Guest Joe S. Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns997076EFBBE4AIraq2008@216.196.97.131... > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in > news:xW7ni.25$wH1.9@bignews8.bellsouth.net: > >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >>> >>> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> Nope. Sorry. They will blame Bush and the mind-numbed sycophants will >> march in lock step. >> >> Just look at what they were saying when it was reported that Al Qaeda >> had set up shop in remote Pakistan where Musharraf had pulled HIS >> troops out. Harry said that it happened because of Iraq: >> >> "Given President Bush's stubborn dedication to keeping our >> overextended military mired in an Iraqi civil war, it is not >> surprising that al Qaeda has been able to reorganize and rebuild." >> >> -Harry Reid >> >> And on queue, this is what we were treated to by the parroting >> democrats here. >> >> "All the time we focused our military in Iraq, Al Qaeda had all the >> time in the world to rebuild." >> >> -Captain America >> >> Amazing isn't it? The lesson with Pakistan is obvious to anyone who >> can think. Pulling out without the Iraqi army able to tamp down Al >> Qaeda in Iraq would create a vacuum for them to work in. Yet, all >> Harry Reid had to do was tell them something obviously stupid and then >> they know what to think. >> >> So you see? Your theory would only be correct if democrats had enough >> brains to think for themselves, but they don't. They are told what to >> think and will be told it's Bush's fault. >> >> And plus, they'll have a zillion illegals naturalized by then, one >> party rule will be instituted and it will be the end of America. >> > > I personally believe that the "kooks" actually represent a fraction of > the Democratic party. Unlike the Republican Party where kooks are the rule, not the exception. Quote
Guest Andrealphus Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 In News f7jf15025g4@news5.newsguy.com,, Joe S. at noname@nosuch.net, typed this: > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in >> news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: >>> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>> rofl Another deluded republican. >>> >>> >> >> Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return >> after Hillary pulls out of there too... > > You ever been to Afghanistan?? > > I have. Amazing scenery. No oil. No rare minerals. Not a strategic > chokepoint. The Taliban can have it. Exactly. Our entire mission in Afghanistan should have been, go in, crack only enough heads as necessary to get Bin Laden and destroy any Al Qaeda presence we found, get out. Fuck all this nation building bullshit. If the Afghani people wanted different leadership, let them have a revolution. Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > >>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >> >> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here > > How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the > US? Explain. > You need me to spell it out? As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan, once the US pulls out and it's dominance, or that of a similar ideology is fully established, they will focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. >>> 2. American blood will no longer be spilled to support a socialist >>> Islamic theocracy >> >> In your dreams - Islamists will focus thier attacks on US civilians > > You fucking idiot - the new Iraq government is a socialist Islamic > theocracy. There is no evidence (ZERO) that the war in Iraq is > deflecting any attacks or plans of attack from the US. > Then you tell me, once Al Qaeda can claim victory in Iraq and Afghanistan, where do you think they will focus their efforts? >>> 3. Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars will stop being wasted there >> >> Only liberals consider defending America as "a wast of tax dollars" > > The war in Iraq is not defending America. The war in Iraq is a threat > to America. Prior to Bush's botched invasion, Iraq was no threat > whatsoever to the United States. > I beg to differ. Before the war in Iraq Saddam Hussein was standing on the world stage and bragging about his $25,000 payments to the families of suicide bombers. Any 'war on terrorism', which the majority of Americans supported at the time, could hardly ignore Saddam. >>> 4. The Iraqi people will take responsibility for their own safety, >>> security and future >> >> LOL - you live in a dream world! > > Why wouldn't the Iraqi people take responsibility for their own > safety, security and future? > > They're not children, you fucking traitor. > Your ad-hom attacks only underscore the weakness of your arguments. Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in news:Yebni.9242$zA4.5244@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net: > In News f7jf15025g4@news5.newsguy.com,, Joe S. at noname@nosuch.net, > typed this: > >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in >>> news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: >>>> >>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>>> >>>> rofl Another deluded republican. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return >>> after Hillary pulls out of there too... >> >> You ever been to Afghanistan?? >> >> I have. Amazing scenery. No oil. No rare minerals. Not a >> strategic chokepoint. The Taliban can have it. > > Exactly. Our entire mission in Afghanistan should have been, go in, > crack only enough heads as necessary to get Bin Laden and destroy any > Al Qaeda presence we found, get out. Fuck all this nation building > bullshit. If the Afghani people wanted different leadership, let them > have a revolution. > > > Yes, I am sure Hillary will think just like you; she will stick her head in the sand, permit the terrorist training camps to return, permit the Jihadists to refocus thier efforts on attacking the US until the next 9- 11... Quote
Guest CoriousAboutBahai Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Joe S." <noname@nosuch.net> wrote in news:f7jeuv025e7@news5.newsguy.com: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> > > 1. US troops will return home only this time they won't be coming > home in body bags. > 2. We will no longer be throwing $200 BILLION A YEAR down a rat hole. > 3. The Iraqis will sort out their own problems, including throwing > out Al Qaeda and Iran. > 4. US oil companies will sign contracts with the Iraqi government to > modernize Iraq's oil fields. > 5. Democrats will win election after election for most of the 21st > century. 6. GWBush will become a footnote in cheap history books. > > > > I hope you're still around here in 2012.. Quote
Guest Andrealphus Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 In News Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: > "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in > news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com: > >> >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> >>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>> >>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >> >> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the >> US? Explain. >> > > You need me to spell it out? As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's > efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan, once the US pulls out and it's > dominance, or that of a similar ideology is fully established, they > will focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. That has recently been found to be false. A report issued late last week by Bush's own national security analysts clearly demonstrated that Al Qaeda is as strong as ever, and are now focusing time, money, and attention into another domestic U.S. attack. The report said: "...we assess that al-Qaida will probably seek to leverage the contacts and capabilities of al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI), its most visible and capable affiliate and the only one known to have expressed a desire to attack the homeland." http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20070717/469c3ec0_3ca6_1552620070717-916732413 .. Quote
Guest Andrealphus Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 In News Xns9970A27C44385Iraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: > "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in > news:Yebni.9242$zA4.5244@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net: > >> In News f7jf15025g4@news5.newsguy.com,, Joe S. at noname@nosuch.net, >> typed this: >> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in >>>> news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: >>>>> >>>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>>>> >>>>> rofl Another deluded republican. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return >>>> after Hillary pulls out of there too... >>> >>> You ever been to Afghanistan?? >>> >>> I have. Amazing scenery. No oil. No rare minerals. Not a >>> strategic chokepoint. The Taliban can have it. >> >> Exactly. Our entire mission in Afghanistan should have been, go in, >> crack only enough heads as necessary to get Bin Laden and destroy any >> Al Qaeda presence we found, get out. Fuck all this nation building >> bullshit. If the Afghani people wanted different leadership, let >> them have a revolution. >> >> >> > > Yes, I am sure Hillary will think just like you; I don't give a rats fuck what Hillary thinks on anything. I care what is best for the U.S. And driving ourselves into bankrupcy trying to pull people kicking and screaming from the 12th Century into the 21st is not best for the U.S. Quote
Guest Iraq 2008 Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in news:%Rbni.8616$Od7.8527@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net: > In News Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at > iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: > >> "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in >> news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com: >> >>> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> >>>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>>> >>>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >>> >>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the >>> US? Explain. >>> >> >> You need me to spell it out? As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's >> efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan, once the US pulls out and it's >> dominance, or that of a similar ideology is fully established, they >> will focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. > > That has recently been found to be false. A report issued late last > week by Bush's own national security analysts clearly demonstrated > that Al Qaeda is as strong as ever, and are now focusing time, money, > and attention into another domestic U.S. attack. The report said: > > "...we assess that al-Qaida will probably seek to leverage the > contacts and capabilities of al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI), its most visible > and capable affiliate and the only one known to have expressed a > desire to attack the homeland." > > http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20070717/469c3ec0_3ca6_ 1552 > 620070717-916732413 > > . The article you reference only confirms my post. Clearly, at this time, Al Qaeda in Iraq is more focused on the war in Iraq, (that is NOT to say that they don't have current desires and plans to attack the US homeland). If you read the complete article, its clear that Al Qaeda in Iraq is already anticipating a US withdrawal they can call a 'victory' which will only embolden them more. Thanks for posting that. Quote
Guest Vandar Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 Joe S. wrote: > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > >>"Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: >> >> >>>"Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> >>>>1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>>2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >>>>3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>>4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>>5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>> >>>rofl Another deluded republican. >>> >>> >> >>Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return after >>Hillary pulls out of there too... > > > You ever been to Afghanistan?? > > I have. Amazing scenery. No oil. No rare minerals. Not a strategic > chokepoint. The Taliban can have it. No oil and no rare minerals? You'd better re-check your information. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the >> US? Explain. >> > > You need me to spell it out? Yes. > As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan How the fuck do YOU know? And if we already had Afghanistan - why did we need to invade Iraq? > once the US pulls out and it's dominance, or that of a similar ideology is > fully established, they will > focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. Why would Al Queda become a dominant influence in Iraq? Do you believe that the majority of the Iraqi people embrace the ideology of Al Queda? Are you really that fucking stupid? >> You fucking idiot - the new Iraq government is a socialist Islamic >> theocracy. There is no evidence (ZERO) that the war in Iraq is >> deflecting any attacks or plans of attack from the US. >> > > Then you tell me, once Al Qaeda can claim victory in Iraq and > Afghanistan, where do you think they will focus their efforts? Al Queda will NEVER claim victory in Iraq or Afghanistan because the Afghan and Iraqi people do not embrace Al Queda. The goal of Al Queda in either country isn't to get the US out of those countries - it's to keep the US IN those countries you fucking idiot. >>>> 3. Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars will stop being wasted there >>> >>> Only liberals consider defending America as "a wast of tax dollars" >> >> The war in Iraq is not defending America. The war in Iraq is a threat >> to America. Prior to Bush's botched invasion, Iraq was no threat >> whatsoever to the United States. >> > > I beg to differ. Because you're a fucking idiot. That's already well established. > Before the war in Iraq Saddam Hussein was standing on the world stage and > bragging about his $25,000 payments to the families > of suicide bombers. The Saudis did the same thing. So what? > Any 'war on terrorism', which the majority of Americans supported at the > time, could hardly ignore Saddam. Who said anything about IGNORING Saddam? Damn, you terrorist-loving right-wing radical traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. >> Why wouldn't the Iraqi people take responsibility for their own >> safety, security and future? >> >> They're not children, you fucking traitor. >> > > Your ad-hom attacks only underscore the weakness of your arguments. My attacks on you are well deserved - and your use of them to fail to answer the question underscores the complete bullshit of YOUR arguments, you fucking traitor. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Andrealphus Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 In News Xns9970A4F0B50ECIraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: > "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in > news:%Rbni.8616$Od7.8527@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net: > >> In News Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at >> iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: >> >>> "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in >>> news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> >>>>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>>>> >>>>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >>>> >>>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in >>>> the US? Explain. >>>> >>> >>> You need me to spell it out? As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's >>> efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan, once the US pulls out and it's >>> dominance, or that of a similar ideology is fully established, they >>> will focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. >> >> That has recently been found to be false. A report issued late last >> week by Bush's own national security analysts clearly demonstrated >> that Al Qaeda is as strong as ever, and are now focusing time, money, >> and attention into another domestic U.S. attack. The report said: >> >> "...we assess that al-Qaida will probably seek to leverage the >> contacts and capabilities of al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI), its most visible >> and capable affiliate and the only one known to have expressed a >> desire to attack the homeland." >> >> http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20070717/469c3ec0_3ca6_ >> 1552 620070717-916732413 >> >> . > The article you reference only confirms my post. Clearly, Actually, it is in direct contradiction to your point. at this > time, Al Qaeda in Iraq is more focused on the war in Iraq, No, read what I wrote again, and read the article again. (that is > NOT to say that they don't have current desires and plans to attack > the US homeland). If you read the complete article, its clear that Al > Qaeda in Iraq is already anticipating a US withdrawal they can call a > 'victory' which will only embolden them more. > > Thanks for posting that. Quote
Guest CoriousAboutBahai Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in news:139qkesorpqkl4e@corp.supernews.com: > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > >>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the >>> US? Explain. >>> >> >> You need me to spell it out? > > Yes. > >> As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's efforts on Iraq and >> Afghanistan > > How the fuck do YOU know? Um, maybe because the fact is that we are fighting them there and not here? Do facts mean nothing to you? > > And if we already had Afghanistan - why did we need to invade Iraq? > Already answered. >> once the US pulls out and it's dominance, or that of a similar >> ideology is fully established, they will >> focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. > > Why would Al Queda become a dominant influence in Iraq? Do you > believe that the majority of the Iraqi people embrace the ideology of > Al Queda? > > Are you really that fucking stupid? > Do you believe that the majority of the Iraqi people embraced the ideology of Saddam? You seem to be under the illusion that opressed people living under fascist opression and dictatorships are happy. >>> You fucking idiot - the new Iraq government is a socialist Islamic >>> theocracy. There is no evidence (ZERO) that the war in Iraq is >>> deflecting any attacks or plans of attack from the US. >>> >> >> Then you tell me, once Al Qaeda can claim victory in Iraq and >> Afghanistan, where do you think they will focus their efforts? > > Al Queda will NEVER claim victory in Iraq or Afghanistan because the > Afghan and Iraqi people do not embrace Al Queda. The goal of Al Queda > in either country isn't to get the US out of those countries - it's to > keep the US IN those countries you fucking idiot. Again, using your logic, Saddam was only in power because the Iraqi people embraced him, or that most Eastern Block countries 'embraced' the USSR... etc > >>>>> 3. Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars will stop being wasted there >>>> >>>> Only liberals consider defending America as "a wast of tax dollars" >>> >>> The war in Iraq is not defending America. The war in Iraq is a >>> threat to America. Prior to Bush's botched invasion, Iraq was no >>> threat whatsoever to the United States. >>> >> >> I beg to differ. > > Because you're a fucking idiot. That's already well established. ...and again you use ad-hom attacks where your logic fails. > >> Before the war in Iraq Saddam Hussein was standing on the world >> stage and >> bragging about his $25,000 payments to the families >> of suicide bombers. > > The Saudis did the same thing. > > So what? > The Saudi's, (government), agreed to work with us... while it is true that a good portion of Al Qaeda is from Saudi Arabia, its pretty clear that Al Qaeda has made the Saudi government a target as well. >> Any 'war on terrorism', which the majority of Americans supported at >> the time, could hardly ignore Saddam. > > Who said anything about IGNORING Saddam? Damn, you terrorist-loving > right-wing radical traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. > I might even agree, that in hindsight, leaving Saddam in power might have been a better route to take - but at the time, and to most Americans, it seemed the right thing to do, (to remove his regiem). >>> Why wouldn't the Iraqi people take responsibility for their own >>> safety, security and future? >>> >>> They're not children, you fucking traitor. >>> >> >> Your ad-hom attacks only underscore the weakness of your arguments. > > My attacks on you are well deserved - and your use of them to fail to > answer the question underscores the complete bullshit of YOUR > arguments, you fucking traitor. > My use of what? Quote
Guest trippy Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > 1. The terrorists will claim victory > 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world > 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by > 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - > 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > > What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? > > 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. -- trippy mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30 sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM http://www.myspace.com/starshine_moonbeam NP: "Goldeneye" -- Tina Turner "What did I tell the kid. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. It's about how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Get up." -- Sylvester Stallone "Rocky Balboa" Quote
Guest Hatto von Aquitanien Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 trippy wrote: > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 took the > hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world >> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> > > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. > Hillary will not be president! http://www.idfiles.com -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://vehme.blogspot.com Virtus Tutissima Cassis Quote
Guest Ben Turner Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Vandar wrote: > > No oil and no rare minerals? You'd better re-check your information. Excellent pipeline route. Seriously massive quantities of opium poppies now being grown. What else? Quote
Guest trippy Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 In article <8Deni.8665$Od7.8124@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, Ben Turner took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > Iraq won't get pregnant? > lol -- trippy mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30 sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM http://www.myspace.com/starshine_moonbeam NP: "Goldeneye" -- Tina Turner "What did I tell the kid. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. It's about how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Get up." -- Sylvester Stallone "Rocky Balboa" Quote
Guest trippy Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > trippy wrote: > > > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 took the > > hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > > > >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory > >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the world > >> 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by > >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - > >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > >> > >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? > >> > >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) > >> > > > > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. > > > > Hillary will not be president! Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. -- trippy mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30 sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM http://www.myspace.com/starshine_moonbeam NP: "Goldeneye" -- Tina Turner "What did I tell the kid. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. It's about how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Get up." -- Sylvester Stallone "Rocky Balboa" Quote
Guest Hatto von Aquitanien Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 trippy wrote: > In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > "Oh Wow"... > >> trippy wrote: >> >> > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 took >> > the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... >> > >> >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >> >> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >> >> >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> >> > >> > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. >> > >> >> Hillary will not be president! > > Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. > > Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. http://www.google.com/search?q=ADFA+BCCI -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://vehme.blogspot.com Virtus Tutissima Cassis Quote
Guest trippy Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 In article <7aidnbkHC-IeEQDbnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > trippy wrote: > > > In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > > "Oh Wow"... > > > >> trippy wrote: > >> > >> > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 took > >> > the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > >> > > >> >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory > >> >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the > >> >> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by > >> >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - > >> >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > >> >> > >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? > >> >> > >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) > >> >> > >> > > >> > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. > >> > > >> > >> Hillary will not be president! > > > > Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. > > > > Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. > > http://www.google.com/search?q=ADFA+BCCI > > I have no idea what you're on about and your nutter links aren't shedding much light on the subject. Why don't you just give me the Reader's Digest condensed version as filtered through you. -- trippy mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30 sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM http://www.myspace.com/starshine_moonbeam NP: "Goldeneye" -- Tina Turner "What did I tell the kid. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. It's about how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Get up." -- Sylvester Stallone "Rocky Balboa" Quote
Guest Hatto von Aquitanien Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 trippy wrote: > In article <7aidnbkHC-IeEQDbnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > "Oh Wow"... > >> trippy wrote: >> >> > In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von >> > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said >> > "Oh Wow"... >> > >> >> trippy wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 took >> >> > the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... >> >> > >> >> >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> >> >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >> >> >> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> >> >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> >> >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> >> >> >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hillary will not be president! >> > >> > Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. >> > >> > Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=ADFA+BCCI >> >> > > I have no idea what you're on about and your nutter links aren't > shedding much light on the subject. Why don't you just give me the > Reader's Digest condensed version as filtered through you. Slick and The Bitch are members of the Bush Mob. George Herbert Walker Bush is a mobster from hell. He called the shots in Dealey Plaza. http://www.google.com/search?q=Zapata-Off-shore+JFK Iran Contra was not the exposure. Iran Contra was the cover up. Slick and The Bitch were fully involved in the biggest drug running operation in the US. You'll just have to dig. I checked enough tail numbers and alternative sources to convince myself that there is more than a little truth to all of this. Bear in mind that Washington Post Managing Editor, Bob Kaiser, as well as John Kerry are members of the Skulls on Boners cult to which both Poppy and Dubya belong. If you think that blowjob in the White House was the scandal, you got some news headed your way. Asa and Tim Hutchinson had a powerful motive for directing the public's attention to the President's penis, and away from a little mountain town in Arkansas. And then there's Bill Buford and Waco, Andreas Strassmeir and OKC, Emad A. Salem and WTC 93, but I digress.... -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://vehme.blogspot.com Virtus Tutissima Cassis Quote
Guest Perseid Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, CoriousAboutBahai <idontgiveoutmy@email.com> Spat the Words > I might even agree, that in hindsight, leaving Saddam in power might > have been a better route to take - but at the time, and to most > Americans, it seemed the right thing to do, (to remove his regiem). It only seemed right to bush, cheney, and rumsfeldt. The rest of the international community, including all academics and intelligence services, said it was the wrong move. You only went along with the cheney 1% doctrine because they were telling you lies and spreading fear. Quote
Guest Perseid Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Ben Turner <BenTurner@notvalid.address> Spat the Words > Vandar wrote: >> >> No oil and no rare minerals? You'd better re-check your information. > > Excellent pipeline route. Seriously massive quantities of opium poppies > now being grown. > > What else? > Maybe he thinks heroin is a rare mineral. Quote
Guest trippy Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 In article <kKydnb0BT6uhPADbnZ2dnUVZ_vm3nZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > trippy wrote: > > > In article <7aidnbkHC-IeEQDbnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > > "Oh Wow"... > > > >> trippy wrote: > >> > >> > In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > >> > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > >> > "Oh Wow"... > >> > > >> >> trippy wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 took > >> >> > the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > >> >> > > >> >> >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory > >> >> >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the > >> >> >> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by > >> >> >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - > >> >> >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > >> >> >> > >> >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hillary will not be president! > >> > > >> > Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. > >> > > >> > Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. > >> > >> http://www.google.com/search?q=ADFA+BCCI > >> > >> > > > > I have no idea what you're on about and your nutter links aren't > > shedding much light on the subject. Why don't you just give me the > > Reader's Digest condensed version as filtered through you. > > Slick and The Bitch are members of the Bush Mob. George Herbert Walker Bush > is a mobster from hell. He called the shots in Dealey Plaza. > > http://www.google.com/search?q=Zapata-Off-shore+JFK > > Iran Contra was not the exposure. Iran Contra was the cover up. Slick and > The Bitch were fully involved in the biggest drug running operation in the > US. > > You'll just have to dig. I checked enough tail numbers and alternative > sources to convince myself that there is more than a little truth to all of > this. Bear in mind that Washington Post Managing Editor, Bob Kaiser, as > well as John Kerry are members of the Skulls on Boners cult to which both > Poppy and Dubya belong. If you think that blowjob in the White House was > the scandal, you got some news headed your way. Asa and Tim Hutchinson had > a powerful motive for directing the public's attention to the President's > penis, and away from a little mountain town in Arkansas. > > And then there's Bill Buford and Waco, Andreas Strassmeir and OKC, Emad A. > Salem and WTC 93, but I digress.... > Not buying it. By the time Bill and Hillary even got close to it, it had imploded. -- trippy mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30 sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM http://www.myspace.com/starshine_moonbeam NP: "Goldeneye" -- Tina Turner "What did I tell the kid. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. It's about how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Get up." -- Sylvester Stallone "Rocky Balboa" Quote
Guest Hatto von Aquitanien Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 trippy wrote: > In article <kKydnb0BT6uhPADbnZ2dnUVZ_vm3nZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > "Oh Wow"... > >> trippy wrote: >> >> > In article <7aidnbkHC-IeEQDbnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von >> > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said >> > "Oh Wow"... >> > >> >> trippy wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto >> >> > von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I >> >> > said "Oh Wow"... >> >> > >> >> >> trippy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 >> >> >> > took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh >> >> >> > Wow"... >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> >> >> >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around >> >> >> >> the world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> >> >> >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >> >> >> >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hillary will not be president! >> >> > >> >> > Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. >> >> > >> >> > Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. >> >> >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=ADFA+BCCI >> >> >> >> >> > >> > I have no idea what you're on about and your nutter links aren't >> > shedding much light on the subject. Why don't you just give me the >> > Reader's Digest condensed version as filtered through you. >> >> Slick and The Bitch are members of the Bush Mob. George Herbert Walker >> Bush >> is a mobster from hell. He called the shots in Dealey Plaza. >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=Zapata-Off-shore+JFK >> >> Iran Contra was not the exposure. Iran Contra was the cover up. Slick >> and The Bitch were fully involved in the biggest drug running operation >> in the US. >> >> You'll just have to dig. I checked enough tail numbers and alternative >> sources to convince myself that there is more than a little truth to all >> of this. Bear in mind that Washington Post Managing Editor, Bob Kaiser, >> as well as John Kerry are members of the Skulls on Boners cult to which >> both >> Poppy and Dubya belong. If you think that blowjob in the White House was >> the scandal, you got some news headed your way. Asa and Tim Hutchinson >> had a powerful motive for directing the public's attention to the >> President's penis, and away from a little mountain town in Arkansas. >> >> And then there's Bill Buford and Waco, Andreas Strassmeir and OKC, Emad >> A. Salem and WTC 93, but I digress.... >> > > Not buying it. By the time Bill and Hillary even got close to it, it had > imploded. What? The Mena drug trade? What's the connection between Slick and The Bitch and Mohammed Atta? -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://vehme.blogspot.com Virtus Tutissima Cassis Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.