Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 1. The terrorists will claim victory 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there 2. American blood will no longer be spilled to support a socialist Islamic theocracy 3. Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars will stop being wasted there 4. The Iraqi people will take responsibility for their own safety, security and future -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Server 13 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > 1. The terrorists will claim victory > 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world > 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by > 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - > 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US rofl Another deluded republican. Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in news:139q1ijnab79v25@corp.supernews.com: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > > 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there You mean more US Civilians will start dying here > 2. American blood will no longer be spilled to support a socialist > Islamic theocracy In your dreams - Islamists will focus thier attacks on US civilians > 3. Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars will stop being wasted there Only liberals consider defending America as "a wast of tax dollars" > 4. The Iraqi people will take responsibility for their own safety, > security and future LOL - you live in a dream world! Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > > rofl Another deluded republican. > > Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return after Hillary pulls out of there too... Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > 1. The terrorists will claim victory > 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world > 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by > 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - > 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > > What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? > > 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will march in lock step. Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." -Harry Reid And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting democrats here. "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the time in the world to rebuild." -Captain America Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and then they know what to think. So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had enough brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told what to think and will be told it's Bush's fault. And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu... > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > > rofl Another deluded republican. As usual, server has nothing.. Now where's my goddamned beer?! Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) > > Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will > march in lock step. > > Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda > had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS > troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: > > "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our > overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not > surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." > > -Harry Reid > > And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting > democrats here. > > "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the > time in the world to rebuild." > > -Captain America > > Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who > can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al > Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all > Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and then > they know what to think. > > So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had enough > brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told what to > think and will be told it's Bush's fault. > > And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one > party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. > I personally believe that the "kooks" actually represent a fraction of the Democratic party. Look at the initial level of support for the Iraq war... When the liberal agenda is implemented, the result will be that they will be exposed for the idiots they really are. I simply cannot believe that very many Americans will contiue to support these morons once the results of their actions are clearly seen. You can only fool most of the people some of the time... Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns997076EFBBE4AIraq2008@216.196.97.131... > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in > news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >>> >>> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will >> march in lock step. >> >> Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda >> had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS >> troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: >> >> "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our >> overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not >> surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." >> >> -Harry Reid >> >> And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting >> democrats here. >> >> "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the >> time in the world to rebuild." >> >> -Captain America >> >> Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who >> can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al >> Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all >> Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and then >> they know what to think. >> >> So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had enough >> brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told what to >> think and will be told it's Bush's fault. >> >> And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one >> party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. >> > > I personally believe that the "kooks" actually represent a fraction of > the Democratic party. Look at the initial level of support for the Iraq > war... When the liberal agenda is implemented, the result will be that > they will be exposed for the idiots they really are. > > I simply cannot believe that very many Americans will contiue to support > these morons once the results of their actions are clearly seen. > > You can only fool most of the people some of the time... So in my example, Harry Reid was only addressing fringe democrats? That must mean that the majority are embarrassed and had their intelligence insulted. Don't bet on it for a second, Bub. Quote
Guest CoriousAboutBahai Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in news:Ga8ni.31$wH1.17@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns997076EFBBE4AIraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in >> news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net: >> >>> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>>> >>>> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >>>> >>>> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >>> >>> Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants >>> will march in lock step. >>> >>> Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al >>> Qaeda had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled >>> HIS troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: >>> >>> "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our >>> overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not >>> surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." >>> >>> -Harry Reid >>> >>> And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting >>> democrats here. >>> >>> "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the >>> time in the world to rebuild." >>> >>> -Captain America >>> >>> Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who >>> can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al >>> Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all >>> Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and >>> then they know what to think. >>> >>> So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had >>> enough brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told >>> what to think and will be told it's Bush's fault. >>> >>> And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one >>> party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. >>> >> >> I personally believe that the "kooks" actually represent a fraction >> of the Democratic party. Look at the initial level of support for the >> Iraq war... When the liberal agenda is implemented, the result will >> be that they will be exposed for the idiots they really are. >> >> I simply cannot believe that very many Americans will contiue to >> support these morons once the results of their actions are clearly >> seen. >> >> You can only fool most of the people some of the time... > > So in my example, Harry Reid was only addressing fringe democrats? > That must mean that the majority are embarrassed and had their > intelligence insulted. > > Don't bet on it for a second, Bub. > Words are just that... It's the RESULTS of the actions of these kooks (once they get real power) that I believe will finally wake up most of the American people. Quote
Guest Server 13 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: > >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >>> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> rofl Another deluded republican. >> >> > > Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return after > Hillary pulls out of there too... Same bullshit, different day. Quote
Guest Server 13 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:R%7ni.28$wH1.12@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > > "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message > news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu... >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >>> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> rofl Another deluded republican. > > As usual, server has nothing.. Thanks for once again taking the time to remind me I need nothing when I respond to a republican nothing. lol Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message news:f7j3vo$lav$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu... > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: >> >>> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >>>> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>> rofl Another deluded republican. >>> >>> >> >> Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return after >> Hillary pulls out of there too... > > Same bullshit, different day. Again, and as usual, server has nothing. Now get me that damned beer! Quote
Guest Server 13 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) > > Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will > march in lock step. > > Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda had > set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS troops out. > Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: > > "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our overextended > military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not surprising that al Qaeda > has > been able to reorganize and rebuild." > > -Harry Reid > > And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting democrats > here. > > "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the time > in > the world to rebuild." > > -Captain America > > Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who can > think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al Qaeda in > Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Except of course that the Iraqi civilians are now killing them wholesale. Try to keep up. Quote
Guest Server 13 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns997076EFBBE4AIraq2008@216.196.97.131... > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in > news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >>> >>> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will >> march in lock step. >> >> Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda >> had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS >> troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: >> >> "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our >> overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not >> surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." >> >> -Harry Reid >> >> And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting >> democrats here. >> >> "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the >> time in the world to rebuild." >> >> -Captain America >> >> Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who >> can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al >> Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all >> Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and then >> they know what to think. >> >> So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had enough >> brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told what to >> think and will be told it's Bush's fault. >> >> And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one >> party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. >> > > I personally believe that the "kooks" actually represent a fraction of > the Democratic party. Look at the initial level of support for the Iraq > war... When the liberal agenda is implemented, the result will be that > they will be exposed for the idiots they really are. > > I simply cannot believe that very many Americans will contiue to support > these morons once the results of their actions are clearly seen. rofl You mean the results no one but wacko republicans predict? Oh, right, I see them in your original post. > > You can only fool most of the people some of the time... "...And those are the ones we want to concentrate on." -- George W. Bush Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 > Except of course that the Iraqi civilians are now killing them > wholesale. > Try to keep up. > If I didn't know better, this statement would lead me to believe you agreed that the Bush plan was working... Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "CoriousAboutBahai" <idontgiveoutmy@email.com> wrote in message news:Xns997079F56E6D1idontgiveoutmyemailc@216.196.97.131... > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in > news:Ga8ni.31$wH1.17@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns997076EFBBE4AIraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in >>> news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net: >>> >>>> >>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>>>> >>>>> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >>>>> >>>>> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >>>> >>>> Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants >>>> will march in lock step. >>>> >>>> Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al >>>> Qaeda had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled >>>> HIS troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: >>>> >>>> "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our >>>> overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not >>>> surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." >>>> >>>> -Harry Reid >>>> >>>> And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting >>>> democrats here. >>>> >>>> "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the >>>> time in the world to rebuild." >>>> >>>> -Captain America >>>> >>>> Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who >>>> can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al >>>> Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all >>>> Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and >>>> then they know what to think. >>>> >>>> So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had >>>> enough brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told >>>> what to think and will be told it's Bush's fault. >>>> >>>> And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one >>>> party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. >>>> >>> >>> I personally believe that the "kooks" actually represent a fraction >>> of the Democratic party. Look at the initial level of support for the >>> Iraq war... When the liberal agenda is implemented, the result will >>> be that they will be exposed for the idiots they really are. >>> >>> I simply cannot believe that very many Americans will contiue to >>> support these morons once the results of their actions are clearly >>> seen. >>> >>> You can only fool most of the people some of the time... >> >> So in my example, Harry Reid was only addressing fringe democrats? >> That must mean that the majority are embarrassed and had their >> intelligence insulted. >> >> Don't bet on it for a second, Bub. >> > > Words are just that... It's the RESULTS of the actions of these kooks > (once they get real power) that I believe will finally wake up most of > the American people. I think you are naive. Should the above outlined "results" of pulling out of Iraq come to fruition, they'll simply blame it on Bush and the dems will fall in lockstep. Just look at the "results" of Musharraf pulling troops out of remote Pakistan. They blamed it on Iraq and they fell in lockstep. If you think the majority of democrats - or Americans - know what REALLY happened, you are dreaming. Just like most people think a covert CIA agent was outed. Most people do not take the time to shift through the fog of the DNC / media cabal. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message news:f7j427$lbb$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu... > > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message > news:R%7ni.28$wH1.12@bignews8.bellsouth.net... >> >> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message >> news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu... >>> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >>>> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>> rofl Another deluded republican. >> >> As usual, server has nothing.. > > Thanks for once again taking the time to remind me I need nothing when I > respond to a republican nothing. lol And yet again, you have nothing. Now, get me my beer, damn you. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message news:f7j487$lcd$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu... > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns997076EFBBE4AIraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in >> news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net: >> >>> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>>> >>>> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >>>> >>>> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >>> >>> Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will >>> march in lock step. >>> >>> Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda >>> had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS >>> troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: >>> >>> "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our >>> overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not >>> surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." >>> >>> -Harry Reid >>> >>> And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting >>> democrats here. >>> >>> "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the >>> time in the world to rebuild." >>> >>> -Captain America >>> >>> Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who >>> can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al >>> Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all >>> Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and then >>> they know what to think. >>> >>> So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had enough >>> brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told what to >>> think and will be told it's Bush's fault. >>> >>> And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one >>> party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. >>> >> >> I personally believe that the "kooks" actually represent a fraction of >> the Democratic party. Look at the initial level of support for the Iraq >> war... When the liberal agenda is implemented, the result will be that >> they will be exposed for the idiots they really are. >> >> I simply cannot believe that very many Americans will contiue to support >> these morons once the results of their actions are clearly seen. > > rofl You mean the results no one but wacko republicans predict? Oh, > right, I see them in your original post. It's simple common sense, so it's beyond your ability to comprehend.. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message news:f7j44c$lbq$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu... > > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message > news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net... >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >>> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >>> >>> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will >> march in lock step. >> >> Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda had >> set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS troops out. >> Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: >> >> "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our overextended >> military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not surprising that al Qaeda >> has >> been able to reorganize and rebuild." >> >> -Harry Reid >> >> And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting democrats >> here. >> >> "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the time >> in >> the world to rebuild." >> >> -Captain America >> >> Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who can >> think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al Qaeda in >> Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. > > Except of course that the Iraqi civilians are now killing them wholesale. > Try to keep up. You've got it backwards. But when did the DNC tell you that? Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns99707E15ED019Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> Except of course that the Iraqi civilians are now killing them >> wholesale. >> Try to keep up. >> > > If I didn't know better, this statement would lead me to believe you > agreed > that the Bush plan was working... <chuckle> On a related note.. Have you ever noticed that these kooks simultaneously believe that the resurgence of Al Qaeda is the fault of Bush and Iraq, while at the same time, the "war on terror" is all made up and was an excuse for Bush to invade Iraq? Hahahahah! The "war on terror" is a bumper sticker slogan and Bush made it up. No, wait! Al Qaeda is gonna killasaw and it's all Bush's fault! Kooks! Bawhahahahah! Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in news:Sq9ni.46$wV4.30@bignews2.bellsouth.net: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns99707E15ED019Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> Except of course that the Iraqi civilians are now killing them >>> wholesale. >>> Try to keep up. >>> >> >> If I didn't know better, this statement would lead me to believe you >> agreed >> that the Bush plan was working... > > <chuckle> > > On a related note.. Have you ever noticed that these kooks > simultaneously believe that the resurgence of Al Qaeda is the fault of > Bush and Iraq, while at the same time, the "war on terror" is all made > up and was an excuse for Bush to invade Iraq? > > Hahahahah! > > The "war on terror" is a bumper sticker slogan and Bush made it up. > No, wait! Al Qaeda is gonna killasaw and it's all Bush's fault! > > Kooks! > > Bawhahahahah! > > Bottom line, when the Democrats pull out of Iraq, the shit is really going to hit the fan and it will be interesting to see how they try to handle the situation... Simply sitting back and watching the carnage and blaming Bush won't help them - they will actually be expected to 'do something'... lol Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there > > You mean more US Civilians will start dying here How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the US? Explain. >> 2. American blood will no longer be spilled to support a socialist >> Islamic theocracy > > In your dreams - Islamists will focus thier attacks on US civilians You fucking idiot - the new Iraq government is a socialist Islamic theocracy. There is no evidence (ZERO) that the war in Iraq is deflecting any attacks or plans of attack from the US. >> 3. Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars will stop being wasted there > > Only liberals consider defending America as "a wast of tax dollars" The war in Iraq is not defending America. The war in Iraq is a threat to America. Prior to Bush's botched invasion, Iraq was no threat whatsoever to the United States. >> 4. The Iraqi people will take responsibility for their own safety, >> security and future > > LOL - you live in a dream world! Why wouldn't the Iraqi people take responsibility for their own safety, security and future? They're not children, you fucking traitor. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Joe S. Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > 1. US troops will return home only this time they won't be coming home in body bags. 2. We will no longer be throwing $200 BILLION A YEAR down a rat hole. 3. The Iraqis will sort out their own problems, including throwing out Al Qaeda and Iran. 4. US oil companies will sign contracts with the Iraqi government to modernize Iraq's oil fields. 5. Democrats will win election after election for most of the 21st century. 6. GWBush will become a footnote in cheap history books. Quote
Guest Joe S. Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: > >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >>> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> rofl Another deluded republican. >> >> > > Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return after > Hillary pulls out of there too... You ever been to Afghanistan?? I have. Amazing scenery. No oil. No rare minerals. Not a strategic chokepoint. The Taliban can have it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.