Guest vivapadrepio@aol.com Posted July 16, 2007 Posted July 16, 2007 On Jul 16, 1:18?pm, "u2fan.org.uk" <isaiah6...@googlemail.com> wrote: > both side need enough weapons to cause a big war, that is happening > all the time funding palestine = weapons > > to be the correct 7 year covenant the 3rd temple must be present hence > arabs must be allowed to destroy the temple mount by digging it, that > is happening > > the next thing may be a collapse of the temple mount Syria and Israel are gearing up for a possible war by the end of this summer. Syria insists on taking the Golan Heights, but Israel refuses. Syria would love for Israel to strike first, justifying any retaliation. If it doesn't happen, look for Syria to start an offensive and explain it by stating that Israel asked for it by not cooperating with the Golan Heights issue. In effect, Israel started it, even without firing a weapon. What remains to be seen is if Syria uses chemical warheads which are classified as WMD. If so, Israel might answer back with a nuclear warhead, and it'll be interesting to see what this scenario leads to. World condemnation probably. It won't be Armageddon, but the world will be that much closer to it. Quote
Guest Pastor Dave Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:10:50 -0700, vivapadrepio@aol.com spoke thusly: >On Jul 16, 1:18?pm, "u2fan.org.uk" <isaiah6...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> both side need enough weapons to cause a big war, that is happening >> all the time funding palestine = weapons >> >> to be the correct 7 year covenant the 3rd temple must be present hence >> arabs must be allowed to destroy the temple mount by digging it, that >> is happening >> >> the next thing may be a collapse of the temple mount > >Syria and Israel are gearing up for a possible war by the end of this >summer. Syria insists on taking the Golan Heights, but Israel >refuses. > >Syria would love for Israel to strike first, justifying any >retaliation. If it doesn't happen, look for Syria to start an >offensive and explain it by stating that Israel asked for it by not >cooperating with the Golan Heights issue. In effect, Israel started >it, even without firing a weapon. > >What remains to be seen is if Syria uses chemical warheads which are >classified as WMD. If so, Israel might answer back with a nuclear >warhead, and it'll be interesting to see what this scenario leads to. >World condemnation probably. It won't be Armageddon, but the world >will be that much closer to it. No offense, but I'll never understand why people keep claiming that whatever they see on the news is "the prophecies from the Bible, being fulfilled right before our very eyes". And when the news changes, the fulfillments change just as quickly. -- Pastor Dave When making liars happy in their word games takes precedence over truth, Christ has been abandoned. -unknown Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith. God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest part of the water. The world says that seeing is believing. The Bible says that believing is seeing. Doctrine is not Scripture. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.