angie Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 And weren't white people the ones with the lovely sailboats ya'll were passengers on? ...>10<... Quote http://www.darwinawards.com/ http://www.snopes.com http://www.breakthechain.org STOP THE SPAM!! Click Me You Know You Want To
Skaterdude409 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 funny how blacks also aranged most of those sail boat tickets for other blacks Quote
Quarky1.0 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Im not sure the type of tests the data was based off of but im sure if you checked the sources at the bottom of the page you could find out. Most of the test results come from the US government, so I do not question there findings, however IQ can be directly linked to the conditions you live in, if you come from a poor and under developed socio ecenomic background, then it is likly you're iq will be lower, because you have not had the privilage of education which is the key in the development of iq and like it or not, the lowest socio ecenomic community in the USA is the black community, thus, there over all iq scores will be lower. As far as the genetics of race go, there are now a number of researches who have been working on this for some time, there are slight differences between the races, around 0.5%. The latest theory of how and why the different ethnic groups developed on earth is simple, climate. In africa dark skin is more enviromentally delevant, because the dispersal of melanin in the skin tissue lowers the risk of skin damage, thus we have the evolutionary develpment of the black genome. As the human race moved out across the earth, and moved north, we have the development of the white genome, which has clumped melanin, lighter hair and blue eyes, which all developed to cope with a colder climate. The asian genome was orginally an off shoot of the white genome. In short and this will offend the narrow minded, humanity started out black, that is why the black genome is a recessive dominant gene, which means if a white woman marries a black man, each of her children will carry the gene, and even after sucessive generations the gene remains, thus after a number of generations a dark skinned, black haired, dark eyes baby can be born to two white parents. Quote
fullauto Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Most of the test results come from the US government' date=' so I do not question there findings, however IQ can be directly linked to the conditions you live in, if you come from a poor and under developed socio ecenomic background, then it is likly you're iq will be lower, because you have not had the privilage of education which is the key in the development of iq and like it or not, the lowest socio ecenomic community in the USA is the black community, thus, there over all iq scores will be lower.[/quote'] Do you think it possible that the reason those areas are poor and undeveloped is because it riddled with people with Low IQs? Europeans have less than half the growing season that africa does, yet we have 5 times as much food... That has to say something... I think you maybe blaming everyone else but the culprit for thier problems... Let's face it, you may just be experiencing a programmed knee-jerk reaction... As far as the genetics of race go' date=' there are now a number of researches who have been working on this for some time, there are slight differences between the races, around 0.5%. The latest theory of how and why the different ethnic groups developed on earth is simple, climate. In africa dark skin is more enviromentally delevant, because the dispersal of melanin in the skin tissue lowers the risk of skin damage, thus we have the evolutionary develpment of the black genome.[/quote'] Skin colour are NOT the only differences... Christ, does anyone bother to read what I post anymore?! Go up and read SOME of Phillip J Rushton's Work... As the human race moved out across the earth' date=' and moved north, we have the development of the white genome, which has clumped melanin, lighter hair and blue eyes, which all developed to cope with a colder climate. The asian genome was orginally an off shoot of the white genome. In short and this will offend the narrow minded, humanity started out black, that is why the black genome is a recessive dominant gene, which means if a white woman marries a black man, each of her children will carry the gene, and even after sucessive generations the gene remains, thus after a number of generations a dark skinned, black haired, dark eyes baby can be born to two white parents.[/quote'] and also, as man moved up North, it got harder and harder to survive... As a result, the smarter men passed on thier genes as a result of being able to better cope with life's little troubles, and the result was a white population that is a bit smarter than those we left behind, both geographically and genetically... Read the Section in Rushtons book about r-k factor... Tell me this man is not spot on... Quote Liberals... Saving the world one semester at a time "I'm not a racist... I'm a realist! And if you don't know the difference, You're an Idiot!" -- Fullauto Present - 1. (Noun) The point that divides disappointment from hope
Skaterdude409 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Blacks have made no significant inventions or pioneered anything in science or other subjects. if they all magicly were done, we would hardly miss them Quote
fullauto Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Blacks have made no significant inventions or pioneered anything in science or other subjects. if they all magicly were done, we would hardly miss them Vote for me! Supreme Chancellor of The World 0 2008 ! Quote Liberals... Saving the world one semester at a time "I'm not a racist... I'm a realist! And if you don't know the difference, You're an Idiot!" -- Fullauto Present - 1. (Noun) The point that divides disappointment from hope
Skaterdude409 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 As long as americans rule over all you have my vote. lol Quote
Quarky1.0 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Do you think it possible that the reason those areas are poor and undeveloped is because it riddled with people with Low IQs? Simple answer low iq's are the result of a poor education and limited prospect for development, thus the cycle never breaks. Europeans have less than half the growing season that africa does, yet we have 5 times as much food... That has to say something... I think you maybe blaming everyone else but the culprit for thier problems... Let's face it, you may just be experiencing a programmed knee-jerk reaction... This is true, however the soil in northern europe is far richer in base organic nutrients and in parts of europe they get up three crops in a season. However your point is valid, africa in general should be alot better off than it is, the main problem behind this is corruption, in a number of cases where there have been famine, the government of that country and Ethopia is prime example here, that countries government has sold the grain stores instread of holding onto them to feed there people, thus opening the door for famine to strike. Skin colour are NOT the only differences... Christ, does anyone bother to read what I post anymore?! Go up and read SOME of Phillip J Rushton's Work... What color do you think christ was, white? I don't think so, if christ existed (probably not), he was of a middle eastern background, ie dark hair, dark skin, dark eyes, the common image of christ being a white european is a false one. and also, as man moved up North, it got harder and harder to survive... As a result, the smarter men passed on thier genes as a result of being able to better cope with life's little troubles, and the result was a white population that is a bit smarter than those we left behind, both geographically and genetically... Read the Section in Rushtons book about r-k factor... Tell me this man is not spot on... Good point, but africa is not an easy place to live. There is one main reason why europeans developed and that is war, waring tribes have a habbit of storing supplies to make war, which then gives way to farming, which gives rise to more advances in civilation, also there is evidence that the humans who made there way to europe had to deal with the remains of the neanderthals. But there is one thing that has been the defining seperation that has made european development possible, caucasians in general are far less likely to hold onto there traditions and thus can alter there societies much more quickly. Modern day africa is still controled by the same tribal mentality that has ruled for centries and until they can break this fear and control they will never develope. That brings me to the final point I have to make. How come the black community in the USA are refered to as African-Americans, this also applies to the asian and hispanic communities. The issue I have with this term is this, are the white community in the USA refered to as European-Americans, or Irish-Americans, English-Americans, the answer is no. The black community has been apart of america from the time it was founded, but even today they're apart. So no bloody wonder they're communities are full of crime, drug abuse, low education and social discord, to be part of a country that really wishes you arn't there is enough to piss anyone off. Quote
Quarky1.0 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Blacks have made no significant inventions or pioneered anything in science or other subjects. if they all magicly were done, we would hardly miss them Again this can be directly related to the lack of education in black communities world wide and not there presumed geneic inferiority. Also this same flawed arguement can be said about women, before the equality of the sexes (which is still ongoing), women had made little or no contribution to sociaty other than to breed, it wasn't til after womens liberation took hold and they had a chance to gain higher eductation that they're now contributing to medican, science, buisness and sociaty as a whole. If the black communities were given the oppotunities, you would see the same results. Quote
Skaterdude409 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 bullshit look at africa. they had it to themselves for thousands of years. they never advanced. Mean while Europeans did. Quote
hugo Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 I don't remember asking you a goddamn thing. You did not have to you fuckin' dumbass. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
hugo Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 and also, as man moved up North, it got harder and harder to survive... As a result, the smarter men passed on thier genes as a result of being able to better cope with life's little troubles, and the result was a white population that is a bit smarter than those we left behind, both geographically and genetically... Read the Section in Rushtons book about r-k factor... Tell me this man is not spot on... Why would smart people move somewhere where it was harder to survive? Sounds pretty dumb to me. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
hugo Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Again this can be directly related to the lack of education in black communities world wide and not there presumed geneic inferiority. Also this same flawed arguement can be said about women, before the equality of the sexes (which is still ongoing), women had made little or no contribution to sociaty other than to breed, it wasn't til after womens liberation took hold and they had a chance to gain higher eductation that they're now contributing to medican, science, buisness and sociaty as a whole. If the black communities were given the oppotunities, you would see the same results. Why is it that blacks in the same schools score lower than whites? Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
RoyalOrleans Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 You did not have to you fuckin' dumbass. Where do you buy your pants, hugo? Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
Quarky1.0 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 bullshit look at africa. they had it to themselves for thousands of years. they never advanced. Mean while Europeans did. READ WHAT I WROTE FFS! They have not advanced because of the tribal mentality, in europe they broke from that type of tribal control centries ago, yes there were still tribes, but in time they gave way to the civilizations in europe and that is the big difference. If a society is going to develop they first need to rid themselves of the trible rule, which is open to abuse and corruption. Quote
Quarky1.0 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Why is it that blacks in the same schools score lower than whites? Perhaps there home life is not as good, perhaps they live in the lower ecenomic side of town, which will result in there school grades not being as good. This entire arguement regarding the different races and ethic purity is the same one put forward by the facist movement. If you took a child from a poor white household and a child from a rich black household, I would bet the overall scores of the rich black child would be higher than that of the white child. Quote
RoyalOrleans Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Why is it that blacks in the same schools score lower than whites? To play Devil's Advocate here, hugo, I believe that standardized tests are always a little biased. They are biased to those that actually sit in their class and LISTEN... do their HOMEWORK... and take some fucking control of their own DESTINY. Instead of falling in line with the rest of the degenerates. I mean, not too many national standardized tests are going to ask "Who is married to Whitney Houston?". Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
RoyalOrleans Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Perhaps there home life is not as good' date=' perhaps they live in the lower ecenomic side of town, which will result in there school grades not being as good. This entire arguement regarding the different races and ethic purity is the same one put forward by the facist movement. If you took a child from a poor white household and a child from a rich black household, I would bet the overall scores of the rich black child would be higher than that of the white child.[/quote'] Boo-fucking-hoo! I think I hear a solo violin playing just for the degenerate hood rat fucks. They choose to live the way they do, this goes for any ****** of any race, and expect a hand out. They live on the fringes of society, they are parasitic moochers that live from hour to hour with no regards where tomorrow will lead. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
Quarky1.0 Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Boo-fucking-hoo! I think I hear a solo violin playing just for the degenerate hood rat fucks. They choose to live the way they do, this goes for any ****** of any race, and expect a hand out. They live on the fringes of society, they are parasitic moochers that live from hour to hour with no regards where tomorrow will lead. The catch cry of the true bigot, when all else fails blame those who you view are beneath you. Quote
RoyalOrleans Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 The catch cry of the true bigot' date=' when all else fails blame those who you view are beneath you.[/quote'] A typical response from a limp-wristed weak-minded bed-wetting fucktard liberal. I'm a bigot because I believe that every single fucking idiot on this planet has the opportunity to make something out of themselves. That they control the hand that fate dealt them! Humans were not meant to run around blaming each other other for the other's woes. That humans should rise and strive to do better. If you live in a bad area... MOVE to a better area. You don't have any money... get a job. You have a bad home life... move out! You're recieving a shitty education and know that you are... take some fucking initiative and find out things on your own! Peer pressure... stand up! Rise up! Worry about yourself and your future, don't allow others to make those decisions for you. We all have a choice in this life, but it is up to you to make the right one. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
Gallytuck Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 It fascinates me how people are so eager to prove how "educated" they are by comparing intellectual prowess, or lack thereof, against the prowess of others. I mean, what does higher education mean? Does it make you what we like to call smarter? Does it give you any more of a grip on what is really going on in the world? I say that it does neither. The problem with the black community is not that they're less educated but rather that they strive to be lower class. Seriously. What's the big rage in the black community at the moment? Take a look at what labels blacks use to identify themselves. The only thing these people don't want is to give. The black community lives in this little bubble of illusion in which every White person has it good and every black person has it bad. They create a constant threat for themselves which is not really based in the reality most of us share. If you should confront a member of the black community and request of them to inform you why so many blacks are prone to criminal activity you'll probably get the ol', "A brutha's gots to do whate'er he gots to do to survive, know what I'm sayin'?" But survival is not the goal. They want everything. Because they have this really fucking odd belief that all White people own several pairs of multi-hundred dollar shoes and extensive wardrobes consisting of all of the most pricey brandnames. Yes, it's true. Every single White person, save for white trash, owns at least one television which is over 50" and at least one nice vehicle. We all have more shoes than we can throw at a brutha and more clothes than you can shake a stick at. Get a fucking grip. IQ and education are irrelevent. The problem with the black community is not how much they know, but rather how much they don't know. They don't teach Reality Check 121 in high school. Racism is alive and well and the black community is doing all it can, conciously or unconciously(probably a bit of both), to ensure it never goes away. 1 Quote
angie Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Yes, it's true. Every single White person, save for white trash, owns at least one television which is over 50" I'm not white trash, and my TV is not nearly that huge. I just don't see the need to have a movie screen in my living room. and at least one nice vehicle. What do you constitute as nice? I drive a Jetta. It's not a shitbox, but nothing fancy, either. We all have more shoes than we can throw at a brutha I have shoes. Maybe 15 pairs (that'll jump to about 22 after I buy my flip flops for the summer, but those get thrown out in the fall). But I don't think that's excessive, and even if you think it is, I'm a woman, what can I say? I like shoes. It's similar to clothes. Different shoes for different seasons. I'm not going to wear boots in the summer, nor would I wear opened toed high heels in the winter. I live in New England. Not such a smart idea. and more clothes than you can shake a stick at. Get a fucking grip. I have enough clothes. Not an extravagant amount, but enough. Stop stereotyping people. It's very unbecoming of you. Quote http://www.darwinawards.com/ http://www.snopes.com http://www.breakthechain.org STOP THE SPAM!! Click Me You Know You Want To
WullieTheRed Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 I'm not white trash, and my TV is not nearly that huge. I just don't see the need to have a movie screen in my living room. What do you constitute as nice? I drive a Jetta. It's not a shitbox, but nothing fancy, either. I have shoes. Maybe 15 pairs (that'll jump to about 22 after I buy my flip flops for the summer, but those get thrown out in the fall). But I don't think that's excessive, and even if you think it is, I'm a woman, what can I say? I like shoes. It's similar to clothes. Different shoes for different seasons. I'm not going to wear boots in the summer, nor would I wear opened toed high heels in the winter. I live in New England. Not such a smart idea. I have enough clothes. Not an extravagant amount, but enough. Stop stereotyping people. It's very unbecoming of you. lol.. from what I got angie, Gallytuck was being sarcastic when she was saying all that. She was saying what she thinks the black guys all say about white people. Quote I am a wanker
Gallytuck Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Holy fuck, I really need to change my nick. I'm a dude, man, a dude. Anyway, Angie, you really missed that one. Wullie got it. Quote
WullieTheRed Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 heh, fucked if I know why I thought you were a chick, man, you know I actually typed that out without thinking... sorry, heh Quote I am a wanker
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.