Guest Gandalf Grey Posted July 16, 2007 Posted July 16, 2007 As States Lead On Health Care, D.C. Elites Say Only D.C. Elites Can Save America By David Sirota Created Jul 12 2007 - 2:45pm Only in Washington, D.C. can people look at data, success and advances in America's states, and still insist that only the Beltway's Wise Old Men, Serious Policy Experts, Self-Described Political Gurus and Universe-Rescuing Pundit Superheroes [1] can solve our country's problems. Yes, only inside I-495 where theses Gods of Mt. Olympus frolick, can some so-called "progressives" not only downplay - but aggressively attack - courageous state legislators that are moving forward with progressive solutions to the most challenging moral crises. Case in point is the Beltway's professional pontificator and self-declared national health policy "expert" Ezra Klein, who penned a laughably absurd article in the Washington Monthly [2] about health care that is now being circulated in political circles (I know, I know, it was in the WASHINGTON Monthly - should we have expected something that wasn't D.C.-obsessed?). As if blaring a homeland security alarm from the gilded rooftops of D.C.'s office buildings, Klein courageously uses Lexis Nexis to put together a supposed "investigative" report that ends up reading like stereo instructions and that lectures progressive state legislators to stop wasting their time working to move their states toward universal health care. Why? Because, he says, the only solution can come from Unbelievably Smart and Important Washington People like him. Yes, that's right, he says "states are no good at delivering universal health care" - the implication being, of course, that Wise Men in Washington have been just incredibly successful at the endeavor. I'll let Nathan Newman at the Progressive States Network [3] (on whose board I serve) do the talking [4] here. In his new article that exposes Klein's article as typical self-congratulatory D.C. propaganda, he shows that the facts are, in fact, exactly the opposite - states are far, far better and more experienced at delivering health care than The Glorious Leaders of Washington. Though many Washington-based and Washington-focused progressives likely haven't bothered to take a look, the data shows that the states have quietly taken the lead in providing more and more health care to more and more Americans. While no one argues that the federal government has played a role in these successes, that role has been primarily financial - not administrative. That is, the feds have cut some checks, but the hard work of actually setting up and running the systems has been done not by the Serious Thinkers or the Deities of Pennsylvania Avenue, but by the states. Newman proceeds to discuss both the political and public policy advantages of targeting universal health care campaigns at state legislatures. One thing he doesn't mention (but I will) is the historical idiocy of claiming that states - many bigger than European countries that provide national health care - cannot provide universal health care. Spend 5 minutes on Wikipedia [5], and you'll learn that Canada's much-vaunted universal health care system began as a provincial initiative. The provinces provided both the better political opportunities, and ultimately the better initial implementation platform that ended up launching the federal program. None of this is to say that the efforts to pass a universal health care system at the federal level are a waste - they aren't, they are absolutely critical, and those of us in the unwashed masses who dare to live in the American heartland wouldn't make that kind of blanket attack on our allies that Klein and other D.C. creatures typically launch against progressives in the states. Perhaps that means the "arrogant" or "uniformed" lobes of our primitive brains aren't as well-developed as the more advanced species in Washington, but perhaps that just means that we have a little better sense of clarity, facts, teamwork and Movement and a little more belief that the Wise Old Men of Washington aren't any smarter than folks out here. Lot's of folks in national progressive circles - donors, organizational leaders, activists - talk a terrific game about truly respecting states, and wanting to devote real resources to fighting battles in the states, as the conservative movement has done so successfully. At some level, they seem to vaguely sense that there are very important reasons why the conservative movement is not as DC-focused as the progressive movement, and why it has spent such huge resources aimed at dominating state policy [6] - especially health care. Yet, when it comes time to devoting real resources to the states, many (but certainly not all) of these same folks slink away or, like Klein, unleash half-baked attacks on the successes that are being forged in the states. These folks are either too obsessed with the the pseudo-celebrity fanfare of being able to meet a U.S. Senator (wow what a thrill!) or believe that by actually focusing on the states they supposedly acknowledge that their work in Washington is less relevant. But it's not - it's not an either/or. Federal AND state campaigns are critical if we are to enact public policy reforms that help the middle-class and if we are to build a movement - not just build a cloistered club of Washington elites and a stack of glossy personality profiles in Beltway newsletters. P.S. I know D.C. isn't a state, but Ezra, I'm betting right now [7] you wouldn't be all that bummed if D.C. had its own universal health care plan. We'll wait until after you recover from your $2,000 root canal to hear the answer... NOTE: I am a nice person, really I am - and I've congratulated Ezra for some of his previous work, when it's dared to not regurgitate debunked, Washington Conventional Wisdom. But nothing gets me more riled up than some aspiring-to-be-elite pundit sitting in Washington feeling like the best way to make themselves feel Important, Serious and Smart is to tell courageous progressive champions in states and the organizations that support them that their work is a waste - when in fact, the actual facts make such claims look ridiculous, and when in fact even modest advances on an issue as critical as health care means actually saving thousands of lives. Yes, I know that last point about saving lives is some sort of afterthought inside the Beltway - but as us in the unwashed masses out here in the hinterlands say, thems the facts [8]. _______ About author David Sirota is a political strategist and NY Times bestselling author whose work appears in major newspapers and magazines. He has appeared on CNN, MSNBC, CNBC and The Colbert Report. He has appeared in TV debates with right-wing icons like Ann Coulter, John Stossel and John Fund. Email: david [at] davidsirota.com. -- NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available to advance understanding of political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 "A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are suffering deeply in spirit, and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at stake." -Thomas Jefferson Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.