Guest Stanley F. Nelson Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 Yes, indeed, and in its own way, and his, equally traumatic for America. Stanley F. Nelson Dallas. Quote
Guest GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Ut Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 Roger wrote: > AWOL Bush had an exit strategy for Vietnam duty. -- There are only two kinds of Republicans: Millionaires and fools. Quote
Guest Roger Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia" <gw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8q4ni.31026$Fc.26120@attbi_s21... > Roger wrote: > >> > AWOL Bush had an exit strategy for Vietnam duty. 1. Get transfered to Alabama. 2. Stay in Texas. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Stanley F. Nelson" <stan02345@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:f7Xmi.10821$rL1.178@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net... > Yes, indeed, and in its own way, and his, equally traumatic for America. > Stanley F. Nelson 4,000 /= 60,000. Does the "F." stand for "Failed math?" Quote
Guest Passerby Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com> wrote in message news:469cf77f$0$32570$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... "Stanley F. Nelson" <stan02345@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:f7Xmi.10821$rL1.178@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net... > Yes, indeed, and in its own way, and his, equally traumatic for America. > Stanley F. Nelson 4,000 /= 60,000. Does the "F." stand for "Failed math?" You're not, by any chance, making a feeble attempt to equate number of deaths, are you, between the two battles? As in 10 years vs March 20, 2003, to date? Do you know the number of casualties that had been sustained up to May 1, 2003, when this mismanaged mission was declared accomplished? You do know, do you not...that in comparable time periods, Iraq has been ahead in casualties? And in any event, you're not trying to say that there's justification of any kind, for this unjustified so-called war...by virtue of your inappropriately represented numbers? And are you aware that the 26,558 wounded (latest report)...some with lifetime disabilities, would have died in Vietnam...and are only counted amongst the "living" (with as horrific as the injuries are...most notably Traumatic Brain Injury, for whcih this administration has actually reduced funding) because of faster, more sophisticated medical attention? And...you do know what you can do with your flippant, cavalier tiny little post response, do you not? And how about being more respectful with the numbers...as in "accurate". Rounding off is somewhat cold, when it comes to counting lives, even when rounded up, as you have done and for the purpose you've done it. Of course, if you count the Afghanistan casualties, that would, in fact...raise the number to over 4,000. To date: First number = the dead. Second number, the wounded: 3619 26558 Here you go, fella... http://icasualties.org/oif/ Keep in mind, also (this being "war", where truth is the first thing to go)... numbers "fudging", as was done in Vietnam. Do you...or any of us...really know how many casualties have been sustained in Iraq/Afghanistan? Doubtful the numbers aren't higher. Need another page for the burgeoning number of those posters, such as yourself...landing themselves in the "inane/irrelevant/misinformed" column. How insane that another two months has to pass, with more deaths/injuries being incurred...awaiting yet another fall-guy general's "opinion" as to success/non-success of the equally insane "surge". Nero keeps right on fiddling. Quote
Guest Patriot Games Posted July 19, 2007 Posted July 19, 2007 "Passerby" <MrE @midnight.net> wrote in message news:8Cjni.230$kU4.56@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com> wrote in message > news:469cf77f$0$32570$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > "Stanley F. Nelson" <stan02345@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:f7Xmi.10821$rL1.178@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net... >> Yes, indeed, and in its own way, and his, equally traumatic for America. >> Stanley F. Nelson > 4,000 /= 60,000. > Does the "F." stand for "Failed math?" > You're not, by any chance, making a feeble attempt to equate number of > deaths, are you, between the two battles? That's what the Subject of the Thread suggests. > As in 10 years vs March 20, 2003, > to date? Do you know the number of casualties that had been sustained up > to > May 1, 2003, when this mismanaged mission was declared accomplished? > You do know, do you not...that in comparable time periods, Iraq has been > ahead in casualties? Of course Iraq is WAY ahead in casualities. They're helpless victims of homocide bombers nearly every day. > And in any event, you're not trying to say that > there's justification of any kind, for this unjustified so-called war...by > virtue of your inappropriately represented numbers? Can you read? > And are you aware that the 26,558 wounded (latest report)...some with > lifetime disabilities, would have died in Vietnam...and are only counted > amongst the "living" (with as horrific as the injuries are...most notably > Traumatic Brain Injury, for whcih this administration has actually reduced > funding) because of faster, more sophisticated medical attention? People get wounded in War. You didn't know that? > And...you do know what you can do with your flippant, cavalier tiny little > post response, do you not? You bet, I can watch you choke on it! Hahahahhahahaha!~!! > And how about being more respectful with the numbers...as in "accurate". > Rounding off is somewhat cold, when it comes to counting lives, even when > rounded up, as you have done and for the purpose you've done it. Of > course, > if you count the Afghanistan casualties, that would, in fact...raise the > number to over 4,000. > To date: First number = the dead. Second number, the wounded: > 3619 26558 > Here you go, fella... Doesn't come CLOSE to MOST other Wars, Vietnam specfically. > http://icasualties.org/oif/ > Keep in mind, also (this being "war", where truth is the first thing to > go)... numbers "fudging", as was done in Vietnam. Do you...or any of > us...really know how many casualties have been sustained in > Iraq/Afghanistan? Doubtful the numbers aren't higher. Feel free to makeup any stupid thing you want... > Need another page for the burgeoning number of those posters, such as > yourself...landing themselves in the "inane/irrelevant/misinformed" > column. > How insane that another two months has to pass, with more deaths/injuries > being incurred...awaiting yet another fall-guy general's "opinion" as to > success/non-success of the equally insane "surge". > Nero keeps right on fiddling. And you keep right on whining... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.