fullauto Posted March 17, 2006 Posted March 17, 2006 Goddamn I just love the right wing' date=' facist bullshit post you have here. The rise of the Nazis party in germany was based on cultural intolerance and to blame it on the jewish people is fucking stupid, but when do you expect from such bloody facist sites as www.sweetliberty.org and www.wintersonnenwende.com. Nice work, do you have your brown shirt all ironed out for you may day march? I've stated Historical fact, and you've stated opinion... Which one of us is intolerant? For the record... I love the Jews... I wish we had more of them... Just because I'm not willing to sugar-frost history to appease them doesn't mean I'm a right wing fascist... The problem we have here is your inability to accept the fact that the history you have in your head, may not be exactly right... Just because you believe it doesn't make it true... Quit stateing your fucking opinion, and state some historical fact... and don't step up to the plate with someone else's opinion, regardless of how educated they are... That is nothing more than educated opinion, but is still opinion... We all have the ability to determine our own opinions without the aid of other people... So stick to historical facts, and then present your own opinion based on them... I am completely sick of you and your fucking 13 brain cells presenting everything you think as incontrovertable fact... That's BS! If your opinion is the right one, surely you have some fact to back it up?! Quote Liberals... Saving the world one semester at a time "I'm not a racist... I'm a realist! And if you don't know the difference, You're an Idiot!" -- Fullauto Present - 1. (Noun) The point that divides disappointment from hope
Gallytuck Posted March 17, 2006 Posted March 17, 2006 Fullauto may not be right-wing but he is a plagiarist. In other words, yeah, exactly what he said. Quote
Quarky1.0 Posted March 17, 2006 Author Posted March 17, 2006 I've stated Historical fact, and you've stated opinion... Which one of us is intolerant? For the record... I love the Jews... I wish we had more of them... Just because I'm not willing to sugar-frost history to appease them doesn't mean I'm a right wing fascist... The problem we have here is your inability to accept the fact that the history you have in your head, may not be exactly right... Just because you believe it doesn't make it true... Quit stateing your fucking opinion, and state some historical fact... and don't step up to the plate with someone else's opinion, regardless of how educated they are... That is nothing more than educated opinion, but is still opinion... We all have the ability to determine our own opinions without the aid of other people... So stick to historical facts, and then present your own opinion based on them... I am completely sick of you and your fucking 13 brain cells presenting everything you think as incontrovertable fact... That's BS! If your opinion is the right one, surely you have some fact to back it up?! Yeah right, so right wing bullshit, that contradicts every other university and history class is rubbish? What a fucking load of crap, next thing the nationalist/racist/facist movement will be saying the Genocide of the Jews in ww2 didn't happen, they all commited suicide, or oh I know, they didn't really die at all and its a leftist plot. Quote
Gallytuck Posted March 17, 2006 Posted March 17, 2006 Yeah right' date=' so right wing bullshit, that contradicts every other university and history class is rubbish? What a fucking load of crap, next thing the nationalist/racist/facist movement will be saying the Genocide of the Jews in ww2 didn't happen, they all commited suicide, or oh I know, they didn't really die at all and its a leftist plot.[/quote'] If you believe everything they teach you in history class you're more of an eejit than we could ever make you out to be. On the Jews, funny how it started with 6 million and now has dwindled down to as low as 800 000. And that's before we let the revisionists speak. As for university and what they teach. You probably accept that the Natives were the first in N. America. Well, we're discovering that it's entirely bullshit. You're implying that you have a belief in an educational system which still teaches our kids that Columbus was the first to discover North America. Quote
hugo Posted March 17, 2006 Posted March 17, 2006 Hitler should have killed ugly women and short people also. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
Quarky1.0 Posted March 18, 2006 Author Posted March 18, 2006 If you believe everything they teach you in history class you're more of an eejit than we could ever make you out to be. On the Jews, funny how it started with 6 million and now has dwindled down to as low as 800 000. And that's before we let the revisionists speak. As for university and what they teach. You probably accept that the Natives were the first in N. America. Well, we're discovering that it's entirely bullshit. You're implying that you have a belief in an educational system which still teaches our kids that Columbus was the first to discover North America. Are your parents brother and sister?! Talk about fucking stupid, 800,000! The number are still at 6 million and this is the offical numbers, not what the bloody right wing nationalist and facist halfwits want us to believe. In regards to the first people to discover america, there is proof now that either the Vikings or Chinese were the first to discover america and this is what is being tough in universities now. As to the Nativies being in america first? By natives you are refering to the North america indians? and if you are you, they were, there is proof that they have been inhabiting the USA for around 40,000 years. So if you are going to quote your arse ended fucked up stupid right wing, nationalist, facist bullshit at me, please try and grow a fucking brain, if not get yourself sterilized so your genetic stupid cannot be passed onto another generation of degenerate mental defectives. Quote
WullieTheRed Posted March 18, 2006 Posted March 18, 2006 A As to the Nativies being in america first? By natives you are refering to the North america indians? and if you are you, they were, there is proof that they have been inhabiting the USA for around 40,000 years. That still doesn't prove they were the first now, does it? Quote I am a wanker
Quarky1.0 Posted March 18, 2006 Author Posted March 18, 2006 That still doesn't prove they were the first now, does it? Anthropological evidence indicates that they were the first Homo sapiens to inhabit north america, before that there were the Neanderthals and before them the Homo erectus, which was the precurser to both the Neanderthals and Homo sapien genesis. So yeah they were here first. Quote
fullauto Posted March 18, 2006 Posted March 18, 2006 Anthropological evidence indicates that they were the first Homo sapiens to inhabit north america' date=' before that there were the Neanderthals and before them the Homo erectus, which was the precurser to both the Neanderthals and Homo sapien genesis. So yeah they were here first.[/quote'] again... please substantiate this shit... preferably something from an edu site... Quote Liberals... Saving the world one semester at a time "I'm not a racist... I'm a realist! And if you don't know the difference, You're an Idiot!" -- Fullauto Present - 1. (Noun) The point that divides disappointment from hope
RoyalOrleans Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Homo erectus Hear that, Vortex? Your kind dates back to prehistoric times. Quote To be the Man, you've got to beat the Man. - Ric Flair Everybody knows I'm known for dropping science.
Quarky1.0 Posted March 19, 2006 Author Posted March 19, 2006 again... please substantiate this shit... preferably something from an edu site... Here are some for you http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.001555 http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0095-6848(199522)21%3A2%3C456%3AEWAMOM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-7316(197901)44%3A1%3C55%3ARAMCFE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W http://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/access.cgi?uri=/journals/human_biology/v074/74.2keyeux.pdf http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5000324483 http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ucp/WebIntegrationServlet?call=LoginWeblet&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.journals.uchicago.edu%2FAJHG%2Fjournal%2Fissues%2Fv63n6%2F980409%2F980409.text.html%3FerFrom%3D3010119496025111046Guest Also the uni of chicago has some journals on the topic, http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/pub-alpha.html Oh yeah and here are some links on the number of people killed in the holocaust, jew and none jew http://www.uca.edu/divisions/academic/history/cahr/holocaust.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust http://www.world-war-2.info/holocaust/ The first is a link from a university site Quote
Gallytuck Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 This one is interesting in more ways than one. Quote
hugo Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Debating by link is pretty boring. What can you expect from Aussies and Canucks though. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
hugo Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Anthropological evidence indicates that they were the first Homo sapiens to inhabit north america' date=' before that there were the Neanderthals and before them the Homo erectus, which was the precurser to both the Neanderthals and Homo sapien genesis. So yeah they were here first.[/quote'] The neanderthals were never in North America. Get a brain. The first individuals that arrived in North America could not have been native americans otherwise they would not have arrived here. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
builder Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Debating by link is pretty boring. What can you expect from Aussies and Canucks though. Yeah, but we have brains. I wouldn't expect you to notice the difference. Check this link. Quote Persevere, it pisses people off.
Quarky1.0 Posted March 19, 2006 Author Posted March 19, 2006 The neanderthals were never in North America. Get a brain. The first individuals that arrived in North America could not have been native americans otherwise they would not have arrived here. I hate to contradict you, but they were, when north america and europe were connected during the last ice age, Neanderthals migrated to north america, they were followed by the first humans, or native americans. After the ice age and the rise in ocean levels, the neanderthals died out, they couldn't compete with humans and became extinct. If you are in doubt have a look at these scentific sites. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/11/041118104010.htm http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/09/30_.shtml Yes I know you don't like to read link etc etc, or think for that matter, but please try. PS where are those photos? 1 Quote
Gallytuck Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Debating by link is pretty boring. What can you expect from Aussies and Canucks though. It's not my preference. I'm not very horny about the whole quoting idea but it seems to be the crutch of choice here. Apparently people have difficulty following posts so you have to keep repeating bits of it for them. On that note, here's another link for the anthropology/archaeology major there. Quote
Gallytuck Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 I hate to contradict you' date=' but they were, when north america and europe were connected during the last ice age, Neanderthals migrated to north america...[/quote'] I'd be careful with the words "migrated" and "Neanderthals". Quote
hugo Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 I hate to contradict you, but they were, when north america and europe were connected during the last ice age, Neanderthals migrated to north america, they were followed by the first humans, or native americans. After the ice age and the rise in ocean levels, the neanderthals died out, they couldn't compete with humans and became extinct. If you are in doubt have a look at these scentific sites. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/11/041118104010.htm http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/09/30_.shtml Yes I know you don't like to read link etc etc, or think for that matter, but please try. PS where are those photos? Neither of your links argues Neanderthals were in the New World. You remain brainless. Try at least quoting from your links so I need not waste time looking through your links to verify your idiotic statements. The Neanderthals had been extinct for 20,000 years at the time of the last ice age. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
Gallytuck Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 Neither of your links argues Neanderthals were in the New World. You remain brainless. Try at least quoting from your links so I need not waste time looking through your links to verify your idiotic statements. You're supposed to actually read your links? I just enter search terms in Google and link the first hit. Quote
hugo Posted March 19, 2006 Posted March 19, 2006 You're supposed to actually read your links? I just enter search terms in Google and link the first hit. I thought Quarky had a patent on that method. Quote The power to do good is also the power to do harm. - Milton Friedman "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison
Quarky1.0 Posted March 20, 2006 Author Posted March 20, 2006 Once again both Hugo and Gallytuck have missed the point of my post. The agument was weather or not humans were in north armerica 50,000 years ago and if you had read the links, which I doubt you did, being of a scientific nature and all, you would have read that there is proof that there were humans in north america 50,000 years ago. If you are going to critis me, please get you shit right, if not shut the fuck up. And an insult coming from you Hugo is a compliment, if you are what's called an intelligent male, pleae call me a fucking retard. Also Gallytuck the link you made is the same as one of mine, so who doesn't read there links? Also the last major ice age ended around 50,000 BC, look it up! Fuck if you are what's is representive of american sociaty then armerica is well and truly screwed. Quote
Gallytuck Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Of course I don't read your links. When I already know I'm right and you're saying I'm not why would I want to read the information which caused you to be wrong? Waste of time, no? On another note I can accuse you of not reading my links. You really fucking amaze me. Quote
Quarky1.0 Posted March 20, 2006 Author Posted March 20, 2006 Of course I don't read your links. When I already know I'm right and you're saying I'm not why would I want to read the information which caused you to be wrong? Waste of time, no? On another note I can accuse you of not reading my links. You really fucking amaze me. Sorry, but even that link you posted before, proves my point, no bloody wonder you didn't read it. I guess you would say Aboriginals weren't in australia 40,000 years ago either? Quote
Gallytuck Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Sorry' date=' but even that link you posted before, proves my point, no bloody wonder you didn't read it. I guess you would say Aboriginals weren't in australia 40,000 years ago either?[/quote'] That's why you amaze me. I'm saying there were humans in North America for at least 50K years. I'm just saying they didn't migrate there and they were nothing like Neanderthal. If you had read it before you would have been nicer after seeing that I was supporting your point. I hate Kanye West. Just had to get that out there. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.