Jump to content

WallStreet Journal Prepares To Become Yet Another Foreign Owned Media Tool Like FoxNews And The Wash


Recommended Posts

Guest tomaxo@aol.com
Posted

Yep, with Korean Religious-Kook Sun Myung Moon owning the Washington

Times and Australian Ruport Murdoch adding the Wallstreet Journal to

his FoxNews propaganda machinery, William Kristol will have even more

help in his efforts to see America completely looted of its future.

 

After all, how else are they going to get America to continue to

sacrifice its future for the enrichment of international corporatists

betting on Red China.

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Bert Hyman
Posted

tomaxo@aol.com () wrote in

news:1184678961.261695.179220@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com:

> Yep, with Korean Religious-Kook Sun Myung Moon owning the

> Washington Times and Australian Ruport Murdoch adding the

> Wallstreet Journal to his FoxNews propaganda machinery, ...

 

Are you suggesting that something needs to be done by somebody, or

just lamenting the trade?

 

--

Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com

Guest therethats_better@yahoo.com
Posted

On 17 Jul 2007 13:37:41 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:

>tomaxo@aol.com () wrote in

>news:1184678961.261695.179220@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com:

>

>> Yep, with Korean Religious-Kook Sun Myung Moon owning the

>> Washington Times and Australian Ruport Murdoch adding the

>> Wallstreet Journal to his FoxNews propaganda machinery, ...

>

>Are you suggesting that something needs to be done by somebody, or

>just lamenting the trade?

 

Pretty much just reporting the facts, actually. It's quite a

commentary on those who so frequently hide behind our flag, that they

get their spoon feeding from foreigners.

 

But , judging by the text you chose to delete (re-submitted below),

perhaps you already knew that..

 

......William Kristol will have even more

help in his efforts to see America completely looted of its future.

 

After all, how else are they going to get America to continue to

sacrifice its future for the enrichment of international corporatists

betting on Red China.

Guest Bert Hyman
Posted

In news:hipq935g3p07qgkdbd6db6d1fsctm6u29l@4ax.com

therethats_better@yahoo.com wrote:

> But , judging by the text you chose to delete (re-submitted below),

> perhaps you already knew that..

 

Why do you think it was necessary for me to repost the article in its

entirety to ask a question?

 

And, why are you answering a question that I put to the original poster

as if it was directed at you?

 

--

Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com

Guest Tomaxo@aol.com
Posted

On 18 Jul 2007 02:06:34 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:

>In news:hipq935g3p07qgkdbd6db6d1fsctm6u29l@4ax.com

>therethats_better@yahoo.com wrote:

>

>> But , judging by the text you chose to delete (re-submitted below),

>> perhaps you already knew that..

>

>Why do you think it was necessary for me to repost the article in its

>entirety to ask a question?

 

I was just noting what you deleted. It's pretty easy to post just to

the part you want to respond to and leave the rest below, as I just

did.

>

>And, why are you answering a question that I put to the original poster

>as if it was directed at you?

 

Getting lazy I guess. The other name was something I created a long

time ago to remove clock-changing troll posts without wasting the

posts I use for discussion. I only occasionally use this newsreader,

which allows for such clumsy mistakes..

Guest Bert Hyman
Posted

Tomaxo@aol.com () wrote in

news:hi2r939mf153r2bq753scs2ugosh4e1s63@4ax.com:

> On 18 Jul 2007 02:06:34 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:

>>

>>And, why are you answering a question that I put to the original

>>poster as if it was directed at you?

>

> Getting lazy I guess. The other name was something I created a

> long time ago to remove clock-changing troll posts without wasting

> the posts I use for discussion. I only occasionally use this

> newsreader, which allows for such clumsy mistakes..

 

So, I'm talking to one of your sock puppets?

 

Thanks for the heads up.

 

--

Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com

Guest Tomaxo@aol.com
Posted

On 18 Jul 2007 12:52:25 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:

>Tomaxo@aol.com () wrote in

>news:hi2r939mf153r2bq753scs2ugosh4e1s63@4ax.com:

>

>> On 18 Jul 2007 02:06:34 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:

>>>

>>>And, why are you answering a question that I put to the original

>>>poster as if it was directed at you?

>>

>> Getting lazy I guess. The other name was something I created a

>> long time ago to remove clock-changing troll posts without wasting

>> the posts I use for discussion. I only occasionally use this

>> newsreader, which allows for such clumsy mistakes..

>

>So, I'm talking to one of your sock puppets?

 

By definition, a sock puppet is something that is disguised. Who just

explained the ownership of the alias to you?

>

>Thanks for the heads up.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...