Jump to content

What Kind of Sheep Allow Themselves to be Massacred Without Resisting?


Recommended Posts

Posted

--forwarded post--

 

>From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

 

Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

without making any kind of resistance?

 

The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

prevent these occassional incidents.

 

If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

others.

 

That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

Judaification of society.

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Tim May
Posted

In article <1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Luc

<zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

> --forwarded post--

>

>

> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> without making any kind of resistance?

 

They went to their deaths like Jews....

 

Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

 

Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

effect.

 

 

--Tim May

Posted

"Luc" <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote in message

news:1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> --forwarded post--

>

>

> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> without making any kind of resistance?

>

> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

> it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

> in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

> going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

> doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

> just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

> kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

> personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

> even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

> prevent these occassional incidents.

>

> If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

> on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

> allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

> all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

> along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

> tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

> those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

> which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

> denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

> in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

> to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

> others.

>

> That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

> themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

> the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

> the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

> Judaification of society.

>

 

Well, why dont you put some perspective on it.

I wonder if you believe the official story about what happenned on

9-11-2001. If you do, you believe that a few guys with box cutters hijacked

jet liners and turned them into missles. You would believe that the

passengers were so afraid of being cut by a box cutter, that they allowed

the guys with these box cutters to fly the jets into buildings, killing them

all. Now, givin that, it's no stretch of the imagination to see that college

students were frozen in their tracks as this crazy man opened fire on them

with highly lethal weapons...

 

You said this in your post about the guys weapons..."Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons..."

 

Now, that would be very easy for you to say since you were not staring the

the barrels of what you seem to think were innocuous weapons, but were

capable of killing 32 people and wounding more. My last comment to you is in

the form of a question...

 

Do you ever touch down in reality, or do you stay in some altered state,

where loaded guns in both hands of a maniac are not a threat, even though

they are wiping out everyone around you? No answer is required. Your

ludicrous post says it all.

Posted

Luc wrote:

> --forwarded post--

>

>

>>From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> without making any kind of resistance?

>

> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

> it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

> in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

> going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

> doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

> just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

> kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

> personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

> even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

> prevent these occassional incidents.

>

> If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

> on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

> allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

> all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

> along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

> tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

> those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

> which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

> denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

> in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

> to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

> others.

>

> That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

> themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

> the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

> the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

> Judaification of society.

>

 

They did as they are instructed by the orthorities

 

they did wat they was told they did not resist they did nothing to

antagonise the perp , they waited for the police to come save them

 

they did nothing wrong , they did as taught .

 

its not a lack of courage , they didnt use violence , modern soiety

deplore violence unless its for political purposes , and then its done

by specialy trained folk who live to do violence , its their job .

 

this is the era of the non violent metro sexual dontcha know ??

 

you only get out of a person what you put into the person

 

maybe its time to rethink the standard do no resist line of education

the kids get these days ??

Guest Joe S.
Posted

"Luc" <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote in message

news:1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> --forwarded post--

>

>

>>From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> without making any kind of resistance?

>

> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

> it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

> in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

> going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

> doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

> just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

> kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

> personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

> even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

> prevent these occassional incidents.

>

> If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

> on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

> allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

> all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

> along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

> tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

> those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

> which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

> denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

> in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

> to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

> others.

>

> That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

> themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

> the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

> the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

> Judaification of society.

>

 

So -- you're telling me that you were an eyewitness and that's how you know

no one resisted??

Guest the_blogologist
Posted

Luc <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on...

 

If someone had pulled out a gun and shot him, you could expect that

person to be prosicuted to the fullest extent of the law.

 

I remember a case a few years back where a bear had attacked several

people at a recreational area. It killed about 4 or 5 people before

someone pulled out a gun and shot it dead. However, that gun possession

happened to be illegal. The shooter (who just saved a few lives) was

promptly arrested for a felony, convicted and sent to prison. Moral of

the story: don't try to save someone's life if you have to break the law

(or expose your crime) to do it.

Guest Roger
Posted

Jesus was a Jew.

 

 

"Tim May" <timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote in message

news:200420072336495171%timcmay@removethis.got.net...

> In article <1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Luc

> <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

>

>> --forwarded post--

>>

>>

>> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

>> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

>> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

>> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

>> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

>> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

>> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>>

>> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

>> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

>> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

>> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

>> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

>> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

>> without making any kind of resistance?

>

> They went to their deaths like Jews....

>

> Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

> program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

>

> Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

> gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

> effect.

>

>

> --Tim May

Posted
--forwarded post--

 

Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

without making any kind of resistance?

 

What kind of people would allow a dunce & facists oil barrons to ruin their country and not any substantail resistance to stop them >>>IMPEACH THE BASTARDs Let us strom the WH and end the farce.

 

Just came to pick those last pieces of furniture BYe Bye Chongos !

Guest Too_Many_Tools
Posted

On Apr 21, 1:20 am, Luc <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

> --forwarded post--

>

> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

>

> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> without making any kind of resistance?

>

> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

> it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

> in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

> going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

> doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

> just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

> kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

> personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

> even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

> prevent these occassional incidents.

>

> If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

> on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

> allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

> all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

> along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

> tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

> those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

> which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

> denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

> in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

> to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

> others.

>

> That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

> themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

> the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

> the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

> Judaification of society.

 

I find it interesting that someone who has no thoughts but those his

handlers have fed him (anti Jew drivel) would comment on others being

led to the slaughter.

 

Do you bleat too when you attempt to talk?

 

The problem was and still is the gun in the hands of the wrong

person...fix that problem and we can move on to other issues.

 

Another gun owner trying to make an excuse....

 

TMT

Posted

Roger wrote:

> Jesus was a Jew.

>

Tim is envious

>

> "Tim May" <timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote in message

> news:200420072336495171%timcmay@removethis.got.net...

>

>>In article <1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Luc

>><zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>--forwarded post--

>>>

>>>

>>>>From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

>>>a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

>>>powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

>>>left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

>>>another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

>>>reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

>>>six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>>>

>>>Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

>>>room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

>>>shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

>>>by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

>>>substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

>>>in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

>>>without making any kind of resistance?

>>

>>They went to their deaths like Jews....

>>

>>Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

>>program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

>>

>>Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

>>gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

>>effect.

>>

>>

>>--Tim May

>

>

>

Guest Lawrence Glickman
Posted

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:36:49 -0700, Tim May

<timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote:

>In article <1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Luc

><zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

>

>> --forwarded post--

>>

>>

>> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

>> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

>> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

>> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

>> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

>> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

>> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>>

>> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

>> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

>> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

>> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

>> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

>> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

>> without making any kind of resistance?

 

 

===================================================================

>They went to their deaths like Jews....

>

>Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

>program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

>

>Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

>gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

>effect.

>

>

>--Tim May

 

That, Tim May, is historically inaccurate, and you know it. Now you

border on lying to further your agenda. The Jews in the Warsaw ghetto

had all been disarmed by the Nazis before they were forced to comply

at gunpoint.

 

Stop lying.

 

I'm losing more and more respect for you every time you LIE.

 

Lg

Guest EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com
Posted

In misc.survivalism Roger <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Jesus was a Jew.

 

And he taught, in the Sermon on the Mount, to turn the other cheek, and

offer it to one's attacker.

 

Maybe there were a bunch of Christians in the room, eager to be good

followers of Jesus?

 

 

 

 

 

> "Tim May" <timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote in message

> news:200420072336495171%timcmay@removethis.got.net...

> > In article <1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Luc

> > <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

> >

> >> --forwarded post--

> >>

> >>

> >> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> >> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> >> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> >> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> >> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> >> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> >> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

> >>

> >> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> >> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> >> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> >> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> >> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> >> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> >> without making any kind of resistance?

> >

> > They went to their deaths like Jews....

> >

> > Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

> > program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

> >

> > Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

> > gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

> > effect.

> >

> >

> > --Tim May

 

 

 

--

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so

certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.

-- Bertrand Russel

Guest skullcrusher7@yahoo.com
Posted

On Apr 20, 11:36 pm, Tim May <timc...@removethis.got.net> wrote:

> In article <1177136452.388185.134...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Luc

>

> <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

> > --forwarded post--

>

> > >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> > a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> > powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> > left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> > another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> > reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> > six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> > Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> > room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> > shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> > by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> > substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> > in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> > without making any kind of resistance?

>

> They went to their deaths like Jews....

>

> Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

> program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

 

Despite being systematically terrorized by brainless nazi thugs in the

30s, the Jews and others simply could not imagine something as

monsterous and perverted as Auschwitz.

 

Today, of course, we know that Nazis are sick individuals...but people

simply could not grasp that before it happened.

> Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

> gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

> effect.

>

> --Tim May-

 

Jewish education? Try Christian. The victims were just normal, mostly

decent, people who could not fathom what was happening to them.

 

Balin

Guest Too_Many_Tools
Posted

On Apr 21, 1:20 am, Luc <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

> --forwarded post--

>

> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

>

> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> without making any kind of resistance?

>

> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

> it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

> in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

> going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

> doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

> just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

> kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

> personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

> even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

> prevent these occassional incidents.

>

> If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

> on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

> allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

> all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

> along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

> tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

> those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

> which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

> denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

> in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

> to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

> others.

>

> That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

> themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

> the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

> the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

> Judaification of society.

 

Yeah...it must suck to you.

 

Funny how you forgot to mention that one of the dead professors who

barricaded the door to the classroom with his body was a Jew...a

survivor from the camps.

 

His sacrifice saved over a dozen kids.

 

And he died on international day for rememberance of the Nazi camps.

>From what I have read so far, anybody in the line of fire did

everything they could to live...or for someone else to live.

>

> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

> it has no greater relevance.

 

Any SOB who thinks this needs to look down a barrel of a loaded gun

for an adjustment in their thinking...there is never a minor incident

when it comes to a needless and senseless death.

 

In my corner of the world, I am going to make it VERY

RELEVANT....meanwhile you can go back and crawl under the rock you

came from.

 

TMT

Guest Too_Many_Tools
Posted

On Apr 21, 10:22 am, skullcrush...@yahoo.com wrote:

> On Apr 20, 11:36 pm, Tim May <timc...@removethis.got.net> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > In article <1177136452.388185.134...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Luc

>

> > <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

> > > --forwarded post--

>

> > > >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> > > a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> > > powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> > > left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> > > another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> > > reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> > > six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> > > Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> > > room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> > > shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> > > by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> > > substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> > > in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> > > without making any kind of resistance?

>

> > They went to their deaths like Jews....

>

> > Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

> > program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

>

> Despite being systematically terrorized by brainless nazi thugs in the

> 30s, the Jews and others simply could not imagine something as

> monsterous and perverted as Auschwitz.

>

> Today, of course, we know that Nazis are sick individuals...but people

> simply could not grasp that before it happened.

>

> > Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

> > gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

> > effect.

>

> > --Tim May-

>

> Jewish education? Try Christian. The victims were just normal, mostly

> decent, people who could not fathom what was happening to them.

>

> Balin- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

>

> Today, of course, we know that Nazis are sick individuals...but people

> simply could not grasp that before it happened.

>

 

Don't kid yourself....the Nazis were recognized as sick as it

happened.

 

Anyone who preaches hate as their doctrine is just as bad.

 

TMT

Guest Robert Sturgeon
Posted

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:01:08 -0700, nobody@nowheres.com

(the_blogologist) wrote:

>Luc <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

>

>> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

>> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

>> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on...

>

>If someone had pulled out a gun and shot him, you could expect that

>person to be prosicuted to the fullest extent of the law.

>

>I remember a case a few years back where a bear had attacked several

>people at a recreational area. It killed about 4 or 5 people before

>someone pulled out a gun and shot it dead. However, that gun possession

>happened to be illegal. The shooter (who just saved a few lives) was

>promptly arrested for a felony, convicted and sent to prison. Moral of

>the story: don't try to save someone's life if you have to break the law

>(or expose your crime) to do it.

 

The way I figure it is: "society" doesn't want me to use a

gun to protect anyone else, and if I do, they might put me

in prison. So I WILL use a gun to protect myself, my

family, my (close) friends. But strangers, or mere

acquaintenances? If they expect me to risk prison time for

them, they'd better get the damned politicians to change the

laws instead. If I'm somewhere, carrying a concealed weapon

(without a permit), and a gunman starts shooting OTHER

people, but not me or any of the above short list of people,

then -- too bad, but you people chose that when you voted

for those asshole anti-gun politicians, and now you're

getting the inevitable result. I'm leaving the area...

while I still can without the police searching ME.

 

--

Robert Sturgeon

Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.

http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/

Guest gaffo
Posted

XTS wrote:

>

> "Luc" <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote in message

> news:1177136452.388185.134240@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> > --forwarded post--

> >

> >

> > > From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol

> > > and

> > a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not

> > high powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people,

> > then left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom

> > with another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot

> > them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably

> > five to six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

> >

> > Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> > room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop,

> > reload, shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty

> > people were shot by one man with a pistol without a single one of

> > them making any substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What

> > kind of sheep live in our society who would allow someone to shoot

> > them and sixty others without making any kind of resistance?

> >

> > The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a

> > shooting, it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are

> > inevitable in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally,

> > there are going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically

> > motivated; he doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment

> > on society; he just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of

> > people over it. This kind of garbage happens all the time and is

> > just part of the human personality, though this is an extreme

> > manifestation of it. Unlike even a flood or a hurricane, there is

> > nothing that can be done to prevent these occassional incidents.

> >

> > If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a

> > comment on how weak-willed people in our society have become that

> > they would allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our

> > brains full of all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't

> > resist, have to go along, accept multi- culturalism, accept

> > immigration, being loving, be tolerant, et cetera, the people of

> > our society -- and particularly those who are groomed for the

> > privileged layers of the working class, which is what all

> > higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and denied any

> > sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking in

> > courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

> > to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

> > others.

> >

> > That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people

> > allowed themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me

> > almost more than the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho

> > are inevitable, but the lack of courage needed to face them is a

> > unique product of the Judaification of society.

> >

>

> Well, why dont you put some perspective on it.

> I wonder if you believe the official story about what happenned on

> 9-11-2001. If you do, you believe that a few guys with box cutters

> hijacked jet liners and turned them into missles.

 

 

 

 

 

they went along with it because they thought it was a hijacking!

 

the LAST plane was fought over by the passengers AFTER they learned the

others planes were NOT being hijacked but being used as missiles.

 

so the poster does have a point.

 

AND remember what happened to Baruch Goldstein when he tried the SAME

STUNT (only with an AK-47!!!!!!!!!!!! not ow hand pistals).

 

the poster has a valid point here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You would believe

> that the passengers were so afraid of being cut by a box cutter, that

> they allowed the guys with these box cutters to fly the jets into

> buildings, killing them all. Now, givin that, it's no stretch of the

> imagination to see that college students were frozen in their tracks

> as this crazy man opened fire on them with highly lethal weapons...

 

 

 

 

 

see above.

 

 

Goldstein, planes not known to become missiles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

> You said this in your post about the guys weapons..."Those are not

> high

> > powered, high-capacity magazine weapons..."

>

> Now, that would be very easy for you to say since you were not

> staring the the barrels of what you seem to think were innocuous

> weapons, but were capable of killing 32 people and wounding more. My

> last comment to you is in the form of a question...

>

> Do you ever touch down in reality, or do you stay in some altered

> state, where loaded guns in both hands of a maniac are not a threat,

> even though they are wiping out everyone around you? No answer is

> required. Your ludicrous post says it all.

 

 

 

 

Goldstein had more powerful weaponry.

 

poster has a point here.

 

 

 

--

Guest gaffo
Posted

the_blogologist wrote:

> Luc <zx034blast56@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

>

> > Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> > room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop,

> > reload, shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on...

>

> If someone had pulled out a gun and shot him, you could expect that

> person to be prosicuted to the fullest extent of the law.

>

> I remember a case a few years back where a bear had attacked several

> people at a recreational area. It killed about 4 or 5 people before

> someone pulled out a gun and shot it dead. However, that gun

> possession happened to be illegal. The shooter (who just saved a few

> lives) was promptly arrested for a felony, convicted and sent to

> prison. Moral of the story: don't try to save someone's life if you

> have to break the law (or expose your crime) to do it.

 

 

 

 

 

so the moral is that a human life is less valuable than being arrested.

 

I'll remember that the next time I might have to break a law to save a

life.

 

thanks for the tip.

--

Guest stuart.grey@comcast.net
Posted

Luc wrote:

> --forwarded post--

>

>

>>From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>

> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

> without making any kind of resistance?

>

> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

> it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

> in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

> going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

> doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

> just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

> kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

> personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

> even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

> prevent these occassional incidents.

>

> If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

> on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

> allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

> all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

> along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

> tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

> those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

> which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

> denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

> in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

> to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

> others.

>

> That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

> themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

> the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

> the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

> Judaification of society.

 

I think you suffer from 20/20 hindsight, and a lack of understanding

about human nature.

 

Sure, looking back on it, a group rush would have saved many lives.

 

People, however, don't think as groups, they think as individuals. The

first person to try to rush him almost certainly will die; this may even

have happened, I don't know. Upon seeing that failure, many others may

have decided that their best survival chance was to do what the gunman

said.

 

There is also the "herd mentality", to do what everyone else was doing.

In retrospect, that got a lot of them killed.

 

Most people have never been in a situation where a murderer was in the

process of mass murder, and don't know what to do. Doing what everyone

else is doing would then seem a good choice. Of course, it wasn't. But

there is a certain (il)logic to doing what the guy with the gun demands:

perhaps he won't kill you if you comply? Why tell you what to do if he

was going to kill you? You don't want to do what he says because it

makes it easier to kill you, of course, but most people are afflicted

with this thing called "hope" and "fear", and don't want to see it that

way. Most people are incapable of accepting an ugly truth at all, and

even less so when under pressure.

Guest stuart.grey@comcast.net
Posted

Tim May wrote:

>

> They went to their deaths like Jews....

 

Did the Jews believe they were going to their deaths? I doubt the

Germans said they were being said to death camps. I believe they were

talking relocation.

 

> Except for the Warsaw Uprising, the only resistance to the "relocation"

> program, Jews were sheeplike in their obedience to orders.

>

> Sixty years' worth of Jewish educational policies in the U.S., Jewish

> gun confiscation, Jewish values....all of this has had the predictable

> effect.

 

Many Jews, and Catholics for that matter, are socialist/communist.

 

It is the socialist & communist who are the problem, not Jews (or

Catholics) per se. Many Jews and Catholics are outstandingly good

citizens who are more of our culture rather than the Jewish culture.

 

I'd rather that people be specific, rather than using sloppy

classifications.

 

Hitler was anti-Communist. He also noticed that many Jews were high up

in the communist machine, but he also knew that many non-Jewish Germans

were communist, and many was a good chunk of the population. An argument

could be made that he used the Jews as a propaganda ploy: by blaming the

Jews, he allowed the German communist to become non-communist. I think

he said something like that in Mein Kampf; something like he wanted to

covert the Germans (from communism) but expel the Jews. His basic

argument was, after all, "look how the Jews have fooled you" when he

could have been more specific (but more adversarial) in saying "look at

how the communist have fooled you".

Guest Omnipotent
Posted

Too_Many_Tools wrote:

> On Apr 21, 1:20 am, Luc <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:

>> --forwarded post--

>>

>> >From what I gather, this Korean nutball took a .22 caliber pistol and

>>

>> a 9 mm pistol to Virignia Tech and began shooting. Those are not high

>> powered, high-capacity magazine weapons. He shot two people, then

>> left, came back, and opened fire. He was locked in a classroom with

>> another sixty people who could not get out, and thus he shot them,

>> reloaded, shot them, reloaded, shot them, reloaded, probably five to

>> six times before he ran low on ammo and killed himself.

>>

>> Think about that. What group of people allows a gunman locked in a

>> room with them to shoot them, stop, reload, shoot them, stop, reload,

>> shoot them, stop, reload, and on and on and on. Sixty people were shot

>> by one man with a pistol without a single one of them making any

>> substantial resistance. Isn't this noteworthy? What kind of sheep live

>> in our society who would allow someone to shoot them and sixty others

>> without making any kind of resistance?

>>

>> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

>> it has no greater relevance. Mentally ill individuals are inevitable

>> in a society with 300 million people, and occassionally, there are

>> going to be mass murders. This guy wasn't politically motivated; he

>> doesn't seem to have been making any greater comment on society; he

>> just got angry about a girl and killed a lot of people over it. This

>> kind of garbage happens all the time and is just part of the human

>> personality, though this is an extreme manifestation of it. Unlike

>> even a flood or a hurricane, there is nothing that can be done to

>> prevent these occassional incidents.

>>

>> If there is any greater message to be taken from this, it is a comment

>> on how weak-willed people in our society have become that they would

>> allow one man with a pistol to massacre them. With our brains full of

>> all this garbage about how we can't fight, can't resist, have to go

>> along, accept multi- culturalism, accept immigration, being loving, be

>> tolerant, et cetera, the people of our society -- and particularly

>> those who are groomed for the privileged layers of the working class,

>> which is what all higher-salary workers are -- have been neutered and

>> denied any sense of transcendence -- and thus are completely lacking

>> in courage. They'd rather cringe under a desk and hope against reason

>> to live than stand up and fight and lose their lives protecting

>> others.

>>

>> That's the lesson of Virginia Tech. The fact that sixty people allowed

>> themselves to be victimized by one gunman disgusts me almost more than

>> the fact a gunman existed. Sick people like Cho are inevitable, but

>> the lack of courage needed to face them is a unique product of the

>> Judaification of society.

>

> Yeah...it must suck to you.

>

> Funny how you forgot to mention that one of the dead professors who

> barricaded the door to the classroom with his body was a Jew...a

> survivor from the camps.

>

> His sacrifice saved over a dozen kids.

>

> And he died on international day for rememberance of the Nazi camps.

>

>>From what I have read so far, anybody in the line of fire did

> everything they could to live...or for someone else to live.

>

>> The Virginia Tech shooting is a minor incident because, as a shooting,

>> it has no greater relevance.

>

> Any SOB who thinks this needs to look down a barrel of a loaded gun

> for an adjustment in their thinking...there is never a minor incident

> when it comes to a needless and senseless death.

>

> In my corner of the world, I am going to make it VERY

> RELEVANT....meanwhile you can go back and crawl under the rock you

> came from.

>

> TMT

>

 

Your right, if all the people in the room would have charged the nut he

wouldn't have reloaded the first time.

Guest Notan
Posted

Omnipotent wrote:

 

<snip>

> Your right, if all the people in the room would have charged the nut he

> wouldn't have reloaded the first time.

 

What was the distance between Cho and those in the classroom?

 

If it was anything more than 10-15 feet, with practice (and I'm sure he did)

he'd have no problem loading a new magazine.

 

Also remember that those in the classroom weren't ready for the events that

followed... He was.

 

--

Notan

Guest Omnipotent
Posted

Notan wrote:

> Omnipotent wrote:

>

> <snip>

>

>> Your right, if all the people in the room would have charged the nut

>> he wouldn't have reloaded the first time.

>

> What was the distance between Cho and those in the classroom?

>

> If it was anything more than 10-15 feet, with practice (and I'm sure he

> did)

> he'd have no problem loading a new magazine.

>

> Also remember that those in the classroom weren't ready for the events that

> followed... He was.

>

 

 

They should have charged him while he was shooting. Somebody would have

tackled him before he needed to reload. If young people can't cover 15

to 20 feet in a few seconds they are in serious need of physical

conditioning.

Guest Notan
Posted

Omnipotent wrote:

> Notan wrote:

>> Omnipotent wrote:

>>

>> <snip>

>>

>>> Your right, if all the people in the room would have charged the nut

>>> he wouldn't have reloaded the first time.

>>

>> What was the distance between Cho and those in the classroom?

>>

>> If it was anything more than 10-15 feet, with practice (and I'm sure

>> he did)

>> he'd have no problem loading a new magazine.

>>

>> Also remember that those in the classroom weren't ready for the events

>> that

>> followed... He was.

>>

>

>

> They should have charged him while he was shooting. Somebody would have

> tackled him before he needed to reload. If young people can't cover 15

> to 20 feet in a few seconds they are in serious need of physical

> conditioning.

 

Easy to say, after the fact, from behind the security of a computer.

 

--

Notan

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...