Guest Sean Monaghan Posted April 27, 2007 Posted April 27, 2007 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:09:18 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <spunky@databasix.com> wrote: [...] > The real question, I suppose is whether Mike can be trained by both > Bookman and Deco: > > http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=cranston > > I don't know the answer. http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=lysaght -- Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk COOSN-266-06-58907; Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award, Winning Trainer Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards - March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007 [Co-] Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Quote
Guest Lionel Posted April 27, 2007 Posted April 27, 2007 On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:42:46 +0000, Sean Monaghan <sean@alcatroll.com> wrote: >On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:09:18 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" ><spunky@databasix.com> wrote: > >[...] > >> The real question, I suppose is whether Mike can be trained by both >> Bookman and Deco: >> >> http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=cranston >> >> I don't know the answer. > >http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=lysaght W00t! Poodle-fucker is the pwnededist! -- W "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them." . | ,. w , \|/ \|/ Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- Quote
Guest Rhonda Lea Kirk Posted April 27, 2007 Posted April 27, 2007 "Sean Monaghan" <sean@alcatroll.com> wrote in message news:njv233tjcokr0p16reu2sn12pcol2830g4@news.club127.net > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:09:18 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" > <spunky@databasix.com> wrote: > > [...] > >> The real question, I suppose is whether Mike can be trained by both >> Bookman and Deco: >> >> http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=cranston >> >> I don't know the answer. > > http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=lysaght Thanks. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant, as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle Quote
Guest Crash Street Kidd Posted April 27, 2007 Posted April 27, 2007 On Apr 26, 3:09 pm, miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fagboi in a Leather Corset: > > > > > > >Crash Street Kidd: > >>Art Deco, moron, wrote: > >>> Crash Street Kidd wrote: > >>> >As I mentioned previously everyone is not scared of me in real life. > >>> >The > >>> >blue eyed beauty has attacked me on a number of occasions and > >>> >the worst I have done is block her punches and kicks. She hits harder > >>> >than most of the guys I know. She studied Tae Kwon Do. > >>> >One anonymous poster remarked that I sounded like a "stealth" > >>> >alpha male which is what I suppose I am. I have nothing to prove > >>> >so I don't go looking for fights. Sometimes you have to fight when > >>> >the opposition gives you no choice by threatening someone near > >>> >and dear to you like the blue eyed beauty. > > >>> Maybe you should also post about you stratospheric IQ. > > >>I find that people who bring the discussion of IQ into the picture > >>as you just did are invariably stupid. HTH. > > >Funny, I've always felt the same way about dropkicks who talk about > >their muscles on Usenet. It's kind of like steroid & HGH abusing body > >builders trying to discuss chess strategies or programming algorithms > >during a weights session. > > If Crash beats you at chess will you remove yourself from usenet > altogether?- Hide quoted text - Is it okay if play the game drunk and blindfolded? Crash Street Kidd > > - Show quoted text - Quote
Guest Crash Street Kidd Posted April 27, 2007 Posted April 27, 2007 On Apr 26, 3:43 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <spu...@databasix.com> wrote: > "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message > > news:f0qtin$t30$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com > > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:09:19 -0700, miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Fagboi in a Leather Corset: > >>> Crash Street Kidd: > >>>> Art Deco, moron, wrote: > >>>>> Crash Street Kidd wrote: > > >>>>>> As I mentioned previously everyone is not scared of me in real > >>>>>> life. The > >>>>>> blue eyed beauty has attacked me on a number of occasions and > >>>>>> the worst I have done is block her punches and kicks. She hits > >>>>>> harder than most of the guys I know. She studied Tae Kwon Do. > > >>>>>> One anonymous poster remarked that I sounded like a "stealth" > >>>>>> alpha male which is what I suppose I am. I have nothing to prove > >>>>>> so I don't go looking for fights. Sometimes you have to fight > >>>>>> when the opposition gives you no choice by threatening someone > >>>>>> near > >>>>>> and dear to you like the blue eyed beauty. > > >>>>> Maybe you should also post about you stratospheric IQ. > > >>>> I find that people who bring the discussion of IQ into the picture > >>>> as you just did are invariably stupid. HTH. > > >>> Funny, I've always felt the same way about dropkicks who talk about > >>> their muscles on Usenet. It's kind of like steroid & HGH abusing > >>> body builders trying to discuss chess strategies or programming > >>> algorithms during a weights session. > > >> If Crash beats you at chess will you remove yourself from usenet > >> altogether? > > > No, I don't even like chess. > > Oddly enough, I don't find that at all surprising. It does take some intellectual capacity to play properly. I haven't played that much lately. I think the last time might have been when I played two blindfold games simultaneously against weak opposition while drinking large quantities of alcohol. I won both games. (And Loonel no my opponents weren't blindfolded.) Crash Street Kidd, Canadian Chess Master, USCF National Master title 12,342nd greatest FIDE chess player of ALL Time... It says so right on the Internet. > > -- > Rhonda Lea Kirk > > Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant, > as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there > are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Quote
Guest DaRkAnGeL Posted April 28, 2007 Posted April 28, 2007 On 2007-04-26 19:12:58 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> said: > miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> Thou dumb innocent. Thou gnawing animal. Ye > muddled: > >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:53 -0600, Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@databasix.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message >>>> news:260420071440500821%erfc@caballista.org > >>>>> Was that supposed to be an insult? >>>> >>>> Do you play chess? >>> >>> Did OJ Simpson slash his wife? >> >> Do you believe in America? >> Do you believe in Justice? >> Do you believe in the Constitution of the United States? >> Do you believe in the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY? >> >> I do. >> >> The jury said it. >> I believe it. >> That settles it. >> >> NOT GUILTY. >> >> When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito Burrito that >> OJ Simpson was "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," did the stupid >> prosecutors listen? No, they didn't. They persecuted a 100% NOT GUILTY >> man and kept him from hunting for the real killers. >> >> Now the trail has gone cold. >> >> So, Deco, you must believe in prosecuting the 100% NOT GUILTY because >> you're some kind of idiot, huh? > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very nice trigger. lmao - brilliant - Art asks a 6 word > question and the frothing loon froths on command, as implicitly foretold > with the recent words "Are you going to rant about OJ Simpson next", and as > stated directly 14 days ago, by Art himself, 'Pssst -- crasston will defend > OJ Simpson to his dying breath." > > For this worthy on cue frothing the likes of which I've only ever seen > Pamela K Russell perform over Michael Jackson, I hereby nominate Michael > "miguel" Cranston for the Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" k0oK > Award, trained and owned by Art Deco. > > Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award > Named in honour of the skilful dog-trainer who became a British TV > personality in the 1980s, this award is given jointly to the best trained > net.kook in any given month and to his or her trainer. Possible examples of > good training include obedience to one's owner's commands to reply to posts, > and devotion in following one's owner around from group to group and through > the Google archive. House-training, which, regrettably, is a rare > accomplishment for a kook, isn't a prerequisite. Woof. > > Do I hear seconds? Heartily and exuberantly seconded. That is, if I'm allowed to vote .... :^) -- --- DarkAngel "Making the world a little bit darker, one life at a time, since 1975!" Quote
Guest Kadaitcha Man Posted April 28, 2007 Posted April 28, 2007 DaRkAnGeL <chaos@whydontyouFOAD.net> Thou giant traitor. Thou hilding foe. Ye bubbled: > On 2007-04-26 19:12:58 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> > said: >> miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> Thou dumb innocent. Thou gnawing animal. Ye >> muddled: >> >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:53 -0600, Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@databasix.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message >>>>> news:260420071440500821%erfc@caballista.org >> >>>>>> Was that supposed to be an insult? >>>>> >>>>> Do you play chess? >>>> >>>> Did OJ Simpson slash his wife? >>> >>> Do you believe in America? >>> Do you believe in Justice? >>> Do you believe in the Constitution of the United States? >>> Do you believe in the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY? >>> >>> I do. >>> >>> The jury said it. >>> I believe it. >>> That settles it. >>> >>> NOT GUILTY. >>> >>> When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito Burrito >>> that OJ Simpson was "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," did the stupid >>> prosecutors listen? No, they didn't. They persecuted a 100% NOT >>> GUILTY man and kept him from hunting for the real killers. >>> >>> Now the trail has gone cold. >>> >>> So, Deco, you must believe in prosecuting the 100% NOT GUILTY >>> because you're some kind of idiot, huh? >> >> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very nice trigger. lmao - brilliant - Art asks a >> 6 word question and the frothing loon froths on command, as >> implicitly foretold with the recent words "Are you going to rant >> about OJ Simpson next", and as stated directly 14 days ago, by Art >> himself, 'Pssst -- crasston will defend OJ Simpson to his dying >> breath." For this worthy on cue frothing the likes of which I've only >> ever >> seen Pamela K Russell perform over Michael Jackson, I hereby >> nominate Michael "miguel" Cranston for the Barbara Woodhouse >> Memorial "Dog Whistle" k0oK Award, trained and owned by Art Deco. >> >> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award >> Named in honour of the skilful dog-trainer who became a British TV >> personality in the 1980s, this award is given jointly to the best >> trained net.kook in any given month and to his or her trainer. >> Possible examples of good training include obedience to one's >> owner's commands to reply to posts, and devotion in following one's >> owner around from group to group and through the Google archive. >> House-training, which, regrettably, is a rare accomplishment for a >> kook, isn't a prerequisite. Woof. Do I hear seconds? > > Heartily and exuberantly seconded. > That is, if I'm allowed to vote .... The only ones that can't vote, nominate or second are socks and official kooks. > :^) -- alt.usenet.kooks "We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us." Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129] Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007. Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660 Usenet Ruiner Lits Top Assholes on the Net Lits Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits "Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up." AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org Jij alpine alledaagse strontstomper. Quote
Guest DaRkAnGeL Posted April 28, 2007 Posted April 28, 2007 On 2007-04-27 23:51:31 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> said: > DaRkAnGeL <chaos@whydontyouFOAD.net> Thou giant traitor. Thou hilding > foe. Ye bubbled: > >> On 2007-04-26 19:12:58 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> >> said: >>> miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> Thou dumb innocent. Thou gnawing animal. Ye >>> muddled: >>> >>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:53 -0600, Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@databasix.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message >>>>>> news:260420071440500821%erfc@caballista.org >>> >>>>>>> Was that supposed to be an insult? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you play chess? >>>>> >>>>> Did OJ Simpson slash his wife? >>>> >>>> Do you believe in America? >>>> Do you believe in Justice? >>>> Do you believe in the Constitution of the United States? >>>> Do you believe in the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY? >>>> >>>> I do. >>>> >>>> The jury said it. >>>> I believe it. >>>> That settles it. >>>> >>>> NOT GUILTY. >>>> >>>> When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito Burrito >>>> that OJ Simpson was "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," did the stupid >>>> prosecutors listen? No, they didn't. They persecuted a 100% NOT >>>> GUILTY man and kept him from hunting for the real killers. >>>> >>>> Now the trail has gone cold. >>>> >>>> So, Deco, you must believe in prosecuting the 100% NOT GUILTY >>>> because you're some kind of idiot, huh? >>> >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very nice trigger. lmao - brilliant - Art asks a >>> 6 word question and the frothing loon froths on command, as >>> implicitly foretold with the recent words "Are you going to rant >>> about OJ Simpson next", and as stated directly 14 days ago, by Art >>> himself, 'Pssst -- crasston will defend OJ Simpson to his dying >>> breath." For this worthy on cue frothing the likes of which I've only >>> ever >>> seen Pamela K Russell perform over Michael Jackson, I hereby >>> nominate Michael "miguel" Cranston for the Barbara Woodhouse >>> Memorial "Dog Whistle" k0oK Award, trained and owned by Art Deco. >>> >>> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award >>> Named in honour of the skilful dog-trainer who became a British TV >>> personality in the 1980s, this award is given jointly to the best >>> trained net.kook in any given month and to his or her trainer. >>> Possible examples of good training include obedience to one's >>> owner's commands to reply to posts, and devotion in following one's >>> owner around from group to group and through the Google archive. >>> House-training, which, regrettably, is a rare accomplishment for a >>> kook, isn't a prerequisite. Woof. Do I hear seconds? >> >> Heartily and exuberantly seconded. > > > >> That is, if I'm allowed to vote .... > > The only ones that can't vote, nominate or second are socks and official > kooks. > >> :^) I think I'm more of a fish-net stocking, really. ;^) Oh ... that's not what you meant. Damn. :^) -- --- DarkAngel "Making the world a little bit darker, one life at a time, since 1975!" Quote
Guest Kadaitcha Man Posted April 28, 2007 Posted April 28, 2007 DaRkAnGeL <chaos@whydontyouFOAD.net> Thou recreant and most degenerate traitor. Thou art a traitor, false to thy gods, thy brother and thy father. Ye writhed: > On 2007-04-27 23:51:31 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> > said: >> DaRkAnGeL <chaos@whydontyouFOAD.net> Thou giant traitor. Thou hilding >> foe. Ye bubbled: >> >>> On 2007-04-26 19:12:58 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> >>> said: >>>> miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> Thou dumb innocent. Thou gnawing animal. >>>> Ye muddled: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:53 -0600, Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@databasix.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:260420071440500821%erfc@caballista.org >>>> >>>>>>>> Was that supposed to be an insult? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you play chess? >>>>>> >>>>>> Did OJ Simpson slash his wife? >>>>> >>>>> Do you believe in America? >>>>> Do you believe in Justice? >>>>> Do you believe in the Constitution of the United States? >>>>> Do you believe in the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY? >>>>> >>>>> I do. >>>>> >>>>> The jury said it. >>>>> I believe it. >>>>> That settles it. >>>>> >>>>> NOT GUILTY. >>>>> >>>>> When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito Burrito >>>>> that OJ Simpson was "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," did the stupid >>>>> prosecutors listen? No, they didn't. They persecuted a 100% NOT >>>>> GUILTY man and kept him from hunting for the real killers. >>>>> >>>>> Now the trail has gone cold. >>>>> >>>>> So, Deco, you must believe in prosecuting the 100% NOT GUILTY >>>>> because you're some kind of idiot, huh? >>>> >>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very nice trigger. lmao - brilliant - Art asks a >>>> 6 word question and the frothing loon froths on command, as >>>> implicitly foretold with the recent words "Are you going to rant >>>> about OJ Simpson next", and as stated directly 14 days ago, by Art >>>> himself, 'Pssst -- crasston will defend OJ Simpson to his dying >>>> breath." For this worthy on cue frothing the likes of which I've >>>> only ever >>>> seen Pamela K Russell perform over Michael Jackson, I hereby >>>> nominate Michael "miguel" Cranston for the Barbara Woodhouse >>>> Memorial "Dog Whistle" k0oK Award, trained and owned by Art Deco. >>>> >>>> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award >>>> Named in honour of the skilful dog-trainer who became a British TV >>>> personality in the 1980s, this award is given jointly to the best >>>> trained net.kook in any given month and to his or her trainer. >>>> Possible examples of good training include obedience to one's >>>> owner's commands to reply to posts, and devotion in following one's >>>> owner around from group to group and through the Google archive. >>>> House-training, which, regrettably, is a rare accomplishment for a >>>> kook, isn't a prerequisite. Woof. Do I hear seconds? >>> >>> Heartily and exuberantly seconded. >> >> >> >>> That is, if I'm allowed to vote .... >> >> The only ones that can't vote, nominate or second are socks and >> official kooks. >> >>> :^) > > I think I'm more of a fish-net stocking, really. ;^) With garters? <salivate> > Oh ... that's not what you meant. It is now. > Damn. > :^) -- alt.usenet.kooks "We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us." Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129] Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007. Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660 Usenet Ruiner Lits Top Assholes on the Net Lits Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits "Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up." AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een homopathische afgeslachte poep. Quote
Guest Lionel Posted April 28, 2007 Posted April 28, 2007 On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:44:14 -0500, DaRkAnGeL <chaos@whydontyouFOAD.net> wrote: >On 2007-04-26 19:12:58 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> said: > >> miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> Thou dumb innocent. Thou gnawing animal. Ye >> muddled: >> >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:53 -0600, Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@databasix.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message >>>>> news:260420071440500821%erfc@caballista.org >> >>>>>> Was that supposed to be an insult? >>>>> >>>>> Do you play chess? >>>> >>>> Did OJ Simpson slash his wife? >>> >>> Do you believe in America? >>> Do you believe in Justice? >>> Do you believe in the Constitution of the United States? >>> Do you believe in the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY? >>> >>> I do. >>> >>> The jury said it. >>> I believe it. >>> That settles it. >>> >>> NOT GUILTY. >>> >>> When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito Burrito that >>> OJ Simpson was "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," did the stupid >>> prosecutors listen? No, they didn't. They persecuted a 100% NOT GUILTY >>> man and kept him from hunting for the real killers. >>> >>> Now the trail has gone cold. >>> >>> So, Deco, you must believe in prosecuting the 100% NOT GUILTY because >>> you're some kind of idiot, huh? >> >> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very nice trigger. lmao - brilliant - Art asks a 6 word >> question and the frothing loon froths on command, as implicitly foretold >> with the recent words "Are you going to rant about OJ Simpson next", and as >> stated directly 14 days ago, by Art himself, 'Pssst -- crasston will defend >> OJ Simpson to his dying breath." >> >> For this worthy on cue frothing the likes of which I've only ever seen >> Pamela K Russell perform over Michael Jackson, I hereby nominate Michael >> "miguel" Cranston for the Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" k0oK >> Award, trained and owned by Art Deco. >> >> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award >> Named in honour of the skilful dog-trainer who became a British TV >> personality in the 1980s, this award is given jointly to the best trained >> net.kook in any given month and to his or her trainer. Possible examples of >> good training include obedience to one's owner's commands to reply to posts, >> and devotion in following one's owner around from group to group and through >> the Google archive. House-training, which, regrettably, is a rare >> accomplishment for a kook, isn't a prerequisite. Woof. >> >> Do I hear seconds? > >Heartily and exuberantly seconded. >That is, if I'm allowed to vote .... You certainly are. And this nom is ofishully THIRDED with extreme prejudice & snickering. -- W "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them." . | ,. w , \|/ \|/ Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.