Guest Paul J. Berg Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 ` From The Willamette Weekly (Portland, Oregon) - July 16, 2007 Some of US Senator Gordon Smith's campaign contributors are so eager to hand him cash that the campaign is finding itself on the receiving end of questions from the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The FEC last month sent "Friends of Gordon Smith", the official campaign for the Republican's reelection in 2008, a letter telling the campaign about a "preliminary review" of its first-quarter disclosure reports. "Schedule A of your report discloses one or more contributions that appear to exceed the limits set forth in the Act. You should examine all of your contributions to check for additional excessive contributions. The Committee's procedures for processing contributions should also be reviewed." George Smaragdis of the FEC's press office said that the FEC is "just asking for clarification on these contributions." No penalties are being issued to Smith or his campaign. Attached to Smith's FEC letter is a two-page list of individual, political committee and corporate contributions to the campaign that appear to be greater than what's allowed. Donors can give a maximum of $2,300 for the primary and $2,300 for the general election. Smith spokesman RC Hammond says some of the people who'd contributed to Smith's campaign were in fact over the limit. But Hammond says the campaign caught the over-the-limit donations well before the FEC issued its letter and either refunded or clarified the contributions. Still, the FEC expects an answer to its inquiry from Smith's campaign by July 23. Quote
Guest Curt Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message news:14011-469CE3CF-997@storefull- > > George Smaragdis of the FEC's press office said that the FEC is "just > asking for clarification on these contributions." No penalties are being > issued to Smith or his campaign. Smaragdis? Doesn't he sound like a brother in law of Emily Boyles' campaign whore? Curt Quote
Guest Paul J. Berg Posted July 20, 2007 Posted July 20, 2007 ` <http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+S6OR00094> ` Quote
Guest hal lillywhite Posted July 20, 2007 Posted July 20, 2007 Curt wrote: > > George Smaragdis of the FEC's press office said that the FEC is "just > > asking for clarification on these contributions." No penalties are being > > issued to Smith or his campaign. > Smaragdis? > Doesn't he sound like a brother in law of Emily Boyles' campaign whore? Well, let's not try to take name similarities too far. So far there seems to be no evidence that Smith's campaign did anything wrong. The campaign doesn't write the checks and claims to have noticed those over the limit and taken appropriate action. Let's see what develops out of this. Let the FEC finish its work before we rush to judgment. If the campaign was complicit in illegal action, they should be punished. However if the campaign did nothing wrong there should be no punishment. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.