prohibiting sales of guns so that someone who is whacked > like you can't just stroll into a gun shop and purchase one. You can't just take away his Second Amendment Rights without some sort of Court Hearing, due process, jurisprudential fairness,etc. > The fact of the matter is its way too easy to purchase guns. If you make it difficult to buy guns, then guns will just be stolen. > You don't need a gun. If you're not a cop or in the military you don't > need a gun. Not true. All who are members of the militia (ages 18-45) should own a gun. All who are hunters, or use guns for sport and/or defense, should own a gun. All who are gun collectors, traders, salespeople and so forth, should own a gun. All who develop target practice, say for the Olympic Alpine/Nordic X-Country Skiing & Gun Shoot, should own a gun. All who are members of a local community gun club, should own a gun. All who seek to assist police by citizen's arrest, posse, deputization, should own a gun. All who own a gun, should own a gun. All who wish to own a gun, should own a gun. And they should own weapons, too. > This deranged student who had obvious signs of mental problems What were his "obvious signs of mental problems" before the incident? > ... was able to go to a store and purchase two guns. So here's the logic > Einstein Obviously, A. Einstein, whose energy-matter equation enabled more research into development of Atom Bombs and Nuclear Weaponry, and wrote a letter to the President advising building them as such (to stop World War II), was opposed to Gun Control and quite a bit more... > IF THEY WERE NO GUN STORES HE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ABLE TO BUY A GUN!!!! He could still obtain box-cutter knives though, and slit the throats of all who threaten to remove his God-Given Constitutional Militia Rights, not to mention Inherent Rights of Self-Defense and Subsistence Rights. - regards - jb ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Tennessee Massacre vs. "Nappy Headed Hos" http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=361 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote
Guest glw82664 Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 On Apr 17, 8:15 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 4:56 am, glw82664 <glw82...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 16, 10:46 pm, Happy Vegan <nofur4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > If this event doesn't convince you nothing will! How many more have > > > to die because of our lax gun laws. > > > >http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574 > > > > That's the problem with the United States every red meat eating muscle > > > head thinks they have to have a gun to feel macho. More innocent > > > people will die because of this mentality. M > > > This has to be a troll, otherwise, you would have explained just how > > any gun law would have prevented this crime. If anything, this event > > demonstrates exactly why gun laws are too restrictive. All it would > > have taken was one armed student (as prevented by the law that was > > quashed a year ago) and this story could have had a less tragic ending. > > How dare you call me a troll you jerk. How about prohibiting sales of > guns so that someone who is whacked like you can't just stroll into a > gun shop and purchase one. The fact of the matter is its way too easy > to purchase guns. You don't need a gun. If you're not a cop or in > the military you don't need a gun. This deranged student who had > obvious signs of mental problems was able to go to a store and > purchase two guns. So here's the logic Einstein IF THEY WERE NO GUN > STORES HE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ABLE TO BUY A GUN!!!! M I actually called you a troll because I couldn't believe it was possible for someone to be so damned stupid and shortsighted. So I stand corrected. Your not a troll. You're just an idiot. Anyway, you are representative of the mindless hysteria that surrounds this debate. Consider this for a moment: the shooter bought this gun legally. A background check was done and he passed it. If his mentally derranged status was so easy to see how on earth do you explain how he got his gun. Remember, a full background check was done. I'd submit that it's easier to buy guns illegally than it is legally. No, there is no law that would have prevented this. If only gun laws weren't so restrictive another student just may have been able to minimize this tragedy. Thank the VA legislature for that. Last, I'm not sure what to make of your obvious disdain for the constitutional right to carry arms. Perhaps you think every time there is a derranged person out there who commits an isolated atrocious act our contitutional rights ought to be tossed away. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.