Gospel of Judas

[builder]

The Council of Nicene was guided by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit don't fuck up.

 

And just whose holy spirit would you be referring to?

 

A ghost? Or the ghost? And who's to say that ghost is infallible? You?? ROTFL

[Quarky1.0]

Its all crap, the whole holy trinity bullshit. If you follow Christianity you are pissing god off and I quote from the ten commandments.

The first commandment: Do not worship any other Gods.

The second: Do not make any Idols.

The fifth: honor your mother and father.

 

Heads up bible bashes, if you believe in god and that is at the root of Christianity, you have breaking the first and second commandments!

 

How you ask?

Well the first you break ever time you pray and you put Christ before his father, thus you are worshiping another god above god.

You are breaking the second by hanging up crosses in your homes, having pictures of Christ, going to church and worshiping in front of a idol.

You are breaking the fifth by putting Christ ahead of god, you are dishonoring the true father of all life, the father of your creation.

 

You know what the end result of this is, you are all going to fucking hell and before you say the holy trinity doesn

[Lethalfind]

Its all crap, the whole holy trinity bullshit. If you follow Christianity you are pissing god off and I quote from the ten commandments.

The first commandment: Do not worship any other Gods.

The second: Do not make any Idols.

The fifth: honor your mother and father.

 

Heads up bible bashes, if you believe in god and that is at the root of Christianity, you have breaking the first and second commandments!

 

How you ask?

Well the first you break ever time you pray and you put Christ before his father, thus you are worshiping another god above god.

You are breaking the second by hanging up crosses in your homes, having pictures of Christ, going to church and worshiping in front of a idol.

You are breaking the fifth by putting Christ ahead of god, you are dishonoring the true father of all life, the father of your creation.

 

You know what the end result of this is, you are all going to fucking hell and before you say the holy trinity doesn

[hugo]

No this has been scientifically proven using carbon dating' date=' linguistic dating and ink dating, using the first known copies of the gospels and before you say the first know copies? It has been proven that for 300 years there was no record of the gospels even existing. So yet again you have proven yourself to be the ignorant one. But then again GM and destroying the natural world is a good call according to the Gospel of Hugo a gogo.[/quote']

 

You are an idiot. Historians widely agree the New Testament was mostly written in the 1st and 2nd Centuries. Try reading history that does not include space aliens for a change.

 

From wikipedia:

 

Estimates for the dates when the canonical Gospel accounts were written vary significantly; and the evidence for any of the dates is scanty. Conservative scholars tend to date earlier than others while liberal scholars usually date as late as possible. The following are mostly the date ranges given by the late Raymond E. Brown, in his book An Introduction to the New Testament, as representing the general scholarly consensus in 1996:

 

Matthew: c. 70–100 as the majority view, with conservative scholars arguing for a pre-70 date, particularly if they do not accept Mark as the first gospel written.

Mark: c. 68–73

Luke: c. 80–100, with most arguing for somewhere around 85

John: c. 90–110. Brown does not give a consensus view for John, but these are dates as propounded by C K Barrett, among others. The majority view is that it was written in stages, so there was no one date of composition.

 

Once again, Quarky has been proven an idiot. It is hard to believe people as stupid as he is exist.

 

Let us thank Monsanto for the possibility of a pesticide free world. Thank God for big corporations.

 

Just had my copy of Romeo and Juliet carbon dated; it came out it was printed in 2001. Damn historians say it was written in the 16th Century.

[hugo]

And just whose holy spirit would you be referring to?

 

A ghost? Or the ghost? And who's to say that ghost is infallible? You?? ROTFL

 

Not me. It is the standard Catholic belief that the Council of Nicaea was guided by the Holy Spirit. Secular humanist arguments that man could not have overcome their prejudices to pick out the correct books to compile the Bible are true. They are moot though since Christians claim divine intervention.

[eddo]

Just had my copy of Romeo and Juliet carbon dated; it came out it was printed in 2001. Damn historians say it was written in the 16th Century.

 

 

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[builder]

. They are moot though since Christians claim divine intervention.

 

You mean the Reverend Sun Moon okayed it?

[hugo]

You mean the Reverend Sun Moon okayed it?

 

The Great Goombah tells me that is blasphemy. You are fortunate GG is a forgiving god.

[Quarky1.0]

You are an idiot. Historians widely agree the New Testament was mostly written in the 1st and 2nd Centuries. Try reading history that does not include space aliens for a change.

 

From wikipedia:

 

 

 

Once again, Quarky has been proven an idiot. It is hard to believe people as stupid as he is exist.

 

Let us thank Monsanto for the possibility of a pesticide free world. Thank God for big corporations.

 

Just had my copy of Romeo and Juliet carbon dated; it came out it was printed in 2001. Damn historians say it was written in the 16th Century.

 

FFS yet again you have proven how plain stupid you and controled you by religion you are. The latest dating methods all prove the testoments were written up 200-300 years after the fact.

 

 

How ever even if I believe what you wrote regading the dates and I quote from your post.

Matthew: c. 70

[Quarky1.0]

Tell me you wrote this in jest...and you are not that seriously lost?

 

 

Nope I mean what I say, read the commandments, they are very very clear, that is why the original Christian church established the so called holy trinity, which is crap and was invented to dull the minds of those who followed.

 

Also have you ever wondered why they show Christ nailed to a cross dead or dying.

why Catholicism still follows the ritual of drinking the blood of Christ and eating his flesh.

 

Christianity has taken great pains to preach to its sheep, that to question is wrong and devotion is right, the pursuit of the sciences was basically banned for 1500 years, the first human autopsy carried out by Leonardo Da Vinci was done under the risk, that if he was found out he would have been declared a heretic and most probably been killed by the church. The Christians were responsible for the burning of the library at Alexandrina, which held most of the collect works and knowledge of humanity at the time.

 

This is not what a so called peace loving religion (and religion by its nature is it) does.

 

You do not show your god risen from death and ascending to the heavens, no you show me nailed to a fucking cross and dying in pain,

[Quarky1.0]

Tell me you wrote this in jest...and you are not that seriously lost?

 

 

Oh yeah as to being lost. I would lay down my life for God, not christ. My God is thy Lord God, not his son.

 

So I view you and all those who put any other above God, as the lost.

[hugo]

( a bunch of bsabbling by someone demonstrating an IQ of about 12)

 

Too stupid to reply to. The books of the Bible were written in the 1st and 2nd centuries. Case closed.

[Quarky1.0]

Too stupid to reply to. The books of the Bible were written in the 1st and 2nd centuries. Case closed.

 

Very funny coming from someone who believed the continued rape of the natural world is a good idea.

PS my IQ is 165, about 164 points higher than yours.

 

And if you are going to quote, don't quote from either a religious scholar or religious site, of course they would come up with evidence to prove there point of view.

 

Also what about the dead sea scrolls, which disprove most of the new testiment and were written long before the first of the new gospels were written?

Or were they the work of the devil, hugo a go go

[ImWithStupid]

No this has been scientifically proven using carbon dating' date=' linguistic dating and ink dating, using the first known copies of the gospels and before you say the first know copies? It has been proven that for 300 years there was no record of the gospels even existing. So yet again you have proven yourself to be the ignorant one. But then again GM and destroying the natural world is a good call according to the Gospel of Hugo a gogo.[/quote']

 

One of the reasons they accepted Mark, Matthew, Luke and John is because these are historically linked to being of the first of the gospels. They are from the late 1st century. (meaning 0 c.e. to 100 c.e.) or early 2nd century (as in 100 c.e. to 200 c.e.)

 

Mark being first because it is linked to be first written about 30 years after the Crucifixion of Christ.

[ImWithStupid]

So far from disproving my claim that they were all written by second hand people' date=' you have proved it. You are worshiping a lie.[/quote']

 

So what you are saying is that if someone reports or records something that they hear someone say, instead of that person writing it down, it must be a lie?

[ImWithStupid]

Very funny coming from someone who believed the continued rape of the natural world is a good idea.

PS my IQ is 165, about 164 points higher than yours.

 

Must have been from one of those free IQ tests on iVillage or something.

[Lethalfind]

Very funny coming from someone who believed the continued rape of the natural world is a good idea.

PS my IQ is 165, about 164 points higher than yours.

 

And if you are going to quote, don't quote from either a religious scholar or religious site, of course they would come up with evidence to prove there point of view.

 

Also what about the dead sea scrolls, which disprove most of the new testiment and were written long before the first of the new gospels were written?

Or were they the work of the devil, hugo a go go

 

Let me just say after reading the replies to your arrogant and misguided statement of your IQ, NO ONE BELIEVES YOU...neither do I. Your self important and a waste of time and space. You have made this up to make yourself feel better, alot like claiming you have a big dick when its the size of a gherkin...Can you say over-compensating?????

 

Most of the time things people say on here are meaningless in the long term, I might think their an ass on one thread and think they have a real handle on it in another...you on the other hand have made a real idiot out of yourself for claiming to have an IQ of 165, thats something that is memorable and will stick to you with just about everyone who reads it. Someone who thinks they are so much better then everyone else and makes such a clear statement of it doesn't belong out in public...

[Lethalfind]

Must have been from one of those free IQ tests on iVillage or something.

 

Anyone who feels the need to throw around their IQ score, whether imagined or real is overcompensate...

Quarky is a real idiot...

 

I think he feels inferior to people on this site or he wouldn't have felt the need to make such an ignorant statement. If your intelligent, its enough for normal people to let your words speak for themselves...only self important ass holes have to sing about their IQ scores...I bet he's a member of Mensa as well...lololol. How hilarious and truly sad for him.

[ImWithStupid]

Anyone who feels the need to throw around their IQ score, whether imagined or real is overcompensate...

Quarky is a real idiot...

 

I think he feels inferior to people on this site or he wouldn't have felt the need to make such an ignorant statement. If your intelligent, its enough for normal people to let your words speak for themselves...only self important ass holes have to sing about their IQ scores...I bet he's a member of Mensa as well...lololol. How hilarious and truly sad for him.

 

Since the scale damn near tops out in the 150 area...

 

.

 

... if what Quarky says is true, at 165, he sure was a waste of a mind because he obviously hasn't got a handle on how to operate such large machinery yet.

[Lethalfind]

Since the scale damn near tops out in the 150 area...

 

.

 

... if what Quarky says is true, at 165, he sure was a waste of a mind because he obviously hasn't got a handle on how to operate such large machinery yet.

 

LOL, I'm still laughing...I haven't read such a pathetic statement in a long time, not even from Hugo...now thats saying alot. Quarky must be a real pea brain.

[hugo]

Very funny coming from someone who believed the continued rape of the natural world is a good idea.

PS my IQ is 165, about 164 points higher than yours.

 

And if you are going to quote, don't quote from either a religious scholar or religious site, of course they would come up with evidence to prove there point of view.

 

Also what about the dead sea scrolls, which disprove most of the new testiment and were written long before the first of the new gospels were written?

Or were they the work of the devil, hugo a go go

 

Keep lying to yourself. You won't fool anyone else. You are a fucking idiot.

 

The dead sea scrolls were OT and other writings they had nothing to do with either verifying or disproving the NT. Quarky is a fucking idiot. Probably got the ADD diagnosis since it is politically incorrect to call people idiots now.

[hugo]

Mr Geniuse's post before his adult special needs helper taught him how to use a spell checker.

 

You are the idoit little one. Have a read of history and you will come to the same conclusion, religion is the clear link to the on going persiction of the human race, one of the main problems within the middle east is there religion, which keeps the people uneducated and controlled.

I feel sorry for you Hugo, you have my pitty, because you are a small narrow minded little man.

 

He has my pitty (sic).

[Lethalfind]

Mr Geniuse's post before his adult special needs helper taught him how to use a spell checker.

 

 

 

He has my pitty (sic).

 

LOL, I guess the high IQ doesn't help his spelling...

[eisanbt]

Firstly, don't start in on correcting people's spelling as its really pathetic, is in no way productive or even clever and goes to prove nothing at all about the person's mental capacity. I'm not defending him being an idiot I'm just saying that we ought to get past spelling eh?

 

Its all crap, the whole holy trinity bullshit. If you follow Christianity you are pissing god off and I quote from the ten commandments.

The first commandment: Do not worship any other Gods.

The second: Do not make any Idols.

The fifth: honor your mother and father.

 

Well the first you break ever time you pray and you put Christ before his father, thus you are worshiping another god above god.

You are breaking the second by hanging up crosses in your homes, having pictures of Christ, going to church and worshiping in front of a idol.

You are breaking the fifth by putting Christ ahead of god, you are dishonoring the true father of all life, the father of your creation.

 

 

I'll clear it up for you, as the other seem to disgusted to. First I agree religion= BS etc etc, but this argument is flawed so here is the lesson:

 

First the Holy Trinity are all one and the same; God. This clears away your arguments for Commandments 1 and 5.

 

The second commandment you abbreviated and in so changed the message. It is don't make any false idols. Christ being god, nobody is in the wrong to worship him or the more conventional God (With a capital 'G'). Remember kiddo, if you're quoting that means direct copying, not stating what you remember it saying.

[hugo]

Firstly, don't start in on correcting people's spelling as its really pathetic, is in no way productive or even clever and goes to prove nothing at all about the person's mental capacity. I'm not defending him being an idiot I'm just saying that we ought to get past spelling eh?

 

Not true. Strong correlation between IQ and spelling ability. No one with a 165 IQ, without a strong mental defect, would have typed the passage I quoted.

 

Quarky is a stupid liar. Case closed.