Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
How could something be defamitory if we take a concensus vote of people who are exposed to a persons idealism and a majority agree that he is an idiot ?? :rolleyes:

.

.

 

 

It's not, that's my point. Fuck em!!!!

 

IDGITS!!!

"An intelligence that is not humane is the most dangerous thing in the world" Ashley Montague

 

"No one should have to walk alone" Phuong Du

 

"An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind" Ghandi

 

 

"If I were asked to define an American in a single phrase, I would say 'An American is a person who has the right to be different' and I think that right is growing" William Manchester

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
How could something be defamitory if we take a concensus vote of people who are exposed to a persons idealism and a majority agree that he is an idiot ?? :rolleyes:

.

.

 

I'm so disappointed.:(

 

Instead of taking the opportunity to PROVE me wrong and shut me up perminantly - I gave you links to the ACLU and ACLJ and Findlaw after all - everyone continues to proceed as if this is a question of opinion rather than fact.

 

Tell ya what I'm gonna do. I'm going to raise the stakes a bit. A little wager...

 

Personally, I couldn't give a rat's ass about the Idiot Box -- it doesn't affect my reputation, and besides neither Phreak nor I have the money to make it worth my while to sue. Phreak doesn't have enough money to take and I don't have the $5-6,000 to start a suit. But I do sooooooo want to hear Phreak admit he was proven wrong, that later today or tommorow I will write a description of our "question" on defamation and the Idiot Box and post it here, so Phreak can read it and approve of its wording. (I will try and be as neutral in the description as possible.)

 

Then we will e-mail it to the ACLU, ACLJ and post it on the Findlaw message board. And let real lawyers tell us who'se right.

 

If two of the three respondents say its not defamation - I leave perminantly, and the "I'm an Idiot" stays on the posts that remain. If two respondants say it does qualify as defamation, Phreak not only puts the "I'm an Idiot" under his own name, but a second line as well - "Papa's my daddy." For one full year.

 

Mark Twain was right; there is nothing more confidant than a Christian with four aces.

 

Care to dance, laughing boy?

A Christian with a Bible is a nuisance to your comfortable level of non-belief. And a Christian with a brain cannot be as easily dismissed as you might be accustomed to. But a Christian with both is a dangerous thing.
Posted

So sue me already...sigh...Even as I sit here, I can't believe I'm writing this. I've never been one to voice my opinions in such a public manner. But after learning that Rev. Holierthen Thou Papabryant wants to insult my intelligence, I felt I at least had to set a few things straight. I guess I should start by saying that if we contradict him, we are labelled pernicious, disloyal reprobates. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. You should never forget the three most important facets of his contrivances, namely their temperamental origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. Holierthen Thou, believes that he is the way, the truth, and the light. That's just wrong. He further believes that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. Wrong again!

Holierthen Thou Pumpyourbutt has two imperatives. The first is to infringe upon our most important constitutional rights. The second imperative is to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians. His reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with his conclusion (e.g., that everything he says is entirely and thoroughly true) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- he always arrives at that very conclusion. He should not carve out space in the mainstream for bloodthirsty politics. Not now, not ever.

I'll let you in on a little secret: the central paradox of his memoirs, the twist that makes PumpYa's artifices so irresistible to bleeding-heart flag burners, is that these people truly believe that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. Does he have trouble living with himself, knowing that the intent of this letter is certainly not hatred, but a probing look into an obviously significant issue? Well, I'm sure the " Revrun' " would rather pander to our worst fears than answer that particular question. It's not fair for him to feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. I know because I have experienced that personally. I overheard one of his buddies at " THE JUNGLE " say, "All literature which opposes Pyrrhonism was forged by clumsy criticasters." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity.

Fuckwit here, has been trying for some time to sell the public on a revisionism-based government. His sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: papabryant the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. The emotional argument: It is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to brainwash the masses into submission. As you can see, neither argument is valid, which should indicate to you that nothing appears more plausible at first sight, nor more ill-founded and antihumanist upon closer inspection, than papabryants undertakings. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. As everyone who has access to reliable information knows, if we don't deal with the relevant facts right now, then the wannabe SAVIORS stupidity, will soon start to metastasize until they champion censorship in the name of free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the name of freedom.

If the past is any indication of the future, he will once again attempt to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that he may be generating. Everybody knows that he is so incredibly quixotic that he really ought to change his name to "Quixotic McQuixotic, the Quixotic King of the Quixotic", but you should consider that if pharisaism were an Olympic sport, he would clinch the gold medal. I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. But preacher boy's fantasy is to impose a narrow theological agenda on secular society. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of chauvinism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that my cause is to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that Holierthen's most flighty tactic is to fabricate a phony war between perfidious clods and the worst types of dangerous racketeers there are. This way, he can subjugate both groups into helping him make incorrect leaps of logic. I unmistakably don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that you should never allow a day to go by in which you do not bring this fundamental truth to at least one new person. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that his little schemes are bound to fail. That's the sort of statement that some people maintain is nutty, but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made, because this is a free country, and I aver we ought to keep it that way. I do not wish to evaluate nepotism here, though I suspect that Holierthen receives most of his knowledge from "Egotism for Dummies". Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that papafullofshit is the prototypical face of blackguardism? Lastly, Rev. Holierthen Thou Papabryant's statements turn the stomachs of those who know even a little about the real world.

.

.

Posted
I need to ask... what kind of control do you hope to accomplish by these rules ?? :

 

Rules:

 

1. Bashing of USM or its members (if they are not or have never been members here) will not be tolerated here. No exceptions.

 

2. Bashing of the site creator will not be tolerated here. No exceptions.

 

3. Racism is neither allowed nor condoned by the owners of this site, any such references to members or non-members of this site will be deleted and time-outs or bans will be given depending on the severity of the comment

 

4. Cursing is allowed but because you are an adult, we encourage you to take restraint in the words you choose to use. There are far more eloquent and intelligent ways to get your point across rather than resorting to cursing.

 

5. No pornographic material, or links to pornographic material are allowed. Any such posts will be deleted without question.

 

6.The Admins and Monitors can and will delete/edit anything they deem fit. They will send a message to you explaining why something was deleted and/or edited. If you have an issue with this, don't take it to the board. Handle it through profile messages. They will make the final decision. No exceptions.

 

7. We know that people do not agree all the time and there are categories here that could result in a heated disagreement. This is ok but we do expect you to show respect at all times. No name calling will be allowed, neither will personal attacks. No exceptions.

 

8. Sarcasm is allowed here but as an adult, you should know where to draw the line. If you have problems finding the line, the Admins will be here to help you with that. With that being said, as an adult you should also be able to take sarcasm. Please don't go whining to the Admins about the smallest of things.

 

9. We do have a category called "The Boiling Pot" to which you can take unresolved disagreements. This is for active members only. You can check their profile to find out when they were last here. If they have not been here in the last week, assume they are not an active member. If the person chooses not to participate in the post, they will not be forced to. A person may message an Admin, at their first viewing of the post, stating that they do not wish to be involved and the post will be deleted. The person who made the post will be sent a message stating why it was deleted. The issue is then between the two parties only and can be resolved through profile messages if so desired. Remember that even if both parties choose to hash it out, you can disagree and still be respectful. If a comment is made by both parties, the assumption will be made that both parties want to be involved.

 

10. Personal information, such as last names and addresses, will not be allowed in posts or comments. Such information will be deleted. No exceptions. If you choose to share any personal information with another user, you do so at your own risk.

 

11. Please do not delete your own posts. The update button is a courtesy to you. If you abuse it, we will have to take that away. If you think you will post something and then regret it later, don't post it in the first place. If you do, for some reason, need or want a post deleted, please message an Admin and they will take it into consideration.

 

12. Please do not make multiple accounts. If for some reason you lose your password, email us and we would be glad to send you your information. The email address is included at the bottom of this post.

 

13. WARNING: Extreme use of fluff is punishable by DEATH! Avoid as much as possible.

.

.

Damn Phreak. I really touched a nerve with ya huh? lmao!

 

What do we accomplish at our site by having these rules?

We have a fun place to be, that can also have a serious discussions. Except for the rule #1 & 2 (which are conditions of our free use of server and software) we don't limit anyones ability to speak their mind. Our site isn't full of baseless attacks as yours is. Maybe you prefer your site more like that, hey ya know what? that's fine and dandy for you. We prefer (as do our members) a place with a bit more control than what you have here, but not so overly trynanical that they cannot say whatever it is that is on their minds.

 

Not once did I say our site was better than yours, because it would be like comparing apples to oranges. Sure they are both fruit, but both serve different needs. Heck, our site is still a baby site.

You, however, as a mod- suck ass. Mostly because you get your panties in a wad over someone questioning you (or gasp suggesting a way to make the site better,) but say how everyoen has free speech here. Your answer to everything? "Don't like it- leave!" That's a good concept, but is likely to last ya for only so long.

 

Why am I here then? Cause frankly, pissing you off is fun. and I am sure te4h sicrles that your mods are running in trying to figure out where I am, who I am, whether or not I am hugo, blah blah blah, has been a bit exhilierating.

 

and yes, I know I suck at spelling. :)

Posted
No, I would give that point to freedom of speech and call foul and TYRANNY on CENSORSHIP in the Jungle.

.

.

 

You can welcome spammers all you want, but we look after our members. censorship? nah. Protection from a bipolar jackass? Yep

 

But hey, if it helps ya sleep better at night, then go ahead and think that we censored sixes for whatever reason you want to believe.

Heres a few to help get you through the night:

-He was to smart.

-He was to close to finding out the "truth"

-He was to handsome and all our guys members were jealous.

-He was to pretty and all our girl members were jealous.

-His haX0r skills were to good for us

-His eloquent style of copy and paste blew our minds and we had no recourse but to ban him

-His posts were to intelligent for us to figure out

-He wouldn't pay us the $12 fee

 

feel free to insert your own.

Posted

Piss ME off ?? Hell your dumber then I thought.. The Mods drew straws to decide which one of us gets to bitch at you.

 

I think C.E.S. is starting shit with sixes somewhere, and I can't recall who Hugh is currently stalking... but either way... the choice to respond to your drivel was mine.

 

You really should cough up $12 and look at the huge laugh we are all getting out of you in the hidden forums.:D

 

Then we can afford a Deluxe pizza this month as we give you the freedom to cry about what we do in our yard.

 

Thanks for playing retard.

.

.

Posted

I guess I would ALSO like to add this comment...

 

If you "SCOFF" at us for accepting Jason into the community, and think you are better off without his presence.. then why do you deem it necessary to stalk him on the site he moved to ??

 

You can try and bullshit yourself eddo and give me a holier then thou excuse, or even think to yourself you are even slightly getting under my skin, but all it really boils down to, is Jason is in a place that accepts him for who he is and does not outcast him for his idealism. For some strange reason, the members of the jungle seem to follow Mr. Jones... but I thought he was a pest ??:rolleyes:

 

Your only retaliation for this eddo is to scoff at the policies of this site... very weak indeed, and actually, pretty sad.

 

Let me finish this by saying..

 

OUR YARD OUR RULES

.

.

Posted
Ithen why do you deem it necessary to stalk him on the site he moved to ??

 

umm, I as "Eddo" was a member here before he was. he followed me here...

 

 

 

is Jason is in a place that accepts him for who he is and does not outcast him for his idealism.

 

idealism? BWUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Posted

AHHH I see, it comes down to senority now does it... hold on... lemme check up on that.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Ah OK, here it is, found it !!!

 

http://Off Topic Forum.com/showthread.php?t=69126

 

I also found some more info

.

.

.

.

.

.

'.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

You are not a LEGACY member or a PREMIUM member, SIXES IS, you are just a REGULAR member so your worth to me is SHIT. I do not work for you, I work for the people who support this site.

.

.

Posted
I guess I would ALSO like to add this comment...

 

If you "SCOFF" at us for accepting Jason into the community, and think you are better off without his presence.. then why do you deem it necessary to stalk him on the site he moved to ??

 

You can try and bullshit yourself eddo and give me a holier then thou excuse, or even think to yourself you are even slightly getting under my skin, but all it really boils down to, is Jason is in a place that accepts him for who he is and does not outcast him for his idealism. For some strange reason, the members of the jungle seem to follow Mr. Jones... but I thought he was a pest ??:rolleyes:

 

Your only retaliation for this eddo is to scoff at the policies of this site... very weak indeed, and actually, pretty sad.

 

Let me finish this by saying..

 

OUR YARD OUR RULES

.

.

 

 

BoooYa! Excellent!

 

Eddo I think it’s pretty funny how your comments on sixes are so derogatory yet you can’t find yourself to flat out say he’s an idiot. You sure are working hard at tip toeing around it. Are you afraid to get sued? :rolleyes:

 

It must really be boring on your sight. You have to spend all your time chasing down sixes.

"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. That's just insane!" Penn & Teller

 

NEVER FORGOTTEN

Posted
It must really be boring on your sight. You have to spend all your time chasing down sixes.

 

lmao!! That is funny! I am a member of about 6 message boards (most ver closely related,) and sixes has followed me to every one of them, including this one.

 

To say that I am chasing him down is simply ridiculous!

Posted
lmao!! That is funny! I am a member of about 6 message boards (most ver closely related,) and sixes has followed me to every one of them, including this one.

 

To say that I am chasing him down is simply ridiculous!

 

Hi eddo ,take a good look by my profile picture up top there. See the IDIOT part? I think you just might have swayed them. Congrats ,but I did not follow you to more than this forum. The others had Feckless there and you know her and I are buds. So please stop with the ego trip ,we are both in the hole. I think they boxed me because of all the hell you guys have created over my stupid ass ,so merry fucking day to you asshat!:rolleyes:

.
Posted
lmao!! That is funny! I am a member of about 6 message boards (most ver closely related,) and sixes has followed me to every one of them, including this one.

 

To say that I am chasing him down is simply ridiculous!

 

VERY true, I can totally vouch him on that^^^ sixes has been very obsessed with Eddo for a long time. Yesterday he was trying to pretend he was with me-:p

Posted

OMG its all true!!!!!!! Except for the part about wanting to do Chi. LOL

I really dont care to debate about stalking eddo as you say ,he has proved himself the nutjob around here ,being that this account he useing is not his eddo account. I'm done talking about him now ,YAWN.

.
Posted
Originally Posted by papabryant

The law that states that defamation of character can be prosecuted in civil court.

 

By posting "I am an Idiot" in an area only controlable by an official of this website, means that the owners of the website are making a character judgement. If that is not supported by facts - such as medical records or copies of I.Q. tests that show by objective standard that the statement is true - that makes it defamation - in writing its called libel and verbally its called slander.

 

If someone, say a potential employer, wanted to do a background check on me - and they ran across this website and saw that "I am an Idiot." logo and it cost me a job, then the owner of the site could be held responsible for my losses. And this is true of EVERY person who gets put into the idiot box, because that constitutes the site owner's official statement, which someone can challenge in court.

 

Now if the owner of the site stated their personal opinion under their own name - that is NOT defamation. It is clearly opinion. Nor is the opinion of a third party the responsibility of the site owners. Only when the site representative acts in some manner that gives the impression they are speaking as fact and in an official capacity - such as the "idiot" banner - without being able to back up the statement with objective documented fact, with the intention to publicly ridicule - can the site owner be sued.

 

So long as a statement of opinion is just an opinion, not containing specific facts that can be proved untrue, a person is safe from the defamation laws. In order to prove defamation, you have to be able to prove that what was said or written about you was false. If the information is true, or if you consented to publication of the material, you will not have a case. However, you may bring an defamatory action if the comments are so reprehensible and false that they effect your reputation in the community or cast aspersions on you.

 

The following website may be helpful: http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/lib...defamation.htm

 

Quoting from that site (emphasis mine):

 

</H3>The following sites may also be helpful:

 

http://www.dancingwithlawyers.com/freeinfo/libel.shtml

 

http://www.cyber-rights.org/

 

http://www.personal-injury-info.net/...-character.htm

 

http://www.expertlaw.com/library/per...efamation.html

 

Of course there are the two big legal groups that argue cases like this on a regular basis (both are seeking internet test cases):

 

http://www.aclu.org/

 

http://www.aclj.org/

 

and lastly is the Findlaw message boards - where real lawyers will answer questions concerning libel and defamation issues for free. Findlaw was a great help to me back when I worked in the motion picture industry as a industrial video producer/director. (Saved a lot of budget money not having to consult attorneys concerning script libel issues. )

http://boards.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin...E0@.ef068a9/18

 

Hope this helps.

 

CRY US A FUCKING RIVER!!

 

Going to take a little name calling to the fucking courts? How sad..

All bullshit, No Business.
Posted
I hate to bust on TH but some of this DOES sound familiar LMFAO

"An intelligence that is not humane is the most dangerous thing in the world" Ashley Montague

 

"No one should have to walk alone" Phuong Du

 

"An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind" Ghandi

 

 

"If I were asked to define an American in a single phrase, I would say 'An American is a person who has the right to be different' and I think that right is growing" William Manchester

Posted
lmao!! That is funny! I am a member of about 6 message boards (most ver closely related,) and sixes has followed me to every one of them, including this one.

 

To say that I am chasing him down is simply ridiculous!

 

 

WHO CARES!!!!

GET OVER IT AND FUCK OFF !!!

I am a pathetic piece of shit leeching single mom.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...