Guest Blackwater Posted July 16, 2007 Posted July 16, 2007 FoxNews PHILADELPHIA : Seven years ago, Russian courts convicted a wealthy American motel owner of molesting children, sent him to prison, then expelled him from the country. The experience did little to keep Anthony "Mark" Bianchi stateside. Over the next few years, U.S. officials allege, he traveled to Moldova, Romania, Cambodia and Cuba to recruit destitute boys for sexual trysts. Bianchi, 44, of North Wildwood, N.J., faces trial beginning Monday under a controversial federal law aimed at thwarting "sex tourism." He is accused in this country of committing crimes, assaulting nearly a dozen minors on foreign soil. More than 50 cases have been brought under what's known as the Protect Act, and more than 30 of the defendants have been convicted, the Justice Department says. So far, however, only one federal appeals court, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has reviewed the law, upholding it in a 2-1 ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court decided not to hear an appeal of that decision. - - - - - "Decided not to hear an appeal" ... meaning they KNOW it's an illegal law but won't DO anything about it because of political considerations. Pretty much the same for a lot of this "anti-terrorism" stuff, the Court just chickens out and does the three-monkeys bit. You know, IF it's OK to prosecute an American for something they did in another country - either legal or ignored there - then it's equally OK for countries like Iran to issue death warrants for heretics like Salmon Rushdie or Danish cartoonists for 'crimes' committed outside Irans borders. Did your girlfriend wear a bikini to the beach this weekend ? Worthy of a death sentence under Iranian law ... and since US law applies anywhere, so does Iranian law - right ? This anti-'sex tourist' law is one of those ones with good intentions (depending on your culture of origin anyway) but it's really BAD law - bad enough so our worst enemies can find ways to exploit the precedent. I propose a NEW law, that the USSC cannot refuse to hear cases or create an unnecessary delay in hearing them. If bad laws aren't quickly flushed down the toilet, all our good laws are for naught. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.